Interview 1289 - James Corbett on Cyber 9/11

07/26/201727 Comments

via Press For Truth: The global war on terror has entered the digital age and it's no longer a question of if there will be an attack on the world wide web but when! In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth speaks with James Corbett of The Corbett Report about what a possible cyber attack scenario might look like, who the perpetrators are likely to be, who the scapegoat will be to take the fall and most importantly what we all can do about it BEFORE it happens.

Bracing for “Cyber 9/11”

Episode 045 – PTech and the 9/11 Software

Confirmed: US and Israel created Stuxnet, lost control of it

Massive US-planned cyberattack against Iran went well beyond Stuxnet

The NSA Is Hoarding Vulnerabilities

US to create independent military cyber command

Lawrence Lessig: US Government has prepared a "Patriot Act" for the Internet

Joe Biden Drafted the Core of the Patriot Act in 1995

Are You Ready for a Driver’s License for the Internet?

China shuts down 3,918 illegal websites in second quarter

China’s online media purification drive is changing millenials’ lifestyle

The Social Media Exodus Has Begun. Here’s Where Everybody’s Going.

Filed in: Interviews
Tagged with:

Comments (27)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Corbett Report Data DVDs
    Order here…

    Short 30 second video description of Corbett’s Data DVDs

    James Corbett shows the DVDs in more detail here…

    The Comparative Value of Corbett Report DVDs is extremely good. Like CorbettReport member Stephen pointed out… it saves me the process of ‘laboriously’ downloading and cataloging myself.
    Besides spending lots of time, a downloader would need to also purchase storage capacity.

    These DVDs are top of the line, not the ordinary type DVD which has half the storage capability.
    The raw blank product is definitely not cheap in cost nor in quality… (And some CorbettReport years have 5 discs!)
    Verbatim 8.5 gigabyte dvd+r dl

    Also notice that Corbett has the discs themselves imprinted with a wonderful graphic label.
    It really does take some time, effort and cost to burn, print, package and mail these.

    This ad is also endorsed by Russian Hackers. 😉

  2. PeaceFroggs says:

    Most know by now that the C.I.A uses all kinds of propaganda and clandestine operations, such as funding and arming “terror” groups (cyber warfare is no different), in order to overthrow governments that don’t align themselves with the Empire…

    …and when these governments find themselves under such attacks, most will resort to ratcheting up the police state and crack down on the C.I.A backed coup plotters trying to overthrow their government, and in doing so, they will then be labeled psychopaths, therefore they should be overthrown and replaced by a nice American puppet psychopath, kinda like Saddam Hussein was once.

    Guess the Vietnamese should have just rolled over and let Uncle Sam have his way with them.

    Wonder what Putin will do if the C.I.A keeps pushing the Russian Hacking meme in order to maybe destabilize Russia in the hopes of getting the Ukrainian conflict raging again?

  3. Greg Bacon says:

    Those ‘TBTF’ Wall Street Casinos are in a lot worse shape now than in 2007 and when that balloon pops, it will make the 2008 Crash seem like a picnic.

    Unless it can be blamed on those damned ‘Rooskies’ thru a Cyber FF that wipes out the crooked bank’s books. Naturally, it will wreck the economy, but the important thing is that the perps–Wall Street and the FED–get to walk away unscathed, with a clean ledger so then can start betting again–and all this misery is blamed on Putin, meaning we just have to attack them to save our way of life.

  4. Richard Ran says:

    Here’s a scenario:

    Bitcoin is pushed/promoted heavily (Bill Gates et al, Goldman Sachs), set up to fail through some spectacular asymmetric cyberattack (“Vlad stole my cryptocoins!”), after which the central banks step in with their own cryptocurrency already waiting in the wings (e.g. Peeps Bank of China), perhaps as a warm-up to a one world digital currency.

    All of this of course necessitates total control over the internet by our overlords, which is only fair because we need safeguards against these hackers. In one fell blow the war on cash is won, the dollar and other hated fiat currencies ended, financial privacy finally a thing of the past (redubbed “credit transparency”) and bitcoin developers hailed as those brave and visionary individuals who paved the way for this long overdue “banking reformation”.

