ISIS Furious About 9/11 Conspiracy Theories!

05/24/20151 Comment

Did you know that ISIS has an official, sleek English-language propaganda magazine? And were you further aware that they are outraged about these 9/11 conspiracy theories trying to take the credit for 9/11 and other spectacular false flags away from the jihadis? Join James on today’s Thought For the Day as he breaks down the latest hilarious propaganda from the powers that shouldn’t be.

SHOW NOTES
‘9/11 Conspiracy Theories Ridiculous’ – Al Qaeda

Syrian Civil War subreddit: Dabiq 9 – They Plot and Allah Plots

Judicial Watch: Defense, State Department Documents Reveal Obama Administration Knew that al Qaeda Terrorists Had Planned Benghazi Attack 10 Days in Advance

Interview 876 – James Corbett Blows the Lid Off of Benghazigate

@stevechovanec revealing more about DoD docs on Twitter

How the US Aided ISIS and the Fall of Mosul and Ramadi

DIA Doc 2012 reveals West behind rise of ISIS

9/11: A Conspiracy Theory

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Filed in: Videos
Tagged with:

Comments (1)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. BuddhaForce says:

    Alistair Crooke, former MI6 agent, validates thrust of DIA document.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alastair-crooke/syria-iraq-fractured_b_7471540.html

    He says that, the document is of course not prescribing direct policy action, but its obvious in the wake of recent events, that because this assessment was widely distributed, it became worked into the policy:

    “In short, the DIA assessment indicates that the ‘wedge’ concept was being given new life by the desire to pressure Assad in the wake of the 2011 insurgency launched against the Syrian state. ‘Supporting powers’ effectively wanted to inject hydraulic fracturing fluid into eastern Syria (radical Salafists) in order to fracture the bridge between Iran and its Arab allies, even at the cost of this ‘fracking’ opening fissures right down inside Iraq to Ramadi. (Intelligence assessments purpose is to provide ‘a view’ — not to describe or prescribe policy. But it is clear that the DIA reports’ ‘warnings’ were widely circulated and would have been meshed into the policy consideration.)

    But this ‘view’ has exactly come about. It is fact. One might conclude then that in the policy debate, the notion of isolating Hezbollah from Iran, and of weakening and pressurizing President Assad, simply trumped the common sense judgement that when you pump highly toxic and dangerous fracturing substances into geological formations, you can never entirely know or control the consequences. And once you go down this road, it is not easy to ‘walk it back,’ as it were: the toxicity is already suffused through the rocks. So, when the GCC demanded a ‘price’ for any Iran deal (i.e. massing ‘fracking’ forces close to Aleppo), the pass had been already partially been sold by the U.S. by 2012, when it did not object to what the ‘supporting powers’ wanted.”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top