Episode 383 – COVID-911: From Homeland Security to Biosecurity

09/11/2020100 Comments

9/11, as we were told repeatedly in the days, weeks, and months after the attack, was the day that changed everything. And now a new event has come along to once again throw the world into chaos. But whereas the post-9/11 era introduced America to the concept of homeland security, the COVID-19 era is introducing the world to an altogether more abstract concept: biosecurity. This is the story of the COVID-911 security state.

For those with limited bandwidth, CLICK HERE to download a smaller, lower file size version of this episode.

For those interested in audio quality, CLICK HERE for the highest-quality version of this episode (WARNING: very large download).

Watch on Archive / BitChute / LBRY / Minds or Download the mp4

TRANSCRIPT

9/11, as we were told repeatedly in the days, weeks, and months after the attack, was the day that changed everything.

NARRATOR: In the span of one devastating morning, America changed forever.

SOURCE: Remembering 9/11: Never Quit

KATIE COURIC: Good morning. America may never be the same and this is why.

SOURCE: Today Show – September 12, 2001

LOU WATERS: American life will change forever as a result of this attack.

SOURCE: CNN on September 12, 2001

REPORTER: Nothing will ever be the same again.

SOURCE: Inside Edition – A Look Back at 9/11

JAMES ROBBINS: Nothing will ever be quite the same again.

SOURCE: 9/11 the day after – BBC1 Nightly News

TOM BROKAW: Life will never be quite the same.

SOURCE: Dateline NBC – Sept. 18, 2001

These were no empty words. They were plain statements of fact. The world did change on that day.

9/11 was the carte blanche for a Great Reset, the institution of a new normal in international relations and domestic affairs. From the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and the militarization of the police to the multi-trillion-dollar wars of aggression to reshape the Middle East, our lives today are drastically different than they were before that fateful Tuesday in September 2001.

GEORGE W. BUSH: On September the 11th, enemies of freedom committed an act of war against our country.

SOURCE: Sept. 20, 2001 – Bush Declares War on Terror

TONY BLAIR: If September the 11th hadn’t happened, our assessment of the risk of allowing Saddam—any possibility of him reconstituting his programs—would not have been the same.

SOURCE: IRAQ INQUIRY / TONY BLAIR / 9 11 CHANGED EVERYTHING

BUSH: For the first time, airport security will become a direct federal responsibility.

SOURCE: Bush signs aviation security legislation

JOHN TYNER: I don’t understand how a sexual assault can be made a condition of my flying.

TSA AGENT: This is not considered a sexual assault

TYNER: It would be if you weren’t the government.

SOURCE: Airport Body Scans Debated

CENK UYGUR: The old fact sheet said, “The primary function of the FBI is law enforcement.” That makes sense. That’s what we grew up with. The new fact sheet says, “The primary function of the FBI is national security.”

SOURCE: Think The FBI Is About ‘Law Enforcement’? Guess Again

JANET NAPOLITANO: If you see something suspicious in the parking lot or in the store, say something immediately. Report suspicious activity to your local police or sheriff. If you need help, ask a Walmart manager for assistance.

SOURCE: Walmart Public Service Announcement

BUSH: All of this was brought upon us in a single day—and night fell on a different world, a world where freedom itself is under attack.

SOURCE: Sept. 20, 2001 – Bush Declares War on Terror

NERMEEN SHAIKH: The Obama administration’s internal legal justification for assassinating US citizens without charge has been revealed for the first time.

SOURCE: Kill List Exposed: Leaked Obama Memo Shows Assassination of U.S. Citizens “Has No Geographic Limit”

RAND PAUL: I don’t know. If the president’s going to kill these people, he needs to let them know. Some of the people [who] might be terrorists are people who are missing fingers. Some people have stains on their clothing. Some people have changed the color of their hair. [. . .] Or people who might like to pay in cash or people who have seven days of food on hand.

SOURCE: Senator Rand Paul exposes scary definition of ‘possible terrorist’

DEIRDRE BOLTON: NYPD Commissioner Bill Bratton is warning that terrorists are using cellphone encryption and literally getting away with murder.

SOURCE: Social media, encryption and the spread of terrorism

BUSH: Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.

SOURCE: Either With Us Or With The Terrorists – Bush

But, nearly two decades later, 9/11 has gone from a touchstone event shaping all of the Western world’s national security decisions to a fading cultural memory of a trauma that took place before the newest generation of high school graduates were even born.

9/11 is no longer a driving political issue.

But, as if on cue, a new event has come along to throw the world into chaos.

Once again we are being told that the world has changed forever.

REPORTER: This is not normal. At least it wasn’t until a few weeks ago, when everything we take for granted—everything—moved just beyond our grasp.

SOURCE: Coronavirus outbreak: Can we ever return to normal during or after the COVID-19 pandemic?

REPORTER: As a global community we’ve experienced a once-in-a-lifetime event that will shift and reshape our behaviors and perceptions for quite some time.

SOURCE: Say Hello to The New Normal Consumer

JUSTIN TRUDEAU: This will be the new normal until a vaccine is developed.

REPORTER: . . . Meaning the new normal could last for months, even years.

SOURCE: The National: COVID-19 ‘new normal’ to last; over 1M jobs lost

NICOLA STURGEON: So return to normal as we knew it is not on the cards in the near future.

SOURCE: Scotland publishes framework for coping with ‘new normal’ of Covid-19

And, once again, this is no empty rhetoric. Governments, businesses and NGOs are now coordinating at the international level on a “Great Reset” to once again completely reshape the world we are living in.

KRISTALINA GEORGIEVA: History would look at this crisis as the great opportunity for reset.

ANTÓNIO GUTERRES: The great reset is a welcome recognition that this human tragedy must be a wake-up call. It is imperative that we re-imagine, rebuild, redesign, reinvigorate and rebalance our world.

SOURCE: The Great Reset Launch | Highlights

JOHN KERRY: Reset cannot mean—we can’t think of it in terms of sort of “pushing a button” and going back to the way things were. [. . . ] And the normal was a crisis. The normal was itself not working.

SOURCE: The Great Reset Initiative | 24.06.2020

CHRYSTIA FREELAND: I think all Canadians understand that the restart of our economy needs to be green. It also needs to be equitable. It needs to be inclusive.

SOURCE: “It’s about time”: Freeland speaks on being Canada’s first female finance minister

MARIA VAN KERKHOVE: What we’re going to have to figure out, and I think what we’re all going to have to figure out together, is what our new normal looks like. Our new normal includes physical distancing from others. Our new normal includes wearing masks where appropriate. Our new normal includes us knowing where this virus is each and every day, where we live, where we work, where we want to travel.

SOURCE: What the New Normal Looks Like After Covid-19

ALLEY WILSON: In parts of Europe, immunity passports are being considered for people who are believed to be immune to the coronavirus. While in China, some cities have already implemented QR codes that generate a color in order for officials to enable how freely an individual may move around outdoors.

SOURCE: Coronavirus outbreak: Could immunity passports become the new normal?

Those paying attention will have already noted the parallels between the “War on Terror” declared after 9/11 and the “War on the Invisible Enemy” that has been declared on COVID-19. In fact, the security imperatives imposed by this pandemic crisis are so similar to those imposed by the terror crisis that, in many cases, the “new” security screening tools that are being put into place to combat COVID-19 are openly acknowledged to be mere upgrades of screening tools deployed after 9/11.

ANDREW ROSS SORKIN: Most people know CLEAR by going to the airport. It was born after 9/11. This is another crisis with a new component that’s being born. Explain what this product is in terms of how it’s going to work relating to COVID.

CARYN SEIDMAN BECKER: So, you’re right: CLEAR was born out of 9/11 and it was about a public-private partnership leveraging innovation to enhance homeland security and delight customers. And that was really the beginning of screening 1.0. And just like screening was forever changed post-9/11, in a post-COVID environment you’re going to see screening and public safety significantly shift.

But this time it’s beyond airports, right? It’s sports stadiums. It’s retail, as Dana talked about. It’s office buildings. It’s restaurants.

And so, while we started with travel, at our core we’re a biometric-secure identity platform, where it’s always been about attaching your identity to your boarding pass at the airport, or your ticket to get into a sports stadium, or your credit card to buy a beer. And so now with the launch of CLEAR Health Pass, it’s about attaching your identity to your COVID-related health insights for employers, for employees, for customers.

Everybody wants to know that each other is safe to start to reopen businesses and get America moving.

SOURCE: CLEAR’s new Health Pass service to help screen for coronavirus: CEO

Yes, in some ways the coronavirus security state is merely an extension of the 9/11 security state. But even more disturbing parallels between 9/11 and COVID-19 are to be found at a deeper level of analysis.

It is true that, just like the response to the 9/11 attacks, the response to the COVID-19 “crisis” is being framed in terms of “security.” But whereas the post-9/11 era introduced America to the concept of “Homeland Security”—security from “terrorists,” individuals with identifiable intentions belonging to groups with stated political goals—the COVID-19 era is introducing the world to an altogether more abstract concept: biosecurity.

