Interview 1390 – James Corbett on Displacing the Dinosaur Media

09/21/201838 Comments

The fake establishment lapdog corporate crony mockingbird mouthpiece dinosaur media has finally learned that no one pays attention to the fake establishment lapdog corporate crony mockingbird mouthpiece dinosaur media anymore. This is humorous, but also worrying. James Corbett discusses what it feels like now that the Eye of Sauron is gazing directly at The Corbett Report in his latest instalment of Financial Survival with Melody Cedarstrom.

Watch this video on BitChute / DTube / YouTube

SHOW NOTES:
Political Extremists Are Using YouTube to Monetize Their Toxic Ideas

Jon Stewart / Jim Cramer Extended Interview

False Flags Over Syria

Bomb that killed 40 children in Yemen was supplied by the US

Obama First US President To Chair UN Security Council

Trump to chair U.N. Security Council meeting on Iran

Poland offers up to $2 billion for a permanent US military presence

Abe wins party vote, on track for record term

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Filed in: Interviews
Tagged with:

Comments (38)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. scpat says:

    YouTube soft censorship, Prop or Not, and now MSM Mother Jones. James, you have really made it. Congrats.

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      So true, scpat.
      Every hit piece is much like a “badge of honor”.

      We often see military dress uniforms decorated with ribbons and medals.

      Corbett’s T-shirt is gaining quite a collection of ornaments.

      While a general might have 4 or 5 stars, certainly The Corbett Report has 5 stars as an independent, open source, listener-supported, alternative news service.

  2. n4x5 says:

    Some of these MSM hit pieces are so ludicrous, so easily refutable, serving to draw attention to the very alternative media sources they attack, that I’m almost prone to wonder if some of them are done by MSM journalists whose consciences have gotten the better of them and are working to undermine their employers from within.

  3. Redneard says:

    Here’s an idea: Have a female speaker re-narrate Century of Enslavement and post it under the moniker “History of Money Fascism” or “Racist Bankers and Monetary Hate Crimes” or some such jumble of relevant, virtue signaling trigger words. Could this be applied on a larger scale? Duplicate existing work and simply replace the narration and vocabulary with voices and language that appeal to different specific subgroups outside the truth movement, renaming them with titular buzzwords that work with the outrage programming to create idea funnels, all while keeping the core information intact, linking to the source material in all variants? If we all did this, flooded the tubeshpere with countless modified copies of truth media under the guise of state propaganda, couched in their own language, how would the censorbots respond?

    Pieces on eugenics could be presented as “Nazi Hate Groups and the Modern Genetic Holocaust”

    Tying that back with the green movement and (particularly third world) depopulation efforts becomes “Climate Change and Corpro-Imperial Racism”

    Could this help to short circuit the outrage and censorship mechanisms? Or at least help to funnel people within our individual spheres of influence from the outrage to a more fact based mindset? This is obviously slippery territory, and I can’t tell if it’s a good idea or not. What do you think? Would such phenomena be effective, or simply increase the intensity of censorship efforts?

    • Fawlty Towers says:

      Interesting idea if implemented rigorously.

      We already have an informal version of this whenever someone ‘steals’ another person’s work (or portion of it) and just throws a new title onto the video.

      Perhaps it could be best implemented by just a few savvy individuals who know how to tweak titles to target all the right groups.

      If it is carried out, I sure hope the original authors are credited as such and retain full rights to their work.

      • Redneard says:

        Yes, rigorous and consistent implementation would be key. This would be a massive (though not insurmountable) undertaking for a small crew. Obviously a larger community participation would disperse that workload, and perhaps create a more dynamic filter subverting mechanism.

        I agree, content attribution is one of the slippery parts. How to conduct such an operation and not detract from creators?

        Since the idea would focus on groups and individuals who would otherwise not consume or be driven away from this media, I don’t know how much detraction would be going on. If done correctly, we could have some breadcrumb trail situation leading back to the source material, theoretically driving more traffic to content originators in the long run. That would be one of the main points of the exercise, direct awareness to truth media outlets.

