Hillary Clinton Is A Threat To All Of Humanity

07/25/201676 Comments

by James Corbett
July 24, 2016

Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Wall Street-backed warmonger whose potential election as President of the United States this November poses an existential threat not just to Americans but to all of humanity.

As First Lady and then as Senator, she actively supported the US' illegal wars of aggression abroad:

BILL CLINTON: "Today, our Armed Forces joined our NATO allies in airstrikes against Serbian forces ,esponsible for the brutality in Kosovo."

HILLARY CLINTON: "You know I voted for the Iraqi resolution."

CLINTON: "The President understands this. He's fully aware that it's going to take a lot of patience and pain-staking planning and we're gonna support him!"

CLINTON: "...including thousands of chemical weapons. Large volumes of chemical and biological stocks. A number of missiles and warheads. A major lab equipped to produce Anthrax."

She not only admitted the US role in creating Al Qaeda:

CLINTON: "When the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, we had this brilliant idea there we were going to come to Pakistan and create a force of Mujahideen, equip them with Stinger missiles and everything else, to go after the Soviets inside Afghanistan."

But then, despite this admission, as Secretary of State her support of the war on Libya and the jihadis in Syria directly led to the rise of ISIS and the migrant crisis in Europe:

CLINTON: "The transition to democracy in Syria has begun and it's time for Assad to get out of the way."

"President Assad is not indispensable and we have absolutely nothing invested in him remaining in power."

"I think based on definitions of war-criminal and crimes against humanity, there would be an argument to be made that he (Assad) would fit into that category."

CLINTON: "Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn't lose a single person."

CLINTON: "We came. We saw. He died! (laughter)"

She was the one who announced the US' so-called "Asia-Pacific Pivot" that has seen more US forces being placed in the Asia-Pacific as a direct military threat to China:

CLINTON: "...and we look to the Asia-Pacific region, as we have for many decades, as an area where the United States in uniquely positioned to play a major role."

CLINTON: "The United States is not seeding the Pacific to anyone."

And she has stated in no uncertain terms that Russia and Iran will be militarily targeted in a Clinton presidency, and that the "nuclear option" is, as always, "on the table":

CLINTON: "And we will make sure the Iranians and the world understand, that the United States will act decisively if necessary including taking military action."

"There will have to be consequences for any violation by Iran and that the nuclear option should not at all be taken of the table. That has been my position consistently."

CLINTON: "And Russia has to support the international community's efforts sincerely or be held to account."

CLINTON: "That Russia and China will pay a price. Because they are holding up progress, blockading it. That is no longer tolerable."

And unlike her many, many political statements of convenience that are merely a reflection of what is most politically acceptable at the moment:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Do you think New York State should recognize gay marriage?"



CLINTON: "I support marriage for lesbian and gay couples."

CLINTON: "I represented Wall Street as a Senator from New York and I went to Wall Street and in December of 2007 before the big crash that we had. And I basically said 'cut it out, quit foreclosing on homes. Quit engaging in these kinds of speculative behaviors.'"

"Now who's exactly the blame for the housing crisis? Now I think there's plenty of blame to go around. Home-buyers who paid extra fees to avoid documenting their income, should of known that they were getting in over their heads."

"I take a back-seat to no one when you look at my record on standing up and fighting for progressive values."

"I get accused of being kind of moderate and center. I plead guilty."

HILLARY CLINTON: "We went through a thorough process to identify all of my work-related emails."

JAMES COMEY: "Lawyers doing the sorting for Secretary Clinton in 2014 did not individually read the content of all of her emails."

CLINTON: "So that the emails were immediately captured and preserved."

COMEY: "There was no archiving at all of her emails."

...we can be assured that these threats of potential nuclear world war by Clinton are not idle threats. A future Clinton president would be assured of a like mind in the new Prime Minister in the UK, who has stated in no uncertain terms that she is willing to launch a nuclear strike that would kill hundreds of thousands:

GEORGE KEREVAN: "Let me congratulate the Prime Minster on her new rule, but can we cut to the chase? Is she personally prepared to authorize a nuclear-strike that could kill 100,000 innocent men, women and children?"

THERESA MAY: "Yes. And I have to say to the honourable gentleman, the whole point of a deterrent is that our enemies need to know that we would be prepared to use it."

Hillary Clinton is a neocon, a war hawk, a liar, an unindicted criminal and a Wall Street puppet. Why is it, then, that those on the so-called "progressive" left who would be warning against her if she had an "R" next to her name are instead lecturing other leftists that it is now their duty to fall in line and help her get elected?

NOAM CHOMSKY: "If Clinton is nominated and it comes to a choice between Clinton and Trump, in a swing state, a state where it’s going to matter which way you vote, I would vote against Trump, and by elementary arithmetic, that means you hold your nose and you vote Democrat. I don’t think there’s any other rational choice. Abstaining from voting or, say, voting for, say, a candidate you prefer, a minority candidate, just amounts to a vote for Donald Trump, which I think is a devastating prospect, for reasons I’ve already mentioned."

JUAN GONZALES: "We in SDS refused to vote. We wouldn’t support McCarthy. We wouldn’t support Humphrey. Our slogan was "Vote with your feet, vote in the street." I’m—I’m here to tell you that the slogan was right, the tactic was wrong. And I think that the country, in retrospect, there would not have been a substantive change, there would have been a positive change, if Nixon had not been elected. But you learn from your mistakes. Hopefully, other generations learn from the mistakes of those who came before them."

