The Carbon Bubble Cometh (and Open Thread)

10/09/2018129 Comments

by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
October 9, 2018

So as I (p)reported this weekend, all the usual suspects in the lying, fake news-promoting, bankster-funded corporate mouthpiece media have responded to the latest hot air from the IPCC by dutifully repeating the line that we only have 12 YEARS TO AVERT CLIMATE ARMAGEDDON!!1! And how will we avert this disaster, precisely? By raising carbon taxes and blowing the trillion-dollar carbon trading bubble, of course. Yay.

For those who are confused by the fact that we had only 3 YEARS TO AVERT DISASTER!!1! last year, don’t fret too much over the discrepancy. As I detailed at the time, we’ve been getting different X YEARS TO AVERT DISASTER!!1! warnings for the last 30+ years now, all of which set a different, completely arbitrary timeline for the end of the world. To which the global warming true believers respond: “Details shmeetails, it’s Settled Science™! End of argument!”

So while I’m off this week working on my next major project (coming to The Corbett Report in the very near future), I’ll take the liberty of reposting some of my previous work on the climate issue. These include reports exposing the IPCC; drilling down on the actual science behind the doomporn platitudes; interviewing actual climate scientists; exposing the data fabrication which the climate cult regularly engages in; and explaining the carbon eugenics philosophy which (aside from the obvious financial incentives) motivates the whole scheme. Stay tuned to the front page of corbettreport.com for a different “featured video” from the climate change archives every day.

In the meantime, as I mentioned at the tail end of last week’s New World Next Week, I am taking this week off from new productions while I’m busy working on my next project, so Corbett Report members are invited to use this space to comment on these developments or whatever else is on your mind. It’s an open thread, so feel free to discuss all the latest news or open up discussion on more esoteric matters. Links, resources, insightful commentary and respectful disagreement always welcomed, of course.

To join the conversation, please login and leave your comment below. For those who are not yet Corbett Report members, please CLICK HERE to sign up today.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Filed in: Articles
Tagged with:

Comments (129)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. revan says:

    Regarding the idea that man can change the climate or can influence the weather I am worried about HAARP and EISCAT. These are two huge installiations not to study weather and climate but to experiment and tinker with it.
    HAARP is in Alaska and EISCAT in Norway. Both close to the North Pole. Now think about this. Climatechange want us to believe the ice on the North Pole is melting. If it happens the North Pole will be the Northern Pole sea. Accesible for ships. Who’s navy rules the waves?
    What can we think of this? The nation with the superior navy is tinkering with the climate in the Nort Pole region. A coincidence? At the same time we have to believe that industrial produced CO2 is the cause of global warming. I would like to see both installations dismantled.

    • FlyingAxblade says:

      you make want to check out WeatherWar101.
      I predict for Hurricane Michael: Elgin, AAFB landfall then it will move to Robins, AFB then to Greer, SC (& possibly stall over Charlotte) then move to KRAX in Raleigh, NC then move in a fairly straight line to Norfolk, VA to be pushed into the ocean just above “Nags Head”.
      If you see the radar & satellite of the storm, just as it passed the tip of Cuba, it had a tremendous influx of hot water vapor rising through it’s core and that plume was the “event” needed to stabilize the vortex. Watched that on “Tropical Tidbits”.
      Just remember all those Water Cooling apparatus are shooting up thousands of tons of hot water vapor which will fuel storms.
      Cherish is the new love, be well!

  2. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Saudi Arabia sells Canadian assets as dispute escalates
    https://www.ft.com/content/b33505ba-9aff-11e8-9702-5946bae86e6d
    EXCERPTS
    The Saudi central bank and state pension funds have instructed their overseas asset managers to dispose of their Canadian equities, bonds and cash holdings “no matter the cost”,…
    Expelled the country’s ambassador
    Frozen new trade and investment with Ottawa
    Suspended a student exchange programme to Canada
    Halted Saudi Arabian Airlines flights to the North American country….

    • patrickdetches says:

      Why send a link that will cost $100 to read? Who are you shilling for?

      • HomeRemedySupply says:

        ? Patrick, Lower the shotgun for a moment…
        Originally, I read it free with no hassle. I caught a headline somewhere, searched it for more news articles, and took this one which gave me access right away. Now, Financial Times won’t give me access unless I sign up – which I won’t do.

        However, now YouTube and other media have stories about it.
        Here is one video…
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUvhnS1ohA4

  3. calibrator says:

    The most interesting headline/news on the “financial doom porn website” ZeroHedge today (in my humble opinion):

    “Bullet Holes Discovered In Pilot’s Body After Mysterious Helicopter Crash That Killed Russian Prosecutor”

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-08/bullet-holes-discovered-body-russian-prosecutor-after-mysterious-helicopter-crash

    Excerpt:

    The official version is that the ‘overloaded’ helicopter crashed after clipping trees in Kostroma region, killing Karapetyan, his nephew Areg Arutyunyan, 47, pilot Stanislav Mikhnov, and another passenger Viktor Kopteev, 54.

    But respected Moscow journalist Sergei Dorenko has bluntly accused the investigating authorities of a cover-up in seeking hide two bullet wounds to highly experienced 54-year-old pilot – and gun shot damage to the copter’s blade.

    ——————————-

    My theorem:

    “The smaller the crashed plane and the more prominent the passengers the likelier it is that the crash of the plane was not an accident.”

    • m.clare says:

      After 43 years of Conservative government in Oil Rich Alberta, The Environmental NDP do the impossible and win the 2015 election. Now we have a Carbon Tax to pay for our environmental sins. What became of the Conservative leader shortly after this historical upset…?

      https://www.google.ca/search?q=jim+prentice+plane+crash&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwinhYGqjYbeAhVCMXwKHZUSAy4Q_AUIDygC&biw=1920&bih=850#imgrc=JpzReWjuxcBbyM:

      Why, his small plane went STRAIGHT down killing all on board, naturally.

      • calibrator says:

        Thanks for mentioning this confirmation of my theorem ;), wasn’t aware of this.

        It’s totally beyond me how people in higher positions (and therefore always making enemies) are still keen on having a private plane.

        Of course: The higher you are the likelier you have a private plane in the first place but I bet that planes of “regular people” crash less often. Perhaps even dramatically so.

        While the majority of “plane accidents” were surely in the 60s/70s they are still a “tool in the shed”.

