What We Didn't Learn At Bilderberg 2017

06/06/201710 Comments

What do we know about the secret, behind-closed-door globalist soiree that was Bilderberg 2017 in Chantilly, Virginia? Only what the Bilderbergers told us, and we know they're lying to us about who is in attendance so why should we trust them about anything? This year James breaks down what we were and weren't told about what was happening at Bilderberg, and what other globalist conferences might be worth keeping our eye on.

CLICK HERE for the BitChute version of this video

CLICK HERE for the YouTube version of this video

Bilderberg 2017 - Official Press Release

Bilderberg 2017 - Official Participants List

Skeltong Catches Latorre At Bilderberg

Mark Anderson interviewed by Press For Truth

Press For Truth YouTube channel

New York City mayor affirms city's plan to carry out Paris climate agreement commitments

2017 Chicago Forum on Global Cities

Filed in: Videos
Tagged with:

Comments (10)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. miggrado says:

    About Latorre: this could be more about the decadent government party. As this year, Albert Rivera, one of oposition leaders was invited, seems Cebrian ( Bilderberg´s man in Spain) was pressured to include some President`s men in the list (other years was president`s niece) this one would be De Guindos. La Torre is in the World Bank thanks to De Guindos.
    Uomo D´Onore! (Just a joke)




  2. larshlaustsen says:

    Two participants that seemed odd to me were:

    Gianotti, Fabiola (ITA), Director General, CERN
    Rosén, Johanna (SWE), Professor in Materials Physics, Linköping University

    Why would two physicists be attending Bilderberg?

    • Corbett says:

      There was some speculation in the video I linked to in this past weekend’s newsletter on “CERN Exposed”


      But, in short, we don’t know. Also possible that it’s a red herring as Bilderberg knows that the only people who are poring over these participant lists and agendas are the conspiracy realists. We have to keep in mind that everything that is in these Bilderberg-supplied documents are things that the Bilderbergers want us to see. It doesn’t necessarily mean that everything is some sort of psyop or distraction, but there’s bound to be some of that mixed in and without reliable intel from inside there’s no way for us to differentiate.

      • ralphodavis says:

        “It doesn’t necessarily mean that everything is some sort of psyop or distraction..”

        So, ..why does that read like famous last words pertaining to Bloodierberg? Surely a shiver ran down your spine, James, as the characters so fatefully marched across your screen.

        As always, of course, we merely have to out-live the interim.. until said genius ideas discussed therein manifest, as often enough, in full lethality, say, on London bridges and the like.

        Clearly, then, one drawback to that delay method is if you happen to be on the unlucky end of said secreted bridge policy discussions, (SBPDs), in their graphic articulation, of sorts, on the BBC, CNN, CBS, etc, in full script of terror-color-code commentary.

        Anyway, as former intelligence asset Frank Zappa once oozed; ‘..it can’t happen here’.

    • mik says:

      James provided a link to PFT interview with Jason Bermas and here is the link to interview with the same guy made by We are change.


      Well, Jason Bermas connect the dots to usual suspects, but in doing this he inappropriately oversimplifies, or maybe he doesn’t know what is he talking about.
      I’m inclined to the latter, particularly after watching his interview with We are change.

      Jason is talking about qbits as sub-atom particles and to make things worse also adding to the mix about some harnessing of energy from parallel universes(WTF).

      Here are two links explaining qbits in quantum computing.

      Quantum Computing ‘Magic’ – Computerphile

      How Does a Quantum Computer Work?

      For AI quantum computing is not necessary. Years ago computer beat Garry Kasparov in chess. Pretty straight forward computing was used for this. Last year Google’s computer AlphaGo beat human in Go game. Complexity of Go game surpasses chess many, many times. AlphaGo uses neural networks running on standard computers.

      Google computer wins final game against S. Korean Go master

      Nice intro for understanding neural networks

      Deep Dream (Google) – Computerphile

      Neural networks don’t need supercomputers. Even internal structure of neural network is not so important as is quantity of data that is used in the process of their learning.