ELIZABETH WARREN: We're all here today because we're with her. And we're going to work our hearts out to make Hillary Clinton the next president of the United States.

BERNIE SANDERS: "She will be the Democratic nominee for president, and I intend to do everything I can to make certain she will be the next president of the United States."

The message here is as clear as it is predictable and disappointing. Once again those with the influence to shape these events and ignite a genuine protest movement against Hillary's coronation at the Democratic National Convention are falling back into their roles as partisan ideologues, advocating for "their" candidate over the "other side," taking the two-party system as a fait accomplis and complicity with that system as the only way forward.

But as Michel Chossudovsky of GlobalResearch.ca points out, this election is fundamentally different. This time, the fate of the world hangs in the balance.

MICHEL CHOSSUDOVSKY: "In so many words Hillary Clinton's foreign policy stance is 'to blow up the planet.' She has made statements to the effect that a first-strike nuclear attack against Russia or Iran is on the table. So that if she is in the White House she could in fact unleash the unspoken, which is World War 3. I think this is something we have to address both in terms of analysis and also political choice. That anyone who wants to blow up the planet is not 'progressive.'

"Secondly, she has a criminal record. Not only in regards to the email scandal but also in relation to The Clinton Foundation, which is involved in fraud, money laundering, political cronyism, etc. It is amply documented.

"So that, in effect, the choice for the American people is to elect a war-criminal."

Too many people become attached to the personality of these political personas or fixated on the "D" or the "R" after their name. This clouds their judgement and stops them from seeing their policies and agenda for what they really are.

As Diana Johnstone, author of Queen of Chaos: The Misadventures of Hillary Clinton points out, Hillary is best understood not as a person, but as the instrument for the think tanks, Wall Street financiers and other connected insiders who want to embroil the United States in more illegal wars and plunder the country and its people even further.

DIANA JOHNSTONE: "I mean Hillary to me is not even an interesting person. She is simply a shallow, ambitious woman. Who has decided to make herself the instrument of the Washington think-tank persuasion and is using that too pose as a great expert on world affairs to be elected as President. She simply is the embodiment of all that is terrible in American foreign-policy that has developed over the past decades."

It is no hyperbole to say that the election of Hillary Rodham Clinton as president this November would be one of the greatest tragedies in the history of the United States, and perhaps the world. It is incumbent on people of all stripes--American and non-American, Republican and Democrat, progressive and libertarian, anarchists, and those who have never thought about politics a day in their life--to protest her nomination at the Democratic National Convention, work against her campaign for President, and avert the nuclear nightmare that is now coming into view.

Filed in: Videos
Tagged with:

Comments (76)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. RobinHood77 says:

    A big THANKS to James and all his co-workers for making this video and transcription.

  2. Moxa4 says:

    Very enlightening indeed!
    To me it seems paradoxical, that you have to be informed to see, what kind of person Hillary Clinton is. But you seem to be uninformed if you vote for Trump.
    (I hope you understand my comment. I not a native speaker)

  3. HomeRemedySupply says:

    “…It is no hyperbole to say that the election of Hillary Rodham Clinton as president this November would be one of the greatest tragedies in the history of the United States, and perhaps the world….”

  4. peace.froggs says:

    …and to believe Donald Trump is not backed by Wall street is naive.

    By the way, Trump said, if elected President he’d rip up the P5+1 Iranian agreement, in other words, Trump wants war with Iran.

    So, basically Americans have two choices come November…

    a vote for Hillary, meaning the US “MIGHT” go to war if the Iranians break the P5+1 agreement and start refining weapons grade Uranium.

    or, vote for Trump, meaning the US “WILL” go to war with Iran after he rips up the P5+1 agreement.

  5. whateverittakes2 says:

    Hi James, Thank you so much for this. And thanks for the print copy. My Safari browser keeps cutting out — or is it Google (running gmail) who wants to make certain that no unnecessary commentary gets out re what a horrific challenge the Earth is faced with right now in Philadelphia?

    Maybe we should have figured out, given the 15-year-long wars of aggression waged by the US in their phony War on Terror, that the people running this show are not human and Shillary is their perfect representative.

    I posted this this morning at TRNN — and will post at Truthdig as soon as the opportunity presents. I’m not in the social media stream but think this should be distributed as widely as possible. And if horror of horrors we end up with this abysmal excuse for humanity as the Democratic presidential candidate all of us will then have a sworn obligation to the earth and to humanity to see that HRC is stopped in her tracks.

    • rltmlt says:

      The fact that this government has not responded to the numerous requests to release the 28 redacted pages of the report generated by the 911 commission should increasingly bother us all !

      • peace.froggs says:

        Like how, if those pages would not have been redacted, at Cheney’s request, the Bush administration could not have easily invaded Iraq, the American people would have asked them to invade their friend and ally Saudi Arabia instead?

        • rltmlt says:

          You just answered your own question ! Just because I expressed a preference for Trump in this election doesn’t mean I’m content with a system that only allows two choices for the top leadership position in a country this large with a population of over 321 million citizens ! An open invitation to rule by special interest !

          • peace.froggs says:

            First of all, the Obama administration DID release the 28 redacted pages of the report generated by the 911 commission.

            Secondly, the fact you support Trump proves to me that you are confused.

