Interview 1573 - Richard Gage Delivers Updates on 9/11 Truth

09/02/202081 Comments

Richard Gage of joins us to discuss the various actions, inquests, studies, documentaries and conferences that are happening around the 19th anniversary of 9/11.

Watch on Archive / BitChute / LBRY / Minds / YouTube or Download the mp4

AE911Truth Homepage

AE911Truth Who We Are

A Tailor-Made Opportunity to Get the 9/11 Evidence into Court: Help This Family Obtain a New Inquest into the Death of Their Son

The Campaign for a Fresh Inquest into the Death of Geoffrey Thomas Campbell on September 11, 2001: A Summary

Donate to the Campbell family inquest fund

When is the News Not the News? – #PropagandaWatch

University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse on 9/11

Statement: 9/11 Families and Experts to Appeal Egregious NIST Building 7 Decision

AE911Truth Request for Correction (RFC) on NIST WTC7 Report

NIST's Response to AE911Truth's RFC

Short Version of New Documentary SEVEN Begins Airing Today on PBS

Justice Rising conference - information and schedule

Filed in: Interviews
Tagged with:

Comments (81)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. james.w says:

    Here is my 5 minute video on what happened:

    • robert.t says:

      Yep. Nice summary.

      In my case, doubt came from watching Alitalia ground and flight staff being interviewed on Italian TV. The interviewees weren’t contradicting any official stories, they just looked far too nervous and bewildered when trying to account for the Pentagon hit. These guys wanted to be elsewhere.

      So I started looking hard at 9/11, something I’d never done. Like everybody, I’d done some mouthing and opinionating, but never actually looked squarely at 9/11. It changed me.

      Contrary to what fake whistle-blowers try to tell us, 9/11 can never be a distraction. It’s permanently dead centre-stage. Everything rests on 9/11, everything either rises all falls by what the truth really is on 9/11.

      • lovetodust says:

        I still can’t figure out the Pentagon and the Pennsylvania hole in the ground.

        To me it looks like absolutely nothing resembling a plane crash has taken place at either site. No plane, no bodies, no refuse.

        So what would be the point of inventing that story? Why not just say a bomb was planted at the Pentagon.

        That part of the story is very very confusing to me.

        At least it is obvious that the 3 World Trade buildings were detonated.

        I don’t want to hijack the comment section but I would be very interested to know what you mean, robert.t, by fake whistle blowers insinuating (my word) that 9/11 is a distraction?

        Looking forward to seeing James et al on the 11-13nth.

        • james.w says:

          They had to blame the hijackers, that is why they invented the stories about the planes liquifying and being swallowed by the hole in Penn.

          • CQ says:

            james.w, when you wrote “hole in Penn.” I wasn’t sure for a second whether you meant Pennsylvania (more than likely) or Pentagon (less likely, of course, though there are two “n’s” in that word, too).

            Then I realized that both Penn and Pent are reminiscent of the pentagram shape, which we know is used in occult symbolism. No wonder the Pentagon was built with five sides (duh!). OK, call me slow!

            Like everyone else here, I’m looking forward to watching the three-day Justice Rising presentations.

        • robert.t says:

          Four planes had to be accounted for then disappear completely (give or take an indestructible paper document like a passport). I guess it was easier to invent an impossible situation with a plane than an improbable bomb at the Office of Naval Intelligence. I guess.

          It’s worth keeping in mind that we are dealing with demonic energy combined with pedestrian imagination. What keeps the 9/11 story afloat is sheer power, nothing else. These manipulators are miserable, empty, bored and inadequate, which is why they choose to act as they do.

          Re whistle-blowers:

          If the world’s most renowned whistle-blower – say, someone with his own statue and movie – were to evade discussion of 9/11 and declare the matter a distraction…

          Well, that would be very handy for the permanent state. That alone would justify his upkeep.

          And if, as a bonus, many were inclined to give him their secrets and leaks…

        • MagicBullet says:

          This is the best study of what happened at the Pentagon:

          See the 2 vids with David Chandler (also of ae911truth) for the understanding that a plane did go in to the Pentagon. However, it certainly wasn’t piloted by a human, and was probably souped-up, that’s my guess why the security camera footage of the object itself hasn’t been made public. David seems to think there were passengers but he didn’t really study that and I’m not convinced because where are the corpses, DNA IDs, etc? ” “Liquified” in the Pentagon conflagration?