Originally employed to describe threats to the environment—the introduction of invasive species to a habitat, for instance, or the transmission of infectious diseases among crops and livestock—the term “biosecurity” was injected into mainstream political discourse when the 2001 anthrax attacks linked bioterrorism to the global war on terror. Suddenly, “biosecurity” was a pressing national security threat, and an entire architecture of national and international legislation was introduced to institute procedures for implementing medical martial law.

In the US, the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act was passed in multiple state legislatures, giving governors the power to forcibly quarantine and even force-vaccinate their populations in the event of a declared public health emergency.

On the international level, the World Health Organization adopted the International Health Regulations in 2005, obligating all 196 WHO member nations to recognize declared “Public Health Emergencies of International Concern” like pandemic disease outbreaks as a global threat requiring international cooperation. Some have even argued that the legislation is broad enough to allow organizations like NATO leeway to enter countries in the interest of “controlling the outbreak.”

Once again, the tie between this biosecurity paradigm and the war on terror paradigm is openly acknowledged. In a 2002 paper on the emerging biosecurity field, two US environmental researchers noted the way that 9/11 had opened the door for biosecurity research and legislation.

“The events of September 11 and subsequent anthrax assaults have made US policymakers and the public more aware of our vulnerability to organisms released with the intent to cause significant harm,” they wrote.

In 2010, the World Health Organization issued its own information note on biosecurity, stating that “The overarching goal of biosecurity is to prevent, control and/or manage risks to life and health,” and—echoing post-9/11 declarations about the need for global cooperation in the War on Terror—that this goal can only be reached through “a harmonized and integrated biosecurity approach” based on “international standards.”

What this predictably bland language obscures is the way that “biosecurity” is used to invoke emergency powers and install new security procedures. Just as the Homeland Security paradigm used the presumed threat of terrorism as an excuse to curtail civil liberties, so, too, does the biosecurity paradigm use presumed threats to public health as an excuse to curtail civil liberties.

REPORTER: In Hangzhou, to enter a tower block you need to have your temperature taken and registered and you must have an app on your phone into which you input your name, temperature, recent travel and ID number. The information generates a color code.

MAN: In Hangzhou, to go out of the community or to public activities you need to have a green code. This green, yellow or red code is automatically decided through the system. It uses big data to decide whether you’ve been to affected districts or come into contact with those people.

SOURCE: Coronavirus: China using app to track quarantined citizens

NARRATOR: Chinese police officers are also seen in another disturbing video nailing in wooden planks to block the front door of an apartment with people inside who had just returned home from Wuhan. Afterwards, officials are seen staking a red sign beside the front door which reads: “The people in this house have just returned from Wuhan. Don’t be in contact with them.” The poor people inside are heard desperately screaming, “Open the door!”

SOURCE: China is sealing people in their homes – TomoNews

MIKE AMOR: Melbourne is in full lockdown tonight as historic stage four restrictions take effect, forcing entire industries and shopping precincts to close. Health officials say it’s the only option to stop the second wave and we’d be looking at twenty thousand cases if we hadn’t shut down.

SOURCE: Coronavirus: Melbourne left desolate as stage 4 lockdown begins | 7NEWS

WOMAN: Can you, like, record this? I’m in my pajamas. I have an ultrasound in an hour.

MAN: Yeah, she’s pregnant, so . . .

POLICE OFFICER: Take it easy.

MAN: What’s this about?

WOMAN: But I have an ultrasound in an hour.

POLICE OFFICER: Let me finish and I’ll explain. It’s in relation to a Facebook post, in relation to lockdown protests you put on for Saturday.

WOMAN: Yeah, and I wasn’t breaking any laws by doing that.

POLICE OFFICER: You are, actually. You are breaking the law. That’s why I’m arresting you.

WOMAN: In front of my children?

MAN: How can you arrest her? That’s—

SOURCE: Andrews ‘must go tonight’ after horrible example of ‘inexcusable powers’: Jones

PETER MITCHELL: Police are preparing to launch their aerial arsenal as part of a crackdown on covert rule breakers. High-powered drones will be used to find people not wearing masks and cars too far from home.

SOURCE: CLIP

CAMERON CHELL: Dragonfly’s public health and safety system uses standard 4k cameras to provide anonymized data on social distancing, heart rate, respiratory rate and fever detection.

SOURCE: ‘Pandemic Drone’ Conducts Initial Flights Near NYC to Detect COVID-19 Symptoms

RODRIGO DUTERTE: My orders are for the police, the military and the villages: Shoot them dead!

SOURCE: ‘Shoot them dead’: extreme Covid-19 lockdown policing around the world

MAN: Why are you surrounding my children? Please step away from my children. Please. Step away. From my children.

POLICE OFFICER: I’m just gonna take care of them, alright? Calming down, yeah?

MAN: My children are fine.

CHILD: Can we just go home?

MAN: But I’ve got cuffs that are too tight on my arms. All I was doing was shopping. I explained to you that I don’t have to have a mask on for health reasons and then three people come up to me and start twisting my arms up. For what? Can you tell me why I’m under arrest.

POLICE OFFICER: You’re not under arrest. You’re detained.

MAN: You can’t just detain me. Under what law?

SOURCE: Detained and Handcuffed for no MASK! White Rose Shopping Centre

CRESSIDA DICK: Well, at the moment we don’t have specific powers, but they will come very shortly, I’m sure. But in the British policing model, we always start by talking to people. We always start by advising people. We can talk even more firmly to people.

SOURCE: Met Police’s Cressida Dick promises to crack down on people ignoring coronavirus lockdown rules

MAN: Who the f*** do you think you’re grabbing? Hey, who you grabbing?

POLICE OFFICER: Off the train now!

MAN: Who the f*** are you grabbing? Get off me! I told you no!

POLICE OFFICER: Get off the train or I’ll get you off.

MAN: Now get off me. Now you’ve been told. Get the f*** off me. Oi. Who the f*** are you grabbing, mate?

POLICE OFFICER: I’ll spray you, mate.

MAN: What? You’re not spraying me for nothing.

PASSENGER: He hasn’t done nothing wrong.

SOURCE: This is tyranny. It’s so f*cking depressing

ELIAS CLURE: There’s a significant police presence there. A number of these protesters chanting “freedom.”

PROTESTERS: Freedom! Freedom! Freedom!

CLURE: We can also see that crowd. Just the size of that crowd and the number of police that have gathered. There’s public order response, there’s mounted police as well. Also riot police have mobilized to try and manage this crowd.

SOURCE: Anti-lockdown protests met with heavy police presence in Melbourne | ABC News

The nightmarish police state that is coming into view on the back of this pandemic panic is not a temporary state of affairs, nor is it a haphazard set of measures thrown together on an ad hoc basis; it is the creation of a new form of governance. This new form of governance relies on the perceived sense of crisis—in this case, a public health crisis—to justify constant surveillance of the public and new powers to inhibit the travel of anyone deemed a health risk.

Famed Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben has documented how this biosecurity state is being erected on the back of the panic that 9/11 and the war on terror helped induce in the public.

“We might say that once terrorism was exhausted as a justification for exceptional measures, the invention of an epidemic could offer the ideal pretext for broadening such measures beyond any limitation.

“The other factor, no less disquieting, is the state of fear, which in recent years has diffused into individual consciousnesses and which translates into a real need for states of collective panic, for which the epidemic once again offers the ideal pretext.

“Therefore, in a perverse vicious circle, the limitation of freedom imposed by governments is accepted in the name of a desire for safety, which has been created by the same governments who now intervene to satisfy it.”

The parallel nature of 9/11 and COVID-19 as catalyzing events ushering in states of collective panic and, ultimately, new forms of governance, is seen most clearly in the area where these two paradigms overlap: bioterrorism.

The molten steel on the Ground Zero pile had not even cooled before the American public and the people of the world were confronted with the specter of bioterrorism. Beginning a week after 9/11 and continuing for weeks thereafter, a series of letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to media personalities and government officials in an apparent continuation of the terrorist attack on the US. The letters were quickly tied to both Al Qaeda and Iraq in the mainstream media:

BRIAN ROSS: Peter, from three well-placed but separate sources tonight ABC News has been told that initial tests on the anthrax sent to Senator Daschle have found a tell-tale chemical additive whose name means a lot to weapons experts. It is called bentonite. It’s possible other countries may be using it, too, but it is a trademark of Saddam Hussein’s biological weapons program.

TIM TREVAN: It does mean for me that Iraq becomes the prime suspect as the source for the anthrax used in these letters.

SOURCE: ABC Evening News for Friday, Oct 26, 2001

The 24/7 coverage of the event in the media ceased abruptly, however, when it was discovered that the strain of anthrax used in the attacks sourced not to Iraq but to the US military’s own bioweapons laboratory at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

But this convergence of terrorism and biosecurity did not start with the anthrax attacks. It began in June of 2001, a full three months before 9/11 and the declaration of the war on terror itself. That was when a number of ranking US military and intelligence officials took part in “Dark Winter,” a high-level exercise that simulated the US’ response to a smallpox attack on the homeland by bioterrorists. The drill, co-hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, took place at Andrews Air Force Base on the 22nd and 23rd of June 2001, and even involved fake news reports that were broadcast to the participants as the simulation unfolded.