    Kind regs from Amsterdam,

    • PeaceFroggs says:

      Interesting scenario, but do you really believe if they take down cryptocoins via a cyber false flag attack, that people will trust and want a cryptocoins to replace their paper?

        • PeaceFroggs says:

          Me neither, I think they’ll leave cryptocoins alone for now since so many of us are still suspicious of it.

          Just thinking out loud, but I think instead, depending on if and when they do decide to pull a cyber 9/11 false flag type attack, the target will probably be one of the BRICS nation, since rumor as it that they have decided to build their own Internet infrastructure, circumventing American and European wiretapping points. Can’t have that.

          • Richard Ran says:

            Okay PF, we agree the people won’t want any new crypto’s, not after a cyber take-down, and probably not even before that (there’s the weak spot in my scenario), but bear with me for a moment (get back to your suggestion in time). Obviously we’re talking scenarios here, and why not. So my crystal ball revealed that in this particular case, come the time when all of this plays out, the question of what the people want might be of precious little importance.

            We can now even expand the scenario a bit. Under martial cyberlaw, the development and/or use of decentralized cybercurrencies will simply be declared illegal (must protect the people from themselves). From then on, the people will want or rather “have a need for” the new CB cryptocoin. Again, the scenario is a simple one and doesn’t factor in the people’s wants.

            As the saying goes by one of the Warburg banksters:

            “We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”

            Transfer J.P. Warburg’s 20th century conquest to our digital times and we have a bankster cyberwar on our hands.

            • Richard Ran says:

              Afterthought: in this scenario, Bitcoin is simply just beta testing.

            • PeaceFroggs says:

              “Again, the scenario is a simple one and doesn’t factor in the people’s wants.”

              — That is true, and history proves it.

              1) Executive Order 6102 is a United States presidential executive order signed on April 5, 1933, by President Franklin D. Roosevelt “forbidding the Hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States”.

              and 40 years later, Nixon pretty much did the same thing as Franklin D. Roosevelt did, except this time it wasn’t just for the continental US it was for the World.

              2) The Nixon shock was a series of economic measures undertaken by United States President Richard Nixon in 1971, the most significant of which was the unilateral cancellation of the direct international convertibility of the United States dollar to gold.

              To summarize,

              The Warburg banksters quote is even more pertinent today, given that WW2 and the Cold War that followed were in fact struggles that pitted the US dollar capitalist system vs the communist system for world government.

              The Nixon shock of 1971 tipped the balance in the US capitalists favor, and as a result the Berlin wall fell and the Soviet satellites states in the East regained their independence, however on the negative side, now the world has to deal with a not so benign US Empire hell bent on World domination.

              The next battle lines may see the BRICS nations pitted against the US in a sort of Cold War version 2.0, but this time not one of communism vs capitalism, instead it will determine US hegemony NWO or if world government will be A multipolar NWO.

              How the US Empire plans to use cyberwarfare and cryptocurrency to keep its hegemonic dollar dominance remains to be seen.

              • Richard Ran says:

                Hi PF,

                Sure think there’s a place for the BRICS nations in the scenario I proposed. So let’s expand the scenario just the way Bitcoin became part of the original plan (my reply to D_).

                Say, the scenario allows for the option that BRICS is part & parcel of a plan to “harmonize” the global financial system by putting up the same old Hegelian Circus, what would the 9/11 FF attack look like in your view? Suppose we know who “they” are, call them simply globalists, and leave it there. You imagined a FF attack on a BRICS nation. Okay. What does the particular flag look like, for it to be false (to our eyes), but true to the general public? In other words, who would the designated Saudi terrorists be in this case?

                Agree with your comment, save perhaps for the term “capitalists”. I’d replace that with “corporatists” to refer to the same crooked people, but I know where you’re coming from and I can live with that. No need for this platform to be an echo chamber of like minded voluntarists.

                Cheers from Amsterdam,

    • D_ says:

      As a crypto user (long term investment not speculation) I agree with the above as a likely scenario.

      Let’s say it is made illegal to spend or exchange Bitcoin etc. Well, this would require closing down exchanges such as Coinbase which are already under pressure to hand over all of their users records. Next step would be to make apps that enable the exchange and spending of such coins illegal. Seeing as a smartphone is required to use these apps it would be a fairly straightforward job of summarily remotely removing them due to backdoors in the app stores and phones themselves. With the doors closed on new adopters along with mass dumping of the coins the price will tank.