          The Pennsylvania hole looks like a bomb site not a plane. There should have been wreckage on the ground, and even if it did go in the hole it would be a crime scene to dig up and get the evidence, and they would want to show the world what Al Q did, but sorry no digs for us. Where is the plane and why baggage was found some km away? Only guesses but there was some radar evidence I saw of the plane going past the crash site, maybe to a mil base in Maryland (it would take me some time to dig up that video). The baggage could have been let out on the way to simulate crash? Anyway, it smells like a rotten story.

      • Roe_Jogan_On_DMT says:

        do you guys know the video where James Corbett was doing a presentation live. NO im not talking about the TED Talk or the Echoes of WW1 presentation. James was doing a presentation about being independent media and he was talking to a group of students. if anyone know what that video is please link it

      • mkey says:

        Robert, how come you chose 9/11 as the founding stone? I’d say we really need to go at least as far back as WW1 to get to the crux of the matter.

        • james.w says:

          I think the founding stone was the great depression and then JFK; the founding organization, the bankers/FED caused the great depression and after WWII, kept the OSS/CIA going and taking over everything, as Eisenhower warned. I single out JFK as the biggy because he was a president of the US. They had never killed one before and it was a team effort, the Mafia, the CIA (Particularly Helms), the FED (Kennedy was threatening to get rid of it), Israel (Kennedy wanted to block their atomic weapon program, all parts of the MICC (military, industrial, congressional complex), FBI, Secret Service, et. al. The whole deep state participated, celebrated the night before at Johnson’s.

        • robert.t says:

          Take your excellent point about going further back, but WW1 has had a century of court historians, media conditioning and general fudging. Widely adored monsters like Churchill, Clemenceau, Haig, Wilson etc are past prosecuting. With 9/11 we have a single, still-fresh event with living actors whom few people particularly like.

          9/11. Dig there first, then work back and forward.

          • Fact Checker says:

            Agree wholeheartedly.

          • mkey says:

            I believe that people will be more likely to accept that a past generation has been duped than they will accept their own duping.

            • Fact Checker says:

              The problem is, even if they come to realize the past generation was duped, they will still be very unlikely to accept that they have been personally, and they are unlikely to take the implication or extend the analogy. So if they can’t be disabused on their own generation’s fraud (in our case, Nighny Leven), they will still never internalize the principle of statecraft that unites that fraud with all those of the past…and present.

              This all goes to support robert.t’s argument that Nighny Level is the cornerstone, the keystone, the skeleton key, without which someone will never really “get it.”

            • robert.t says:

              It comes down to this: do we want a first or second place in an Oxford University debate on the origins of WW1 or do we want to prosecute a massive, pivotal crime which is still fresh?

              I’m all in favour of questioning accepted modern history, events like the bankster French Revolution and the English-funded invasion of the Two Sicilies by Garibaldi’s masonic scum. Let’s go for it.

              But first things first. There are still many educated people in Australia who think we are “fighting ISIS” and “fighting Al Qaeda”. They actually believe those execution scenes with the Lawrence of Arabia backdrops and the bored victims.

              It comes of attending to the left-wing slop and right-wing slop called “media” rather than using our eyes and ears and brains. With lockdown people are even more prisoners of the slop bucket media. I’m no smarter than anybody else: I’m just one of the lucky discoverers of a precious device called the OFF button.

              Unfortunately, the really hard thing is the one essential thing. 9/11 truth has to come out soon or we lose the lot, history and all. Soon it will be an academic matter in the hands of court historians with some counter-opinions disdainfully admitted. Cue that civilised Oxford debate.

              We have to seize the nettle while 9/11 is still a crime with living perpetrators and fresh consequences. As with all hoaxes and false flags there are the standard confusion factors, like when school shootings etc start with “multiple active shooters” before being pulled back to “one angry loner”. So we are allowed the juicy hints about Saudi Arabia as the possible state actor in 9/11 while the bulk of the story still rests on the renegade Saudi in his cave. Saudi Arabia constitutes the “multiple-shooters” factor in the controlled muddling of the narrative.