            Please YouTube “Donald Trump Endorsement for Prime Minister Netanyahu” and wake the f… up!

            • peace.froggs says:

              Just learned that Trump asked Putin to Hack US government servers to find the 30 000 missing emails.

              What kind of Presidential nominee would ask another country, in this case a not so friendly country, to hack government servers in order to influence out come of the election?

  6. cobrien says:

    Hi James,
    yes we all know the folly of the Clinton tidal wave and that there will be more death and destruction to follow (either candidate). In discussing this with friends and family, I have been getting nothing but grief from all angles regarding the abstention and demonstration option. This two party program and the only option being the “evil of two lessor’s” is a maddening thought but we are so thoroughly indoctrinated within this program that I am beginning to feel that there is no way out. I know you were trying for a shock factor with the “bomb” imagery and hyperbole but can’t we also recognize that those who will say anything to get elected are doing just that?

  7. rltmlt says:

    I’m not sure James but I think this piece just became a serious contender for top spot against Dinesh D’Souza’s movie “Hillary’s America” just released this past weekend !
    Hillary’s candidacy finally drove me over to the Republicans from a Democrat Party that I supported for the past fifty years ! Though I have to admit that Trump’s history as a total Washington outsider had a lot to do with it. I also have to admit that my wife and I met Trump in his former Atlantic City Casino about twenty years ago and his winning personality and ability to openly discuss a wide range of issues with us made him an instant winner in our book !

    • peace.froggs says:

      Oh brother.

      • rltmlt says:

        Your obviously content drinking the Liberal Cool Aid, a group that’s always happy as long as they are spending somebody else’s money. Obama = 19 Trillion in debt, up from 2 Trillion fifteen years earlier, and he’s ready and willing to sign the T.P.P. after the election, an act that will officially make us a 3rd World Economy!

        • peace.froggs says:

          The only one between me and you drinkin any cool aid is you Trump lover!

          I’ll bet you a million dollars that regardless who becomes President come November, he’she will increase the National Debt.

          Learn something… Google “Executive Order 6102” and “Bretton Woods” and “Nixon Shock”

  8. Mohawk Man says:

    Played and played well or has the Liberty movement made some strides here? (speaking only on the premise of the presentation here is accepted and agreed) Speaking as a “Duck and Cover” child, why is it that when I speak to people who are on the A. Right side-men, real man, men who work with steel, (who don’t even know it but are) and people very close to me, particularly those of Mohawk decent, are more trusting of Mr. Prutin than our current “elected representatives”? If queried on why someone of Mohawk decent posses this question to them and the answer is in the affirmative. Both parties in this discussion stated that while true “what the hell has happened here?” Has the Soviet Union infiltrated so deeply and indoctrinated both the Useful Idiots and used a much needed nationalism movement to join both sides in an unholy union? Genius, I’d say if true.

    Or, has the Zio-Con movement, Bolsheviks (points well to their hatred of Russia) and their useful idiots (Christian-Zio’s generally) who are openly and rabidly hateful of Mr. Prutin (mostly on the Zio-Con side)and wants to attack him and his allies also or conversely so ingrained in our culture as to want to make this switch with a red herring approach? Both sides are very smart and psychology is used on the masses to send messages. Most or many Americans are very stupid people. Just dumb as hell and spew such non-sense it’s almost tear inducing.

    Just some questions posed and they need answers fairly quickly. One last comment regarding James’ nationalism versus individual liberty question……James, please know this….they are not mutually exclusive in that in order to re-plant the seeds of the individual and their freedom these globalists/totalitarianists must first be defeated. The next step is at the local level. The Regressives have infiltrated at the very local, local, state and national level. Start at home. Expose them and ride them out on a rail. The Narcissistic Sociopath and Narcissistic Ambitionite are drawn to these place of power and are needed to be shown the door on a permanent basis. The levels from Narcissist to Psychopath is very wide. From a Paul Ryan on the one end to a Kissinger on the other. This must be understood. Where they cross paths and become one is indeterminate but eventually occur.

    The respect that this man (Mr. Prutin) has garnered is astonishing or is it a play? The open contempt our’s have sowed is almost laughable in it’s obviousness as it is reaped by the public. This goes for each and every branch. Every damn one of them including the central bank system and it’s people. Are they that inept or is a plan in place to make them want to become untrusted? Non-papable pulses may our only refuge. Sounds harsh but so is totalitarianism and stolen wealth and grotesquely excess living for those who claim to serve us. Choose one.

    Love One Another (and shut down all of the Foundations..until we “figure them out”)

    The Mohawk

    • Mohawk Man says:

      To those who dismiss or laugh at my constant “Love One Another” always last line, it is not just rhetoric. It is not just a famous quote of dying men, Jesus or George Harrison or soon mine, a secret message or anything else, it is what you must do. To rephrase this, I ask you to do so. Love encompasses everything you do from a business deal of $500,000,000 negotiated to a man or woman who looks lost and may be lonely, to your man you may want to sleep around on, to the woman who cut you off in the line at the grocery store. Understand what brought them there and shine some light. Use your love like a sword. It is sharp and never dulls. Wield it and be proud. Rebuked for it, as you shall be, know it has had an impact they will take with them. A mark. A scar. A beautiful scar. It will be remembered. It will be passed on sometimes unknowingly.

