You Won't Believe What They're Planning To Do With "Vaccines"

11/16/2020366 Comments

Rejoice! The vaccine is nearly ready!

In case you didn't see the big news this week, Pfizer has announced that the preliminary results from the "Phase 3, late-stage study" of their COVID-19 vaccine show that it is "more than 90% effective in preventing COVID-19 in participants without evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first interim efficacy analysis."

Yay! As Dissembler-in-Chief Trump notes, this is a BIG WIN that was only made possible thanks to his COURAGEOUS LEADERSHIP in helping to WARP SPEED the wonderful vaccines directly into everyone's veins (with the help of the US military, of course):

Oh yes, Mr. President, sir! SUCH GREAT NEWS!

. . . Except for just a couple of teensy-weensy little problems. Like the fact that this announcement is just that: an announcement. There is no data to scrutinize here, nothing presented for public review (let alone peer review). This is a press release—literal corporate PR and nothing more.

And the fact that, as even their own "trust us, it works" statement goes on to note (buried 310 words into this lesson in propaganda), "As the study continues, the final vaccine efficacy percentage may vary." In other words: "We're irresponsibly releasing preliminary results that don't tell us anything because they make our future product look good and will generate a lot of excited media headlines in the mainstream corporate media that we fund with our advertising dollars."

And there's the fact that, right after the announcement (and subsequent media extravaganza), Pfizer's CEO and executive vice president both sold millions of dollars worth of stock in the company. Nothing suspicious at all here, you crazy conspiracy theorists!

And then there's the fact that the coronavirus vaccine trials themselves are a documented sham. As I discussed with James Evan Pilato on New World Next Week recently, the vaccine candidates are not even being measured on the basis of whether or not they can prevent infection, but whether they can reduce symptoms such as coughs and headaches in patients who have already tested positive. As even contributor Walter Hasseltine notes: "These trials seem designed to prove their vaccines work, even if the measured effects are minimal."

But disregarding all of that, there's one other major issue that has been glossed over in all the breathless coverage of this new miracle cure that is about to deliver us from the COVID plague: This "vaccine" is not a vaccine in the traditional sense. It is an experimental injectable technology that has never been used before in humans.

Learn more about Pfizer's experimental vaccine in this week's edition of The Corbett Report Subscriber.

To access the full newsletter and to support this website, please become a member today.

For free access to this editorial, please CLICK HERE.

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register here.

Existing Users Log In

Filed in: Newsletter
Tagged with:

Comments (366)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Mielia says:

    good to see reaching this the English speaking world
    thanks to Wodarg at least the altmedia listeners in Germany are aware of that (since, dunno, maybe April, maybe later) – the rest of the populace likely hardly.
    Though I am not sure if I heard of/realized the DNA version.

    it’s not vaccines but tools to make you GMhumans

    and then we get back to the can humans be patented question…

    • Alchemist says:

      The vaccines currently available on the market are grown on proteins (eggs, monkey kidney, calf blood (bovine serum), horseshoe crab blood, insect parts, aborted human fetuses, etc.). DNA is found in protein.

    • says:

      While the unfolding of dystopian measures might appear to be the outcome of mission creep, I always search for the organizing principle underlying such narratives…and, WahLah! a major guiding force is outlined very clearly in a 2012 document I unearthed on the WHO.INT website titled, “Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011-2020”, co-authored by none other than Anthony Fauci and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, among other representative ‘experts’. A very enlightening overview of the ‘business plan’, including marketing and implementation strategies, the effects of which are playing out right now. The game is on!

      It’s particularly interesting that they spin the vaccine story as if it has no history going back to the mid-20th century, and that health disasters resulting from the Salk polio vaccine of the 1950’s ( ie: the discovery after 5years and over 90 million injections, that the base ‘culture’ of monkey kidney cells was tainted with ‘unwanted’ viruses) never happened. The whole fascinating yet sordid story is told in The Vaccine Race, an amazing book published in 2017 that provides a detailed look at the structure, politics and economics of the ‘science’ space as established with the Race to eradicate polio. (According to the ‘2012 Action Plan’, the old polio project is still not successful, as “health officials of 194 countries declared that the completion of polio eradication is a programmatic emergency for global health”.)

      To read the GVA Plan is to gain invaluable insight into the ‘Global Immunization Project’…especially when viewed through the Eugenicist/Depopulation lens of the likes of ‘Bill”.

      • Kate says:

        The SV40 aka monkey virus is still in vaccinations to this day.

        • Duck says:

          pretty sure monkey parts in the polio is where AIDS came from….