              Jetliners piloted by amateurs flying at full speed near sea level? That’s where it all started for me. But it hasn’t finished there. To borrow a famous, inspiring and totally made-up quote…let’s roll.

              9/11 is the big one. Go to the place the likes of Assange and Chomsky tell us not to go. Go to the very spot where there is a no-digging sign. And start digging right there.

              • mkey says:

                I understand what you are saying, but I don’t understand whom exactly do you expect to carry out the prosecution? It certainly won’t happen under conventional courts. Besides, I’d much rather see people cast away their fetters than brought any of these satanists to justice. Understanding the system for what it is will mean its destruction.

              • HomeRemedySupply says:

                Highlight these words!

                mkey says:
                Understanding the system for what it is will mean its destruction.

            • yelv says:

              As Mark Twain? said: “It is easier to fool a man than to convince him he has been fooled”.

    • mkey says:

      Excellent work James. I guess it takes a James to condense information so efficiently.

    • hugo.c says:

      Yes. David Chandler provides the most simple explanations from a Newtonian Physics analysis. There’s another one on WTC 7:

      This was THE video which told me it was controlled demolition. I have studied physics to second year bachelors. I understand Newtonian physics. And steel framed high risers are essentially just big steel rectilinear structures with stuff handing off them (floors, windows, whatever). Very Simple Stuff (apart from wind shear, earthquakes etc.).

      I am assuming that David Chandler is not misrepresenting. What motive?

      Thus, if his presentation is accurate, you have about a third of the building falling at freefall. The building twists, but does not ‘fall over’. It MUST pass through itself. Thus, you have to uniformly destroy almost *all* of its supports for some height below the falling portion. The controlled demolition experts know how to do this; diagonal partial cuts plus explosives or other methods. But, you need HUNDREDS of them carefully placed and PRECISELY timed. Weeks of work.

      There is no other way to do this but controlled demolition. None.


      Hats off to Halsey and his team. They get to the exact details about how this can be done for this specific building. But it is just so obvious from this singular work by Chandler based on very simple physics.

    • Libertydan says:

      Nice summary to make the point that the Official 9/11 Story is a Lie. So, who really planned those Events, and how could they control the Media and the Courts and the Government to cover-up the truth for so long?
      I find that Investigative Reporter Christopher Bollyn has uncovered some very compelling evidence that Israel was behind most of the death and destruction done on that day, yet they had to have a lot of help in order to prevent the truth from bringing Justice to the Criminals behind it all.
      Lots of filthy dirty money was made as a result of playing the 9/11/01 Events. These, less than human, beings, need to be prosecuted if we are to regain some sense of Justice.
      Perhaps, because those bastards were never prosecuted, a new group of Psychopaths has staged a World Pandemic along with a Global Reset.
      When are we going to let them know that they have gone to far???
      I think we know who they are!

    • lizzie says:

      Great video there. Awesome

    • Mielia says:

      concerning 3:19 and after
      please watch (playlist)
      Explanation of the Evidence at the Pentagon on 9/11

      or read up on

  2. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Many of the NIST video presentations during the summer of 2008 are no longer available.

    For those who wish to download YouTube videos before they are deleted,
    here is one of the few surviving YouTube video links…

    NIST WTC 7 Report – Press Briefing 8/21/08 pt 1 (and MORE at the CHANNEL)

  3. hugo.c says:


    I eagerly await JusticeRising:

    Jones, Griffin, Harrit, Ganzer, Corbett, Zimbatti, and more.

    Hats off to AE911Truth for their engagement in the UK case, and for organising JusticeRising. They are dogged. We owe them thanks (and/or funding).

    PS: Personally, I have a real soft spot for Jones; so carefully and quietly spoken, but also with a lively sense of humour. He’s a scientific teddy bear.

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      hugo.c says:
      Personally, I have a real soft spot for Jones; so carefully and quietly spoken, but also with a lively sense of humour. He’s a scientific teddy bear.

      Ditto here.

      “Ode to the Neocons” song – presented by Dr Steven Jones at the 9/11 Evidence Conference in L.A. 2006

      (By the way, the Loose Change guys were at this event. Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas.)

      • HomeRemedySupply says:

        James Corbett used to listen to…

        Paris – “What Would You Do?”

        That is a great question which the song’s chorus highlights.
        We all should answer it.