      Those who follow James here must be aware that he is spreading love in his way and he is correct. That is his way whether he knows it or not. The Red Man, The Asian Man, the Black man and the European looking man can all connect with a constant. Love is like mathematics..it is a constant, it is Truth, but like math, it must be practiced to be effective. It will never be bought or killed. It just is. A gift. Use it..

      Realtors, vendors and negotiators, politicians..bring love to the table. It doesn’t mean lay down or take it in the shorts. Just don’t cheat them. Use love as your guide. Be smart. Be successful. Always love. It’s sometimes hard and you may have to lay down the law and defend others…it’s okay. Protecting others is love. Truth is also Love. Know Truth for it is Love. Constant vigilance is also Love. It has a price. Practice it.

      Love One Another

      The Mohawk

  9. tj69t says:

    I would also like to know more about Trump’s past personally. The fact he met behind closed doors with Kissinger according to MSM and that he is a billionaire makes me believe there will be other ties to NWO believers. Also, I would like to know if Alex Jones is a proponent of the Republican party or if his hatred of the Clinton’s has blinded him to Trump’s faults. It seems to me there was a time when you both were of the same opinion andd now that has shifted?

  10. Best case scenario is an electoral college tie, 269-269, forcing the House to select a compromise president. Such a person would be an insider, but would have an extremely weak mandate, which would be a recipe for gridlock.

  11. nosoapradio says:

    So here we go again with Noam Chomsky selling his “there’s nothing wrong with voting for the lesser of two evils” snake oil.

    He helped roll in the trojan horse Obama who was made out to be the “lesser of two evils” but who then predictably went on to beat the Bush hands down in his escalation of warring, torturing and solidification of the police state.

    That’s what’s so dangerous about trojan horses and their gatekeepers,

    Clinton and Trump are quite obviously equally dangerous puppets of the apocalyptic deep state, but thanks to Trump’s rhetorical blend of outlandishly reactionary statements and genuine “conspiracy theory” truth he appears more dangerous than Clinton to the politically correct masses as he ever so efficiently discredits alternative thinking.

    That’s his job.

    He holds up the democratic devil by making her look not so bad. Its a mutual, left-right cooperative campaign to lead humanity straight into nuclear annhialation as we obliviously drink the kool-aid and hold hands triumphantly singing kumbaya, celebrating “human progress” as proven by the victory:defeat of the white, black or female puppet tyrant.

    And this video so clearly and eloquently demonstrates this.

    Incidentally, the seafood lasagna offer still stands…?

  12. VoiceOfArabi says:

    First, I believe all humans are born equally the same… Governments spends tons of money to shape (or reshape our instinctual) moral code…..

    I know I will be very unpopular after this post, but then, if i can’t express myself here, then i can’t think of anywhere else.

    I think this video is trying to speak to the average voter of United States of America. By that I mean….

    In every nation, there is Majority (80%), Minority (15-18%) and then there is the ruling class (the rest).

    From visiting and mixing with Americans from many states, i can honestly say that Majority of American citizens are “dumbed-down”, and are just cattle at this stage. The Minority of Americans citizens are “aware”, but in a “house slave” position (Chomsky is just an example-he will express his opinions, but he is sooooo bland, he is ineffective), and then the ruling class, which appear to take ques from Darth Vader.

    If you directly compare the US Nation to Vietnam for example, you will be shocked.. The average man or woman (Majority) is aware and have “good” instinctive moral code, and will not stand for wrong doing (that’s why they defeated United States). So are the people in Iran, but even more so.. They are a nation like @Mohawk Man explains above.. “people who are on the A. Right side-men, real man, men who work with steel, (who don’t even know it but are)”

    The reason i make this judgement is, I have been researching the situation in the USA, and trying to understand the culture and getting close to the pulse on the street, and I was dumbfounded.

    For example, Yesterday, i watched the movie “America: Freedom to Fascism (2006)” by Aaron Russo, and previous to that, I have watched many other documentaries explaining to the American people that they are in trouble, yet nothing is happening in America… people did not even rebel against the TV station and newspapers that are poisoning them. If 10% of those movies applied to Iran and was played on Iranian TV, there would be many many revolutions.

    So, the simplest act of rebellion, which is switch the TV off is not happening.. this can only lead me to believe that the majority of American’s have lost their instinctive moral code.

    Therefore… just like this video, we need more scarecrow’s to herd the cattle… That said, i would like to end by saying, we are all born equally, but the state will manipulate us.

    And I understand also, any leader who will speak out in defense of the American people, will be killed, and Martin Luther King is just one of many i am sure. But they can’t kill 80% of the population.

    • Moxa4 says:

      Hi VoiceOfArabi

      What you say about Vietnam may be true: “The average man or woman (Majority) is aware and have “good” instinctive moral code, and will not stand for wrong doing.”
      But I think, that the reason why the United States did lose the Vietnam War was not just because of the resistance of the people of Vietnam (“they defeated United States”). An other reason for theyr defeat was due to the fact, that journalism was functioning in a completely different way. Since the first Gulf War (25 years ago) we are supposed to consume the reports of the so called embedded journalism.
      Anyway, that is no contradiction to your statement that “citizens are dumped down”. 😉

      • VoiceOfArabi says:

        Hi Moxa4,

        I care about this deeply as my nation’s majority (over 90% of people) are “dumbed-down”, and are just cattle at this stage, which is why we have ISIS and AlQa’ada and Muslim Brotherhood today…

        If more countries get dumbed-down, then we will have “empty brains” ready to be made extremist world wide… a bit like living in a “Mad Max” movie.

