Interview 1223 - Parsing the Comey Letter with Michel Chossudovsky

11/01/201615 Comments

chossudovskysquareFBI Director James Comey threw the 2016 presidential (s)election into (yet more) chaos by delivering an October surprise: the re-opening of the Clinton email investigation. Are the string-pullers abandoning Hillary? Or would they prefer a lame-duck president to be the face of the declining American empire? Is chaos part of the plan? Today we talk to Michel Chossudovsky of about the Comey letter and its potential implications on the emerging world (dis)order.

Filed in: Interviews
Tagged with:

Comments (15)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. rltmlt says:

    According to a report from Ed Klein at the Daily Mail,“The atmosphere at the FBI has been toxic ever since Jim announced last July that he wouldn’t recommend an indictment against Hillary,” said the source, who Klein says has known Comey for nearly 20 years, goes to Catholic mass with him each week, and spends family outings together.

    “Some people, including department heads, stopped talking to Jim, and even ignored his greetings when they passed him in the hall,” said the source. “They felt that he betrayed them and brought disgrace on the bureau by letting Hillary off with a slap on the wrist.”

    The source says Comey agonized over the issue for months and even talked about it with his wife, Patrice.

    Comey told Patrice the stack of resignation letters from livid agents was making him depressed, as they reminded him that morale at the bureau had hit rock bottom.

    “He’s been ignoring the resignation letters in the hope that he could find a way of remedying the situation,’” said the source, according to Klein.

  2. jhnsmall6 says:

    0.30 the letter was sent to both democrats and Republicans. That the letter was sent only to Republicans is a HC propaganda point, or a lie,

  3. Neo says:

    High ratings is reason enough

  4. JM says:

    An insider’s rumor is going around that this is actually a diversion to focus on the “new” e mails, which in actuality have been previously scrubbed so as to vindicate Clinton and allow her to denounce the whole process as a political attack. The secondary goal would be to distract attention away from the issue of voter fraud which is certainly getting an unprecedented amount of attention.

    For anyone who hasn’t seen it this presentation by Beverly Harris is extremely powerful and one that desires wide recirculation.

    • Ragnar says:

      Wow! How totally screwed up this is. The worst part is this info can just be out there and no one cares enough to plaster it across the front pages of every news site. Elections should be halted until this can be transparently fixed. Every election held while this system was operating should be redone.

  5. m.clare says:

    Clinton vs. Trump? Seriously? From the start neither candidate was suitable.

    Civil war is possible. World War III seems inevitable. Financial collapse is certain. The Climate Crisis fairy tale simmers in the background. The current system is failing us. It’s all going down simultaneously (timing is everything…) Who can save us from ourselves?

    Why, the UN will have to step in and set things right. Stop the fighting. End the Corruption. Fix the banks. Fix the climate. Save the planet.

    We’re in the 11th hour. The crisis is knocking at the door. The New World Order will answer.

    Brilliantly engineered long ago:


  6. vumxmx says:

    Trump has exposed the criminal nature of the Clinton’s at a national level. The various leaks from Wikileaks, the manipulation of the voting machines, etc., etc. The ptb cannot back her anymore since they do not want an outraged public, which is not to their benefit. It is not a problem for them to throw Hillary under the bus, in fact it is to their advantage, since it would tell the public that justice has been done, and it deviates attention from the ptb to the criminality of Hillary and possibly even including Obama who in principle could both be indicted. They can then do a deal with Trump. Trump will deal. There will be some salutary changes, some clearing of the corruption, but the system will be largely intact.

    Civil war is a fantasy typical of the American Hollywood fanatasy of the rugged individualist. The American public is far too passive, too ignorant and “dumbed down,” too busy texting, chatting on Facebook, watching “the game” or a netflix series, shopping at the mall, and so on, and far too easily manipulated by the mass media, and far too brainwashed by their national mythologies. The police have been militarized. There is also the surveillance of the security state. A “revolution” wouldn’t have a chance at this point. There would first have to be an internal collapse of the economy, but this would entail catastrophic–apocalyptic–consequences for the vast urban populations that cannot feed themselves.

    • Ragnar says:

      Unfortunately I agree regarding the civil war. We do have the dissatisfied and abandoned military members who are under supported and who’s prospects for the future look pretty bleak. Then there are the unknown number of (good) law enforcement people. These two groups possess considerable training that would be useful in a conflict. But the majority of the public is unprepared and uninspired. They’ve been coddled and nanny stated to death, literally!