ANGIE MILES: On day six of the smallpox epidemic, the White House confirmed that federal government officials and military personnel are being vaccinated. Three hundred people have died; at least 2,000 are infected with smallpox. Still no group claims responsibility for unleashing the deadly smallpox virus, but NCN has learned that Iraq may have provided the technology behind the attack to terrorist groups based in Afghanistan.

SOURCE: ‘operation dark winter’ 3

In an incredible parallel, the same Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security that co-hosted Dark Winter also co-hosted “Event 201,” a simulation of a globally spreading novel coronavirus pandemic that was held in New York just months before the declaration of the globally spreading novel coronavirus pandemic that hailed the advent of the era of biosecurity. This exercise similarly involved fake news broadcasts:

FAKE NEWS REPORTER: It began in healthy-looking pigs months, perhaps years, ago. A new coronavirus spread silently within herds. Gradually, farmers started getting sick. Infected people got a respiratory illness with symptoms ranging from mild, flu-like signs to severe pneumonia. The sickest required intensive care. Many died.

SOURCE: Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Highlights Reel

Unsurprisingly, many of the same characters that were involved in the promotion of the bioterror scare under the old “Homeland Security” paradigm have been influential in promoting the COVID-19 scare under the new “biosecurity” paradigm.

The phrase “Homeland Security” itself was popularized in Washington in the late 1990s and capitalized on by the ANSER Institute, which formed an Institute for Homeland Security in 1999 led by Randall Larsen, a professor and department chair at the National War College. The Institute prepared a course on “Homeland Security” which was to be co-taught by Larsen and his National War College colleague, Robert Kadlec. Coincidentally, the course was slated to begin on September 11, 2001. Part of the course syllabus included a review of the Dark Winter exercise, which the Institute for Homeland Security co-created.

The name “Dark Winter” derives from a statement made by Larsen’s colleague, Robert Kadlec, credited as a “Bio-Warfare Defense Expert” during the exercise’s fake news broadcast.

ROBERT KADLEC: . . . and the problem is we don’t have enough vaccine to go around.

MILES: Meaning we don’t have enough vaccine for the United States?

KADLEC: Well, I would like to think that. But we don’t have sufficient stockpiles for the people in Oklahoma, Georgia or Pennsylvania, much less for the entire United States population.

MILES: Well, that certainly doesn’t sound encouraging. What do you mean, exactly?

KADLEC: Angie, it means it could be a very dark winter for America.

MILES: Sobering. Thank you very much for joining us, Dr. Kadlec.

SOURCE: operation dark winter’ 2

A career officer and physician in the United States Air Force, Kadlec would go on to contribute to the FBI’s investigation of the 2001 anthrax attacks and then serve in several key biosecurity-related roles in the George W. Bush White House. During this time, Kadlec helped draft the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act. Passed by Congress in 2006, the act greatly expanded federal power during public health emergencies and consolidated many of these powers in a new office, the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR). Then, in what Kadlec has called “just a coincidence,” Trump appointed Kadlec himself to that position in 2017.

In his role as ASPR, Kadlec oversaw a joint exercise in 2019 named Crimson Contagion. The drill included the National Security Council, the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security and a raft of other government agencies and simulated the US government’s response to a viral pandemic originating in China and spreading around the globe. Like Dark Winter, the “Crimson Contagion” exercise took place just months before the events it was simulating began to play out in real life. And, like Dark Winter, it gave participants like Kadlec the chance to argue that biosecurity was a pressing national security challenge that the country was ill-prepared to meet—an argument that he made to Congress with Dr. Anthony Fauci by his side just one week before the first reports of the novel coronavirus spreading in China.

DIANA DEGETTE: Dr. Kadlec, what keeps you up at night when you think about preparedness for the next big flu outbreak.

KADLEC: I mean, thank you, ma’am, I appreciate the question. I mean, I sleep like a baby: I wake up every two hours screaming.

DEGETTE: Much like me.

KADLEC: Yeah. But I think the key thing here is a pandemic. Quite frankly, I have a unique background on this committee or this dais. I have served two years on the Senate Intelligence Committee and looked at the many threats that face the United States, but there is no singular threat that could devastate our country through our health and our economy and our social institutions than pandemic influenza.

DEGETTE: Yeah.

KADLEC: And we had four during the last century. And even though we’ve had a mild one in this first century, I think the risk is that we’ll have another severe one, and that would devastate our country.

SOURCE: Pandemic Preparedness – testimony of ASPR’s Robert Kadlec – December 4, 2019

Then there’s Donald Rumsfeld. As Secretary of Defense in the first term of the George W. Bush administration, there are few people more closely associated with the “War on Terror.” Rumsfeld, too, has been intimately associated with the emerging biosecurity state for decades. In the 1980s he personally participated in secret meetings with Saddam Hussein that resulted in anthrax, botulism, and other chemical weapons being sent from the US to Iraq. In the 1990s he was named chairman of Gilead Sciences, a California biotech company that profited handsomely from the scramble for Tamiflu during the bird flu scare of 2005 and which is currently profiting handsomely from Remdesivir as a result of the COVID-19 scare.

ANTHONY FAUCI: The data shows that Remdesivir has a clear-cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery.

SOURCE: Fauci announces good news about coronavirus drug

There are many others whose careers blaze the same trail, transitioning seamlessly from the Homeland Security state to the biosecurity state. People like Dr. Richard Hatchett, who served as Director for Biodefense Policy under George W. Bush, then as acting Director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and acting Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response within HHS before becoming the CEO of CEPI, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation co-founded Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations. In his position as “global health expert,” Hatchett made waves back in March for his alarmist pronouncements about the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

RICHARD HATCHETT: It’s the most frightening disease I’ve ever encountered in my career, and that includes Ebola, it includes MERS, it includes SARS. And it’s frightening because of the combination of infectiousness and a lethality that appears to be manyfold higher than flu.

SOURCE: Coronavirus researcher accused of scaremongering for calling it ‘most frightening disease I’ve ever encountered’

That so many of the people who were there at the birth of the “War on Terror” are currently acting as midwives to the biosecurity state should come as no surprise. After all, the biosecurity paradigm is not a replacement for the terror paradigm; it is its fulfillment.

The “War on Terror” imagined a covert army of foreign invaders slipping through the defenses of the Homeland and commandeering the resources of the body politic to wreak internal havoc. The biosecurity state posits largely the same scenario, but now those foreign invaders are not “terrorists” possessed with a “hatred of freedom”; they are “asymptomatic carriers” possessed by a pathogen.

Just as the Homeland Security forces and border security agents were entrusted to protect us from the terrorists, now the “frontline heroes,” doctors and nurses armed with the tools of the technocratic priest class, can protect us from the invisible enemy.

This speaks to an important aspect of the biosecurity state: ultimately, it is not about health. It is about politics.

Once again we find insight on this turn of events from Giorgio Agamben, who has noted that viral epidemics are

“above all a political concept, which is preparing to become the new terrain of world politics—or non-politics. It is possible, however, that the epidemic that we are living through will be the actualization of the global civil war that, according to the most attentive political theorists, has taken the place of traditional world wars. All nations and all peoples are now in an enduring war with themselves, because the invisible and elusive enemy with which they are struggling is within us.”

Governments are banning gatherings and events. Instituting new screening procedures. Quarantining healthy, functioning people against their will. Tracking and surveilling every individual. Controlling their movements. Monitoring their transactions. Make no mistake: the “War on Terror” is not over. It has just greatly expanded.

The proponents of 9/11 truth have warned for 19 years that the “War on Terror” was always a war on the public. Long pushed to the margins of the political debate, that viewpoint has been vindicated as the “terrorist” label is replaced by the “asymptomatic carrier” label and all the machinery of the police state is wielded against everyone who opposes the biosecurity takeover.

Given that those once derided as “conspiracy theorists” have turned out to be the most prescient political observers of all, perhaps it is time to learn the real lessons from 9/11 that mainstream discourse has always excluded:

  • That 9/11 and the “War on Terror” was not a war at all, but a power grab;
  • That the “temporary” measures brought in to deal with an alleged “emergency” will never be relinquished;
  • And, most importantly, that unless everyone who cares about this—the most blatant power grab in history—rises up, refuses to cower in fear of the invisible enemy, and reclaims their inalienable rights to freedom of movement, freedom of association and freedom of assembly, then those freedoms will be gone for good.

This is the message of 9/11 truth: that the world was tricked into giving up their rights in the name of an endless parade of bogeymen. In reality, it was the very politicians and officials claiming to protect us from these bogeymen—the ones donning the mantle of “Homeland Security”—who were the greatest threat to the public. And now they are claiming we are the bogeymen—”asymptomatic carriers” of an invisible enemy,” walking and talking weapons of mass destruction who must be caged in fear forever lest the virus kill us all.

This is a lie, and it exposes what the fearmogers are themselves afraid of: free humanity. Gathering. Talking. Working. Playing. Living.

It is no small irony that this year’s 9/11 memorials have been disrupted by the COVID scare. The torch has well and truly passed, and the annual injunctions to “Never Forget” have been replaced by a litany of “Always Remembers.” Remember to wear your mask. Remember to stay six feet apart. Remember to avoid large groups. Remember to stay home.