        That’s the upcoming real threat to humanity that will change the world into New World Order. “The Organized Chaos” made public by Condoleezza Rice around 2003.

    • michael.k says:

      New member. I had been a dumbed down American till 40 days ago. At 64 years I decided to learn about secret societies. Needless to say I have read over a thousand articles on Zionism, Black Nobility, committee of 300, etc.. in just 40 days. Switching off the TVs would be a good start to rebelling. And they can’t kill 80% of us. I remember the anti-Vietnam protests reaching 300,000+ on one March to Washington that I was involved in. The youth in America has been dummied down even worse than our adult population. Universities have helped make sure of that. The Zionist’s etc… have ensured we cannot start even an Anti-Zionist movement in the USA because of instant cries of Anti-Semetism. I was hoping we could start an Anti-Middle East protest (ala Anti-Vietnam) to get all military and financial support to the entire region, including and especially Israel, withdrawn. It seems there is a still developing plan to start a “World War 3” between Arabs & Israel and that the rest of their respective allies will be drawn into it. If the USA had the balls to withdrawal EVERYTHING from the Middle East – then they would have to find another way to draw us into said War.

      • VoiceOfArabi says:

        Hi michael.k,

        And welcome to “eyes wide open”. It is amazing how “wrong doings” are hidden in the open, yet we were unable to see them, and now they are there right in front of us. I say this, as I was in your position not so long ago and woke up at about similar age 🙂 ….

        I think if you get your Fourth Estate freed up, that would be a major step forward…

        but it is amazing how the richest country in the world does not have free medicine, or free education, or even freedom of movement or choosing a president without the NSA knowing and sometimes nudging.. I would understand it if you guys did not pay any taxes… but you pay double the taxes on everything.. (you pay road tax and then pay tax again on your income…) You are paying for your own enslavement…. that’s very hard pill to swallow…

        I am not american, but I care a lot about Americans… Once you guys are freed up, then there is a chance for me to be free (currently, this is the only space i can express myself, otherwise, it is jail time baby…)

        • mik says:

          “but it is amazing how the richest country in the world does not have free medicine, or free education…”

          I agree … but that would be socialism, that’s non-american, half way to communism, apage satanas….🙂

          • VoiceOfArabi says:

            Hi mik…

            But it is not really free, since American Citizens already paying for it..

            So, Stop all the taxes, and then let the market provide health care.. (real market not the pharma cartel)

            You can’t tax people twice and three times, and then expect them to provide their own services.. what is the tax for… What is the fuel tax for, what is the road tax for, what is the income tax for..???

            Day light robbery… (or as i would like to call it.. paying for your own enslavement)

            • mik says:

              I was kidding. So many times I’ve heard/read socialism type ranting when it comes to universal and basically free health care.

              Even in socialism things were not free. People were paying taxes.
              In my opinion, universal (free) health care should be based on the principle of Solidarity.
              You never know whether you will got sick or not and also how severe sickness will be. Solidarity would be the best for everyone.

              But nowadays as far as I know american health system is suited to the wealthy. In fact, like everything else.

              • VoiceOfArabi says:

                Hi Mik,

                sorry, english is not my first language, and sometimes i miss jokes and sarcasm… forgive me please…

                and you are right.. it is never free and the reason it is so expensive is the pharma cartel that’s being deployed across the world… that’s how they will enslave us… you want health care for you and your loved ones… be our slave.

                We are going back to Debtors’ prison…

  13. shiranaihito says:

    So how is Hillary personally such a big threat if she’s controlled by The Deep State just like Trump would be?

    If she’s not just a puppet but is part of the Deep State herself, even in that case her _presidency_ wouldn’t matter because it would still be the Deep State calling the shots just the same.

    • mik says:

      I agree 100%.

      I think James made this video for some other audience (maybe Newsbud). Usually there isn’t that much fear-mongering present in his work.

      Interesting take on presidential selections by Truthstreammedia

      • shiranaihito says:

        > I think James made this video for some other audience (maybe Newsbud)

        So that’s the audience he’s supposed to consciously mislead, or something? 🙂

        We’re not even on the Newsbud site here!

        • WannabePhilosopher says:

          In what way was it misleading?

          • shiranaihito says:

            It’s misleading to say that Hillary’s _presidency_ is some sort of great calamity that must be avoided at all costs, because the presidency itself doesn’t matter as I explained above.

            Either she’s a puppet of the Deep State or part of it herself, but either way, the Deep State will be in charge just the same, and that applies if Trump is selected too, of course.

            In other words, her presidency doesn’t affect the direction the country will take, nor does Trump’s.

            James knows and understands this, so unless I’m missing something, he’s consciously misleading people.

            • There’s a couple of ways to look at this but we all come to the same road I believe.

              Implied in your argument is that the deep state (whatever that may be) is this monolithic entity that controls both candidates. Perhaps it is on one level, certainly. But reality also suggests that there are various layers to the onion of the deep state (that’s why it’s deep), and various factions among intelligence agencies, proxies, bankers, media, foundations, etc. That doesn’t make one faction better than the others, because they essentially advance the same power structure (sort of like everyone wants to possess the Ring of Power from Lord of the Rings, but none can wield it).