        Others “tools” are:
        – If the person has a history of heart problems then he will get a heart attack while “alone” at home. See the movie “Michael Clayton”.
        – If the person has a DUI history then he will be found in a crashed car at a tree or in a river.
        – If he is working on his home and has a nailgun around…
        – If he likes fly fishing his boat will be found first.
        – If under police protection a surprising case of “lightning diabetes” is also in the realm of possibility (don’t laugh, happened here in Germany a few years ago).

        etc.

        Pro tip: If you run a crime cartel and have to get rid of many people then make sure you have some variety.
        People hanging or shooting themselves gets old quickly. Especially when they shoot themselves two times in the back of the head.

        • HomeRemedySupply says:

          That is a pretty good tool list.

          Personally, I speculate that there exists a very, very large number of “accidents” caused by corporations and businessmen,(relative to ‘government accidents’) in the United States.
          But these fly under the radar and don’t draw much credible attention.

          Karen Silkwood is an example of someone who had an ‘accident’ when working in Oklahoma for a corporation. (Made famous by the movie).

          Also in Oklahoma is the ‘accident’ of Aubrey McClendon a few years back.
          https://www.corbettreport.com/welcome-to-the-driverless-future/#comment-42578

          In many cases, a corporation doesn’t need to perform a fatal accident.
          Another set of tools for the businessman includes data, technology, financial means, etc. to ruin, stress, make ill, or otherwise cause turmoil within the target’s household.

          Weaken the target with stresses, and then the target becomes ineffective.
          …After all, the government does this to everyone all the time.

  4. calibrator says:

    Here’s another interesting one, this time from the gold standard of news reporting, CNN:

    “Suspect in Maduro assassination plot dies in mysterious fall from window”

    https://edition.cnn.com/2018/10/09/americas/venezuela-assassination-plot-intl/index.html

    ———————-

    My take on this:

    We didn’t have such a clear case of suicide since James Forrestal and Frank Olson…

    • zyxzevn says:

      Let me describe my side of the story that I based upon the data
      from Abby Martin.
      The country is full with criminals and CIA.
      Both use the “socialism did this”-propaganda to try to get a majority.
      The “opposition” is causing most violence from the reports that I have seen.
      The neutral media is under attack by criminals directly (people get shot if they report the positive side).
      The international market is blocked, so it generates no income.
      The state-less companies are hijacking the market and raising prices
      using monopoly tactics.
      The US media is continuously presenting faked reports of hunger and such to create an urgency. It is to push a need for war.

      So there is a continuous coupe going on, in their media,
      in their finance and in the streets (violence).

      So the situation is a mixture of:
      phoenix project – controlled violence in the state,
      controlled media – just like in the US
      economic hitman – the usual business
      extreme sanctions – stopped the international trade/ oil-sale

      Solutions

      I disagree with any violent action, especially a war or intervention.
      This would create a new Libia with their own slave-trade.

      The idea that they should sell their oil-sources is actually what
      started the trade-ware. The state reclaimed the oil-sources
      when the owners started using it as a pressure tool.
      There is too much violence to get capitalism back, unless
      you arm the whole population.

      Some people propose that their problems might be solved by going more socialistic. Which is fair as the US companies still have far too
      much influence in the system.
      It would become more like in western Europe.
      Yes, we have a far more socialistic state here in Europe.
      But the corruption is a bit too high. So you will not get a
      (former) Sweden, but a Greece.

      Trading oil and goods with China and other “free” countries.
      This can bypass the trade-blockage that the US has setup.
      The IMF is just a puppet of the US banking system.

      I think the real solution would to go the anarchy way,
      as in anarchapulko.
      This would give the power back to the people themselves
      and not to corporations (which is what the US wants).
      The income of oil can be shared.
      But I don’t think the people need to sell much oil when
      they have their power back.
      They need to defend it against the states, though, as they
      will certainly try to claim it.
      It is probably sold to some US company already.
      So the oil could be used to finance a small defense army
      (with local people included).

      But as it looks now, due to the US interventionism,
      China might become the protector.

      • calibrator says:

        The US banking system doesn’t exist.
        You mean the “international banking system” which is controlled by very few people – but executed by many.
        The IMF is part of it.
        The World Bank is part of it.
        As are all central banks.
        And of course the BIS in Basel.

        If banking stood for itself the problem would be only half as big.
        But banks always invested in the big industries.
        In the mid to late 19th century it was railroads – which means coal and steel had to be controlled, too.
        This is why Carnegie sold to JP Morgan (=Rothschild).

        Then came oil.
        Hence Rockefeller & Royal Dutch Shell (=Rothschild).

        After this came electricity.
        This is why JP Morgan controlled General Electric.

        Then came the military with its demands – thanks to the World Wars(tm).

        Then came airlines (both civil and military).
        Care to know why 5 Rockefeller men sat on the board of Pan Am?

        Now we have “data as the new oil”.
        Why should we believe that it would be different?
        Who gave Google money?
        Who originally made Google Maps and Google World? (yes, a rhethoric question, too)
        Who made sure that Amazon survived despite being a money-losing establishment in the first years?
        Who pays Amazon hundreds of millions a year for “cloud storage”?

        etc. etc.

        As for Venezuela: It reminds me a bit of Operation PBSuccess.
        Except for the bombing, but that may come later.

        And no, China won’t become a protector.

        • manbearpig says:

          sounds like a pretty good recap to me…

          yea, for a long time, when I was even more naive than I am today, the “End the Fed” slogan left me a little perplexed – as I wondered why folks drew the line in Washington D.C. instead of heading straight up to Basel.

          And no indeed, China won’t become a protector.

          But the binary mentality machine probably will, and to a certain extent already is in certain ways, presenting the western-groomed Dragon as the “good guy”… along with most anyone else pitted against the remarkably well-performed arch-vilain, tyrannical Twitter-terrorist Trump.

          …Perhaps just as in the Syrian conflict, Putin is playing the diplomat and strategist hors pair, along with poised victim of unjust election-tampering accusations, and dignified leader of the BRICS power-ranger super-gang …

          ultimately serving as the underdog anti-thesis for the NWO synthesis…

          if that makes any sense…

          sorry long day…

          • calibrator says:

            Don’t worry: You make perfect sense.

            It’s the world that doesn’t – and you have to dig further and further down to find any.