After 19 years, perhaps it is time to admit that 9/11 truth failed to expose the “War on Terror” lie in time to derail the homeland security agenda. But we are entering a new era, and we have a new chance to wake from this nightmare.

Knowing this, the only question is: Will we reject the “War on the Invisible Enemy” before it’s too late?

Whatever our choice, we better make it quickly. A Great Reset is coming.

BUSH: Great harm has been done to us. We have suffered great loss. And in our grief and anger we have found our mission and our moment.

Freedom and fear are at war. The advance of human freedom, the great achievement of our time and the great hope of every time, now depends on us.

SOURCE: George W. Bush: Address to Congress, September 20, 2001

DONALD TRUMP: I want to assure the American people that we’re doing everything we can each day to confront and ultimately defeat this horrible, invisible enemy. We’re at war. In a true sense, we’re at war and we’re fighting an invisible enemy. Think of that.

SOURCE: President Trump says he is a ‘wartime president’ battling an ‘invisible enemy’ over coronavirus

Filed in: Podcasts
Tagged with:

Comments (100)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Flameyo_Hotman says:

    So sad to see people fall for 9/11 lie. i know im not the only who has been shamed for questioning the events that day. people have been just desensitized to lies from the state they dont care but when a normal pleb dares questions it the mob unleashes

    • geisha says:

      So sad to see people fall for the covid19 lies.

      Maybe some are right in their hopes that this deadly invisible enemy that hates us for our freedom is becoming so large that even blind people will not be able not to see it.

    • taxSlave says:

      When the state controls “education” and licenses lamestream media, then it is clear to me that they control the narrative. Except for us remnants.

  2. debra.b says:

    Extraordinary, James and Broc! Frightening, but extraordinary work. Thank you!

  3. skip says:

    Thanx James and Broc; very important. Spreading this as far as I can…

  4. raymondkitchen says:

    Is that the pedo Dennis Haster(sp) sitting behind GWB Jr. at 1:15?

  5. ClintTorrez says:

    Kromek extends 9/11 biosecurity DARPA deal to develop virus threat system.
    https://netimesmagazine.co.uk/news/kromek-extends-darpa-deal-to-develop-virus-threat-system/

  6. SuperMom Belle says:

    The 2nd World Economic Forum “The Great Reset Initiative | 24.06.2020” link is set to “unlisted” with 1,576 views currently (this seems so odd).
    https://youtu.be/-h49aH8RzV8

  7. urthp says:

    The Trump administration chooses to continue FDRs 1933 war emergency. In order to confiscate and then revalue gold, Roosevelt could only proceed with the Banking Cabals national / international guidance plan by declaring a “national war emergency” (Proclamation 2039). This national emergency was instituted by pure legal flim flam. Adolph Hitler followed Roosevelt’s lead with similar (and later worse) emergency declarations in Germany.
    The general game plan seems to be; “hoodwink the less intelligent sheeple”, extract their labor value & keep their lives reasonably short by whatever means (inoculations)(war & all manner of fake medicine-like ventilators)(etc).
    Covid is just the latest hoodwink event.

  8. bta says:

    Dear James,

    Thank you for shining artistic light on our irrational world. After teaching physics for over 30 years, I now know that the scientific revolution is over. The new religion is pseudoscience. Your light has allowed me to remain sane over these months, and thus be able to love my children. Your meticulous discipline has inspired me. “Remain in Light” during what is sure to be a “Dark Winter”. -Bruce

  9. Ukdavec says:

    From 9/11 to the Great Reset. From Al Qaeda to Covid The Virus…

    Davos types issue a new ‘with us or against us’ ultimatum eerily reminiscent of the old 9/11 world.

    Great article from Pepe Escobar

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/911-great-reset/5723556

  10. padraig says:

    as per usual. excellent sir. i myself am fast approaching some snap point. lol. in the booze house today they played, non-stop, a PSA about happily being apart together or some such fucking inane drivel. i started muttering fuck off but soon realized i was some anonymous face diapered everyman and the volume….. she went up!!! wheee! full out hollering fuck off from behind various rows of coloured bottles. i saw a gal near the vodka coolers with a camo diaper and suspiciously crinkly eyes belying a hidden grin. the gig was up! run away!! nee nee nee. forever a knight of Nee.

  11. RichW says:

    As always, an excellent presentation of truth. It’s later than most people realize. It’s time to go vertical and connect wonderfully well with Almighty God through faith and trust in His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. His government is the Holy Spirit ruling through your heart and life by the working power of His grace motivated by His divine love energizing your human love toward others, correcting it, adjusting it, and raising it up to His highest expression. May He bless you now and always with His loving presence.

    • Fact Checker says:

      Looks to me that your Almighty’s “government” is as corrupt, merciless and beyond redemption as any other.

      Do you even watch the news? Did you even watch this clip? (I get the sense you did not, since your string of glittering generalities are entirely generic and not responsive to the video at all.)

    • padraig says:

      why the middle man? can one pray directly? like if your 2 year old daughter is dying of cancer is it better to pray directly to the god? or the jesus? ive ever been confused about the jesus insertion. is there any studies? how much better the direct approach is?

      • Fact Checker says:

        Remember: there’s a “Holy Spirit,” too. It’s a “Trinity.”
        So you’ve got a one-in-three chance of praying to the right one, in any given situation.
        Get it right: WISH GRANTED.
        Get it wrong: Eternal Torment in the Pits of Hell.

        Choose. Carefully…

    • Alchemist says:

      Thank you, RichW. We are in it! But I think many of us knew it would happen in our lifetimes. Positive colliding with negative energy—like an electric storm.

    • southamerica says:

      Where was his loving presence 9/11 WW2 WW1 US Civil War Spanish Inquisition Witch hunts and that’s just for the Western World, let’s not start on India, Africa, Middle East- I wish these **** would give us a break from the God and Jesus claptrap. Seriously – we the awake are feeling close to suicidal amirite? (suicidal as a form of exit rather than depression. I dont wanna hear from bible bashers. Please put a god mask on.
      There doesnt seem to be much we can do to counteract this – same as we couldnt after 911. Tech gives them all the tools – that’s why it’s rolling out now. They’ve built their database and they’re ready. There is NO recourse to justice – if that ever existed this century. Growing a few veg and stockpiling rice isn’t gonna save us from Big Bro.

  12. padraig says:

    a more naive time i suppose… when freedom seemed to be shouting out loud.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qrlDGhoI1Q

  13. robert.t says:

    When 9/11 happened it was easy to press my buttons. I fell for the cheesy self-importance of the media yappers, thought the empty gaze of Bush was actually a “steely” gaze, quickly dispelled my initial doubts over how the two towers fell…

    But I’ve now had several years without the media. That’s the diff.

    When the first CV victims started collapsing in the streets in China I immediately saw that they were falling and spreadeagling like kids playing cowboys and indians…like especially awkward kids playing cowboys and indians. (Whatever happened to street collapses, by the way? They were funny. Bring them back, globsters!).

    The clumsy fakery was obvious from the start. Event 201 confirmed it to my satisfaction. The simulation that just happens to go live? Sorry, been tried too many times.

    Am I smarter now? No. I just found the OFF switch several years ago.

    The OFF switch is the most precious device in the world. Tell everyone.

    • Fact Checker says:

      It’s utterly astounding to see the epistemologically stunted worldview of the TeeVee people, having gone more than a decade without TeeVee myself.

      They’re so utterly disconnected from material reality, that you can see panic grip their eyes the very second you make any humble, empirical observation at variance with the cognitively-dissonant dreamworld. Oh boy, do they get testy. Just the very thought of scrutinizing what their television told them is an intolerable affront to them.

      I was laughing off the covidiocy from day one, and the look in people’s eyes would be a mix of rage, disbelief and outright hope that the apocalypse would come, and destroy me first.

      Of course, everything I predicted proved precisely true, but that only makes them testier.

    • urthp says:

      Agree with your observations. The ridiculous Chinese Covid street theatrics back in Jan -Feb raised serious doubts in my mind about the reality of any serious spreading viral disease. You want to sell a story – hire better actors.
      China seems to be running in post-lockdown mode now. The CCP party people must see covid for the fiction it is.

      • mkey says:

        Regardless of actor quality, we can not say it didn’t work, can we? Chinese government got what they wanted out of the scare, that’s why it’s apparently over. Alsop, people over there are a lot more conditioned and accepting of the new normal.

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      robert.t says:
      The OFF switch is the most precious device in the world.
      Tell everyone.

    • mkey says:

      As Mark Passio discusses it in his Natural Law seminar, the most powerful word is (the one that sound like) NO. It can mean both NO and KNOW. He also spent some time on discussing how Romans had a same word for two completely different things: LIBER. A word meaning both a BOOK and FREE.

      • Jed says:

        Mark Passio’s the shit! He has every show he’s done since 2010 available and free of charge. He’s the real deal, like the guy who runs this site. Giants.

  14. scpat says:

    Great work James and Broc. James, the way you presented this story–the progression and the interweaving threads of 9/11 and COVID–was fun to watch. The presentation of this information just really hammered each point home. I hope this information can be spread far and wide.