              It also suggests that be as the deep state may be, individual candidates still have a certain level of personality and will which they impress and impose upon the material world in which they act (even if that personality displays psychosis,neurosis and/or megalomania). This is why decisions of these ‘leaders’ (beholden to certain factions over others on various issues, but also still possessing free will) have real world consequences (e.g., bombings and war, legislation that erodes our human liberties, etc.).

              I think it’s important to not forget that these ‘leaders’ or ‘Presidents’ (if you will) have free will and are thinking beings (even if their thinking is based on appeals to their psychosis, neurosis and/or megalomania)

              Is it also possible that Trump is in ‘cahoots’ with the Clinton campaign to get Hillary elected? Sure, why not? The Clinton and Trump friendship is publicly known, and not just what’s officially discussed in mainstream media. They also have a common denominator in the form of Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire pedophile. Thus, this is indicative of a big club, and as George Carlin would say, we’re not in the big club. This also could explain how the vastly liberal establishment media has been trying really hard to paint Trump as the ‘villain’ character (e.g., he’s a fascist, he’s a Nazi, etc.). This is like a staged version of WWE. This would ensure that people subconsciously vote for Hillary, meaning, she’s already been decided.

              If the deep state supports both candidates, they are probably compromised, on certain levels, either way. But they are also bringing their own personality to the table. If Hillary tries to overcompensate for not being a man, and instead of cool, calm, decisiveness, shows impulsive behavior launching a nuclear strike, I don’t think the deep state necessarily has to ‘sign off’ on that decision since that would probably ensure the destruction of the deep state itself (whatever that may be). If you study chaos theory, you’ll know that there are many variables to realty. The deep state cannot account for each and every variable, and certainly not our own entropic demise.

              If that Doomsday seed vault is already operational, then please ignore above rant. I’m sure the Rockefellars, Gates’, Brzezinskis, Kissingers, etc., have cloned and spliced their DNA for replication.

              • shiranaihito says:

                I’m not sure what to make of that, besides that you’re probably a psychopath 🙂

                (And somehow failed to mention psychopathy as a factor in all of that)

                Yeah, not every single thing can be controlled and decided upon beforehand, but by and large they can count on their puppets doing what they want, because they’re all probably “competing” for a place in the ranks of the local Deep State.

                I suppose the local DS everywhere is then like a second level of “proving grounds”, where they compete for entrance into the Globalists.

                At both levels, all competitors are psychopaths of course, and as such, they have a strong incentive to do as they’re told, because getting into the next level is like their wildest, wettest daydreams come true.

              • mik says:

                I agree that deep state is not in total control because this is not possible. In my opinion it’s more monolithic.
                I think candidates brings almost nothing with them and it’s like question: would you like spaghetti or macaroni?

            • nosoapradio says:

              Adidas/Nike Coke/Pepsi Microsoft/Apple Iphone/Samsung Left/Right White/Black Male/Female For/Against Up/Down

              In a binary interpretation of Mr. Corbett’s video it is reasoned that because Mr Corbett details the atrocities that make up Clinton’s political history thus demonstrating that it would be a tragedy for mankind if she were elected

              means he’ implying that Trump would be less disastrous.

              However, when one takes into account Mr Corbett’s repeated “smashing of the left/right paradigm” one sees clearly that he is not endorsing the other candidate.

              So one must try to step out of the mental prison of binary thinking.

              Mr Corbett has always stated that it’s best NOT to participate in the vulgar horse and poney show that is the American Presidential selections. At all.

              In a non-binary world one is free to conclude that indicting the irrefutable crimes of one of the two candidates is not endorsing the other but encouraging viewers to abstain from being a criminal accomplice in handing power over to a psychopath

              by abstaining from voting entirely.

              Deliberate or unwitting misinterpretation of Mr.Corbett’s works

              by putting words in his mouth and purporting he has stated what he has in fact never stated

              is misleading.

              So I must wonder who here is consciously misleading people?

              • shiranaihito says:

                > thus demonstrating that it would be a tragedy for mankind if she were elected

                Again, as I’ve explained, it makes no sense to suggest that *her presidency* would lead to catastrophe when you know the Deep State is in charge either way.

                Unless you want to consciously mislead and/or fear-monger people, that is.

                > when one takes into account Mr Corbett’s repeated “smashing of the left/right paradigm” one sees clearly that he is not endorsing the other candidate

                I haven’t claimed he is endorsing anyone, but endorsements don’t matter either. The Deep State is in charge no matter who is endorsed or elected.

                > one must try to step out of the mental prison of binary thinking

                One must try and address what I’ve actually said, and the point I’ve actually made.

                Otherwise one may end up just meandering about without refuting anything I’ve said, despite what one may think oneself.

                One. :p

                > Mr Corbett has always stated that it’s best NOT to participate in the vulgar horse and poney show that is the American Presidential selections. At all.

                Yet, suggesting that Killary’s election would result in calamity implies that some action is necessary to counteract that happening.

                So in a way, Mr. Corbett is inviting us to engage in the political process!

                > indicting the irrefutable crimes of one of the two candidates is not endorsing

                And “endorsement” is still irrelevant.

                > the other but encouraging viewers to abstain from being a criminal accomplice in handing power over to a psychopath

                As if we all didn’t know that both candidates are psychopaths, just like all other politicians.