            If you then talk about that you are getting shunned by those influenced by the “binary mentality machine” as you call it.

            Today everything is either black or white. But white is of course the new black…

            Most people love simple things, simple stories and simple solutions.

            So a crime movie must come to a satisfying end. Often with explosions and car chases as distractions and “show values”.
            But the baddie gets it in the end more often than not.

            The difference is: In the real world the baddie gets everything, keeps it and can turn around the narrative to become the good guy.

            Some can even bend the law of physics and become invisible – at least with the coerced (or owned) media…

  5. FlyingAxblade says:

    It’s like all those Radio preachers: Jesus is coming back in two years, in 10 years, etc.

  6. weech says:

    What’s happening in Turkey? The Khassoggi “event” whatever really happened inside KSA consulate has eerie parallels with the recent UK Skripals in Salisbury adventure – with its one (accidental?) fatality. There’s a much bigger picture
    It seems contrived. Who’d weaponise this mysterious situation?

  7. ddude says:

    I personally entered the whole conspiracy rabbit hole through the UFO subject and related government cover up – then 9/11. Just wanted to let the community know that recently Richard Dolan has become very active on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnaIeNm-jSa1l8yHrn7PlQg). Like Corbett, I like Richard Dolan a lot, and think that members here might like him as well. Two of my very favorite truth guys. Meaningful criticism encouraged.

    • zyxzevn says:

      You may like the direct relation between UFO-waves and Nukes..
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57Osj8z5bHs

      It appears that the aliens are very interested in the nukes.
      Sometimes disabling them, on both sides.
      Maybe they stop us from destroying ourselves?

      • ddude says:

        Yes, I’ve often thought that the apparent increase in UFO activity after WWII seemed related to nukes. And the fact that UFO’s have directly interacted with nuclear facilities in very in-your-face ways leads me to wonder the same as you state.

        It also occurs to me that these nuclear explosions may be damaging a part of reality unknown/unseen to our senses, perhaps in the realm of these “others” and their UFO’s. It certainly isn’t helping out *our* environment any.

  8. paul2 says:

    Here is a good resource that actually relies on evidence rather than the religious scaremongering

    http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/Climate%20Change%20and%20Global%20Warming-Exposed-6×9.pdf

    • ddude says:

      Not sure about this particular article, but I’m not too crazy about its author, Andrew Johnson. He says this “It is nonetheless difficult to comprehend the number of people that seem to be involved in this cover up. There seem to be a disturbing number of people who are willing to lie about and misrepresent the truth of what Dr Wood has said and shown. People such as Alex Jones, Richard Gage and his AE911 group – and a raft of other authors, presenters and reporters such as James Corbett.” on http://www.drjudywood.com/wp/the-cover-up/ page.

      To suggest that James Corbett seems to be involved in the cover up of this information is a crock of shit. Period. To claim some sort of cover up from Corbett is damaging to Johnson’s credibility in my opinion. His backup evidence for this claim, at least what I’ve found, in http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/911%20Holding%20The%20Truth%20-Andrew%20Johnson%20-%202017.pdf (page 86-87) does not support his assertion at all in my opinion. I’ve been listening to Corbett for many years. Butt hurt seems more likely what happened with Corbett’s comments, not a cover up ffs.

      Johnson’s “no nano-thermite” stance is not only at least seemingly unnecessary, but does nothing but divide and turn the truth movement against itself for no apparent reason that I can discern. Now who’d want to do a thing like that?

      So, long story short version, I’d be a little extra wary of anything put out by this guy. He’s at best very careless about what he says, but it seems quite a bit worse than that to me. Just my 2 cents.

      • paul2 says:

        I was commenting on the Climate Change Myth not the whole debate on 9/11.

        James has done outstanding work on this and many other topics. Just because a researcher disagrees about certain issues does not necessarily mean any other work should be disregarded

        I am no apologist for Andrew Johnson. He does make the disclosure in many of his items, “if anyone has information to the contrary please get in touch”. Perhaps make you views known directly to him.

        This is merely information, take it or leave it.

        • ddude says:

          I stand by my comment, which is pointing towards Andrew Johnson, not you – unless you are Andrew Johnson. I have less than no interest in getting in touch with him, that’s for sure. As you say, my comment is merely information, take it or leave it.

      • Leslie says:

        I think Andrew Johnson makes that statement because Crobett does not talk about the brilliant work done by Dr Wood (as far as i know), i do not know why he does not as her work on 9/11 is the best i have come across, her book is a must read, i disagree that Corbett is any way lying about 9/11, i just think he has not read her book, i would love to get his thoughts on it if he did read it, i have her book which is all evidence based, no speculation or conspiracy, everyone should read it for themselves, everyone i have seen who attacks Dr Wood never addresses the evidence she has provided.

        To go along with her work i highly recommend watching this documentary as well – 9/11 Alchemy – Facing Reality – https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuCrY4trS8N1/

        If Dr Wood is wrong and anyone can provide evidence that she is then please do let me know, what i believe is not set in stone, it is based on the evidence i have seen and heard for myself, and so far Dr Wood has provided the best evidence of what actually took place on 9/11 imo.

        • Fawlty Towers says:

          I think Andrew Johnson makes that statement because Crobett does not talk about the brilliant work done by Dr Wood (as far as i know), i do not know why he does not as her work on 9/11 is the best i have come across, her book is a must read

          Perhaps James does not talk about Wood’s work because he doesn’t think it is brilliant?

          I was seduced by Dr. Wood for a time, but then I saw the light.
          I don’t think her book is a must read.

          i disagree that Corbett is any way lying about 9/11, i just think he has not read her book, i would love to get his thoughts on it if he did read it, i have her book which is all evidence based, no speculation or conspiracy, everyone should read it for themselves, everyone i have seen who attacks Dr Wood never addresses the evidence she has provided.

          Her book and work promote a theory that Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) were used to bring down the towers on 9/11.
          DEW weapons were used, however not the ones that Dr. Wood would like us to believe.
          Nuclear directed energy weapons were used, not Star Wars DEW’s.

          If Dr Wood is wrong and anyone can provide evidence that she is then please do let me know, what i believe is not set in stone, it is based on the evidence i have seen and heard for myself, and so far Dr Wood has provided the best evidence of what actually took place on 9/11 imo.