        • Duck says:

          Yikes…just listening to that doc again and forgot that Koprowski got his start testing experimental vaccines on retards. I guess It should not surprise me since most of the medical researchers think their Dr Mengele or something

          • Kate says:

            My biggest concern is what I’ve been exposed to in vaccinations. I fell for the ‘test balloon’ swine flu propaganda in 2009 and took that one willingly. Never again!!!

  2. Big-_-Brother says:

    Boy oh boy, James back at it again with another banger of an article. Glad I subscribed. This partially answers my question in the November thread 2020.( I was asking why James was always referring to the vaccine as a “chip”. Why does he always says “chip” when talking about vaccine even though from his Who Is Bill Gates documentary it says it will be “dissolvable micro-needle array patch” but never said it will be a chip that tracks your everyday movements.

  3. anonymint says:

    The virus that isn’t there, genetic sequencing, and the magic trick

    by Jon Rappoport

    Recently, I’ve written a series of articles revealing that the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is unproven.

    I’ve quoted key CDC and study documents that confess “the virus is unavailable.” Which is like an ice company saying they have no access to water. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

    I’ve published quotes from Dr. Tom Cowan’s major article [6] [7] exposing how CDC journal authors “assemble” the idea of a virus from cobbled sequences they ASSUME are parts of SARS-CoV-2. (Below, I reprint my article on Dr. Cowan’s shocking findings.)

    Now, I want to make overall comments on the con, the game, the hustle.

    The public, and most medical professionals, are awed by the whole concept of genetic sequencing. They accept the process as a holy of holies. If researchers in their lab claim they’ve “sequenced the virus,” the virus must exist. How else could its genetic structure have been discovered?

    Of course, the virus doesn’t have to exist at all. We are talking about an illusion. Stage magic


    Cowan: “The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:”

    “’[…] and A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection’.”


    “The shocking thing about the above [CDC journal] quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.”

    You can click the link to read the rest of the article. I have a lot more to say on this topic. I am really dejected to see so many people believing that this hoax virus actually infects humans when the CDC even cites research that it can’t infect humans.

    • anonymint says:

      Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’:

      First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC “designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).”

      To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn.


      The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this “new coronavirus” is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.


      If people really understood how this [junk!] “science” was done, I would hope they would storm the gates and demand honesty, transparency and truth.

      • Libertydan says:

        What if human beings were previously injected with traces of a Dog Corona Virus or Pig Corona Virus (masking as a Flew Vaccine) and then, were to come into contact with this Bat Corona Virus strain by seemingly natural means?
        Is it not possible that these Vaxed people who thought that they were getting “Few Vaccinations” would have compromised immune systems that would correlate closely with the Injected Monkeys?
        In other words, by getting Vaccinated, these people have made themselves vulnerable to a lab created Bat version of the Corona Virus that would not otherwise be harmful.

        • mkey says:

          Why overly complicate the issue? Why would they need a lab made “virus”?

        • anonymint says:

          I believe you’re missing the point entirely.

          1. Viruses are not even proven to exist. I will be elaborating on that below.

          2. The “virus” measured to “grow” in the poisoned monkey kidney cell culture doesn’t mean there was any virus at all. It just means that the poisoned cells released more exosomes and by the process of the fabricated nonsense employed by researchers which Dr. Andrew Kaufman explains, the researches conclude some meaningless nonsense about “viruses” and causation which they absolutely can’t prove.

          The entire “viruses” charade is probably a grand hoax. The entire Western medical system is ostensibly mostly a hoax when it reaches into the realm of cellular biology. Western medicine can fix broken bones and even repair a torn retina. Western medicine can’t cure viruses nor cancer because viruses don’t cause disease and cancer is poorly understood.

          Consider this comment as edited in way that doesn’t change the reality or what was observed but completely changes the interpretation:

          An example is poliovirus[exosomes misnomered as ‘poliovirus’], which causes[is present along with] paralytic disease in about 1% of those infected[who exhibit these exosomes]. Further compromising[reinforcing the importance of] postulate #1 is the fact that infection with the same virus may lead to[exosomes are present in] markedly different diseases, while different viruses[exosomes] may cause[be present with] the same disease.

          • Concetta says:

            Thank you very much for this explaination.

            It helps me better understand how they come up with these different viruses when you cross out their misleading words and replace them with the correct information.

            Definetely we have been scammed from the very beginning with vaccines. No one should be injected with any vaccin let alone the one they plan to unleash on the public for the Covid-19. Truely criminal.

            I don’t see any other comfort, than to trust in a loving presence and guidance as we move forward. My wish for all of humanity is that we do not get distracted and divided with all the lies and garbage we are being fed. And that we support each other and remain united.

