Interview 1088 – Black Op Radio: 9/11 Research

09/11/20155 Comments

911squareToday James joins Len Osanic of Black Op Radio to talk about the 9/11 false flag. They discuss the psyop aspects of the attacks as well as those pieces of evidence that directly contradict the narrative of the attacks.

SHOW NOTES:
9/11: A Conspiracy Theory

NSPD-9

Taleban in Texas for talks on gas pipeline

Forbidden Truth: U.S.-Taliban Secret Oil Diplomacy

Alleged hijackers drank alcohol in bars

Mohamed Atta: Pork Chop Lover. Cocaine User.

Mohamed Atta lived with pink-haired stripper

System Planning Corporation’s Flight Termination System

Reuters 2013 investigation: Pentagon can’t track $8.5 trillion

9/11 Commission Members Doubt Official Story

9/11 Insider Trading Explained (Corbett Report members)

9/11 Insider Trading Explained (Non-Corbett Report members)

9/11 and Cyberterrorism: Did the real “cyber 9/11” happen on 9/11?

Rebuilding America’s Defenses

Operation Northwoods

Michael Springmann on Visas for Al Qaeda

Dean Haglund blows the whistle on The Lone Gunmen pilot episode

Who Is Really Behind ISIS?

What Happened to the WTC Gold on 9/11?

Meet Allen Dulles: Fascist Spymaster

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Filed in: Interviews
Tagged with:

Comments (5)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. LisaW says:

    Excellent podcast today. Thanks James. It the Black Ops Radio host the same man who posts videos on YouTube under The X22 Report?

  2. candideschmyles says:

    A good sober discussion was that. Being so sober it brought home how daunting a task it is to get it across just how much evidence there is against the official narrative. And the sheer absurdity that it is difficult at all is bizarre in its own right. An idea occurred to me that a YouTube video that was a montage of many of ordinary people who do know the truth speaking a line or two of a concise yet coherent joining the dots narrative, distilled into a 1/2 hr or less, could be very powerful. I know the style is far from an original concept but I have noted that the many uses of such a montage are memorable and effective in carrying a meme. From pop video to celebrity fund raising the style gets attention. Even better if its younger folk who are still looking good and sane.

    We do have to take some encouragement that the comprehensibility of the events (and the evidence in support of them) discussed here was not possible to find even 5 years ago with the same ‘matter of fact’ casualness as we heard here. We have joined the dots. It’s shocked us, which is why we are here. And its digested and had time to settle in the mind. Such huge events need that time I suppose.

  3. doublek321 says:

    Agreed w/ Lisa. Excellent podcast. I listened last night but want to listen again today. Chock full of info.

    James – looking forward to the podcast-umentary mentioned that you were working on in the NWNW episode.

  4. john says:

    It really occurs to me listening to this — and no offense to any other alt media voices out there — how truly excellent James is at doing this stuff. Some of the people out there, and bless their cotton socks, but their level of analysis is on the order of: “Dude, the way those buildings went down? No WAY!” Which is fine but it often stays right there at that level. James does actual work. He brings actual research to bear on these issues, and applies it analytically. It’s really unusual and so valuable. There are not a lot of people doing that.

    Just thought I’d take a moment to note how much I appreciate it. THANK YOU.

    • Corbett says:

      Thank you for the kind words, John. I try not to take myself too seriously but I do take this work and these subjects very seriously and it’s good to know that the effort I’ve put into this work is not unnoticed. Once again, thanks belong to you and all the members here for making this work possible.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top