    It was also quite interesting to see familiar characters from the war on terror (especially Johns Hopkins) reappearing, as if on queue.

  15. nce3 says:

    Why don’t we ever hear anything about buildings 3,4,5, & 6? The entire WTC complex was destroyed on 911. Check out Judy Wood’s book, “Where Did The Towers Go?” One of the photos of building 6 is frighteningly similar to photos of the Murrah Federal Building after the OKC bombing. Of course, only a whacked out, lame brain conspiracy theorist would draw a parallel. Count me in.

    Thanks, James for all your outstanding work. It is greatly appreciated.

  16. bladtheimpaler says:

    I have a deep seated fear and not without cause of the abrogation of human dignity and freedom by the financial monoliths and their entourage of corporate and government go fors. No one will be able to hide but at least if you can get to a rural property you may have at least some space to wander about on unmolested. (larger than other living situations, an apartment/condo or a postage stamp city lot)

  17. Alchemist says:

    Nice work, James & Broc!
    We’ve been conditioned for a bio event for almost 20 years now. That’s why millennials can’t help us. It’s unfortunate since they’re in their physical prime—the soldier years. Their minds are too saturated with propaganda.

  18. hanky says:

    Excellent!
    Thank you.

  19. alexandre says:

    I’m sure everybody watched this already (The Great Reset – from the WEF), but as the Schwab started talking with that German accent, I couldn’t bear it no more. Anything there worth watching?

    PS – It made me think of The Serpent’s Egg. Maybe old Hitler did metastasized after all.

    https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/

  20. Fawlty Towers says:

    Thanks James. You hit another home run with this one!

    To be perfectly honest though, it saddened and sickened me greatly to watch many segments of your video.
    It wasn’t just the vicious police state brutality unleashed on their citizens, but the knowledge that all of it was based upon one lie piled on top of another and another.

    As I watched the youth in your video and I watch the youth of today in my community I see the same parallels.
    I see a generation that has become totally brainwashed, mostly through ‘smart technologies’. They have nothing to compare their life today with.

    Sure there was pre-Covid, but that was also post-9/11 for them.
    So they are very used to police state tactics and all that it entails.

    Everything is just par for the course for them.
    They don’t have a clue that all of these ‘crises’ have been deliberately synthesized from the ground up, and so they timidly show their smartphone to officials for approval.

  21. Viv Aldistaw says:

    “The world has been transformed around us on the back of a scam” James Corbett 9/11/2020

  22. nirvana says:

    Thanks Corbett Report.

  23. Mielia says:

    Steven E Jones (ae911 summit – Justice Rising)
    just mentioned this report under the name of
    COVID 9/11

    strange
    but whatever

  24. MagicBullet says:

    Let me remind everyone of the smoking gun. The virus is man-made and real, only the story of its origin from a food market is a hoax. The virus allows the biosecurity state to serve as a tool for control of the masses for specific ends:
    Bat Corona Virus Made to Infect Humans in Wuhan China.

    Nature Medicine article, Nov. 2015
    https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985

    A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

    From the Abstract:
    Using the SARS-CoV reverse genetics system, we generated and characterized a chimeric virus expressing the spike of bat coronavirus SHC014 in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV backbone. The results indicate that group 2b viruses encoding the SHC014 spike in a wild-type backbone can efficiently use multiple orthologs of the SARS receptor human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2), replicate efficiently in primary human airway cells and achieve in vitro titers equivalent to epidemic strains of SARS-CoV . We synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo.

    • cu.h.j says:

      This is interesting although it’s sort of a red herring similar to the speculation about the particulars of the 911 false flag. Regarding Covid 19 the bug that’s circulating in the US is weak. All these lockdowns and paranoia are wrong even if this was Ebola. Governments never have the right to do what they are doing. We will never know if the virus was created in a lab. There will never be proof beyond a reasonable doubt thus I think focusing on this is a distraction.

      • MagicBullet says:

        This study was a gain-of-function study that was off-shored to China because these kinds of studies were outlawed in the US in Oct ’14 but Fauci kept funding the studies with taxpayer $ and Dr. Shi to do them in Wuhan with 15 US researchers. See this and the links in it:
        https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/updated-dr-fauci-likely-broke-us-law-funded-wuhan-lab-continue-coronavirus-projects-banned-us-2014/

        Now, I’m not saying that THIS specific virus in the Nature study is Sars-Cov-2, I’m saying that, unless you believe in coincidences with astronomically low probabilities, then you can calculate the chances that a bat corona virus, in Wuhan, is able to infect humans in 2019, fought front-line by the NIH, is unrelated to research funded by the NIH on bat corona viruses coached to infect humans (not their natural reservoir) in Wuhan 4 years prior.

        So you have at least 5 variables: 1. NIH involvement, 2. Happen in Wuhan, 3. A Corona Virus, 4. Natural reservoir Bats, 5. New virus able to infect humans.

        This coincidence is probably orders of magnitude less than the chances you find a red-herring washed up on the beach at the exact moment beach where you open your stats book to read about red-herrings.

        It’s not absolute proof, but the needle of truth should be pointing at that project and lab, and all the US and Chinese researchers who had been working on outlawed gain-of-function for many years. I said nothing about lockdowns (though I am against them), and this information allows us to understand the nature of the beast that is against us. This research is not ending in 2020, it will happen again and serious consequences should be in place for these kinds of researchers-that is not a distraction, sorry I strongly disagree.

        • cu.h.j says:

          This should be investigated. It sounds criminal. Maybe it was an experiment on the population of Wuhan. I think the virulence of this virus has been hyped though. I think this should be investigated but should not provide support for the continued lockdowns and masks and paranoia.

          Thank you for sharing this article.

          • Fact Checker says:

            I find it highly unlikely that there was ever really a pathogen in Wuhan.

            After Event 201, George Gao, the head of China’s CDC who was China’s representative in the panel, returned to China with a clear mission: create propaganda for the US military to use in order to justify an unprecedented “lockdown” of the entire US population, and controlled demolition of the US economy. He did this first by publishing some papers, on super-sketchy “evidence” that a “novel” coronavirus had been identified, and that it could be transmitted by “asymptomatic carriers.” No genetic sequence for such a virus was ever published, and no actual data was offered to support the asymptomatic nonsense.

            I see no reason to believe that the round-up video clips included in this piece were anything other than a targeted detention of run-of-the-mill political enemies, staged with goofy moon-suits to sell the “pandemic” narrative, and then delivered to the US media to get the ball rolling.

            I DO think Fauci, et al., had labored for years trying to develop an actual gain-of-function bio-weapon for purposes like these, but I think all their efforts proved futile, and they finally just threw up their hands and said, “Aw fuckit let’s just make up a fake virus and get on with the Lock Step game plan already!

    • Ahmed Al Zamily says:

      Recently, Dr. Li-Meng Yan has also stated that it has come from a lab, though the Chinese government tried to suppress this information. The official narrative is steadily crumbling.

    • Arby says:

      I no longer accept the ‘concept’ of virus. I won’t go so far as to say that such a thing can’t exist, but if it does exist, I believe, then it only exists because it’s something that was created. (Chemical weapons? Of course. But lets not talk about the real environmental crisis that stems from manmade chemicals.) In other words, they took an exosome, something that humans produce and is the opposite of what they say a virus is (that is, exosomes are beneficial) and screwed with it and made it into something harmful.

      Why would they go to all the trouble, and expense, of manufacturing a virus that kills less people than seasonal flu? They wouldn’t. They would simply do what they’ve done. They’ve “Trust us. There’s a virus and it’s going to wipe out humanity.”

      • MagicBullet says:

        Arby,
        There has to be some real viral bogeyman even if they made it and fear-monger it. Just like 9-11, there had to be some real damage done to get buy-in with the cause. It doesn’t matter if you call it an exosome or shmexosome, it has to infect others and cause respiratory illness and cause some deaths at least in the sick and elderly, so it’s called a virus. It takes some cost and trouble to make it, but it’s not an expense at the end of the day because the banking industry and rich get money quickly (see below), and the Pharma people and their investors will get rich slightly later.

        1. They don’t care if it kills more or less than the flu. The end-game is the biosecurity state and its specific goals as you have surely seen James Corbett detail. However, you can see here that Covid is similar to-not less than-the flu, depending on the country the SEVERITY is a bit different:
        https://swprs.org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality/

        The analysis states:
        In countries like the US, the UK, and also Sweden (without a lockdown), overall mortality since the beginning of the year is in the range of a strong influenza season; in countries like Germany, Austria and Switzerland, overall mortality is in the range of a mild influenza season.

        2. It may have cost the US taxpayer lots of money, but it made tons of money for the bankers and the rich. You can see here in this Best Evidence video (a favorite Corbett guest) around 30:00 that the Fed balance sheet went up in exact tandem with M2 (banking) money.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_A4wUXlVAM

        Perhaps is all makes sense to you now.

        • Fawlty Towers says:

          “The analysis states:
          In countries like the US, the UK, and also Sweden (without a lockdown), overall mortality since the beginning of the year is in the range of a strong influenza season;”

          The U.S. case and death numbers have always been played with and artificially inflated.

