The Technocratic Agenda: Sustainable Development and Climate Eugenics

11/15/20153 Comments


Previously on The Corbett Report we discussed the technocratic agenda of the Trilaterals and their globalist ilk with "Technocracy Rising" author Patrick Wood. Today Wood joins us once again to discuss the upcoming COP21 Climate Conference in Paris and how it plays into the technocrats' plan to control the world's resources and implement genocidal eugenics-based austerity.

CLICK HERE for show notes and mp3 audio

Interview 1046 - Patrick Wood Exposes the Technocracy Agenda

Technocracy Rising

Technocracy News

Technocracy Rising Hour on

The Irrational War On Carbon: Toward The 2015 Climate Change Summit in Paris

Fuel poverty killed 15,000 people last winter

Scientists: Genetically Modified Humans Can Fight Climate Change

Carbon Eugenics

Human species 'may split in two'

Grassroots Kodiak Defeats Agenda 21-Inspired Zoning

Filed in: Videos
Tagged with:

Comments (3)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. manbearpig says:

    Thought this “Birthstrike” article/video might as well be here as anywhere for posterity:

    “Women Go On BirthStrike Because Of Climate Change
    charles the moderator / 3 days ago March 6, 2019
    5:46 PM 03/05/2019 | Politics

    Caitlin McFall | Contributor

    BirthStrike is the newest movement in the push to advance climate change regulations.

    At least 60 women have joined the BirthStrike movement, which encourages women to refuse to have children because they believe the earth is in crisis due to climate change. Members of this newly formed group believe it would be unjust to raise children in a world that could look vastly different than the world they grew up in…

    …According to a report released by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which is a body in the United Nations focused on assessing the world’s climate trends, having fewer children is the best way people can cut down on CO2 emissions. And this has prompted the formation of BirthStrike…”

    • CQ says:

      Good finds, mbp. Both on the wattsup website and in Corbett’s archives.

      The Huxleys and Darwins and Galtons and Wedgwoods must be celebrating in heaven . . . or do I mean in h _ _ _? (See

      Oh, that’s silly of me to think for a second that they weren’t the very families who, in the early 20th century, plotted the climate change agenda and the BirthStrike movement into existence when they drew up eugenical plans for their technocratic progeny to execute decades later.

      Isn’t it interesting that the three tags James affixed to his discussion with Patrick Wood more than three years ago — climate change . . . eugenics . . . technocracy — are the three-legged stool upon which sits the NWO’s depopulation agenda.

      One thing just occurred to me: “Population control” means to the “inbred elite” not just lowering the birthrate, resulting in fewer children (for all families except theirs), but also controlling (manipulating, propagandizing, enslaving) the thoughts and lives of the men, women, and children who are so “unlucky” as to have been born!

      Controlling us right out of existence, that is. Every time today’s eugenicists utter the words “population control,” they’re probably thinking to themselves: “(de)population control.”

      But in this conspiracy they are not going to ultimately succeed. There are too many of us who are awake to their schemes, and more are waking up every day. Example: Today I met a young man who served in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and he let me know, in no uncertain terms, that he has seen through all the deception. Far from passively accepting his lot in life, he has been quietly shaking awake — or reaffirming the suspicions of — his fellow vets, many of whom are students at the large college campus where he works.

      • generalbottlewasher says:

        CQ- when I read this idea from MBP , the thought of the Darwin theory popped up. I see no reason in the world , but one , that they unbirth themselves out of existence. However the one reason you mentioned, the fact that they consider themselves outside the equation of population reduction is always a concern. Couldn’t agree more.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top