        The other being to subvert and confuse the very censorship algorithms which are actively diverting potential viewers.

        Hopefully blockchain will hurry up and revolutionize content attribution already.

    • manbearpig says:

      At any rate it was very funny!

      …outmarket the slave marketers using their own emotionally charged spin vocab…I like it… Let’s Wag their damn dog!

      could backfire…

      have to think this through…

      • Redneard says:

        I was considering how it could backfire. The scheme would surely be heaped in with reasons to push net legislation, unless of course the whole story was presented as “far/alt right using regulatory censorship to propagate ideas; How Silicon Valley’s Secret Facist Underground is Using Censorship to Drive the Public to Extremism – restrictive legislation is just one tool they’re using to cement their goals.”

        It can then be made clear that the only way to neutralize the problem is to migrate to platforms where there are no censorship mechanisms to be gamed.

        Pair that with an examination of the question, “what produces more extremism; censorship, or monetization?” From here, one may argue that extremism is purely a byproduct of censorship and the suppression of ideas.

        Compare the results of man-made religion (the crusades, literally any terrible human activity you can think of,) to the agora, i.e. a general increase in the quality of life and sentient choice. It may be noted that the evils of ‘modern capitalism’ find their genesis in the historical monetization of extremism, and is therefore itself the product of a censorship dating back thousands of years, a sort of technology initiated by the first group of peoples to forcibly restrict the resources and actions of another.

        As for more immediate results we could think of who would and would not become aware of the true nature of such a ploy, and within that who would be enticed or repelled by a given video or vocabulary.

        If they are unaware and enticed by the language, then they are exposed to the truth and source material with a positive correlation, footing for the facts, so to speak.

        If they are unaware and repelled by the language, those particular buzzwords may lose their efficacy.

        If they become aware and are repelled by the scheme, perhaps this will cause them to distrust and further analyze such trigger-laden phrasing in the future.

        If they become aware and are enticed by the scheme, well then great.

        Aside from altering existing content, creators could also use this idea as a framework for original projects. I’m sure this is being implemented to some extent.

        It’s kind of a stinky trick but it makes me smile.

        • wall says:

          Yeah, but what platforms aren’t censored? I mean, I was looking at Luke Rudkowksi’s Parkland vid and it doesn’t even work. The twirly thing twirls about but the vid never plays. I tried emailing him about it and got no reply.
          https://d.tube/#!/v/lukewearechange/r221zfuw

          So, Dtube is censored.

          Then my own minds account has not had ANY new views in weeks. The videos seem to work, but the view count has been frozen. I am not saying that I should have many views, but they are completely frozen. And with me posting the links here there had to have been a least a few people that stumbled across them.

          Then I have had complaints that the video on my bitchute video doesn’t work, although the audio does.

          And I cannot find my accounts or videos in a search on either site.

          So, is there any platform that is not censored? THAT is the question.

          Here are the links of the vids I put up if you want to see for yourself.

          Mass shooting: questions, curiosities, statements and solution

          https://www.bitchute.com/video/XmMoxsDhV5xU/

          Here it is on minds.com if the above link doesn’t work. Some have complained that only the audio plays in the bitchute link.

          part 1
          https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/875263159189942272

          part2
          https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/875266535273312256

          part 3
          https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/875269992244809728

          • wall says:

            Huh, funny, if you go to Minds.com and type in “mass shooting” (without the quotation marks), my videos, linked above, are the first to show up.

            That is odd considering that the view counts have not budged.

            The first time I searched for them I had not clicked on the videos tab.

    • AnimalsArentFood says:

      lol, this is priceless. I genuinely want to give it a try.

      • Redneard says:

        It could be as simple as choosing a video, acquiring a transcript, fiddling with the language, and re-narrating via screen capture. Then just slap on a clever name and send it on its way. I wonder what would happen if everybody did just one? Doesn’t even have to be as long or well-crafted as COE…

        Might be good for people who want to elevate their involvement to the next level but aren’t quite ready or inclined to produce video content themselves.