        • CQ says:

          Thank you, HRS, for reminding us of this ode to 9/11/01, which (as many recent commenters below the video observe) is just as applicable in 2020, if not more so.

      • hugo.c says:

        Hey HRS,

        Sorry for the personal input on Jones, but hey, we’re a community so one can do this stuff. Right?

        I have read so many of your inputs to the all so many discussions and always find them interesting. (Note: do not always agree, but am interested/challenged by them — nothing better!).

        Above I highlight THE video/evidence for me on 911, which was Chandler’s WTC video. It MUST me controlled demolition. And from there the rest unravels; red/grey chips, multi-tonne girders flying around, almost innumerate reports of explosions etc..

        What was your ‘data flip point’?

        • HomeRemedySupply says:

          The short story…
          Before most videos were out back in 2005, I started researching 9/11 to prove to a friend of my wife’s that 9/11 was NOT an inside job. She has said that it was an inside job. The more I researched, the more I discovered the cover-up. I ate crow and cried…couldn’t sleep for months.

          Jimmy Walter’s free “Confronting the Evidence” 2005 DVD was one of the first I watched.
          When “9/11 Mysteries” came out, I told my wife that she needed to watch it and finally confessed to her that I thought 9/11 was a government cover-up. The video sold her.

          Here is that video circa 2005. Jimmy gave out more than 300,000 DVDs. I still have the original with its small cardboard cover.
          CONFRONTING THE EVIDENCE – (Riaprire le indagini sull’11 settembre)

          I used to follow 9/11 news, daily, for years and years.

          • lovetodust says:

            Oh my gosh, HRS, I think I watched this in around 2014?

            I am watching it now. This should be put back on youtube!

            I wonder what has happened to these people – Ed Begley,Jr.,and the rest of the speakers. And Jimmy, himself. I am going to look into it after I finish the video.


      • hugo.c says:

        It is so sad that Alex (not Stephen) Jones has lost his brain in the last 15 years.

        • gauntlet33 says:

          @hugo.c, unfortunately, Alex Jones never lost his mind…he was always part of the misdirection and just an earlier version than the now current Q(Anon).

  4. Greenbean950 says:

    NIST will not admit that it lied. The government courts will not find NIST at fault.

    • Fact Checker says:

      True. The NIST weasels are a lot more afraid of the military brass who they’re carrying water for than they are of AE911Truth.

      But wow isn’t Gage’s energy awe-inspiring? So driven and positive, after all that’s happened, and even as society has been shattered from around us?

      I got damn-well misty to see his camaraderie with James, and their expressions of mutual admiration.


      • CQ says:

        That’s a touching tribute, Fact Checker. Gage will probably get “damn-well misty” himself when he reads it. Maybe Corbett will, too.

        I was thinking tonight about the millions of people each of them, in their respective positions, has awakened from dreamland.

    • Libertydan says:

      NIST is part of a Corporate Government that is controlled by world Bankers. NIST will do what the Government tells it to do.
      Perhaps we need a new Government, eh!
      Call for a Convention of the States to End the Fed!

  5. gauntlet33 says:

    @JamesCorbett, our comments post as 9/3 instead Sept. 2nd

  6. lovetodust says:

    I’m surprised Kevin Ryan is not speaking. He was one of the earliest whistle-blowers. And Graham MacQueen on anthrax. He did extensive research right after the anthrax scare and wrote a book about it.

    I suppose they cannot ask everyone but these two fellows were very involved for years.

    • CQ says:

      lovetodust, maybe next year, the 20th, AE will invite all of the 9/11 researchers to its commemorative event, including the two worthies you cite.

      An even more magnificent “maybe” would be if someone who worked on NIST’s Twin Towers report or its WTC 7 report were to listen to his conscience, come clean, and confess his — the entire agency’s — sins.

      • lovetodust says:

        Well, CQ, I suppose if that brave person from NIST has just been diagnosed with a terminal illness and has a month to live that person might “spill it”, short of that I do not think anyone is going to say anything.

        I tend to think that we really don’t have a clue, well, I should only speak for myself, but in general, I don’t think we take seriously enough the threat people who may directly or indirectly be a part of these crimes face should they stray off the reservation.

        I think that is why after all these years, after all the people who lost loved ones, after all the people who have suffered horrible illnesses, no one but the people we know of already, has spoken out.