            What comes to mind is the Grinch who stole Christmas. The Grinch took everything but he couldn’t take away their hearts.

            Once again thank you for the information you have provided.

          • anonymint says:

            Here the original April 2020 video by Dr. Andrew Kaufman wherein he first explained that SARS-CoV-2 “virus” had not been isolated. He then elaborated on the theory that “viruses” are really just exosomes.

            I suggest you download the video before Youtube censors it.

            Does anyone have a more stable link to this video such as Bitchute or LBRY?

          • mkey says:

            Here’s another presentation by Andrew Haufman regarding missing proof of virus existence.


            • anonymint says:

              Here’s a written summary of that Rooster in the River of Rats video.

              Note I had already posted the link to that video two days before you did, and there is additional information and discussion within and under my comment post about that video.

              P.S. Thanks for uploading Kaufman’s other video to Note Kaufman is not only a psychiatrist, as he also has experience in hematology and oncology.

              • mkey says:

                There are at least two earlier references to it. I have crippled the links as to avoid the queue.



                You are very much welcome regarding the lbry repost, I have grown a tendency for posting mirrors due to a) memoryholing of important material and b) lack of knowledge regarding proper video compression from the majority of uploaders, hindering the proliferation of seminal content.

          • mkey says:

            I have uploaded the video to lbry.

            The Truth about a Virus Dr Andrew Kaufman, MD, Psychiatrist explains what a virus is and is not

          • ridgeback says:

            Thanks for the information

        • cu.h.j says:

          I think Dr. Fauci mentioned how vaccines can make people more susceptible to other viruses. I think there was a link between Covid and the flu shot. This was covered in another question for Corbett podcast.

      • anonymint says:

        To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn.

        The 180 IQ highly respected Princeton professor Freeman Dyson pointed out the inherent, speculative leaps of faith in computer modeling in for example the bogus climate change models, aren’t suitable for making predictions and certainly not for establishing any link to anthropogenic causation. The autodidact eighteen year old, 160 IQ Naomi Seibt also recently explained why the IPCC models are bogus and aren’t even back tested to empirical data! There’s other professors and even a Nobel Laureate physicist speaking out against this junk science.

        I’ve reasserted Dr. Kaufman’s point that an exquisite, expert geek computer model is indistinguishable from random noise if there’s not exhaustive controls to rule out all alternative scenarios that the chosen model parameters implicitly ignored.

        In short we have geeks having fun with their new toy virtual reality computer models and then in their groupthink, Sheep logic delusion claiming that these models apply to our reality. And they have the audacity and “pride cometh before thy falleth” hubris to claim that makes them renown experts. It’s a snake swallowing its tail in that their basis of confidence is circular and not founded on any reality whatsoever. These neckbeards are very dangerous and they do not realize they’re actually collapsing human civilization with this myopia. But it’s they would who will perish because nature culls the herd of Yuri Bezmenov’s “useful idiots”. They’re disposable, unwitting minions of the manipulative forces of political economic power. I blogged three years ago Countries Vulnerable to Economic Devastation Soon.

        We have for example the Imperial College’s Neil Ferguson playing the role of a God with his shoddy, invalidated and willfully fraudulent computer modeling that was the basis for all these lockdowns and the devastation of the global economy that has pushed millions in the developing world into deprivation.

        I spoke with a 167 IQ Democrat who was a friend from high school and it’s confounding to observe how an individual with such a sharp mind can delegate all the data-founded reasoning to a “consensus of the renown experts” when he should realize that doing so is the antithesis of 160 IQ Taleb’s Antifragility. He’s contributing to the metastasis of accumulated risk, which ultimately leads to waterfall, societalcide collapse over the[ir] blind cliff. In essence he has chosen to subscribe to Sheep Logic (yet on the “higher” road to hell of renown experts, ahem, as if that is a distinction of merit which it isn’t). But that’s how nature must operate in extremes to form cycles so that per the Second law of Thermodynamics universal entropy can trend to maximum (i.e. maximum distribution of probabilities) by destroying the order of a groupthink grouping of certitude.

        • anonymint says:

          The two characteristic bookends of the political spectrum “aspirational class” idealists and CHRINOs cling to a “safety porn culture” normalcy bias which binds them to the groupthink that blinds them to societalcide that ultimately devours them.

          It’s already started in the UK as these ‘useful idiots’ are now complaining that the morass they enjoined is becoming arbitrary and totalitarian — which are the generative essence traits of their “we idol expert consensus” religion so why do they expect any other outcome? Well because they suffer the common psychosis either unwittingly or due to willful delegation of their civic duty to independently analyze the facts from first principles.