          The magic bullet came for me a little over a week ago when the CDC quietly published on their website that only 6% of all the 190,000 U.S. Covid deaths were due to the virus alone!!!

          They admitted that less than 10,000 otherwise healthy Americans have died from the virus !!!

          That is extraordinary given the 24/7 fear porn the U.S. has been shoving down our throats since March 2020.

          So no, this ‘virus’ is NOT more lethal than the seasonal flu, even in the U.S.

          • cu.h.j says:

            Yes that’s incredible and people don’t want to accept it. People don’t know what to do. That’s the unfortunate realization that people need a leader because they are used to it. Someone needs to step up and form a unified front of resistance. People have been so conditioned to being told what to it’s hard to go against the conditioning. I myself am moving away. My MO is to hide and gather supplies until the time is right to fight.

            • HomeRemedySupply says:

              This cu.h.j statement should be highlighted, because it is one of humanity’s biggest failings…

              “People don’t know what to do.
              That’s the unfortunate realization that people need a leader because they are used to it.
              Someone needs to step up and form a unified front of resistance.
              People have been so conditioned to being told what to it’s hard to go against the conditioning.”

              I may offend some people with this…

              Most folks who are aware of the Covid charade of power, and there are millions, lack a spine.
              The majority of aware folks in the U.S. are “waiting” for leaders to organize a “Berlin Style March”.

              Want a Leader?
              Who’s your Daddy?

              It is laughable.
              Independent thinkers and doers?
              Where is some spine?

              Look at the Derrick Broze #ExposeBillGatesActionDay.
              The number of aware people taking independent action is lame (or at least not widely shared and noticed if it did occur).

              Do aware folks need to be told “Inform others in a material way”?
              When others see others sharing information in a physical, material way…
              …that is real.

              That is where the snowball effect occurs against tyranny.
              It starts with individuals taking independent material action.

              There are many millions of us who are aware.
              The “Powers That Should Not Be” are laughing and laughing.
              They know that most aware folks lack a spine to take independent material action.
              They know that the public (aware & unaware) want to be told what to do, want to be led by leaders.

              The folks who will play a major role in bringing down liberty will be the ones who were aware of the tyranny but did not take visible, material action.

              • cu.h.j says:

                Yes, Home Remedy Supply, you are right! There are many people who lack a spine and just want to “fit in” or are afraid of the economic consequences of non-comliance.

                But, you are setting a good example and should be proud of yourself. I have not complied with outdoor masking, but I’m still in CA, and most places I have to get food from make masks mandatory to enter. However, I was in Arizona for several days and things were much different there.

                They have mask mandates on the books but don’t enforce it and there are way more non-masked people there eating in-doors going on about their lives in a “pre-COVID” way. No one asked me to put on a maks to enter a store in Arizona (the town I was in and am moving to), no dirty looks or cops lecturing me like in California.

                What can people do who are afraid of being fired from their job and feed their families do to resist this?

              • HomeRemedySupply says:

                cu.h.j says:
                What can people do who are afraid of being fired from their job and feed their families do to resist this?

                They should do the things like what you do in work and in life…the best you can for the situation.

                “The Art of War” kind of approach.

                It would be silly of a soldier in WW1 to jump out of the trench into machinegun fire. There is nothing courageous about getting mowed down needlessly.

                We can all take actions in any number of ways. It may be as simple as leaving a flyer on a shelf in a store, or mailing a postcard, or complimenting a coworker’s anti-establishment perspective.

              • Jed says:

                Well put Hrs!
                “It would be silly of a soldier in WW1 to jump out of the trench into machinegun fire. There is nothing courageous about getting mowed down needlessly.”

          • MagicBullet says:

            Yes, I completely agree that the US numbers are fudged and the fear porn is disgusting, any child can watch the US evening news and see caskets being buried and families wailing about the bereaved.

            The fudging is not so clear with other countries. In Japan, they only give stats on the news, no caskets or bereaved families, and the deaths/total population ratio is 1/50th of the US though Japan is 10% more urban.

            However, the CDC did not say that less than 10,000 otherwise healthy Americans have died from the virus. We do not know the proportion of the other 94% that was 1. caused by Covid in a person with preexisting illness; or, 2. respiratory disease without covid or covid testing, but coded as a covid death. In addition the no of dths from lockdown which inflates the xs deaths helping to support the Covid death stats.

            So yes, the CDC is essentially admitting the number of deaths is less than the reported number, but it didn’t admit the entire 94% were without role of Covid, we don’t know the proportion.

            • Fawlty Towers says:

              “So yes, the CDC is essentially admitting the number of deaths is less than the reported number, but it didn’t admit the entire 94% were without role of Covid, we don’t know the proportion.”

              I was not trying to imply that the other 94% was not associated with Covid.
              I chose my language very carefully.

              I said “They admitted that less than 10,000 otherwise healthy Americans have died from the virus”. Otherwise healthy, meaning that apart from Covid they were healthy.

              Logically, even though I didn’t say this explicitly, that would mean the rest 180,000+ died of Covid + some other diseases.

              And now to be very explicit, those 180,000+ were basically on their death beds with more than two comorbidities other than Covid.

              • MagicBullet says:

                Do you have a document to prove the 180k had at least 2 comorbidities and were on their death bed? You mean NONE had one comorbidity or were ambulatory and Covid contributed significantly to their death?

                Additionally, some persons were reported by Drs to be dying from any respiratory illness they were coerced to code them as dying from Covid to increase hospital reimbursements. They may not even have been tested for Covid.

                I don’t think you have anyway to negate these possibilities. The CDC statement only supports the notion that the numbers were fudged, which most every subscriber to the CR would agree.

              • mkey says:

                Those people died of something and sure as shit that wasn’t covid because there is no physical evidence that covid even exists.

              • Fawlty Towers says:

                “Do you have a document to prove the 180k had at least 2 comorbidities and were on their death bed? You mean NONE had one comorbidity or were ambulatory and Covid contributed significantly to their death?”

                The average number of comorbidities for the 180,000 was actually 2.6.
                This means that some had 1, some had 3, some had 4 etc.
                This document is available to the public at the CDC website.

                No one in the world can say definitively if Covid contributed significantly to their deaths.

                “Additionally, some persons were reported by Drs to be dying from any respiratory illness they were coerced to code them as dying from Covid to increase hospital reimbursements. They may not even have been tested for Covid.”

                Yes I know about this too.

                “I don’t think you have anyway to negate these possibilities. The CDC statement only supports the notion that the numbers were fudged, which most every subscriber to the CR would agree.”

                Yes. I am in agreement. I know all about the games they are playing to inflate the number of Covid cases and deaths.

                The reason I wrote my initial post was because you said that
                the overall mortality since the beginning of the year in the U.S. is in the range of a strong influenza season.

                That statement uses the CDC’s highly misunderstood and exaggerated fatality numbers.

                When all is said and done just .0036% of otherwise healthy Americans are dying of Covid! Hardly worth even writing a headline about that, much less locking down the country, shutting down businesses, and causing all of the fear and panic in the public.
                Would you agree?

        • cu.h.j says:

          Thanks for posting the Best Evidence video. I watched that one, very eye-opening.

          • MagicBullet says:

            Your welcome.

            To Faulty Towers just above, yes we now agree on most points!

            About:
            “the overall mortality since the beginning of the year in the U.S. is in the range of a strong influenza season.”

            I got that from the Swiss site I linked to above. It means if you take the US numbers at face value then it would be equivalent to a severe flu in the US. In other countries it would be a mild flu.

            My point is that Covid-19 is real and similar to a flu, vaguely speaking “more or less” because some flu years are very mild maybe less than Covid, and some are severe, probably much worse than Covid, and I believe there is some place to place variation of Covid severity because of local factors, whether K or G strain, etc. This doesn’t negate number fudging which we all agree.

      • Lynny says:

        Well said! In the beginning, I fell for the fact it came from a wet market in Wuhan. Once I started to sense something wasn’t right, that’s when I started to do my research just around the time the initial lockdowns began. It certainly has been in the works for decades by the elitists.

  25. Seraph says:

    BitChute link is not working!

  26. urthp says:

    Another angle of attack – from Blackstone.
    Bouvier’s Dictionary of Law, 1856. Blackstone’s Commentaries says a law which violates the Law of God is void. Time of war. Enemy.

  27. mkey says:

    Excellent work. This would have fit in nicely, but of course you can possibly hope to keep up with these freaks.

    Latest From Fascist Australia
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sPdi7IAC_A

    • eat my cake says:

      its all out front now,
      the likes of that clip happened elsewhere in Aus. at a “freedom gathering” where otherwise people in the town were milling about, by the thousands, with no concern about infectiousness, distancing is mandated in shops but no masks required, and but then people are shoulder to shoulder in public spaces so the whole enfircement game is clearly nothing to do with staying healthy, at all.