          You asked for it, so here it is. Please watch these three videos very carefully:

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxC_8Kuagcw
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Se5BDbEbtwU
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbwYEzrB-g0

    • Leslie says:

      An excellent book, I just posted a link to that myself before i seen your comment, Andrew Johnson is a fantastic researcher.

  9. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Goldfinger & Warburg

    Mike Malone has an interesting recent (4 minutes) video…
    The Real GoldFinger – Who Was This Secretive Banker?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYBSfwzWsMk

    Mike references this article entitled…
    The real Goldfinger: the London banker who broke the world.
    The true story of how the City of London invented offshore banking – and set the rich free

    by Oliver Bullough
    https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/sep/07/the-real-goldfinger-the-london-banker-who-broke-the-world

    For you young tikes, Goldfinger is a 1964 James Bond film.
    It was rated ‘R’, so my Dad bought my ticket insisting that I see it. He loved the Ian Fleming books.

    The film’s plot has Bond investigating gold smuggling by gold magnate Auric Goldfinger and eventually uncovering Goldfinger’s plans to contaminate the United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox.
    ~~ “Oddjob” shows off – (90 seconds) https://hooktube.com/watch?v=AAbtiIrTqCE
    ~~ The Golden Girl (very risqué for the era)(90 seconds)
    https://hooktube.com/watch?v=USD2Y7wRNgk

  10. calibrator says:

    It gets better and better and better:

    “James Murdoch Slated To Replace Elon Musk As Tesla Chairman”

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-10/james-murcoch-slated-replace-elon-musk-tesla-chairman

    “Media mogul James Murdoch is at the top of the list to replace Elon Musk as the chairman of Tesla, according to the Financial Times, citing two people briefed on the discussions. Murdoch has reportedly signaled that he wants the job.”

    Yes, /the/ James Murdoch, son of Rupert Murdoch, media moloch extraordinaire thanks to the graciousness of the Rothschild empire.

    Right now he “only” sits on the board of Tesla…

    Remember the brilliant 2017 article “The Brain Chip Cometh” from James?
    Especially this paragraph here?:

    “The real question to ask is how this PhD dropout from nowhere in particular was able to found a financial service company in the late 1990s that received FDIC insurance. Or how he worked out the exceptionally low financing from the government for his SpaceX venture. Or how he then managed to bilk another $5 billion out of Uncle Sam to underwrite his (unprofitable) Tesla venture.”

    *Now* you know who this pot-smoking, hair-implanting, bullshit-talking, taxpayer-money-slurping fraudster really works for!

    Apparantly they are unimpressed by his performance and now want him out. They are simply afraid that this clown is running their precious Tesla venture into the ground so they are grabbing the steering wheel.

    They’ll probably let Musk fly with one of his rockets…

    • manbearpig says:

      he may be running Tesla into the ground, he’s still a powerfully charismatic propaganda pundit…with a marketing side-kick like Sam Harris he may not have outlived his usefulness…

      • ddude says:

        I must say that this whole thing looked like some sort of setup to me. I mean, first of all, he goes on Joe Rogan’s show, so he has to know that these guys smoke pot on the show regularly. And he just casually takes the blunt and takes a puff without thinking of any consequences of that action? Anyone that has ever smoked pot and watches this video knows that this guy didn’t even inhale the one puff that he did take, so it had no real effect on him. I’ve watched a lot of Joe Rogan and he’s not trustworthy to the truth at all for quite some time. I just found myself looking fascinated at the whole scene thinking that there just has to be some plan behind this craziness.

        I saw that Musk was on-board with the whole climate change narrative and tuned him out as far as anyone worth listening to for any kind of truth, but this is very interesting to see just how this whole scenario works itself out. So here’s a Murdoch puzzle piece…

  11. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Derrick Broze What a stellar activist!

    On Tuesday October 9, Derrick Broze spoke to Houston City Council about the dangers of blindly supporting the 5G technology roll out.
    Derrick Broze Educates Houston City Council on 5G Tech
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUa_XbgZgq8

    • ddude says:

      Thanks for the heads up and link. Derrick did a great job and appeared to actually have some effect, at least from appearances.

    • mkey says:

      Reflections on “Can Voters and Non-Voters See Eye to Eye?”

      Derrick’s been doing more gods work. I don’t know what he changed in his diet lately, but it’s working out great for the lad.

    • generalbottlewasher says:

      Homey, you are so correct in your opinion of this man. Blindly we go into that place where all great schemes are hatched. DDT, Glysophate, Hexiflouride, SRM, Coal fly ash…ect.ect.
      A very interesting basket of eggs gathered here today. All very worthy of our attention. I have prioritized the geo-engineering military industrial banking/financial complex as the largest and most crazy deadly threat to all life on earth.
      I encourage you to read the peer review paper by Herndon. Published September 2018. It is at the bottom of the page on Claudia@Cabin Talk as a linked reference. Claudia is interviewing Ian Baldwin on the subject

      https:/yoitu.be/KBtVlu-7dr4

  12. justine.k says:

    BREAKING NEWS!! It was announced today: The winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics goes to?…….wait…..holding breath with excitement (and irony)

    The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2018 was divided equally between William D. Nordhaus “for integrating climate change into long-run macroeconomic analysis” and Paul M. Romer “for integrating technological innovations into long-run macroeconomic analysis.”

    More Hot Air!!!

  13. benab says:

    https://skepticalscience.com is a site dedicated to debunking “AGW deniers”.

    Wikipedia gives this site a very positive and IMO very biased article for this website.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeptical_Science

    I wanted to draw attention to what I think is very valid criticism of the main article on wiki in the talk section:
    Please take a look at this link:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Skeptical_Science

    I found this part in particular interesting:

    “Out of 28 sources, 15+ are Cook’s words or own site. 7+ are favorable reviews of the site, some which don’t include Wiki article assertions. The remaining are the only acceptable sources, because they specifically note origins, policy, and/or creation of the site. This giant, waving, red promotional banner is unacceptable.

    There is a massive amount of vague wording, “primarily”, “mostly”, “may be”, “mainly”, et al. These are all subjective comments and are rife in the article. One or two would be understandable to describe the site. These quantifiers are being used to describe everything from the creation, application, function, development, use and content.