        • anonymint says:

          The powers-that-be are ostensibly attempting to deplatform Freeman Dyson perhaps because of his aforelinked scientifically sound position against climate change models. They are “burning the books” already by pressuring websites and their Internet hosting service to censor content, as the following linked content no longer appears on the source web page.

          Richard Dawkins author of The Selfish Gene was put in his little place by the venerable Freeman Dyson.

          Reddit censored my post mentioning the Great Reset.

    • anonymint says:

      There’s no SARS-CoV-2 virus that provably infects humans…

      The Rooster in the River of Rats ~ Dr Andrew Kaufman (Youtube)

      The Rooster in the River of Rats ~ Dr Andrew Kaufman (Bitchute)

      In the aforelinked video, Andrew Kaufman M.D. explains that neither SARS nor SARS-CoV-2 have ever been provably isolated from humans, nor proven to cause any disease. He points out the lies and fraud of the published papers which make or insinuate such claims, and/or which are erroneously cited in making such claims.

      Dr. Kaufman explains that the virus has never provably fulfilled Koch’s postulates for an infectious pathogen causative of a specific disease.

      Kaufman (misspoke?) fails to point that by modifying criteria #1, Rivers’ criteria by not requiring proof that the pathogen does NOT exist in healthy individuals effectively enables farcical means of proving the pathogen exists in ill patients in lieu of actually purifying the pathogen from the hosts. This is an important distinction because the fraudulent RT-PCR tests they’re employing have very high false positive rates in the healthy, e.g. Elon Musk tested positive twice and negative twice in the same day at the same lab using the exact same procedure and equipment.

      Rivers’ criteria was apparently invented because no virus has ever been able to fulfill Koch’s postulates, which raises the question whether viruses even exist or are some abstraction or idealization invented to assign a cause to disease that Western medicine actually can’t explain. Kaufman dives a bit into this rabbit hole.

      Also by eliminating the requirement to filter the cultured pathogen, Rivers’ criteria allows for the milieu to be measured by for example the noisy RT-PCR amplification as signal. Confusing a noisy environment with signal is analogous to aliasing sampling error which can generate a moire patterns artifact which can be mistaken for a real thing.

      Come on sheepeople. Wake up and unplug from the media matrix deception that’s programming our minds.

      • anonymint says:

        Scientists Have Utterly Failed to Prove that the Coronavirus Fulfills Koch’s Postulates

        The real kicker, though, is that the third postulate – isolating and sequencing the virus and then showing it causes the disease in other organisms – has not been fulfilled either.

        We’ve scoured the internet and found no proof that scientists have done the simple steps required to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 conclusively meets even one – never mind all — of the third postulate’s constituent parts.


        A few scientists have claimed that some or all of the postulates have been fulfilled. Their papers have been given laudatory coverage by the media, public-health officials and politicians.

        The problem is that each of these papers falls apart on even cursory examination.


        Meanwhile, public-health officials appear oblivious to this gaping hole in the science. They imperiously pronounce that they’re using the best data available, and act as if evidence-based decision-making is the substrate for the draconian measures they’re imposing.

        Could it be that they’re in fact using [tail wags the dog] decision-based evidence-making?

        • anonymint says:

          Comments on the aforelinked article…

          I made a FOI request to a major UK NHS Hospital Trust for evidence proving the virus exists and causes the alleged illness and deaths. Here is a link to its reply stating it doesn’t have such information:

          Here are 16 Freedom of Information (FOI) responses from various institutions in Canada, NZ, Australia, Germany, the U.K., England, Ireland, all indicating that they have no record in their possession, authored by anyone, anywhere, ever, describing the isolation of a “SARS-COV-2 virus” from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient:

          An international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort case ever ‘the corona fraud scandal’. CDC Admits Covid19 Test Does Not Exist. In the video, ATTORNEY REINER FUELLMICH summarizes facts that will become the core of a class-action suit. Reading from what sounds like the opening statement to the jury, Fuellmich brings together in one presentation virtually every major issue that lurks behind the controversies over testing, distancing, masking, and contact tracing Back up if censored

          The germ theory is plain wrong, and it’s about the ‘terrain’! Fungi grows and can causes illness – but mushrooms are fungi and taste GOOD! We once had bad bacteria only – now we know we must maintain GOOD bacteria in our gut and on our skin. There was ‘high cholesterol’ but now divide cholesterol in to GOOD and bad with our level expressed as a ratio of the two. Viruses have been thought of for over a century as pernicious external invaders, but the word is out – bad ‘Viruses’ are actually GOOD ‘Exosomes’ – inter cellular messengers generated by our body’s defences.