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      Redneard,
      I liked this one “Racist Bankers and Monetary Hate Crimes”.

      • Redneard says:

        Me too, it’s completely accurate. Pretty much any combination of “hate, lies and theft” would be true, regardless of how sensational.

  4. Nevertheless says:

    If the so called “elites” (they are not elites, they are thieving psychopaths) did off McShame I would have to revisit my negative opinion of them. But in all seriousness, McShame was a class A Zionist puppet, not something that the psychopathic scum would wish to rid them selves of, quite to the contrary.

    More likely the cognitive dissonance between the actions of McShame and that of a actual human were so great his brain exploded.
    He is in the deepest pits of hell.

  5. Nevertheless says:

    And there is no reason not to include the statement regarding Jewish bankers, that would certainly not be in error.

  6. zyxzevn says:

    Stephan Molyneux has a good breakdown/rebuttal of the
    Youtube censorship manifesto.
    See: https://www.bitchute.com/video/2j2gmMrqKgM/

    The George Soros’ Open Society Foundation funded Data & Society Research Institute recently released a report titled “Alternative Influence: Broadcasting the Reactionary Right on YouTube” by Rebecca Lewis. The report claimed that 65 political commentators had created a “Alternative Influence Network” by adopting “brand influencer” techniques with the goal of “selling” a far-right political ideology. The “Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon” style report sought draw collaborative connections between many political commentators including Stefan Molyneux – and far-right ideology, and was thus widely spread by the mainstream media.

    Generally the the manifesto wants to forbid people to be intelligent and to make up their own minds. OBEY!

  7. Fawlty Towers says:

    Great show James!
    You really hit the nail on the head with this one.
    Very focused.

    I personally became so disgusted with a certain Canadian ‘Dinasaur Medium’s blatant censorship of comments a year ago that I have permanently relegated it to the dust bin.

  8. AnimalsArentFood says:

    In this episode of James Corbett: Partisan Zombie Neutralizer
    Melody, once again, cautiously attempts to lure James into the pro-Trump, anti-“liberal” bubble that so many of her listeners reside in.
    James cleverly counters with a reminder that Trump is chairing a U.N. security council meeting with essentially zero negative response, even though Obama was thoroughly bashed for doing the same thing.

  9. manbearpig says:

    the latest Syrian news I found easily…:

    Dangers, Opportunities for Turkey in Idlib Deal, Analysts Say:

    “…Ankara now faces the formidable task of removing radical Islamist groups, along with the heavy weapons of rebel forces, from a 15- to 20-kilometer zone by October 15…

    …The leverage Turkey has is that Turkey is still supporting the Free Syrian Army and many other groups. From the very beginning, they have looked to Turkey for support in fighting [Syrian President] Bashar al-Assad,” according to international relations professor Huseyin Bagci of Ankara’s Middle East Technical University…

    …Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov stepped up the pressure on Ankara. “Nusra Front terrorists should leave this demilitarized zone by mid-October; all heavy weaponry should be withdrawn from there,” Lavrov told a press conference Friday…”

    voanews.com/a/turkey-russia-syria-idlib-deal/4582028.html

    Turkey’s ambiguous game in Syria: Erdogan ordered to take sides:

    “…Within this context, Turkey has but two alternatives:

    – Take sides with Russia and Iran, or, at least adopt a neutral position with regards to any Syrian offensive against Idlib, exactly as it did during the autumn 2016 battle of Aleppo.

