Interview 1475 - The News on Declare Your Independence

09/05/20199 Comments

via Ernest Hancock interviews James Corbett on a variety of world news headlines. Topics include 9/11 news, media manipulation, Dave Chappelle, the Plunge Protection Team, etc...

VIDEO COURTESY: Declare Your Independence

When is the News Not the News? – #PropagandaWatch

Episode 319 – Psychographics 101

Another Conspiracy Confirmed: How the Plunge Protection Team Rigs the Markets

In Unprecedented, Shocking Proposal, BOE's Mark Carney Urges Replacing Dollar With Libra-Like Reserve Currency

Dave Chappelle's Impressions Are Insanely Accurate

UPDATE – Dr. Tim Ball wins @MichaelEMann lawsuit – Mann “hides the decline” AGAIN

The Great Global Warming Swindle

At Hong Kong Swearing-In, Some Lawmakers Pepper Their Oath With Jabs

Filed in: Interviews
Tagged with:

Comments (9)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. HomeRemedySupply says:

    “I don’t put stock in that quote,” says James in reference to Larry Silverstein and “pull it”. (just past the 5 minute mark)
    I lean with James on this.

    However, if the following lost video is ever found and Tony Szamboti is right, then it becomes a whole new ball game. (Listen to the interview)

  2. HomeRemedySupply says:

    I guess Corbett and Hancock and the University of Alaska and thousands of architects, engineers and professionals are wrong about World Trade Center Building 7.

    ASSOCIATED PRESS – June 13 2017
    AP FACT CHECK: Fire, not demolition, brought down WTC towers
    Blah blah blah blah… …This story is part of an ongoing Associated Press effort to fact-check claims in suspected false news stories.

  3. HomeRemedySupply says:

    “very” soon Corbett will release his 9/11 video.

  4. manbearpig says:

    Dunno… maybe it’s ’cause first impressions die hard… but I have trouble imagining Larry Silverstein’s talking about the firefighters with his “we decided to pull”… In fact, though the recording seems slightly clipped, like Mr. Hancock, I hear “pull IT”:

    you mean like…”it”, the intervention?….?

    Without suggesting that it’s the most vital piece of the puzzle,

    I’d be interested in “hearing” some compelling reasons why Mr. Silverstein did NOT let the proverbial cat outa the bag with that…

    • manbearpig says:


      I really should have put this video. This short 11-minute video gets more and more compelling as it goes along, reflecting at least my own position that is

      I don’t need to go on a wild goose chase for a video where he actually says verbatim that it was “a controlled demolition” (even if I believe this interview exists and that I even saw it myself)

      which certainly would make me a bad researcher (should I aspire to be one) and even if, like the debates about EXACTLY what more or less exotic technology brought down the twin towers, this whole “pull it” psychosis is a red herring,

      it’s perty darn clear to me what he meant by “Pull it” despite the colossal attempts to spin it.
      I mean honestly.

      But I’m quite open to compelling arguments to the contrary!!

      • HomeRemedySupply says:

        I want to mention that I don’t care what opinion a person has on this “pull it” issue. It does not make me think more, nor less, about that individual’s integrity.

        Larry Silverstein and “Pull It”
        This has long been a controversial issue in the 9/11 Truth Community.

        Some of my buddies swear “‘pull it’ means “demolition”.

        I once had the opinion that “pull it” inferred that Larry Silverstein was talking about demolition.

        But it was “inference”, a conjecture, a speculation.

        For me, it is not a hardcore fact that Larry’s statement “We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.” meant “we decided to take the building down in a demolition”.
        Here are just a few of my reasons, besides “inference” of the phrase…

        ~~ With PBS or any film crew, we don’t know the full context and emotions nor surrounding conversations, nor edited clips. We just don’t have all the data.

        ~~ In my opinion, if an interviewer caught wind of Larry admitting that Building 7 was a controlled demolition based on Larry’s decision, then right then and there the interviewer would query Larry further. It would be a big scoop. A huge story in 2004. And even if, PBS cut out ‘Larry’s admission’ from the tape, likely a film crew member might leak the info. It would be a big story.

        ~~ Logistically, it does not make sense that Larry Silverstein would have any control or say about “when to bring down Building 7”.
        Planning of the 9/11 Event probably had the building slated to come down in the morning. Barry Jennings’s testimony corroborates the explosions and damage in the morning. But the perpetrators flubbed the morning demolition when the Building would have been shielded by the smoke from the Twin Towers.

        In short, most 9/11 Researchers, believe that Building 7 came down at 5:20pm because the perpetrators flubbed the first go at it in the morning. The perps were probably scrambling to get that thing down. I doubt that Larry had the final say of “when” in the perpetrator chain of authority.

        All in all, we just don’t know. Not for sure for sure.

        Anyway, that is my take.

        • HomeRemedySupply says:

          Here is Ae911Truth’s…
          FAQ #11: Did WTC 7 owner Larry Silverstein admit to ordering the controlled demolition of the building?

          …In the end, whether or not Silverstein admitted to personally authorizing the controlled demolition of WTC 7 has no bearing on the evidence presented by AE911Truth. The scientific, forensic, and eyewitness evidence surrounding the building’s destruction proves beyond any reasonable doubt that it was intentionally demolished. While Silverstein’s actions as the leaseholder of the Twin Towers and the owner of Building 7 should be thoroughly examined with suspicion, only an unimpeachable, independent criminal investigation can determine who was responsible for destroying the WTC skyscrapers.

        • manbearpig says:

          Well HRS, I appreciate your take on this.

          I’ll have to go really fast ’cause I’m out the door at 6;45 this morning:

          -I’ll repeat that I don’t think this infamous “pull it” will ever be of any use to anyone ever in proving anything BUT

          -for my own understanding and despite the mental gymnastics one must constantly perform to try to make sense of this or anything else that goes on in this nutty world, by “Pull it”

          It’s very clear he meant destroy the building.

          “…In short, most 9/11 Researchers, believe that Building 7 came down at 5:20pm because the perpetrators flubbed the first go at it in the morning. The perps were probably scrambling to get that thing down…”

          As I was showing a student the Barry Jennings video yesterday I made that very remark: that they had certainly wanted it to go down at the same time as the first two. But it was an idea I’ve only thought about recently… I think…

          So if they can flub bringing down the building at a credible time (5:20 in the afternoon is NOT a credible time considering the way it fell), they can flub explanations to the press.

          But as incredible as flubbing the “pull it” may seem, under the stress and perhaps underestimating the pressure of the media et al for answers, the chaos and improvisation necessary that day, I’m sure the greedy accomplice to mass murder Mr. Silverstein could very well have blurted out that “pull it” either by accident like an idiot or on purpose to create a wild goose chase.

          Reality is always stranger than fiction and the evil and stupidity of people in high places of power and money never cease to astound us all. As does their evil competence at other times.

          I’m particularly allergic to that phrase “We’ll never know”. That’s the dismissive thing I hear everyday, everywhere in response to these important issues though I know in your case, not only do you care, but you ACT.

          However, concerning the “pull it”, maybe you’ll never know,
          but I already know.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top