      As a holder of cryptos you’re then left with coins you can’t spend or cash out of because the tech and other means of doing so will be controlled or shut down. It’s not necessary to control the actual coin or blockchain just the means of exchange. All of this would require the speculated CyberFF to implement. A new ‘safe’ digital currency that is ‘centrally controlled’ is introduced as a solution.

      Interesting side note. I was recently told by my bank (in the UK) that they would not authorise me opening a business account unless I removed all mention of Bitcoin from my personal online shop selling artwork and remove Bitcoin as a payment option.

      • Richard Ran says:

        Thank you D_,

        for eloquently filling in the blanks in the suggested scenario. Yes, the cardinal point is:

        “It’s not necessary to control the actual coin or blockchain just the means of exchange.”

        Now let’s suspend disbelief just a little more with an extra addition to the scenario. One that is a bit of a stretch perhaps, but one that might serve to underline a wider point I’d like to make about alt- or countereconomics, Bitcoin-style.
        To make the case for Bitcoin as beta testing more explicitly, let’s allow the scenario to include the option that the Bitcoin project was part of the plan from the get go.

        The wider point would be that from a globalist’s perspective, people trying to circumvent the system by going peer-to-peer digital Hippie2.0 pose no threat to the system whatsoever*. So let’s lure them into doing so and have them believe it is really revolutionary. Of course it has revolutionary potential, but perhaps not in the sense most activists would have it.
        There’s even an opportunity here to use people as trailblazers for something the globalists want anyway (replacement of today’s failed paper currencies in a new banking order). Now develop something which will resonate with activists, has a counter-economics flavour to it and generally sounds like a dream come true for countereconomic activists of all stripes. It almost sounds too good to be true (as in a genuine grassroots rebellion against the state sponsored banking system).

        The main problem in this scenario is that in order to pose a credible target for a 9/11 FF attack, the cryptocurrency project must enjoy more widespread success than it does today. Perhaps that’s why “the elites” are pushing it so hard these days. Kind of like the ISIS boogeyman in need of constant marketing/media attention to play any role at all in the WoT scheme. But again, talking simple scenarios here. People in places of power need to be able to come up with this stuff, so nothing fancy 😉

        Cheers from Woodenshoesland,

        *I now realize that at this point, the scenario echoes some of @weilunion’s concerns posted down below.

        • PeaceFroggs says:

          That extra addition to the scenario makes perfect sense to me.

          I do believe the US Empire would go about it exactly that way, since they have covertly funded trailblazers for something they would want anyway. (Examples like Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Google etc..)

          Sometimes however, people will work outside of the system for a while unnoticed, however these people always end up being bought out eventually, or simply eliminated.(Example YouTube being bought out by Google)

          Here’s where I don’t necessarily agree with the scenario,

          1- the term “globalist” is somewhat of a fallacy.

          The current New World Order is lead by the US and has been since Bretton Woods (1945), however they never really had complete control of the world. The Cold war, Korea and Vietnam Wars prove that.

          Even today, now that Communism has been defeated, and the US stands alone, they still do not control the world. Iran, Russia, and to some extend China and India, aren’t under their dollar hegemony control.

          My point is, the US cannot pull a FF attack to introduce a cryptocurrency world wide, since they would first need to reign in countries like Russia, China, India, Brazil and a bunch of other smaller emerging economies like Venezuela, and have them under the IMF and WorldBank control before they can implement a world wide cryptocurrency.

          In other words “Incremental steps”…

          “We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”

          …and may I add, whether world government will be multipolar or a Monotheistic Dictatorship.

          • D_ says:

            But let’s say that the Dollar system, Euro, and British Pound etc. get swept up in this reset/CFF of sorts; enabling the introduction of a regulated digital currency for this collection (selection?) of nations. How will the likes of China or India trade with the ‘West’? Would this new digital currency be forced upon them by necessity? These would be your “Incremental steps”. Plus, as James often reminds, these supposedly opposing forces are all just different faces and versions of the ‘NWO’.