    – Or choose outright confrontation by opposing the Syrian army forcing itself into war with Russia and, perhaps even provoking a conflict between Russia and NATO. A catastrophic scenario….”

    french.almanar.com.lb/1043660

    Russian IL-20 Surveillance Plane Went Down Off Syrian Coast During Israeli Missile Barrage (Updated)

    “…The increasingly convoluted war in Syria is highly susceptible to a major miscalculation that could spark an international crisis…

    …France denies any involvement in the downing of the Russian IL-20 Surveillance plane off the Syrian coast…Auvergne is an Aquitaine-class, or FREMM multipurpose frigate, that carries both Missile de Croisière Naval (MdCN) land-attack cruise missiles and Aster 15 surface-to-air missiles. In April 2018, her sister ship Languedoc took part in a massive U.S.-led missile barrage against Syrian chemical weapons-related sites…
    …According to Moscow, four F-16s approached Latakia at low altitude from the Mediterranean. A statement from the Russian Ministry of Defense obtained by RT.com reads:

    “The Israeli pilots used the Russian plane as cover and set it up to be targeted by the Syrian air defense forces. As a consequence, the Il-20, which has radar cross-section much larger than the F-16, was shot down by an S-200 system missile.”

    thedrive.com/the-war-zone/23655/russian-il-20-surveillance-plane-went-down-off-syrian-coast-during-israeli-missile-barrage

  10. wall says:

    I will spam this again as I have no other way to get it out. And I think youtube would pull it down even if I did manage to upload it.

    This video is about the Parkland shooting.

    It has the video of the student who claimed 1 shooter was coming in from 1 entrance, and that when they ran to the other entrance another shooter came through that entrance. This proves that there was more than 1 shooter.

    It also has large screenshots of the David Hogg mugshots, and the audio of the closet interview where Hogg says that it is 9:32 which shows the video was recorded 5 hours before the event and many other interesting things.

    Mass shooting: questions, curiosities, statements and solution

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/XmMoxsDhV5xU/

    Here it is on minds.com if the above link doesn’t work. Some have complained that only the audio plays in the bitchute link.

    part 1
    https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/875263159189942272

    part2
    https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/875266535273312256

    part 3
    https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/875269992244809728

  11. wall says:

    Oh, this should be interesting to all of you.

    3D gun advocate accused of sex with minor is jailed in US

    https://www.mail.com/news/us/8753586-3d-gun-advocate-accused-sex-with-minor-jailed-us.html#.23140-stage-mmm1-2

  12. Lumen says:

    Displacing the Dinosaur Media. Interview is with Carla Ortiz

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCu8mNC1JyE

  13. jrgjrg says:

    There are two ways to cover up the truth. One is to lie. The second is to tell the truth through a discredited source. A discredited alternative media unfortunately serves an insidious useful purpose for the propagandists.

    • manbearpig says:

      Very good point.

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      ditto… Good Point.

    • manbearpig says:

      One variant of this phenomenon is that Trump is now the mascot, in the eyes of much of the world, of the “climate skeptics” who do not believe humans are causeing global warming (though many if not most people believe that “climate skeptics” believe there is no global warming).

      could be trump or his equivalent fox news or faux news (faux meaning false)…

  14. jrgjrg says:

    Independent Israeli TV reporter says 200 US and UK military “advisors” to ISIL (oops!) are trapped in Idlib, and NATO ally Turkey won’t grant them safe passage out. Russia warning US to get them out to avoid US-Russian military confrontation.

  15. generalbottlewasher says:

    I’ve had time now to think about the big picture of the dinosaur media. As a propaganda tool , this group (here, now) is aware of the agenda. That agenda, to me, seems to be driving us like cattle to the railhead. Much like the old TV western ” Raw Hide”. We all know who profited from and what the destinations for the cattle will be. For the cattle, they are ” no longer in Kansas “.
    We have believed the media as ” truth sayers “, the protectors of the Republic. However we, the awakening masses know them as the defenders of ” democracy”. Ruled by the Mob. Just as the Bilderburgs and the Royal Institute of International Affairs have so created, as confirmed by Caroll Quigley’s book The Anglo-American Establishment.
    What now for the media? The best counter- intelligent move now that all credibility has been destroyed by the PTSB, and the populaces are wary and off balance, would be to let go, have no more need or expense in controlling the narratives. Let it return to its sanctimonious mission of the forth branch of government. No one will believe in the message, mission or purpose. Chaos of the mind. Or change the name, venue, format and let it run wild confusing and debilitating the real goal of the invested Republic reporter. Time will tell. They love to mock and keep you profane of balance.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top