                > So I must wonder who here is consciously misleading people?

                I must wonder who’s yet another psychopath, doing damage control for “Brother Corbett”.

            • nosoapradio says:

              Thank you of your reply Shiranaihito.

              The deep state is indeed very probably in charge “either way” and one very valuable way of proving this and making it known to would-be electors is

              by documenting the crimes of its puppet agents.

              This is called “information”, not fear-mongering.

              “…Yet, suggesting that Killary’s election would result in calamity implies that some action is necessary to counteract that happening.
              So in a way, Mr. Corbett is inviting us to engage in the political process!..”

              Again, informing people of the provable crimes of the system’s top candidate-deep state collaborators, particularly when the majority of the masses is unaware of these crimes

              is informing people, NOT a solicitation to engage in the political process.

              “…As if we all didn’t know that both candidates are psychopaths, just like all other politicians…”

              It’s one thing to glibly state such a thing and quite another to take the time and energy to Prove it.

              And I do appreciate the immense time, energy and personal risk that Mr. Corbett devotes to substantiating what is generally dismissed as “conspiracy theory” or paradoxically by others as “obvious”.

              “…I must wonder who’s yet another psychopath, doing damage control for “Brother Corbett”…”

              Well, your last sentence speaks for itself. 8-))

              • shiranaihito says:

                > The deep state is indeed very probably in charge “either way” and one very valuable way of proving this and making it known to would-be electors is by documenting the crimes of its puppet agents

                You’re still not addressing my original point, but that’s most likely on purpose (considering you’re not *that* dense), so I won’t waste much more time on you.

                Once again, James is suggesting that Hillary getting elected is a cause for great concern, even though he knows full well that Hillary is not in charge, and thus has no effect on any major moves the US government makes.

                Also, I don’t see how documenting some puppet’s crimes “proves” that the DS is in charge.

                Let’s call it a day.

              • nosoapradio says:

                Let’s make this super simple:

                We would seem to agree on at least two points:

                1: Both candidates are probable deep state collaborators.

                2: Clinton has already belonged to the government and has during these stints committed criminal acts and engaged in warmongering and lying.

                Now let’s consider a couple of scenarios:

                1st scenario: Everyone rejects Mr. Corbett’s call to protest and inform the masses out of fear that it’s an incitation to engage in the corrupt political process he decries (and might actually help Trump get elected)

                and one of the two deep state collaborators is elected.

                2nd scenario: People heed the call and come and protest and inform others about Hillary’s concrete criminal acts, lying and warmongering in her former positions in the U.S. government,

                and one of the two deep state collaborators is elected.

                In which of the two scenarios do we strike a victory?

                “…Also, I don’t see how documenting some puppet’s crimes “proves” that the DS is in charge…”

                Shutting up and not documenting or saying anything certainly isn’t going to prove their existence.

                Speaking of the crimes of the deep state’s puppets often gives enlightening glimpses into their methods, history, cronies and very existence.

                Think Watergate.

        • mik says:

          The thing with Newsbud is my speculation.

          “So that’s the audience he’s supposed to consciously mislead…”

          Aren’t you a bit malicious? I see no misleading. For my taste he is not saying enough, but this could be maximum someone else is able to chew. There are a lot of people who truly believe in elections, present rotten system… For those people you have to tune your massage, you cannot speak about (s)elections as meaningless charade. That would be outside their domain, they wouldn’t understand you, they would switch off immediately.

          I see the message: Killary is really bad candidate. And it’s true. A lot more people can understand James’ video then the video I proposed above. Looks to me that this time he decided for more simplistic approach and spice it with more fear.

          • shiranaihito says:

            > For those people you have to tune your massage, you cannot speak about (s)elections as meaningless charade. That would be outside their domain, they wouldn’t understand you, they would switch off immediately.

            And when teaching someone an advanced mathematical concept, you kind of have to mislead them at first because they’re just not ready for the truth yet? 🙂

            And why would “spicing it with fear” be a good thing? Don’t we get enough fear-mongering from just about everywhere already?

            • WannabePhilosopher says:

              The real fear-mongering is the idea that these kinds of weapons should even be built much less used in a preemptive manner. They’re one of, if not the most, indiscriminate forms of destruction ever.

            • mik says:

              Are you proposing that children should learn calculus? That’s no go, because they are not capable of that level of abstraction.
              In a way, I’m interested how are you explaining to ordinary people the concept of Deep state.

              Regarding fear-mongering, Who said it’s a good thing? In previous commentaries I haven’t been precise enough. Usually, I find James as total opposite of fear-mongering, but not in this video. However, I don’t think that overall he made a mistake or something bad. This video won’t be in my favorites and that’s it.

              • shiranaihito says:

                > Are you proposing that children should learn calculus?

                No, I was suggesting that when you’re (supposed to be) speaking the truth, you don’t “tune your message” to be something other than the truth.

                > I’m interested how are you explaining to ordinary people the concept of Deep state.

                Even just talking about “a government behind the government” gets the idea across, but you can be more specific and tell people that the politicians they see are not actually in charge, but some tiny, hidden elite behind the scenes is.

                The problem is not describing the idea of the Deep State – it’s getting people to accept that reality doesn’t match their currently held beliefs.

                > Usually, I find James as total opposite of fear-mongering

                Yeah, that’s been my general impression too.