      Visualizing and Understanding Deep Neural Networks by Matt Zeiler

      But there are some problems of NP computational complexity, not solvable with standard computers, that are believed could be solved with quantum computers. For example cracking RSA encryption(public, private key).

      P vs. NP and the Computational Complexity Zoo

      And at the end of the day, there are problems that are not solvable, like Halting problem (Turing and, of course my favorite, Goedel)

      part 2

      Bilderberg cockroaches are always up to something, but we shall not mystify.

  3. PeaceFroggs says:

    Has anyone pieced together a sort of time-line of past Bilderberg meeting agenda’s which correlate with world events that unfolded the following year?

  4. grbcpt says:

    California has the Brown Act, which prohibits informal meetings of 2 or more municipal board members outside of official meeting events. This is obviously intended to curtail shadow/unrepresentative decision-making outside of the public eye.

    One wonders why there is so little outcry (let alone a legal prohibition) over groups like Bilderberg, whose membership include elected/appointed governmental officials, and which has been established explicitly to operate outside the public eye, eschewing completely the notion of transparency in governance.

    And speaking of shadow governance, I am wondering if James is at all following the open source investigation of George Webb into the Seth Rich murder? It deserves great skepticism, but is nonetheless completely fascinating. George has even referenced the Corbett Report in his YouTube podcasts. Just wondering what James’ take is.

  5. ralphodavis says:

    Uh-0h, grbcpt, ..now you’ve really stepped in something apparently more odious to discussion on decent, politically polite, neo-alt-semi-rad-but-don’t-push-it too-far narrative abiding websites, ..than the color apropos Brown Act. Hope you were not wearing the deep lugs.

    Webb’s gained some serious, well earned traction now evidenced by +40k subscribers since he illuminated the deservedly reemergent deep-dark-state Seth Rich murder. No case is more symbolic and definitive of our current, runaway mutating strain of contagious, degenerative political corruption, imho.

    It’s an unexpectedly dynamic personal rarity amid culture collapse to find one willing to confidently stand and stroll into a dark alley armed only with determined personal discernment and crowdsourced intelligence to expose it all at potentially ultimate personal cost. No bravado, remember his namesake, yet he nevertheless suffers the slurs of the mind-control fearful, the willfully naive and those simply envious of his unique skill set. Just too bad for those too timid, too vain, lazy or themselves agenda corrupted to comprehend and spotlight the guilty.

    All I can say is: fair warning, James. I love ya, dude, ..but here we go, guidelines or no. How can we ignore completely verifiable profusion of evidence at our very real peril? Far beyond Seth Rich, RIP. In thousands of citations spanning these past, relentlessly investigative 228days, the singular articulation of this most sordid expanse of, rabid malevolence and greed overtaking the entire western world awaits its capable audience. It will either will net massive change through purgative prosecutions or the deserved revolution that’s been simmering. He’s an admirer of your work, James, reiterated recently, and would love to interview with you. It would be epic.

    It’s naming names, many names and systemic criminal methodology that distinguishes this cagey, hyper-literate frontman, and very possibly Mossad asset, with an interesting computer-tech engineering and sales background and cultural sophistication with intellect to match his gallows humor wit, he’s perceptive, intel-trade-craft savvy, yet humble, Webb is but the visible head of a grad-school and law enforcement professional tentacled cadre of crowd-sourcing octopedal predation of the worst, murderous official human dregs not in prison or hung.

    Oh, but rather than go on and get myself virtually assassinated from yet another membership website for crimes of promoting defiant infidel alliance, I’ll just recommend going back to day169 on the YouTube series to pick up the recap episodes for latecomers ostensibly for assembling coherence of each successive day’s breadcrumb trail.

    George Webb and filmmaker Jason Goodman are the Holmes and Watson for our times. If you can step in the dirtiest shit that humanity, or at least what its power-intoxicated psychopathic scum component can muster and inflict on its target non-Bloodierbergers plebs, do not delay catching up.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top