          […click to view image of putrid fishbowl with a sick fish vs. a clean fishbowl with a healthy fish…]

          Make sure you’re sitting down when you read this:

          • anonymint says:

            I would first recommend you go directly to the presentation of the German Corona Investigation Committee alliance of apparently comprised of some ~1000 European doctors:

            An international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort case ever ‘the corona fraud scandal’. CDC Admits Covid19 Test Does Not Exist. In the video, ATTORNEY REINER FUELLMICH summarizes facts that will become the core of a class-action suit. Reading from what sounds like the opening statement to the jury, Fuellmich brings together in one presentation virtually every major issue that lurks behind the controversies over testing, distancing, masking, and contact tracing […]


            Here’s an interview with that alliance’s doctor/attorney licensed both in Germany and in the state of California:


            He mentions at 14:30 that Germany threw attorney Beate Bahner in a mental institution for several days when she tried to speak out against this virus hoax fraud.

            • anonymint says:

              Mercola published Lawsuits Begin Over SARS-CoV-2 Lab Leak:

              Flawed Studies Form Base of Zoonotic Theory

              USRTK is also concerned about new claims that PLOS Pathogens and Nature published key papers on the origin of SARS-CoV-2 despite being flawed. I discussed these disturbing findings in “Top Medical Journal Caught in Massive Cover-Up.” It appears data sets were changed without notices of correction being published.

              November 9, 2020, USRTK published a series of emails4 they’d sent to the lead authors and editors of the papers in dispute. The questions raised5 by the responses they received “put in doubt the validity of these key studies,”

              So now the complicity of the Chinese is coming to light.

              Note that I need to dig up my source (and later post it as reply to this comment). I remember I had read in the comments on a prominent epidemiologist’s blog that the Wuhan biolab uploaded the genome for the alleged bat virus in late January after the Chinese PLA had taken control of the Wuhan biolab.

              P.S. I think these investigators are incorrect to presume a viral model of disease. Based on the discussions and information we are digging up here in these comments, I now think viruses are just exosomes excreted by cells when disease is also present. And that viruses are NOT infectious agents and do not cause disease but instead are an effect of disease.

          • vadoum says:

            so now we know, that like bacteria’s, there exists good and bad people, good and bad choices, resonance and dissonance.

            Do you mean being human doesn’t have to be complicated? phew, sometimes these reports can be a briar of possibility, but mostly, after reading, I seem to have found a life boat of sorts.

            Life was a globe girdling adventure, a roller-coaster of success and failure, but much more joy than pain, and then came the past 19 years: humanity getting schooled by itself on the meaning of lying.

            along with the exposure of bad people/insidious slime whose design was to eat everything, I also was massively lied to. I’m a slow learner, but decade by decade I begin to be more honest about the need to transmute dissonance, or at least less and less of a rule bender (the rules of natural law).

            thanks for the post & links

      • anonymint says:

        This is an important distinction because the fraudulent RT-PCR tests they’re employing have very high false positive rates in the healthy, e.g. Elon Musk tested positive twice and negative twice in the same day at the same lab using the exact same procedure and equipment.

        COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless

        Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose


        So to start, it is very remarkable that Kary Mullis himself, the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology, […] Mullis passed away last year at the age of 74, but there is no doubt that the biochemist regarded the PCR as inappropriate to detect a viral infection.

        The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.


        Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with.

        This is a fundamental point. Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity”[1] and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available.


        Apart from the fact that it is downright absurd to take the PCR test itself as part of the gold standard to evaluate the PCR test, there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19


        Now the question is: What is required first for virus isolation/proof? We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from.


        Hence, we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses.

        But not a single team could answer that question with “yes” — and NB., nobody said purification was not a necessary step.


        In addition, there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.


        Which means they just assumed the RNA was viral.







        • anonymint says:

          Consider the following quoted comment as edited for clarity to remove the misnomers:

          Kaufman demonstrates how the virus[exosomes] is [mis]identified via a filter. But mycoplasma infections act as viruses and are smaller than virus[exosomes]. So they would pass through the filters and the RNA inside the mycoplasma would be picked up on a antigen test.(The PCR tests may pick-up the Corona sequences but with much error).. Doctors are not performing urine antigen tests or other such mycoplasma detection tests on Covid patients for the most part and this is the huge elephant in the room. The PCR tests only detect the RNA sequences but are blind to see where it comes from. Antigen tests detect mycoplasma type antigens. This is what is causing the Covid-19 advanced stage disease,not a new virus[exosome] […] But the serious cases and fatalities are not from the so called new SARS Covid-2 virus, but from the mycoplasma infections. This is why Azithromycin together with hydroxychroloquine and zinc work. The first kills the mycoplasma bacteria and the later two stop the viral reproduction which leads to[exosome excretion as a by-product of] the serious cases.