      200 or so people sitting & standing in a park quietly while a few took turns with a megaphone speaking about “freedom”. were surrounded by particularly gigantic police,, 9 were arrested, taken to the copshop and fined $1000 each.

      then later, in a small food shop, I got threatened to be turned in to the police for trying to start a conversation about the hypocrisy of distancing here but not there,,

      lets hope the psychotic scourge burns out as fast as it surfaced. But in the mean time, as much as there’s an obligation to help, one must also survive. I suppose MLKjr might disagree. He said one should stand with the principle of freedom even to the death.

      I like to think that there’s a funny way out of the spell, a lighter way to see the aggressive foolishness. trouble is, no matter how clever or ethical or law abiding, soon as a goon wants, the goon gets.

      maybe james is right? maybe the enemy is within us?

      I wrote here a few months ago that we are all “useless eaters, by degree”,,. the point being that we all contribute to whats gone wrong.

      sorry.
      forgive me.
      respect to those that help keep creation strong

      • eat my cake says:

        I’m hopping from lilly pad to lilly pad with this, so far its the same pond: Jon Rappoport from “no more fake news” reports on legal action in Ohio against the constitutional/population fracking,,

        https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?hl=en&tab=wm#inbox/FMfcgxwJXpVTgdgdJnmHqMQxrCwWClCL

        “a bright light in ohio,,”, may get snuffed or ‘cided, like the rest of the recent bright lights (gandhi, mlkjr jfk, the musicians, comedians, brave whistle blowers, ingenious bodhisattva types), or perhaps the slime mold has become so fattened by its recent success, that it can’t respond quick enough, or its wandered from the high hills down to the open plains, and never was so exposed and fat, the deception’s exponential gloat, fracking into the verdant. it’s no longer just bearable bad breath and b.o. its now shit splayed all over our faces, lies like irremovable tattoos,,, as the dominator mind avalanches towards its own dead end, and the tone of high E’thical reason will resonate just long enough to dissolve the tumor. “it’s already done” (chanted by the chi-kung practitioners while removing a stomach tumor without touching the patient,,).

        These are the days of the sprung lie, including the  holographic truth of our interdependent complicity with the mess; where dominator models of few over many on scales from the Vatican’s god to Genghis rumsbushbama slaughter by region, to everyone’s ego-orientation: “its just me and everything else”, while buying a daily dose of foolery and gas (feeding the obstacle) which pays & empowers dumb cunts to lord-over..

        What do the Tibetans call it?: “subjective origination”? (that phrase mightn’t quite be right,,?). point is, within symbiotic reality, most all have the capacity to be, or at least dissonate with, deep staters by degree. We’ve been entrained from before birth, to behave (egocentrically), plus we’re mostly haunted by inherited and foisted trauma-pain (hungry ghosts that lodge as memory demons), its not just the oligarchs that will drain when the plug is pulled; mensch! the bath water’s gotten murky-as. commoners are piranhas in the murk, lurking about with hair-trigger aggression frothin’ to spew.

        Here’s imagining, or at least voting for, a yes: yes we are sophisticated by design to enrich the creation song (suddenly an inexperienced pilot realizes he/she’s flying a very sophisticated machine). Even though there’s no name for life’s longing for itself, ffs humans can swing! May Ohio, (big early-on player in the car scourge,,) tip its domino in support of the inertia, all who survive this must, of transmuting the current dumpster-juice back into spring water.

  28. lizzie says:

    Not sure if the link has been posted
    A&E for 911 free webinar this weekend

    https://www.ae911truth.org/justicerising

    There was a great interview between the makers of the Film SEVEN and the University of Atlanta professor Dr Leroy.Husley, who conducted a four year study on the building and looked at the inaccuracies of the N.I.S.T, report which he said failed to show the buildings were brought down by fire and graded them E/D score for their effort.

    James will be on the webinar tonight talking about 911 and online censorship

  29. lizzie says:

    Has anybody noticed the new 2020 covid soundtrack music everywhere you turn?
    It sounds frantic yet strangely euphoric, always featuring a heavy dose of allegro strings and I know there is no such thing but it is in the key of fear.
    If anyone wants to hear what I’m talking about here, click the video on the top here of the A&E for 911 truth page.
    https://www.ae911truth.org/justicerising
    It’s a maddening sound so sorry to subject you to more of it than necessary

  30. suzt says:

    James and Broc get a well deserved promotion and review of this video by
    Mark Crispin Miller!!!! YAHOO!!!! he points out how James and Broc’s video is much better than Pepe Escobar’s.
    http://markcrispinmiller.com/2020/09/9-11-was-the-template-for-the-nightmare-wracking-us-today-must-watch-from-james-corbett/

  31. Simon7 says:

    Good video!

    This is what concerns me:

    The health care industry has been working on the flu vaccine for about 70 years.
    The flu shots are about 20% to 60% effective, depending on the year.
    99% of those testing positive for covid-19 will not die or become seriously ill.
    The Covid-19 test are about 60% reliable.

    Therefore, any vaccine they come out with (including a sugar pill), they can say is effective… and essential for society. And there will probably be no way to prove them wrong.

  32. hunt1 says:

    James,where i live (New Zealand ), people just don’t want to know about this.
    The government is doing everything to keep them safe.
    The only thing i fear is that they will never get it.Most people are doomed and they will drag the rest of us down with them.
    What to do ? Please tell me what grounds you to be so brave in sharing the truth.

    Thank you for this excellent concise ,as always well-researched presentation.
    Wendy

  33. nirvana says:

    Here is some news, the first COVID vacines arrive in Brasil, from China, 9000 doses to be distributed in 5 states and Distrito Federal. Also, on the channel Band News, in an interview with a doctor, he said that COVID is causing people’s kidneys to stop functioning but only in hospitals. I’m looking for that in print but I haven’t found it yet.

    https://noticias.band.uol.com.br/ciencia-e-saude/noticias/100000995337/aviao-com-vacina-chinesa-chega-ao-brasil.html

  34. pfunk says:

    Great work as usual, James! Also, I found your speech today at Justice Rising inspirational.

  35. Lynny says:

    James, your work deserves many accolades. I’m sending you them. I just watched this tonight, and you did an excellent job on explaining what is going on in our current state of society and how it parallels to the 9/11 lie about the war on terror, and the events. Thank you for once again opening my eyes.

  36. charles.g says:

    The inversion of our reality is almost complete. The “virus” is a response to illness, not the cause of it! This whole plandemic is based on a fundamental lie… viruses are not alive, they do not replicate, and they are not contagious.

    The real virus, in the mainstream sense of the word, is the ignorance cultivated by years and years of propaganda and the army of shills, dolts and demons responsible for perpetuating this dreadful hoax whose ultimate aim is vaxxing the plebs/Profane right out of existence.

    We simply cannot acquiesce. We must never forget that the people behind this agenda do not harbor an ounce of compassion for us. They used us, they abused us and now that they no longer need us, they will exterminate us. God, forgive me for hating them.

  37. Agorist says:

    James,
    You have excelled as you do always and your service contributes to freedom the seeding of Agorism. Thank you for all you have done and what you are doing. You, single handedly making a great impact and honestly, your work is the highest quality across all alternative media.

    James and other members here, please make a comment!

    I know it may, at the first glance, seems to be complete fit to this show notes, but a closer look makes it very crucial. Please help each other to explore this.

    I know it may seem a bit off topic here, but I would like to bring up a significantly important point with a great potential for bringing more momentum to our cause. This is a very crucial piece of work of “Alexander Baker” which give us great vision about two major aspects of the ongoing Psy-Op s:

    1. How strong the visual effect is in creating of mass illusion/hypnosis even contradicts all basic physics and common sense. (e.g., Orson Welles in the “Wars of Worlds”)

    2. How complicated and successful is the “controlled opposition” or “Gate Keepers” (e.g., https://www.corbettreport.com/meet-noam-chomsky-academic-gatekeeper-video/). From this work, can find out that almost any 911 truther movement avoided a very crucial and fundamental obvious: there was no planes! So many Noam Chomsky roles in play here!

    This worth 1000% deserves deep attention and publicity. Here is the link to his blog (he is forced to remove on section #7 which is a crucial part):
    http://acebaker.blogspot.com/

    Fortunately it is mirrored in multiple places. For example the missing chapter #7 can be found here:
    https://odysee.com/@Infomirror:8/9-11—The-Great-American-Psy-Opera—Documentary-2012-1:0

    Or complete assembly here:
    https://odysee.com/@wilhelmwinkelried:5/911-Ace-Baker-The-Great-American-Psy-Opera:c

    https://odysee.com/@Infomirror:8/9-11—The-Great-American-Psy-Opera—Documentary-2012-1:0

    FYI, I am a PhD in Mechanical Engineering and would be happy to answer any technical questions you may have. I think this deserves serous attention and maybe a podcast? What are your thoughts?

    Thank you!

    • I took to Ace Baker initially as he seemed to have compelling evidence that countered the official narrative.

      After studying his work painstakingly for many months I discovered many holes in his theories.

      His ‘no planes’ theory is seriously flawed.
      There were planes, at least in New York.

      He made a fool of himself in his debate with Steve Wright on Ron Wieck’s Hardfire show by presenting a 2nd or 3rd generation copy of WNYW’s chopper 5 video that he claims did not show any plane approaching the WTC2 tower.