    In addition, another conflict occurs with “trained as a solar physicist”, when Cook has had no formal training, education or employment other than a “year of study” post graduation (https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2010/12/skeptical-science-founder-john-cook/) for physics alone, and he did not receive any degree or certification. This claim is dubious, since according to Postgraduate_education#Australia, twelve months would grant an additional certification of some sort, so if it’s a year, would it not then have given him something tangible rather than “a year’s study”? (Honest question, as I’m unfamiliar with Australian education system and can only refer to internet sourcing and this needs proper attribution and addressing in the article.) In addition, he never worked in this field (same source), let alone research in it. While his specific path should be part of this article, then it should be clarified that his degree is ONLY in physics, no additional branches, and is an undergraduate degree with no employer, study, or scientific research was completed by him in this field. To prevent confusion due to this murky situation, it should be clarified his recent doctorate is in psychology, not physics or other climatology related fields, since the ordering and description in the current article is confusing in this situation (intent by editors is obviously unclear, but I believe this jumbled chronology is intentional, in looking in past edits/reverts). Also, it should be added to his information, any various other positions he holds and where, such as https://communication.gmu.edu/people/jcook20 and https://www.climatechangecommunication.org/peoplepartners/. This will clarify his standing and list achievements and associations for his work. Ironically, the lede refers to the founding to his current employment site, but then shifts to SS to source claims of the sites purpose, systems, etc.”

    • ddude says:

      Wikipedia is such a great concept, and works extremely well for non-controversial subjects. I’ve found it completely unreliable for anything controversial, and it seems that many things are (unfortunately for Wikipedia users) increasingly controversial these days. It’s good to see that folks are still there who are at least forcing them work for it.

  14. urban says:

    Hey Y’All,
    The truth is that despite the apparent so called evidence, there actually is a lot more to science that is not taught in schools. Research the works of John Worrel Keely, Stubblefield, Tesla, Oliver Heaviside, T Henry Moray, Ron Brandt, Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleyev, Lester Hendershot and a number of others. This is all to say what James and a number of you already know deep down in your spirits: The world we’ve been presented rather amounts to a “Matrix”. Any crisis of energy, and scarcity for that matter, is fiction.

    • urban says:

      ^This is all to say that the whole fossil fuel paradigm and hence false alternative energy “solutions” of wind nuclear solar etc. are all shams. There are real solutions with zero harmful effects and or have baked efficiencies but we like mushrooms are kept in the dark and fed (bull)sh*t. I encourage all to seek out the writings of the above scientists to shed light on what actually is real.

  15. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Corbett says:
    “…so feel free to discuss…and respectful disagreement always welcomed, of course.”

    I am calling attention to…
    Interview 1388 – Emma Fiala on the Women’s March on the Pentagon
    Read “why” the title “Women’s March” was chosen.
    …and how the 9/11 Truth Action Project supports the march.(comment above the link)
    https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1388-emma-fiala-on-the-womens-march-on-the-pentagon/comment-page-1/#comment-55842

    I recommend watching Cindy Sheehan in this video.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mq8m0UFe4iE

  16. ashley says:

    I decided to continue living today
    A feat worth celebrating
    In this world of men
    To continue breathing
    Contemplate
    Stillness of mind discovers
    The real work has only begun
    To find the Power and the Glory
    The part of the heart
    That will conquer death

  17. Eltervag says:

    Here is a link to an old article from 1989.
    U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked

    Quote “The most conservative scientific estimate that the Earth’s temperature will rise 1 to 7 degrees in the next 30 years, said Brown.”
    Brown “said even the most conservative scientists ″already tell us there’s nothing we can do now to stop a … change″ of about 3 degrees.”

    https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0

    Some things never change, eh? I was 21 years old at that time. And I do not buy the scare propaganda

  18. mkey says:

    Why you have (probably) already bought your last car
    https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45786690?utm_source=pocket&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pockethits

    You’ve probably seen headlines about accidents involving self-driving cars but the truth is they will be far safer than ones driven by you and me – they won’t get regulatory approval if they are not. That means tens of thousands of lives – perhaps hundreds of thousands – will be saved as accident rates plummet.

    That will generate yet another cost saving for our fleets of robo-taxis. The price of insurance will tumble, while at the same time those of us who insist on continuing to drive our own vehicles will face higher charges.

    The logical next step will be for human beings to be banned from driving cars at all because they pose such a risk to other road users.

    Thanks, Pocket. I’ll refrain from commenting as it’s really nothing we haven’t heard before.

  19. mkey says:

    ‘THE GOOD CENSOR’: Leaked Google Briefing Admits Abandonment of Free Speech for ‘Safety And Civility’
    https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/10/09/the-good-censor-leaked-google-briefing-admits-abandonment-of-free-speech-for-safety-and-civility/

    One of the reasons Google identifies for allegedly widespread public disillusionment with internet free speech is that it “breeds conspiracy theories.” The example Google uses? A 2016 tweet from then-candidate Donald Trump, alleging that Google search suppressed negative results about Hillary Clinton.

    The document also bemoans that the internet allows “have a go commenters” (in other words, ordinary people) to compete on a level playing field with “authoritative sources” like the New York Times. Google-owned YouTube now promotes so-called “authoritative sources” in its algorithm. The company did not specifically name which sources it would promote.

    Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. To quote Alan B’stard.

  20. dennis.m says:

    I am too lazy/preoccupied/or whatever to research climate change. I would like to see two preeminent 9/11 Truthers, David Ray Griffin, and James Corbett, who are on opposite sides of the climate change issue, have a climate change debate.

  21. mkey says:

    Facebook purged over 800 accounts and pages pushing political messages for profit
    https://web.archive.org/web/20181011211145/http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-facebook-political-messages-purge-20181011-story.html

    Derrick Broze pointed out the link. (I archived the page for EU prisoners)

    The accounts and pages, with names like Reasonable People Unite and Reverb Press, were likely domestic actors using clickbait headlines and other spammy tactics to drive users to websites where they could target them with ads, the company said. Some had hundreds of thousands of followers and expressed a range of political viewpoints, including a page which billed itself as the first publication to endorse President Trump. They did not appear to have ties to Russia, company officials said.

    How dare they use …. ads? Oh, won’t you think of the children?