          And another:

          Notice how stabilizing the P.H. levels of the body are key to controlling the mycoplasma in the body. The mycoplasm mutates to bacteria which then mutates to form viruses[cause the cells to excrete exosomes], the video above suggests. A later state is mutations to parasitic form. This would explain why broad sprectrum anti-biotics attack the Corona virus[disease associated with excretion of exosomes with coronas] as those which are anti-malaria attack the parasite forms…the hydroxychloroquine and zinc will attack the viral mutation. The drugs which attack like or flees are also effective to attack the plasmoid state. Anti-malarial drugs are effective as well. By eliminating the mycoplasma, one can eliminate cancer, AIDS, Corona virus, cystic fibrosis and many other neural-systemic diseases.

          • anonymint says:

            That individual clarifies that viruses don’t exist and presents a theory that mycoplasma is being distributed in vaccines to make us sick:

            Kaufman explains nicely the exosome model based upón the polymorphic nature of the militarized mycoplasma disease infection of the cells which is causing this so called pandemic. It is not a Corona pandemic nor should it be characterized this way. It is a bio-weapons generated mycoplasma infection pandemic. It was created for profit, so the Rothschild – Warburg – Rockefeller – Queen – Black Nobility – Nazi Swiss Octogon banking cartel can rake in trilions from their contaminated vaccines which will spread the sickness even more. All vaccines are contaminated with the mycoplasma. See the videos and work of Judy Mikovitz to understand this. Yet even Judy does not understand that viruses do not exist. What she isolated was not an AIDS virus but rather exosomes which are manifestations of the mycoplasma infections, the root cause of all neuro-systemic diseases. So SARS Corona-1, 2, 3, 4 or whatever are not viruses. Viruses do not exist. What exist are cells infected with the militarized mycoplasma, infected via The Invisible Rainbow process as described in the famous bookd by Arthur Firstenberg. So 5G combined with the nanobot, nanotube dispersed bio-weapon mycoplasma versions are what cause AIDS, cancer, cystic fibrosis and other neuro-systemic diseases which doctors have a hard time to treat as they do not know, for the most part, about these militarized versions of mycoplasma. (97 % of doctors do not know about them). There are some 7 or so militarized versions. The Spanish Flu was actually caused by the vaccines. The same with AIDS, cancer and now Corona Covid-19. This is because they contain the infected mycoplasma which carries the RNA or DNA genetic code for whatever disease they wish to produce. They can either disperse it directly via DNA code or reverse transcript it into the cells using the nanobots activated by 4G or 5G. The nanobots burrow the mycoplasma carrying the RNA or the DNA into the cells. Once this is done, the spark of the disease is initiated. It progresses in a polymorphic disease progression through various stages. It ultimately manifests, in the current RNA sequence, as what they call Covid19. But it is not a virus and it was never a virus. Germs and bacteria etc do not transmit the disease. Viruses do not exist nor do they transmit any disease. Bacteria are reactions of your body to fight off the intracellular mycoplasa infections […] The other “Q” movement is fake and controlled opposition.

            Note Artemisia annua combined with zinc and iron supplementation cures the illness caused by mycoplasma.

            • anonymint says:

              Note Artemisia annua combined with zinc and iron supplementation cures the illness caused by mycoplasma.

              By apparently an analogous mechanism another malaria medication Hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc is also effective.

              In 2005 Fauci claimed Chloroquine to be “a potent inhibitor of” coronaviruses like SARS

              The tweeted image excerpt.

            • anonymint says:

              The Spanish Flu was actually caused by the vaccines.

              If we ignore the claimed (backsplained?) late-18th and mid-19th century “descriptions“ of polio (which could be a fabrication or just sporadic incidences of mycoplasma induced polio-like illness) NMAH | Polio: Timeline (c.f. also History of Polio) indicates the following timeline of significance:

              1894, first outbreak of polio in epidemic form in the U.S. occurs in Vermont, with 132 cases.

              1916, large epidemic of polio [in the U.S.]

              1921, […] FDR contracts polio at age 39 […] major impact on public perceptions of […] disabilities.


              1953, Salk […] develop a potentially safe, inactivated (killed), injected polio vaccine.

              1954, nearly two million children participate in the field trials.

              1955 - 57, incidence of polio in the U.S. falls by 85 - 90%.

              1968, […] Architectural Barriers Act, requiring that all federally financed buildings be accessible to […] disabilities.