        Where are all the people that survived? Do none of them think that it was an inside job? Has anyone spoken out? I do not say this accusingly at all, it’s just always been puzzling me. Is it because they all signed waivers in order to be financially compensated? (deservedly)

        So many questions.

        • CQ says:

          All questions I have asked myself, too, lovetodust.

          I should explain that what I was envisioning, with hope, was a Saul-to-Paul kind of conversion. The kind that no one can predict. Not even “Saul” himself, whoever he (or she) may be.

          Yes, the dangers are real and looming.

          But the truth can become even more real and persuasive to some “lost-then-found” soul.

          I don’t mean a religious conversion necessarily, but certainly a moral or ethical one.

          I believe we all have a conscience, no matter how hidden by layers of compromise and cop-outs and corruption it may be.

          Thus, to me, even so-called psychopaths, whose true selves — apparently long lost — are made by the one good Creator, deep down want to feel innocent and unselfish. Most of them won’t confront their conscience in this earthly life, but all it takes is one who does respond to that inner urge to come clean.

          I can only imagine the torment some of the perpetrators of 9/11 and other false flags must be dealing with (though seemingly successfully suppressing) day after day after day.

  7. Maximize the video and check out the two flashes at 14:40
    Coming from a structure above the leftmost building.

    Certainly seems to have a relationship with the Building 7 collapse.

    Maybe camera flashes indicating possible foreknowledge?
    Though I don’t know if camera flashes would be that bright from that far away.

    Maybe someone setting off explosives in/on some other structure, using the Building 7 collapse as sound cover (and visual distraction)?

  8. Libertydan says:

    The wheels of Justice move Slowly, eh!
    19 years and counting on bringing the Criminals of 9/11/01 to Justice.
    Some of us are beginning to wonder if there is such a thing as Justice.

  9. urthp says:

    All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.

    It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
    Another possible starting point of analysis might be the Spanish American
    war. This war was staged as a coordinated Media-Military action adventure exercise, with great success.
    Play-action events like 9-11 and Covid-19 are only possible because we live in a Babylonian Whorehouse of psycho-sexual absurdity. Fun,fun,fun.

    • CQ says:

      urthp, what you wrote reminds me that on The HighWire’s five-hour coverage of the Europe protests last weekend, a rapper at the London event belted out a song that repeatedly referenced the vile “fun, fun, fun” of which you speak. The crowd, incensed at the depravity of their “leaders,” yelled back in derision each time the rapper’s words went down that dark hole.

  10. scpat says:

    I wonder why PBS is agreeing to air this documentary. Maybe all the years that have passed, and 9/11 isn’t as sensitive a topic? But still, the Establishment must know that widely exposing the lies of 9/11 would further damage government credibility and ultimately, their perceived authority.

    I’m looking forward to watching this film. With the combination of Dylan Avery and Ed Asner it should be great. The below linked video on the collapse of WTC 7 narrated by Ed Asner is what woke me up to the lies of 9/11. I remember being absolutely rocked to my core when the realization instantly sunk in.

    Architects and Engineers: Solving the Mystery of Building 7 – w/ Ed Asner

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      15 minute 5 Star video

      • CQ says:

        HRS, scpat expresses surprise that PBS is airing a short version of othe documentary SEVEN. Do you happen to remember the name of the PBS host or anchor in Denver who more than once gave AE and its videos good coverage, including during the station’s fundraising appeals? I think her first name is Sherri, or something like that.

        • HomeRemedySupply says:

          Here is one reference circa 2012 in August

          Colorado Public Television
          …Appearing live in the CPT12 studios: San Francisco Bay Area architect Richard Gage, AIA, and founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, will join Shari Bernson and Tom Colbert in the CPT12 studios for questions. Gage has recently completed a national tour with this new, landmark film (9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out)…

          Due to visionary Development Director Shari Bernson’s leadership, CPT12 is the first US broadcaster and PBS station to air content addressing alternative theories and suppressed news about the events of 9/11.
          Their US premiere broadcast of 9/11 Press for Truth in June 2009 was a successful fundraiser, but not without controversy. The station received many viewer responses, pro and con, nationally and internationally….