            • Pablo de Boer says:

              Well said D,

              BRICS nations are also members aka obediently servants of the Bank for International Settlements from the mountainous banksters paradise Switzerland

              BIS member central banks

            • PeaceFroggs says:

              First, let me address something that has been said…

              Just because countries trade with one another doesn’t mean we live under a monotheistic One World Government.

              Fact is each country each have their own currency, with their own central banks.

              The U.N. is not a government, there is no global government.

              For a time, countries had to convert their country’s currency into US dollars before completing a trade, like when buying Oil for instance. This gave the US an unfair advantage.

              When Nixon stopped US dollar convertibility into gold, it pissed off a lot of countries that held billions worth of US paper, which lead to the creation of OPEC and the Oil crisis.

              (BIS) Bank for International Settlements

              Article 4

              (1) The authorised capital of the Bank shall be three
              thousand million Special Drawing Rights (SDR), as defined
              from time to time by the International Monetary Fund.

              Article 19

              The operations of the Bank shall be in conformity with the
              monetary policy of the central banks of the countries

              Article 23

              The Bank may enter into special agreements with central
              banks to facilitate the settlement of international transactions
              between them.

              Article 24
              The Bank may not:
              (a) issue notes payable at sight to bearer;
              (b) “accept” bills of exchange;
              (c) make advances to Governments;
              (d) open current accounts in the name of Governments;
              (e) acquire a predominant interest in any business concern;

              SDR’s can hardly be considered a One World Currency, I’d say the BIS bank is nothing more than a HUB for International Trading, so of course BRICS bank would part of the BIS bank.

              more coming soon…

              • Richard Ran says:

                PF, you make some interesting points here. With more to come, allow this Dutchie one aside concerning:

                “Fact is each country each have their own currency, with their own central banks.”

                If only that were true in Europe today. The ECB is calling the shots here, not the central bank of Holland. I don’t suppose you’d view the EU as a country already (let alone a “nation”, like the US). So just for the record, let me state that I’d really love to have our own Dutch currency back (and the EU dismantled).

                Minor point though.

              • PeaceFroggs says:

                I wouldn’t rush to dismantle the EU Richard Ran. The EU has some good points, like rivaling the US and keeping them in check.

                The US has attacked the EU economically a few days ago when Congress passed the Russian sanctions bill. We’ll have to wait and see if Trump Veto’s it. (He won’t)

                Remember this article? Stupid Conspiracy Theorists! Chemicals Aren’t Turning The Frogs GAY!!

                — Well, the chemical that turns frogs gay, atrazine, has been banned by the EU, still allowed in the US.

                If you think America is looking out for your best interest, think again.

                The upcomming German elections will be one to watch. I’m sure the C.I.A is busy trying to find ways to topple Merkel.

            • PeaceFroggs says:


              “Plus, as James often reminds, these supposedly opposing forces are all just different faces and versions of the ‘NWO’.”

              — Sure, but that doesn’t mean the cold war was theater.
              — I also don’t believe the JFK assassination was theater.
              — I believe the Korean, Vietnam and Russia/Afghan wars were wars fought for supremacy between the Capitalist West versus the Communist.

              The US eventually won the cold war when the Berlin wall fell, and the Chinese became more capitalist, but that doesn’t mean the US Empire controls the entire world now.

              Which brings me back to the FF cyber attack, I just don’t foresee this event, if it is to happen, as a catalyst to bring about a One World Government with a One World currency.

              I’m not saying this isn’t the plan, what I’m saying is we ain’t there yet, we ain’t even close to that yet.

              I’d argue, the upcoming conflicts will be because the EU, the BRICS and others would rather have a multipolar NWO, instead of one lead by the US.

        • Richard Ran says:

          Hi PF,

          I’ll reply here to save some room for discussion. And thanks for not leaving the term “globalists” at the stage where we supposedly all know exactly what it should refer to. I agree with your assessment about the possible genesis of a NWO (mono- multipolar) here.

          Now, I must rush to the NWNW interview to repeat the wider point I was making in our exchange (and with D_), which is that going Hippie2.0 will not pose any significant threat to the system.