              1979, last case of polio […]; last case of smallpox in the world.

              1980s, post-polio syndrome identified

              1990, Passage of the Americans with Disabilitites Act

              1999, inactivated polio vaccine replaces oral polio vaccince [in the U.S.]

              Let’s cross-correlate that to the vaccine history:

              1885 Louis Pasteur first used rabies vaccine in humans.

              1893 City and state public health departments began mass production of diphtheria antitoxin

              1906 The Pure Food and Drugs Act was formed, prohibiting interstate commerce in misbranded and adulterated foods, drinks, and drugs.

              1908 The first county health departments in the U.S.

              1914 Tetanus toxoid was introduced

              1914 Rabies vaccine was first licensed in the U.S.

              1914 Typhoid vaccine was first licensed in the U.S.

              1915 Pertussis vaccine […] was licensed

              1918 The "Spanish flu" influenza pandemic

              1923 Diphtheria toxoid was licensed

              1927 Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine was first used in newborns


              1943 Penicillin first became mass-produced

              1947 Comb[o] diphtheria and tetanus toxoids for pediatric use was first licensed in the U.S

              1949 The last case of smallpox in the U.S. was reported

              1952 The worst recorded polio epidemic in U.S. history

              1957 - 1958 "Asian" influenza pandemic […] an estimated 70,000 deaths in the U.S.

              1963 Inactivated measles vaccine […] licensed in the U.S.

              1964 A rubella epidemic swept the U.S.

              Dec 1967 Mumps virus vaccine live […] was licensed

              1968 - 1969 The "Hong Kong" influenza pandemic […] 34,000 deaths in the U.S.

              Let’s analyze this in (your and) my follow-up replies…

              • anonymint says:

                1. So the first significant outbreak of polio in the U.S. in 1894 (132 cases) was preceded by the first mass production of the diphtheria antitoxin in 1893. Hmm.

                2. The first large epidemic of polio in the U.S. in 1916 was preceded by adoption (in the U.S.) of the Tetanus toxoid, Rabies vaccine, Typhoid vaccine and Pertussis vaccine in 1914 and 1915. The global The “Spanish flu” influenza-like illness pandemic followed soon thereafter in 1918. Hmm.

                3. The worst recorded polio epidemic in U.S. history in 1952 is preceded by adoption of a combination diphtheria and tetanus toxoids for pediatric use in 1947. The global “Asian” influenza-like illness pandemic followed soon thereafter in 1957. Hmm.

                4. A rubella epidemic swept the U.S. in 1964 which was preceded by adoption of the inactivated measles vaccine in 1963. The Mumps live virus vaccine was adopted in late 1967.The global “Hong Kong” influenza-like illness pandemic followed soon thereafter in 1968. Hmm.

                5. These (intentionally manufactured Hegelian dialectic?) health crises lead to subjugation of the formerly laissez-faire system/culture by enactment of new bureaucracies and the development of what I refer to as “safety porn culture”. This is the typical global elite modus operandi.

                6. It appears that the diseases ceased in the U.S. possibly due to some combination of a) immune systems eventually adjusted and stabilized after the posited poisoning by vaccines (although autoimmunity lingers until now as significant health issue for many), b) ingestion/injection of mycoplasma (mycobacteria) from sickened cells (which as posited had been previously poisoned by vaccines) in the form of for example the polio vaccine induced an immune response and/or c) discovery of antibiotics as means of inducing an immune response to mycoplasma and the variant pleomorphic forms of bacteria it can morph as either the etiology and/or pathology of the disease.

              • mutig says:

                That a vaccine caused the “Spanish” Flu appears to be well documented:


                Please note that one of the authors of the article cited in footnote 3 is Anthony Fauci.

              • mkey says:

                This is very interesting. So many people live lies so deeply I don’t think there is any chance they would give up on defending them and will probably take them to their graves.

              • anonymint says:

                The discovery of truths on the Internet about the vaccine and viruses hoax that the global elite have been foisting on human civilization for more than a century, might explain why they’re so desperate to move to 1984 totalitarianism before the wide access to information on the Internet undermines their control and results in their decapitations. They’re ostensibly in desperation mode now and preparing to launch a spare-no-prisoners war on truthers.

                @mutig I quote from that excellent article you linked:

                The “Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime. Bacterial pneumonia attacks people in their prime. Flu attacks the young, old and immunocompromised.

                Wikipedia ‘backsplains:

                In 1918, older adults may have had partial protection caused by exposure to the 1889–1890 flu pandemic, known as the “Russian flu”.