  22. Camille says:

    Something that I find helpful when watching YouTube…
    https://youtu.be/QCziGklvPXQ

  23. ddude says:

    Pulled up James’ “How Bad Global Warming Science Hurts the Environmental Movement” on GooTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnlcLUbHG2I) and was a bit startled to discover this message underneath the video – appearing as if the video creator put it there: “Global warming is the observed century-scale rise in the average temperature of the Earth’s climate system and its related effects, as part of climate change. Multiple Lines of scientific evidence show that the climate system is warming.”, and points to this Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming?wprov=yicw1

    Same place as the Russian Government warning that appears along with RT videos.

    Just reminds me of what James has been saying for a very long time: one of these days, these videos will no longer be allowed on the platform.

  24. scpat says:

    https://wikileaks.org/amazon-atlas/document/AmazonAtlas_v1/

    https://www.cryptogon.com/?p=53613

    Today, 11 October 2018, WikiLeaks publishes a “Highly Confidential” internal document from the cloud computing provider Amazon.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZSeOAZ5j9s

    Wikileaks publishes #AmazonAtlas, the location of Amazon’s hidden data centres

  25. UseLogic says:

    All this Climate Change propaganda results from handing out bogus degrees via the educational system.

    No one should be able to get anything above a Bachelors Degree when their field of study is one giant opinion unsupported by scientific fact. Political Science, Economics, Climate Science, Paleontology, Archaeology, Law, etc are made up fields of study that can’t prove anything past common sense and for the most part spread misinformation that actually damages the society. Look no further than Keynesian Economics for the damage it’s done.

    If “college” were the domain of only real science – STEM – then the degrees handed out to a much more limited number of really intelligent people would have real value. A degree in any of the Humanities / Social Sciences can all fall under the umbrella of a degree in Basket Weaving.

    We have Climate Scientists that rely on consensus to determine fact. There are no “Climate Scientists”. There are climate data gatherers, climate modelers, climate priests, but no Climate Scientists. They have yet to produce an even remotely accurate model of the climate and yet demand that we take them seriously. They are part of a fraudulent “profession” that was invented by the educational system to bilk students that were propagandized into believe that humanity KNOWS enough about the climate to create a legitimate area of study. The climate is too chaotic for us to understand and therefore should be relegated to further study at the maximum Bachelors level since the real knowledge base is so sparse.

  26. Fawlty Towers says:

    Open thread…

    Amy McGrath is a Kentucky candidate for the Democrats in the U.S. congressional race.

    She is reportedly a U.S. marine fighter pilot who flew 89 combat missions in Afghanistan and Iraq before retiring with the rank of lieutenant-colonel.

    “If Amy McGrath wins this race, the Democrats will take the House of Representatives,” says Ben Chandler, the former Democrat who represented the district from 2004 until he lost to Barr in 2012.

    “Amy McGrath is a war hero. Amy McGrath is a mother of three who has killed terrorists,” he said. “Now, I don’t know too many people who have that profile.”

    Made me feel sick when I heard this story on the radio today.
    War hero? Terrorists? …

  27. zyxzevn says:

    Solar science= Bullshit

    I will repeat it here again, and go a bit further:
    The mainstream science of the sun is filled with bullshit.
    It breaks with established physical laws of thermodynamics and
    electromagnetism.

    And because the sun is directly related to Earth’s temperature,
    we get bullshit for our climate science.

    On http://www.reddit.com/r/plasmacosmology/wiki
    I found 8 major errors in the model.

    Explanations

    1) Magnetic reconnection
    is a fantasy that has no relation with physics or reality. It is about field-lines that release energy when they connect. Never observed, and based on false ideas. It is like free energy. It would break with all physics that we know. And we would see it every day around us,
    because field-lines of very strong radio-waves bump into each
    other all the time. They should explode if we follow this theory.
    Still wikipedia and Nasa use it in their “explanations”.

    2) Magnetohydrodynamics
    Only works in situations that never happen in reality, not even on the sun. The Lorentz force is often seen as evidence for it, but it is the Lorenz force instead. (Electrical field due to change of magnetic field).
    Combined with it we have “frozen magnetic fields” that can not exist
    in the real world.
    They invented this to also ignore all electric currents that are necessary (by laws of physics) to produce magnetic fields.

    3) Electrical fields do not exist according to astronomers. But in experiments and in space we see electrical fields all the time.

    4) Mainstream: Sun has no condensed matter. Like a Fluid. But we see fluid-like behavior and radiation that corresponds with fluids or solids.

    5) Mainstream: Sun does have a surface. Only true when you close your eyes.

    6) Mainstream Sun model breaks with basic thermodynamics:
    a- Mainstream: outside of the sun is millions of degrees.
    This breaks with basic physics, the sun is much cooler inside.
    Is the outside of a fire so much hotter than the fire itself?
    Reality: Surface temperature is different and based on false measurements.
    b- Mainstream: heat spreads very slowly inside the sun.
    This breaks with thermodynamics.

    7) Mainstream: Pressure outside the sun is extremely low
    This breaks with the normal expansion of gas and plasma around an object.
    a – Reality: The sun is surrounded by gas and plasma, following a curve like around a planet. Which we can also observe.
    b- Mainstream uses pressure radiation as a significant force.
    Reality: pressure radiation does not do much.

    8) Chemical reactions on the Sun are fully ignored.
    They are clearly happening, and likely in combination with electro-chemistry.

    On the wiki I also explain how they should be replaced.

    What does all this mean?

    Most of “established science” contain major errors!
    This is about the sun that is visible every day.

    This means that even smart scientists are not likely to see
    through theoretical bullshit even when it is in front of their eyes.

    On universities smart people are trained to follow instructions and
    not to have their own ideas.
    “Obey the expert’. “Doubt free thoughts”.

    Because I was trained physics with applied techniques, not just
    with theories, I could see through this bullshit.
    And that even took me a lot of years.

    But people that are trained in this field are hard to talk with. They just
    refer to books or people that repeat the old errors. They have
    been brainwashed into this nonsense. Never to think for themselves.
    Or point to “straw-man alternatives” to make their bullshit seem better.

    But just look at my list.
    Using just basic applied physics, you can already see
    that these subjects are at least very problematic.
    1-> Radio-waves that bump into each other causing explosions.
    6-> A fire that is cold inside, but extremely hot on the outside.
    8-> No chemical reactions. Did they just forget it?

    I think this is a good subject to talk with your friends about,
    before talking about more political things.

    • mkey says:

      I read and reread this, that I could explain it anyone with a straight face on is very doubtful. Interesting subject but not very intuitive.