          Cheers from Amsterdam,

        • wingsuitfreak says:

          While I haven’t covered this whole discussion, I would like to point out the one thing I know about bitcoin. That is that the Russian government claims it is a product of the CIA. I don’t trust bitcoin myself, as I have had software and such disappear forever for many reasons, but that is a different story. However, even if they did; remember the internet came out of Darpa. I think we’ve done okay with it so far. Cheers, Jim

          But, they can’t control barter or physical alternative currencies. Which I think are our best options. But, I am admittedly somewhat of a luddite. Not that I don’t like technology, but there is a big difference between it being a tool and a controlling device.

  5. Ragnar says:

    I think it would be prudent to prepare for this eventual cyber attack, and ready the response, the protest against the “iPatriot Act”. I doubt they will succeed, but it needs to be attempted. Plus, such a protest may well serve to awaken those sleepers who are mesmerized by their screens, their phones and tablets. It could, and should be the acid test to prove to the 99% that their will, their voice either has an effect, or has no effect on the politicians in Corruption DC.

  6. weilunion says:

    As always, I agree with James” critical assessment of the state of cyber warfare and Silicon Valley. There will be multiple new warfares as biological or say knocking out entire electrical grill systems and the like.

    The issue is what to do about it. And here James and I disagree. Although agorism, admirable and worthy as á concept to achieve, it is not and will not help us in the fight against fascism, cyber or otherwise. It is too individualistic, offers only individual solutions, fails to take into account social class, race and the like.

    Fascism will not be beaten by people who are in debt slavery, deracinated, have no jobs or chances for work and live under neo-feudalism, as capitalism continues to devour everything creating a rentier lifestyle where you basically rent everything and own nothing.

    When the entire internet is controlled going to another ‘google’ alternative is not going to help; just like Tor did not and is not helping to encrypt.

    No, it is only an organized mass of people with a class consciousness that can create the fundamental elements of change and mobilization, if change and mobilization for the better is even possible.

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      …it is only an organized mass of people with a class consciousness that can create the fundamental elements of change and mobilization, if change and mobilization for the better is even possible.

      Your last paragraph sounds similar to this concept…
      ……a community based on cooperation, exchange and friendship… …Cooperation and exchange are the very basis of human civilization. Economy (as in government management) and central planning are their antitheses….

      James Corbett spends about 10 minutes talking about some concepts and “What Are You Going To Be When You Grow Up?”. I enjoyed this video.
      (He looks pretty sharp in that suit.)

  7. Gefaat says:

    What about a connection with the role/agenda of/behind the Joe Snowden case? Is that too evident or would such a play card be already taken/reserved towards the prognosticated “kill switch” event?

  8. Pablo de Boer says:

    Hola aloha señor James, todos los otros reporteros del The Corbett Report y tu tambien rana psicópata PF,

    I work for one of the biggest energy distributors in Holland and last month all my colleagues and I received a warranty message about that the company and other big pirate corporations from Holland were being attacked with ransomewear and the whores from the Dutch MSM also mentioned this in their prewritten articles.

    Large scale attack with ransomware now also affects the Netherlands /

    original source

    Grootschalige aanval met ransomware treft nu ook Nederland

    And on the same day in Ukraine, the newest lapdog of the NWO, Major firms, airports and government departments had been struck by a massive cyber attack which began to spread across Europe on Tuesday afternoon.

    Petya cyber attack: Ransomware spreads across Europe with firms in Ukraine, Britain and Spain shut down

    Note Pablo: Energy suppliers, airports and government departments are good (fake) targets for a (false flag) Cyber 9/11.

    Off topicohhh

    And graammaer nazis I know my eenglisch is verrie kripplet. I see even here fellow humans who correct their own misspelling. This behavior has a narcissistic tendency because you are rereading your own comments and…. To be honest for me grammar nazis are also mind controlled, because thizz behafior they learned at SCHOOL + Universities aka the biggest brainwashing factories on pacha mama / mother earth. Specially vor you and rana psicópata PF (aka anti copy/paste socialist) I linked this cancion about your teachers and their grammar Bricks

    Pink Floyd – Another Brick In The Wall (HQ)

    Pero yo tambien tengo mis defectos, por que nadi es perfecto

    Saludos para todos y tu tambien rana psicópata PF,

    Pablo de Boer

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top