      And with the survellance state the way it is. Any group that met to plan, or began training or purchasing supplies, would be quickly identified and likely arrested on hoaxed up charges if not murdered as “violent terrorists” :insert eye roll:

      I hate to say it, but hardship is the only thing that will motivate the majority to demand change. The enemy’s division methods have been practiced and are working as intended. All right in front of the unseeing eyes of the population.

  7. aelease says:

    Ordo ab chao
    Lux e tenebris
    Lux in tenebris

    – 33rd Degree Masonic motto, & motto sometimes affixed to Masonic correspondence & documentation, respectively. The deceptively small differentation between ‘Lux e tenebris’ & ‘Lux in tenebris’ is in the meaning. ‘Lux e tenebris’ means “Light out of Darkness.” The second phrase, “Lux in tenebris,” means “Light in Darkness,” & is the title given by German dramatist Bertolt Brecht circa 1919 to a one-act farce. The Latin phrase belongs to the Latin translation of the Gospel of John, Chapter I, Verse V: “et lux in tenebris lucet et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt,” meaning, “The Light shines in the darkness and the darkness did not comprehend it.” I’m not sure exactly why this is germane to this comment section, but its distinction FEELS important to at least note.

    The first Latin phrase, “Ordo ab chao,” is so well known explication seems redundant. However, in the interest of clarity, it is generally accepted to mean, “Order from chaos.” Another way of rendering the concept, “Problem > Reaction > Solution,” the ‘Mission Statement’ of Masonic long-term goals as regards to tactics. As for strategy, that’s a more nebulous concept; not that it’s unknown entirely, but that it’s open to myriad interpretations, most of which have negative connotations vis à vis the individual will versus the ‘needs’ of the State/Society/Collective. Since some of the above data was sourced from Wikipedia, checking for one’s self fom alternate sources is always good practice, as there’s a chance my whole ‘intuited’ premise is flawed. I found none, but that’s no guarantee it’s error-free & generally accurate.

  8. peace.froggs says:

    FBI director James Comey may be under investigation for Hatch Act violation

  9. GE⊕ says:

    F. William Engdahl writes about H R Clinton’s aid for the past 20 years: Huma Mahmood Abedin

    The Real Huma-gate Crime is the Muslim Brotherhood!

    The real crime revealed in the Hillary Clinton emails sent from her private server is so explosive that it could not only derail Clinton’s bizarre Presidential campaign. It is so dangerous to those implicated that a US Attorney General and a Director of the FBI covered it up at risk of career. It could likely lead to impeachment charges against President Barack Obama for criminal complicity in heinous crimes against the United States.

    James, could this be a basis for an investigative examination of Huma Mahmood Abedin ex. Mrs. Anthony Weiner?

    A real House of Cards!

    • peace.froggs says:

      Not talking about FOIA, but could it be that Hillary and others like Colin Powell knew their government emails servers were being read in real time by say the Mossad and/or others, and decided to set in up private server to secure their communication?

      Ever wondered how Wikileaks was able to easily hack US government servers, yet couldn’t hack and/or recover the 30 000 deleted emails kept on Hillary’s private servers?

      Seems to me, if somebody wants to keep information confidential and out of reach of Wikileaks or hackers, then they SHOULDN’T use government servers!

  10. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Nov 4, 2016
    Global Research TV – Corbett and Chossudovsky
    “U.S. Elections “November Chaos”: What You’re Not Being Told”

    GOLD and Oil
    Also, the markets have recently made some strong moves.
    Gold has been rising, while oil dropped 10% week ending Nov 4th.
    The move on oil prices is dramatic.
    (Some odd record-breaking ‘bogus’ numbers also came out from the EIA)!&interval=D&hidesidetoolbar=0&symboledit=1&toolbarbg=f4f7f9&studies=&hideideas=1&theme=White&timezone=exchange&studies_overrides=%7B%7D&overrides=%7B%7D&enabled_features=%5B%5D&disabled_features=%5B%5D&locale=en&

  11. tezla says:

    Here’s a well-curated, daily-updated list of the new Podesta files that are being completely ignored by msm.

    Feel free to post it anywhere if you have a spare moment over the next couple of days.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top