          (more information)

          • CQ says:

            Yes, that’s precisely what (CPT12)/who (Shari Bernson) I was thinking of, HRS. Thanks so much for finding it/her for me/us!

            (Interesting that the broadcast was titled 9/11 Press for Truth. As you know, the last three words are the name of the internet news show founded by Dan Dicks, whose YouTube channel was banned a month or so ago.)

            • HomeRemedySupply says:

              9/11: Press for Truth (also known as “Press for Truth”) is a 2006 documentary film about the September 11 attacks on the United States. Directed by the American filmmaker Ray Nowosielski, it was partially based on The Terror Timeline, by Paul Thompson. The film premiered theatrically in September 2006 in New York City and the San Francisco Bay area.
              The film follows three of the Jersey Girls (widows of individuals killed in the attacks) as well as other family members in their search for answers about what really happened on 9/11.
              9/11: Press For Truth FILM
              (53 minutes)

              • CQ says:

                Oh, yes, HRS, thanks for reminding me. I watched that documentary a long time ago; its name escaped me momentarily.

                You’re such a fount of info, archived and otherwise! 🙂

    • eat my cake says:

      But, “where did the towers go?” JW, there is stacks of unanswered evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood. I dont know which is the most succinct video, but here she is describing points that controlled demolition nor fire can explain.

      personally, I think 9/11 was pulled off with many of the same modalities being employed today: numerous angles of attack, makes many story lines none of which complete the picture, a hall of mirrors that creates clouds within clouds of obfuscation, or confused survivors (all of us) will we never know the whole truth? I suppose that exotic means (by general public standards) were also employed.. the kind of weapons that nobody knows about, yet. I think I got it from “The art of war”: “An aggressors strongest asset is the element of surprise.”

      some stuff I’m stuck on:
      Free fall speed?
      lotsa matter instantly turning to dust?
      negligible debris pile?
      “toasted” cars? not different to the odd melted? or atomically interfered with? cars in calif fire zones (search for “interferometry”)
      nose of the plane hitting the N tower emerging from the adjacent wall?
      open and empty gold vault?
      survivors in stairwell at 4th floor level (I think it was S tower?), while the entire rest of the building, 110 stories had just fallen? disappeared?
      no damage below street level?
      nil seismic imprint that would indicate that mass hitting?
      pentagon and PA., no planes? but wouldn’t people have seen a missile vs a jet liner flying over a metropolitan highway in mid morning low enough to knock over lamp posts? is there a tricky holographic way to make a missile look like a jet?
      fire fighters walking away from building 7 saying “its gonna fall”, how did they know?

      controlled demolition is a good answer for some but not all the evidence.

      • intento says:

        There are answers to the many things you raise here and this long and sometimes rambling documentary will help you find them.
        I knew when this first happened it was a put up job.
        Watching it on the TV something just was not right about the images although the motivation for starting a war was obvious and at the time I thought it was just for oil but since then I have learned a lot.
        I have sent this to James as I think he should watch it too and being such a qualified researcher I would have thought he would have seen it already?

        The moment I saw it I had one of those “aha!” moments.
        Watch it, stick with it and it will lead you to answers to the questions you ask above…

        I might have to repost this as a general comment as people need to have facts to make their minds up, life is after all about learning…

    • Octium says:

      Perhaps they are just hoping that 9/11 will take some of the heat off Bill Gates and his Husband.

  11. Tsuyoshi says:

    Some of you might have seen this already, but let me share a video I just came across and watched. It’s entitled “This Can’t Have Happened – IT Doesn’t Make Sense” and features a talk by David Icke.

  12. HomeRemedySupply says:

    A shout out to VP
    …an old, dear friend from the 70’s in Dallas, Texas.
    I heard your echo! 😉

  13. RON says:

    I always felt the 911-truth movement was a CIA psyop designed to tarpit the investigations. Remember Area-51 at the time when the military was secretly developing the SR-71 spy plane? All these rumors surfaced about UFO’s and alien autopsies. Those were the days for ufologists. The CIA discovered that outlandish conspiracy theories were the perfect cover for an actual conspiracy. When you even mentioned “Area-51” people immediately thought you were one of those crazy alien conspiracy nutters and stopped taking you seriously. From a CIA point of view, it was perfect.