      The first generation chopper 5 video (and yes, even the one he presented)
      clearly shows the plane approaching the tower.

      This was perhaps his most serious blunder.

      • mkey says:

        When you say there were planes in New Xork, are you sayin that two planes have flown at impossible speeds (for given altitudes) and penetrated steel reinforced buildings (one going all the way through) thaz were specifically designed to be able to whitstand a plane collision?

        I will not claim that many of those videos have been correctly interpreted, but that’s exactly the point, to have people fight over the manner in which something that didn’t happen happened.

        • When you say there were planes in New Xork, are you sayin that two planes have flown at impossible speeds (for given altitudes) and penetrated steel reinforced buildings (one going all the way through) thaz were specifically designed to be able to whitstand a plane collision?

          No I’m not saying that two planes flew at impossible speeds.
          I’m saying that two planes were modified so they could achieve the speeds they did and were swapped with the planes that were to have allegedly flown into the towers.

          The penetration of the steel reinforced buildings is confusing to many people. The planes did not cut any of the steel columns, rather the columns cut the planes (shredded them to pieces).
          The planes’ momentum was sufficient to push the columns back at their joints (which is exactly what you see in the photos and videos).
          Not a single column was snapped in the middle.

          The ‘art students’ likely played a role in softening up the building on the floors targeted for impact.

          One plane did not go “all the way through”, rather one of its engines did (the ‘wrong engine’ found at Murray St.).

          Yes the buildings were designed to withstand plane crashes and did so wonderfully on 9/11. They weren’t designed to have planes bounce off them, but rather to have them pass through the outer shell without disturbing the integrity of the rest of the structure.

          I will not claim that many of those videos have been correctly interpreted, but that’s exactly the point, to have people fight over the manner in which something that didn’t happen happened.

          There were many moving parts to 9/11. It was a complicated operation.
          But the squabbling over the contents of dozens of videos released after the 9/11 was certainly not a planned affair.

          Baker’s ‘Nose in – nose out’ was another in a series of his embarrassing blunders.

          • mkey says:

            Something like this? -> i.imgur.com/84DGzKv.jpg

            The “art students” as written about by Rebekah Roth? -> https://web.archive.org/web/20210116230930/https://jamesperloff.com/2016/01/02/some-in-truth-movement-are-asking-questions-about-rebekah-roth/

            Yes the buildings were designed to withstand plane crashes and did so wonderfully on 9/11. They weren’t designed to have planes bounce off them, but rather to have them pass through the outer shell without disturbing the integrity of the rest of the structure.

            I can not follow this reasoning. Much of the structure was the outer shell, which, as the videos intimated, were cut.

            Why not simply use a cruise missile ( i.stack.imgur.com/KH1vQm.jpg ) that somewhat looks like a plane (at least to an inexperienced observer placed hundreds of meters away, who maybe caught a brief glimpse of it), dump a random engine from a truck and find a passport in an incredible stroke of luck. The only downside of that plan is to control any possible sources that could provide a clear picture of the high speed lfying object that was probably launched from a nearby building. How many people would have been ready to catch that object and then, considering the follout of the events that later took place, have the guts to share it with the world? Not many, I’d wager. Maybe one, probably none.

            But the squabbling over the contents of dozens of videos released after the 9/11 was certainly not a planned affair.

            I couldn’t disagree more.

            • I think it’s important to take a step back and look at the grand picture rather than get bogged down in the ‘petty details’.

              All who realize that 9/11 was a false flag attack are really on the same team.
              It matters little whether they all agree to exactly what happened on that day.
              Some will agree that A,B,C,D, and E happened.
              Some will agree that B,C,D, E and F happened.
              Some will agree that A,C,D, E and F happened.
              etc.
              So long as they are genuine truthers (not paid shills) they understand who the real enemies are and are usually after the same end goal.

              To me 9/11 was the most important geo-political event this century until the plandemic started.
              As big an event as 9/11 was, the plandemic has far surpassed it in terms of how much of an impact it will have on our
              lives going forward into the coming decades and beyond.

              Having said all that, to address your questions…
              My brain is hard-wired to focus on physical evidence whenever possible, although I certainly do study all circumstantial evidence as well and realize its importance.

              In the case of the planes vs. no-planes arguments, I found sufficient physical evidence to satisfy me that planes were used in New York on 9/11.

              The 30+ videos of the plane hitting WTC2 was certainly a good starting point as were the hole cut-outs on the towers that matched the planes’ dimensions.

              But the two pieces of physical evidence that sealed the deal for me were the swaying of WTC2 at impact (dispelling the hologram theory) and the precious video shot by an amateur witness where he instructs his buddies to duck as the engine and landing gear approach and then fly right past them. The video is priceless. Its soundtrack captures it all. First the sound of the plane approaching WTC2. Then the crash.
              Then a few seconds later the witness tells his friends to duck. Then the sound of the landing gear lodging between the two buildings, and finally the sound of the engine ricocheting off a building and landing at the corner of Church and Murray Sts. It’s all captured in the video.

              ”Something like this? -> i.imgur.com/84DGzKv.jpg”

              Not quite. 🙂

              ”The “art students” as written about by Rebekah Roth? -> https://web.archive.org/web/20210116230930/https://jamesperloff.com/2016/01/02/some-in-truth-movement-are-asking-questions-about-rebekah-roth/”

              No not as written by Roth. BTW I do have great respect for Perloff. He gets 90+ % of 9/11 right in my estimation.

            • Yes the buildings were designed to withstand plane crashes and did so wonderfully on 9/11. They weren’t designed to have planes bounce off them, but rather to have them pass through the outer shell without disturbing the integrity of the rest of the structure.

              “I can not follow this reasoning. Much of the structure was the outer shell, which, as the videos intimated, were cut.”

              Sorry I wasn’t clear. I was going mostly by what architect Frank De Martini said in an interview about potential WTC plane crashes. He compared the damage that the building would sustain to the damage that would occur to a window screen if you were to poke a hole in it with a pencil.
              In other words, the building would swallow the plane and the damage that would occur would be local and not jeopardize the rest of the structure either right after the crash or after the fires subsided.

              Why not simply use a cruise missile (i.stack.imgur.com/KH1vQm.jpg ) that somewhat looks like a plane (at least to an inexperienced observer placed hundreds of meters away, who maybe caught a brief glimpse of it), dump a random engine from a truck and find a passport in an incredible stroke of luck. The only downside of that plan is to control any possible sources that could provide a clear picture of the high speed lfying object that was probably launched from a nearby building. How many people would have been ready to catch that object and then, considering the follout of the events that later took place, have the guts to share it with the world? Not many, I’d wager. Maybe one, probably none.

              Getting a cruise missile to look like the plane that was videotaped by more than 30 different people would have been a tall order indeed.

              As for dumping “a random engine from a truck” (as per Jim Fetzer et al.) is concerned…

              What a totally ludicrous idea! Fetzer was suggesting a team had hauled the engine from the back of a van onto the corner. Try to get a team of men to haul a 2000+ lb engine from the back of a van. Better still, try to get a 2000+ lb engine into the back of a van!

              But most importantly, as I mentioned above, the engine flying out of WTC2, ricocheting off a building and then bouncing onto the street at Church St. is one of the strongest pieces of physical evidence we have proving an airplane crashed into WTC2. The video of the engine flying directly towards the corner of Church and Murray Sts and the amateur video capturing the audio of the engine’s flight is rock solid physical evidence.

              • Agorist says:

                Please ask ONLY technical questions about the physics, that you do not understand or have question about.

              • Agorist says:

                All facts presented in Ace’s work are true. However, there are number of other supporting scientific facts missing in the Ace Baker’s documentary. For example:

                The prefect penetration of plane in ghost plane video (by Michael Hezarkhani) requires the BOTH of the following conditions to be possible:

                1. Hyper velocity … meaning velocities higher than 11,000 km/h!!!!

                2. The projectile should be made of material denser and stronger than target.

                as you see, none of above can be met at all.

                basically, only Cartoon Physics can make those fake videos possible.

                see, for example:
                https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0734743X87900455

                ####
                Corbett Report is a place of challenging our believes and keep improving our understanding of how much more of our assumed facts, are fundamentally not facts, but just fake imagery that has been painted on a cave wall for us.

      • Agorist says:

        Let’s see. I am seeing some interest here.

        First of all I do not see any physics behind your argument.

        Depending your level in Mechanics, I can change my level of technical complexity. Ask me ANY TECHNICAL question regarding “no plane” argument. I will be happy to answer. I have made presentations in two Canadian universities (UofM and UofC), one in Italy (univ of Pavia) and one in France (Univ of Avignon) to highly technical audiences (Grad students and faculty members). Just FYI: I have been able to address EVERY single questions with ZERO failure.

        So you can try your best, I am here.

        The Ace’s documentary (last two episodes were not released unfortunately) has one single technical mistake which is about the popping windows below crash zone which does not have anything to do with “no plane” fact.

        So please shoot me ANY question 🙂
        ANY question, with 100% guarantee that I can address it.

        PS: I am highly qualified to talk about this, as my PhD work and years of research includes hyper velocity impact and wave mechanics.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top