                > However, I don’t think that overall he made a mistake or something bad

                If you don’t count consciously misleading people about the implications of Hillary’s presidency bad, then I guess not.

              • mik says:

                Obviously, I’m not native speaker so I’m not sure that ‘tune’ is the best word.
                What I want to say is, whenever you communicate you have to take into account to whom you are speaking. You might not be saying everything, but you will get through something. On the other hand, you might want to say everything and get misunderstanding or even worse.

                I think you are not talking much with ordinary people about deep state. Approach you described usually ends up been labeled as conspiracy nut. Maybe they won’t tell you but you can see it in their eyes.
                Yes, the problem is in beliefs.

      • WannabePhilosopher says:

        I’m not sure why it’s fear-mongering. It’s just presenting Clinton’s world view in her own words as far as I can tell. Of course, that’s not to say that Trump’s is any less dangerous.

        • mik says:

          Talking about nuclear Armageddon if killary will be elected is fear-mongering to me. Every president or prime minister who gets nuk-button have to say that he/she is prepared to push it. Otherwise they would find someone else.
          Also as far as I know, the latest US nuclear doctrine where first strike possibility is conceived, is not written by killary.
          Killary just helped that we came to the point, where nuks flying around looks like something possible.
          I believe that even talking about nuclear war makes it more possible.

          • WannabePhilosopher says:

            To me, the point was simply to expose her views on nuclear war which are the epitome of fear-mongering. I think it’s quite reasonable to come to the conclusion that the threat of preemptive nuclear war literally raises the very real possibility of our extinction. Not talking about it only increases the risk of it.

    • phreedomphile says:

      Excellent observation! Hillary is just but one of many high level DEEP STATE minions.

      To imply she is simply beholden to Wall Street or that she and other evil doers are strictly neocons is also a type of limited hangout that is commonly encountered in left-of-center “alt media”; sadly, increasingly in Global Research pieces. This practice deflects blame from the neocon’s partners in crime the NEOLIBERALS as the torch carriers of global economic neoliberalization, IMF, World Bank, UN edicts, etc.

      Never forget the Banker Puppet Masters working ALL the strings around the globe…

      • shiranaihito says:

        You’re basically suggesting that “neocons” and “neoliberals” are two sides of the same Deep State coin, which doesn’t make much sense.

        What do those labels even mean, let alone with regard to a secret cabal of psychopaths running the country from behind the scenes?

      • Mark K. P. says:

        In Donetsk Republic the western financiers who came and saw to conquer the (significant) local resources and industrial infrastructure were politely told to fuck off. Local bankers were arrested and the private funds of their banks were seized and used to pay local pensions. Donetsk is also receiving a lot of sympathy and support from Russian govt and intellectuals. Doesn’t sound to me like ALL the strings everywhere fits these facts.

    • Mark K. P. says:

      This thread is bizarre. The creeps who run the west do it off shore. They’re not Deep State, they’re people. Deep State attempts to describe interlocking organizations which serve the offshore rulers. Gangster, drug dealer, mass murderer + all round psychopath Clinton is a species of people too, albeit a very tired , sick and rapidly ageing subhuman. The older and sicker she gets the more likely she is to act independently of the handlers and controllers who raised her up, since there’s a risk she might perceive that there’s not much time or life left to her for enjoying offshore rewards and punishments. Some of her rulers may be planning a nuclear world war and general depopulation, and some may be diametrically opposed, preferring to rule ever above ground to cowering in bunker towns for a century or two. Who really knows the workings and evolutions of the internal factions offshore ? But still they rule by remote control while its the official leaders of the nation state nuclear powers with the direct power to launch nuclear war.

      James’ argument is logical enough, it’s encapsulated in the title, and fleshed out in straightforward manner on the basis of the personal history and psychology of the Clinton individual subhuman who will have the direct power to launch nuclear war if elected. Since you’re in struggle street grasping his meaning it amounts to this ; Clinton will unleash nuclear war, Trump might not. This difference might not matter much to Americans but it makes ALL the difference to the rest of the world.

  14. Bog_Digger says:

    Thank you James for this great video.

    Here is another video that helped me to understand her politics better.


  15. Steebs says:

    I haven’t seen anyone mention it, but people should check out the Clinton Cash documentary that just released.


    Just sharing the link here too.


  16. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Thanks for re-running that “The Last Word on Voting”.
    Your way with words communicates well.

  17. Octium says:

    You must be doing something right James, you are picking up trolls. Paying ones too! 🙂

  18. doublek321 says:

    It’s interesting how the media calls out Trump as racist (though never Hillary) despite Hillary having praised former KKK member, Robert Byrd.



  19. turley2u says:

    The American press, more than anything else, has been responsible for the rise of Hillary Clinton. And nothing undermines the credibility of the American press more than their ongoing cover-up of the MURDER of Vince Foster.
    Hillary, Trump, and even the Corbett Report stay away from this big stinking fish in the living room. The Foster murder cover-up could bring down the entire house of cards because it exposes the Republicans, Democrats, FBI, and most of all the corrupt American media.


  20. Octium says:

    Well, she is certainly a threat to anyone around her…

    Clinton Body Count +5 in Just 6 Weeks

    “Hillary will stop at nothing to claw her way into the White House; unfortunately, people are dropping dead left and right in her path and, in the case of the last two found dead earlier this week, the mainstream media is pretending not to even notice they are gone…” – From Truthstream media

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top