    Even today, people are still investigating the actual bullet that killed JFK. It was not the bullet that killed him but the person who ordered it. The answer is never in the technicalities. If I was to setup an assassination or a false flag attack, I would make damn sure that whatever I said that happened actually happened and then cast doubt on that. People will search forever to find ‘the truth’, while me being stuck with an evil grin on my face.

    In the past 19 years the entire 911truth movement accomplished exactly nothing, just regurgitating the exact same rumors and mantra’s like “skyscrapers cannot collapse onto itself”. They never provide evidence for their axiom’s or “cannots” as I call them. Its a psychological tool, repeatingly and firmly stating that something is not possible makes people assume it is an established fact. If people who know these kind of things say so, why should I cast doubt on that? I mean, we all know there is some conspiracy going on and just let these people investigate, right?

    Did you ever look for statistics on skyscrapers with similar architecture, collapsing or not collapsing due to airliners loaded with tons of kerosene crashing into them? Did anyone ever reproduce the events in a full size reconstruction? There is not a whole lot to go with is there? Maybe the architecture was just crap and those towers DID just collapse from airliners loaded with tons of kerosene crashing into them. FWIW, I am an engineer.

    They never ask the real questions that actually matter. Qui bono? They do not investigate the perpetrators, the Bin Ladens, the Saudi royal family and their connection with the Bushes. The neo-conservative movement that needed another ‘catalyzing event’ is rarely mentioned. Millions of man-hours are wasted chasing ghosts. I remember clearly the “OMG they really went ahead with this”-look on Bush Jr’s face when he was told what just transpired, that famous clip when he was reading fairy tales to toddlers. That man has some answers and a bunch of other man have answers too.

    • RON says:

      In addition to the above. Buildings sometimes do collapse in a fire and sometimes they don’t, or only partially. It depends on many factors. Collapsed or not, those buildings would have been total-loss and many would have been killed in both scenario’s.

      If the instigators organised some airliners crashing into the towers, why would they also rig them with explosives? Imagine the workforce and coordination required to place the charges without anybody noticing. Many people would have to be involved without anyone spilling the beans. First rule of any conspiracy is: Do not talk about the conspiracy. You can guess the second rule. Then why would you take a huge risk and get a large workforce to do the dirty work? Hiring a few kamikaze pilots is just perfect. Dead men tell no tales.

      If the instigators could opt for collapse, they would have done so, but not with all risks involved. Even if they did, why would they make a controlled demolition look like a controlled demolition? To make an average building collapse onto itself is actually quite hard. I requires experts who can do the math and know what they are doing. If some columns do not break or if not all charges explode at exactly the right moment, the building would not come straight down. So why would the instigators deliberately make it look like one? It does not make any sense. Nothing about the 911truth movement makes any sense unless it is a psyop.

      Then why did they collapse straight down? Look at its peculiar architecture. It was like an exoskeleton with floors just bolted onto the walls. On one side of one floor, many bolts were smashed away by the impact, causing a significant section to hang on a few bolts on the edges of the impact crater. Given enough time and heat, those bolts give way, then more weight hangs on the next bolts, who also fail, etc. All bolts failing in rapid succession. One floor drops onto the next, the impact breaks that floor off the walls, then the double floor sandwich crashes onto the third. Air pressure blowing dust out of shattering windows every time a floor gives way looks like explosions. There may even have been some flashes from electric shorts.

      • lovetodust says:

        And the tons of solid steel beams holding up those floors?

        I’m not an expert but I can’t see fires or one plane demolishing those.

      • flammable says:

        I agree and disagree with. Yes I suspect a psy-op too. Yes a plane that large hitting the towers would still cause thousands of deaths and render the building unusable. However I cannot doubt explosives were used or explosions happened. I disagree with the controlled demolition. What I think happened was certain offices engaging in risking investigations and carrying sensitive data were blown up to guarantee it’s destruction. A controlled demolition may be too much work but sneaking in bombs to take out a few offices can be done. Especially with some unknown company called Ace Elevator being allowed to work in the renowned WTC buildings. But I could be falling for a psy-op too.

        This particular psyop over the building physics is a very simple trick. I believe the government purposely provided a faulty explanation of the collapse so most truthers will take the easy bait. In fact I am concern since we are using the mainstream physics to explain how skyscrapers couldn’t collapse in such a way. What makes us so sure that a building surviving a jetliner crash isn’t bogus like plenty of other mainstream scientific studies?