      • zyxzevn says:

        …not very intuitive

        I think this is the problem with a lot of bullshit science.
        The theories have run wild without real evidence.

        Therefore I added the last 3 as simple examples.
        Like -6- Ever seen a fire that burns deep inside, but is only hot
        on the outside?
        I don’t think anyone has ever seen such a thing.

        When observations show that these theories are wrong:
        1) most people do not understand the problems.
        2) specialists in the area try to keep the theories and bend the
        observations so they fit the theory.
        3) PHD students graduate when they do not oppose the theories, and invent invisible stuff to explain the differences.
        4) scientists from other fields ignore the problem, can’t believe that something is wrong, and let the specialists deal with it.
        5) scientists that do see that something is wrong are treated as (1) or as lunatics / heretics. “how can you even believe that we make errors in science?”

        I could only find those errors because I actually understood what they were doing and dived deep into the fundamental theories behind it.
        I did not assume that they were right, because their conclusions were opposite of what I have learned in proven basic physics.

  28. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Lately, I have noticed something regarding The Corbett Report and Google.
    When I use Google to find The Corbett Report, I just type in “Corbett Report“.

    In the past, the Home page would be one of the very first entries. At the top.

    Within the last week or so, both on my computer and on my phone, the “Contact” page is one of the first entries, followed by “About” or “Membership” pages, then followed by “Corbett Report YouTube”, then…get this… “The Corbett Report – Home Facebook”.

    No longer is the “Home” page even on the first page of entries for a Google search.

    And, there are some other oddities which I had never seen before when doing the Google search using the words “Corbett Report”, such as books on the first Google search page with pages citing a historical Mr. Corbett or historical ‘Corbett Report’.

  29. ddude says:

    Israel fines New Zealand Women $18,000 for damage to “”artistic welfare””

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZdw0pL5kho&t=0s

    In other words, shut the f*** up.

  30. heartruth says:

    The politics behind ‘man made’ climate change… summarized in rap!

    https://trillion.bandcamp.com/track/09-the-climate-gated-community

    • manbearpig says:

      Prodigious.

      Great music!

      8 years ago already!

    • ddude says:

      Nice one. I looked it up on GooTube hoping for lyrics. Found a part 1 which I noticed also contains the attached global warming “fake news” warning.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2KknCl8mbw

      • heartruth says:

        Interesting intro! For the lyrics, you can go to:
        http://www.trillion.co.nz/lyrics/category/2010%20everything%20is%20under%20control%20lpc19fb8184f
        Top row, 4th image – click to zoom in. Still very small text so to read it you’ll need good eyesight or a large monitor 🙂

      • manbearpig says:

        Awesome video.

        The thing I find a little discouraging, even as I realize that we can’t all agree on everything, is that folks like Tim Ball and “Lord Monckton”, categorically poo poo the chemtrail issue while whipping out the old manipulative epithet “conspiracy theorist”…

        Here’s a Tim Ball quote:

        “…The conspiracy theorists exploit people’s lack of knowledge of clouds and cloud formation. Sadly, most of them don’t know what they are talking about but select information through the tunnel vision of their political ideology that includes hostility to progress and development.
        The Chemtrail Conspiracy in Scientific Context
        I am not going to examine all the claims and evidence presented by chemtrail conspiracy theorists. It includes a variety of internal and external photographs of aircraft all purportedly showing spraying equipment and modifications for spraying. There are a few scientifically and mechanically based web pages that completely dismantle the claims and show the extent to which conspiracy theorists will go…”

        http://www.ontariolandowners.ca/news/chemtrails-contrails-tim-ball/

        and a video with “Lord Monckton” who at 5:01 minutes, in response to the following question about evidence of spraying being collected: “how do you know that it hasn’t and that it isn’t being censored” explains that

        he isn’t a conspiracy theorist

        and proclaims that if there was spraying going on relevant scientists would’ve collected info about it and published it in peer-reviewed journals…

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPpuxOXAYEc

        8-/

        • ddude says:

          I’m not familiar with Tim Ball or Lord Monckton, but what you’re saying reminds me of Noam Chompsky regarding 9/11. I don’t care for that type of talk. Perhaps a gatekeeper for the chemtrail secret? Admittedly pure speculation here on my part, but I can’t help at least consider it based upon what they said.

  31. ddude says:

    Unabashed climate change narrative support stand-alone commercial? on RT, complete with proper shaming. This is the 2nd one I’ve bumped into there recently. I only watch RT from time to time, so I don’t know if this is a new thing there or not.

    Encouraging to note that a lot of people are commenting negatively on the video and getting quite a number of likes.

    #ICYMI: Climate change, who cares?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhfrZ-Tp5C4

    • manbearpig says:

      always wondered why no one ever insisted on the murder of the 96 Polish government figures in that 2010 airplane crash…

        • manbearpig says:

          Thanks for this mik! Really looking forward to watching it asap!

          It’s crazy… people around me, when I ask them what they think about this tragedy respond with variations on:

          “well you can see a conspiracy in ANYTHING!” …and stop there.

          It’s clearly a mentality that, probably very pragmatically, refuses, for even the space of a second, to entertain the idea of anything but normality…it’s all normal…everything’s normal…move along…nothing to see here…killing 96 government leaders is unheard of so it’s obviously an accident…why try to see anything else in it?…you just wanna see conspiracies in everything… but everything’s normal…

          Maybe that’s why Mr Corbett uses the term “normies”…

          the masses hooked on normality…disney/football/repub-dem normality…

          I know I’m kicking a dead horse here but… can’t quite wrap my mind around this phenomenon…

          the emphatic, pragmatic embrace of ‘ignorance is bliss’…curiosity represents uncouth excess…it’s fundamentally antisocial…?

          Ok, I feel better now, time for some morning coffee…

          • mkey says:

            People are lazy and vain.

            • manbearpig says:

              Good morning Occam!

              • mkey says:

                Good morning. I don’t imbibe coffee, but I’d love some tea. Excuse me for a moment while I run to the shed to sharpen my razor.

              • manbearpig says:

                don’t trip! could be devastating…

                thanks for the Corbett Polish murder link!
                I’m not absolutely sure I’ve watched it already…!??

              • mkey says:

                This site has a LOT of content. I doubt I consumed more than 20% of it myself.

          • ddude says:

            Reminds me of Jordan Peterson’s discussion of “chaos” and people’s need to keep chaos at bay. And Jack Nicholson’s “you can’t handle the truth”.

