Interview 1181 - Michel Chossudovsky Dissects America's Global War

06/23/20169 Comments

As NATO forces conduct full-scale military exercises on Russia’s doorstep, the world’s attention once again turns to Eastern Europe. But as Professor Michel Chossudovsky, author of Towards A WWIII Scenario and The Globalization of War points out, in this era of total warfare, the real threat is not just a military one and its scope is truly global.


Urban Training in Poland for Anakonda 16

Neoliberalism and The Globalization of War. America’s Hegemonic Project

Towards A WWIII Scenario

The Globalization of War

Filed in: Interviews
Tagged with:

Comments (9)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. tgmolitor says:

    Thank you for the introduction to Michel Chossudovsky and his work.

  2. pieter says:

    yes, not declare war is a good strategy;
    call a depopulation agenda; a depopulation agenda and not a war against the population or genocide is also a strategy.
    there is not a war strategy behind supposed terrorists attacks in the welfare state.
    An example of psychological warfare in Vietnam.
    was to establish boegie traps; not to directly murder the enemy.
    but in order to injure.
    because troops with injured people are more vulnerable than troops with dead persons.
    The modern take out programs across the globe “organized gang stalking”
    is a very coordinated war.
    they Include, mind control, electromagnetic weapons, satellite terrorism, romeo method; constant surveillance, social isolation, and much more.
    Remember; gorillas by night instead of troops by day.
    it requires a change in outlook and a change in strategy.

    and of course, thanks and respect for your podcasts.

  3. James Ouimet says:

    I like your approach James. Everything is the big bad USA run by Satan but we need took at who is running them. Commander in Chief is non existent. I refer to an excellent video by Dr John Coleman “21 Goals of the Illuminati and The Committee of 300 – Wake Up America full”.
    Keep up the good work.

  4. black sheep says:

    Where is audio only?
    Data cost is killer.
    Thanks James

  5. black sheep says:

    Shit that is pretty bleak.
    Are we going to destroy ourselves?

  6. VoltaicDude says:

    Thanks for interviewing the great Prof. Michel Chossudovsky – his exposés of financial warfare and how the I.M.F. and The World Bank restructure Third World debt in order to effectively enslave those populations is indispensable.

    In today’s political landscape, the Anglo-American economic (thus military) superpower reigns, just as it did last century, during which it most-shaped the century’s military conflicts through backdoor financial machinations hidden from public scrutiny.

    Is that the same nexus of power that you refer to James, when you differentiate between “the U.S.” and the globalist hegemon? – An important difference!

    Such a view illustrates that “Americans” are only a privileged class among subservient people world-over – expand the notion, and include the nations covered by NATO.

    We are the blessed (“exceptional”) subjects of the World Hegemon Empire (WHE – a title deservedly redundant), and have thus, since WW-II, been spared most of the harsher realities of the system.

    But Americans are also deluded that WHE will remain loyal to us!

    Chossudovsky goes on to explain how Vietnam has been conquered as a subservient state under modern globalist financial structures (part of the NWO).

    Contrastingly, mainstream American news hypes Vietnam as a dynamic new “winning” culture based on “entrepreneurial” values.

    The war WHE could not win militarily, WHE won through the globalist financialization of post-war Vietnam. WHE won the war after all!

    But is the President the most probable initiator of a nuclear strike and WW-III?

    Could be, but how do we factor in the mini-nukes? – Now a field general’s discretion?

    The standard blurs the line – who is initiating? Even if it is actually signed-off at higher levels behind closed doors, a mini-nuke strike could be “sold” as a field-action. (Maybe Israel or Saudi Arabia could be used to initiate?)

    And who is a civilian? Rothschild? Rockefeller? Which generals attend Bilderberg or the Trilateral Commission? How does a President become a President? Who actually controls the programming behind the red button? (Diebold comes to mind.)

    Chossudovsky also points out the Pentagon’s bellicose obsession with Iran.

    Compare the build-up of ridiculous NAZI rhetoric (compared to Weimar Republic culture, perhaps its day’s most inclusive European national culture for Jews), to this:
    Must See! Crazy European Immigration Crisis
    Rioting migrants yesterday- Calais to Dover port

    Recently Russia put its foot down in Syria, so in response WHE invaded the Ukraine under the guise of what we can refer to as “The Free Ukrainian Army!”

    Putin went on a quiet state visit to China.

    Chossudovsky sharply points out the fact that ultimately Chinese popular sentiment – historically more closely allied to Russia – may be subverted by the new Chinese deep-state through the infiltrating presence of JP Morgan Chase, Citibank, and Goldman Sachs.

    When WHE and New-China are on the same side in the Middle East, will WW-III begin?

    When the smoke clears, will WHE own all the peoples left in the world?

  7. ktrammel says:

    I’m curious James: I don’t understand very well Prof Chossudovsky’s statement that the President determines whether or not there’s to be a nuclear war. From my experience and research, the president doesn’t actually determine anything significant, but rather acts as the agent of extra-governmental higher authorities, and probably on a very short leash. I don’t believe it matters who is selected to be in office, other than perhaps as a kind of “wind sock” indicating the direction in which these higher authorities wish to take the country (and the world).

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top