    • mkey says:

      I am an engineer as well. Planes don’t fly on a few hundred feet altitude good 100mph above their top cruising speed on 10.000 feet. The atmosphere does not allow that.

      • eat my cake says:

        thanks mkey. that statement is backed up by more than a few pilot interviews.

        Ron, you are an engineer? what type? your observation of factual evidence demands reproof. you aren’t acknowledging anything in my list of questions above.

        as for who got the money? the bush short that was worth trillions. Silberstein’s double insurance claim, do you need more than lotsa?

        there are elements of psyop, true; such as “the muslims did it lets go wipe em out..” but if you really think all the effort to explain other causes of tower collapse than planes crashing is meaningless, then you are feeding the obstacle. why would you?

        The abuses on humanity that came as and from that act, the enormous scale of murder, the pathetic thievery & degusting lies, your claim that the movement for truth hasnt gotten anywhere is a giveaway that you are ignoring the factual bread and butter statics of elementary structural engineering.

        One antidote to ignorance is to see with a wide open horizon/mind.

  14. rob32367 says:

    After his brother’s death on 9/11, Campbell worked with Tony Rourke on the excellent documentary “Incontrovertible “

    That looks at many of the lies our govt have told us from JFK to MLK to the war machine and concentrating on the 9/11 lie. Highly recommend watching it.

  15. padraig says:

    is it possible that folks got freaked out at how close the van bombs came to collapsing the two towers that they wired them for destruction in case of future problems? from what i understand and have learned, the owners would believe it to be a unfortunate but necessary noble lie. it’s another deep state event so entangled in the world of spooks that you can’t be sure of anything. i wonder how the clean up of the two damaged towers would have happened. i can’t see repair even possible. i’ve wired towers my entire career. i cannot, for the life of me, envision the repair. thus you’d have to cut the remainder of the towers down. the cost beyond imagination. (though i guess beyond imagination has to be tweaked apres this plandemic). shutting down Manhattan used to be unimaginable. the logistics of cleaning up the mess made necessary the quick collapse. and the ‘quick’ tidy up. all good. except….. some assclown shot down the 3’rd fucking plane! now what? well building 7 HAD to go down. oops. wait til everyone’s had a breath. a drink. gathering the clan together. quietly drop the structure at supper. that’ll work!

    • Jed says:

      Things to consider around 9/11 WTC
      – Empty office space- there were a lot of empty offices affording access to all different areas of those towers.
      – High Security- after the ‘93 event one didn’t just come and go out of there, with draconian security provided by Marvin Bush, W’s brother.
      – WTC 1 & 2 were constructed differently than WTC 7. 1 & 2 were more akin to pipe scaffolding, plenty strong though when married to their central elevator columns, while 7 was old school steel and concrete. All collapsed pretty much the same.

      Here’s a local-yocal story. An engineer who worked on the WTC project from the early 60’s retired here (E’LI) and used to frequent a local bar/restaurant. When poked/joked by his friends who’d ask when those towers he worked on would topple over, he’d always answer that they would never topple over, rather they could only come straight down as per the laws of physics.

      • HomeRemedySupply says:

        Ya’ll bring up an extremely important aspect about 9/11 which correlates very well with the Covid 2020 scenario.

        A lot of folks in power are milking the benefits from this current tragedy.
        Even the two-bit players are grabbing what they can.

  16. Mislav says:

    Hello all,

    I wanted to share a video I made at the Berlin protest on 29.08.2020.
    This is not something I usually do, travel Europe to join protests and make videos, however, I feel the need to do most that I can in these troubling times.

    Hope you will enjoy it and please feel free to use any part of it.
    It was a great day for sure 🙂

  17. Droves of Perception says:

    I still never gt an explanation of why the Judy Wood theory is attacked and rejected by Richard Gage. Why does their information need to be framed as contradiction? The video evidence shows steel, fading to dust. Just because we can’t explain this doesn’t mean that we have to exclude and ignore this, explosions and all.

  18. Steve Smith says:

    This appears to be quite a comprehensive collection of information on 911.

  19. Steve Smith says:

    Great Job at the Justice Rising conference James.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top