            I think that this is likely literally the truth for some people, especially older people – they just couldn’t/can’t handle it. Uncovering this material for real can be very shocking – it certainly was to me.

            I’m 60 and started looking into this endless rabbit hole 10-15 years ago via UFO’s and 9/11, and it is one ugly ass rabbit hole. Horrific. I used to think that my country (U.S.) was a force for good in the world until then, but now I know that it’s actually pretty much the biggest bully and murderer of the world. This is not easy to take. I had to stop myself from looking at it so much because I could see that it was damaging me to do so.

            I guess I’ve sort of gotten used to it somewhat, and I don’t stay buried in it all the time. Need more coffee…

          • mik says:

            Kaczynski wasn’t a team player and all sides could have a motive to do him.

            Last times I’m challenging normies with a fact that normality is changing to worse. Most of them were not aware, they agree mostly with my observations, but they don’t want to be bothered because…come on, that’s just how things are.

            Conformity is good for society (to some extent), it reduces tensions.
            On the other side I believe even normies prefer a dish with spices, not without.

            • ddude says:

              I’m grateful to have whatever was required in order to not be completely ignorant of our situation. It took me 45 years or so to catch a real clue in that direction.

            • manbearpig says:

              If I read you right about even normies preferring spicy dishes, I’d say Trump for example is the equivalent of monosodium glutate… tittytainment for the taste buds… anything but his institutionalized political incorrectness would be politically incorrect…

              he’s the circus in bread and circus

              • mik says:

                trump_creature hahaha….

                He reminds me on galactic president from Hitchhikers Guide to Galaxy.
                When he was asked how is possible that such a notorious person could be galactic president, he replied that a real mandate is to distract and divert attention from real powers.

    • mik says:

      RT always disseminated climate scare religion.

      Even Redacted Tonight, comedy show that many times used topics that just appeared on CR (I’m pretty sure they follow James’ work), is preaching climate bible.

  32. Leslie says:

    A very good free book (PDF format) by Andrew Johnson – Book: Climate Change and Global Warming – Exposed: Hidden Evidence, Disguised Plans – http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/Climate%20Change%20and%20Global%20Warming-Exposed-6×9.pdf

  33. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Facebook now knows how many users were hacked last month: 29 million
    https://www.vox.com/2018/10/13/17973190/facebook-data-breach-29-million-users
    EXCERPTS
    The company had previously said as many as 90 million accounts could have been compromised…

    … In nearly half of the cases, hackers were able to see details like their users’ relationship status, the area they live in and part of their search history…
    …According to the most recent details, hackers could see the phone numbers and email addresses of 29 million users, and additional biographical information — including self-reported current city, education, work, people they follow, the last 10 places they were tagged in and the last 15 searches — of 14 million of those….

  34. zyxzevn says:

    Dr. Mark Skidmore – $21 Trillion “Missing” Money Huge Implications for Dollar

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4XRbcBz2Z4

    Michigan State Economics Professor Mark Dr. Skidmore says there is a limit to money printing even when all the global central banks are doing it. Skidmore says, “What does it mean when a central bank is buying equities, or buying debt with printed money in order to suppress interest rates and keep this game going? I think, overall, the whole world is awash in debt, and it’s expanding at a rate that is unsustainable. The only way it has been sustained is that interest rates have been falling for 30 years. Now, interest rates are no longer falling, and we are running up against a constraint. Now, if this $21 trillion in “missing” federal money really represents spending above and beyond what the official records indicate, then that has huge financial implications and huge implications for confidence in the dollar as the reserve currency. This is an enormous priority to address and not just cover up and say we are all good.” In closing, Dr. Skidmore says, “How can you have a democracy if you don’t have any transparency whatsoever? Having integrity and confidence is so essential to the whole system, and this just puts everything in question. . . . We should clean this up and show we are legitimate. If we don’t, we are just shooting ourselves in the foot.” Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Dr. Mark Skidmore, Professor of Economics at Michigan State University.

    Also on Redacted Tonight:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KfJO8Irjyo
    Truth About $21 Trillion Missing At The Pentagón w/ David Degraw

    Who stole the money?

  35. irose says:

    I wonder why when we (!) are literally drowning,  up to our collective necks in garbage, we are obsessing over ‘climate’ — what was gained and what was lost by having shifted the discourse away from pollution, emissions, toxic spills, the war machine, big Pharma/Argo, the polluters, pillagers, extractors… to ‘climate’?!
    Who profits? 
    And who profits from having an ‘Immigration Crisis’ instead of a ’War on the people, on the earth Crisis’?

    • manbearpig says:

      well put!

    • ddude says:

      Couldn’t agree more. I just made the following comment recently because I was triggered by this comment: “Human-caused climate change is reality. It doesn’t care about your feelings.”

      I say: Continuous earthly climate change is reality. It doesn’t care about human opinions. There are plenty of horrible things that people (corporations with governments) are doing to badly damage the earth and its people, completely outside the realm of co2 emissions – co2 emissions which actually feed plant life and green the earth.

      This climate change narrative is a steaming pile of distraction, taxes, and making people feel bad for being alive and breathing. And it’s a major cog in the desired one world government to rule all countries wheel. Wake up people, you’ve been scammed – again!

      Some of the really bad things that actually are happening: Fukushima, Deepwater Horizon (with Correxit application), fracking, corporate ownership of the U.S. and other governments, Federal Reserve & central banks all over the world and the wars and enemies that strangely and regularly align with those not under that central bank control.

      Human generated co2 is the very least of our worries folks.

  36. Fawlty Towers says:

    Another story about the trustworthiness of scientific studies.

    We’ve all heard about fake news. How about fake science news?

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/second-opinion-scientists-data-fudging-1.4861556

  37. Hotfoot says:

    ‘Trouble brewing: climate change to cause ‘dramatic’ beer shortages’

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/15/climate-change-to-cause-dramatic-beer-shortages-extreme-weather-price

    The heady combination of The Guardian and The University of East Anglia (ring any bells?) was always going to produce an interesting headline. Here it is. Wave bye-bye to your beloved beer, gentlemen..

    Clearly they want us all down the pub, brandishing pitchforks and vowing to pay more carbon taxes in a valiant attempt to halt this nightmare.

    Blah blah blah….

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top