                But that doesn’t explain why the posited flu attacked people in their prime. Thus the only plausible explanation is that the pandemic wasn’t caused by a viral flu.

                Wikipedia is unable to provide an explanation which supports the viral hypothesis:

                Scientists offer several possible explanations for the high mortality rate of the 1918 influenza pandemic. Some analyses have shown the virus to be particularly deadly because it triggers a cytokine storm, which ravages the stronger immune system of young adults. In contrast, a 2007 analysis of medical journals from the period of the pandemic found that the viral infection was no more aggressive than previous influenza strains. Instead, malnourishment, overcrowded medical camps and hospitals, and poor hygiene, all exacerbated by the recent war, promoted bacterial superinfection. This superinfection killed most of the victims, typically after a somewhat prolonged death bed.

              • anonymint says:

                @mutig another important quote from that excellent article you linked:

                In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built a power grid and wired the city so power was available in every home. Electricity allows for refrigeration. Refrigeration is an unsung hero as a public health benefit. When food is refrigerated from farm to table, the public is protected from potential infectious diseases. Cheap renewable energy is important for many reasons, including combating infectious diseases.


                US Mortality Rates data from the turn of the 20th century to 1965 clearly indicates that clean water, flushing toilets, effective sewer systems and refrigerated foods all combined to effectively reduce mortality from infectious diseases BEFORE vaccines for those diseases became available.

                So in addition to the introduction of antibiotics and humans perhaps developing some natural immunity to protect against the ongoing onslaught of a barrage of toxic vaccines, there’s also improved sanity conditions (i.e. cleaning up the putrid fish bowl) that possibly lead to the eradication of the illnesses that seem to have been created by (e.g. polio) or exacerbated by vaccines (e.g. bacterial pneumonia and smallpox).

                The Black Death spread apparently by an infestation of rodents in the unsanity squalor of overpopulated European cities before the Industrial Revolution wherein there was massive poverty due to an oversupply of agricultural labor. The Black Death actually instigated the Industrial Revolution because it created a shortage in agricultural labor, c.f. §Hajnal line and manorialism.

              • anonymint says:

                @mutig another important quote from that excellent article you linked:

                In 2018, the vaccine industry experiments on infants every day. The vaccine schedule has never been tested as it is given. The results of the experiment are in: 1 in 7 American children is in some form of special education and over 50% have some form of chronic illness. (12)

                In 1918-19, there was no safety follow up after vaccines were delivered.

                In 2018, there is virtually no safety follow up after a vaccine is delivered.

                Who exactly gave you that flu shot at Rite Aid? Do you have their cell number of the store employee if something goes wrong?

                In 1918-19, there was no liability to the manufacturer for injuries or death caused by vaccines.

                In 2018, there is no liability for vaccine manufacturers for injuries or death caused by vaccines, which was formalized in 1986. (13)

                That’s damning. If Americans don’t revolt against this then they deserve to be slaves and perish.

              • Alchemist says:

                Thank you, anonymint, for taking the time to share this information. We should also note that “polio” was a catchall term for any paralytic illness. It has since been re-named: transverse myelitis, Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM), Guillain-Barré syndrome, aseptic meningitis, and Enterovirus D68. There are thousands of polio-like illnesses reported each year.

                Also worth mentioning is the theory that “polio” from the 50s was actually DDT poisoning and those without tonsils were at highest risk. Regarding FDR’s paralysis… well there are some theories about that too.

                I did not realize the Black Death helped usher in the Industrial Revolution, but that seems relevant and worth exploring, so thank you for pointing that out!

                To anyone who wants to learn more on this topic, I recommend:

                “Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, And The Forgotten History” by Dr. Suzanne Humphries


              • anonymint says:

                @Alchemist, thank you for pointing out that polio-like illness never ceased and was instead just renamed — which is the typical sort of deception employed by our overlords against us.

                <b“might explain why they’re so desperate to move to 1984 totalitarianism before the wide access to information on the Internet undermines their control and results in their decapitations […] and preparing to launch a spare-no-prisoners war on truthers.<b”

                The powers-that-be are ostensibly attempting to deplatform Freeman Dyson perhaps because of his aforelinked scientifically sound position against climate change models. They are “burning the books” already, as the following linked content no longer appears on the source web page.



                Richard Dawkins author of The Selfish Gene was put in his little place by the venerable Freeman Dyson.

              • anonymint says:

                Responding to an email from my 167 IQ former high school staunchly-Democrat classmate who read our comment posts:

                while some of it is interesting, none of it is overwhelming evidence of anything nefarious. There are even plausible explanations for why the so-called Spanish Flu resulted in so many deaths from bacterial pneumonia. Hospitals back then were not well sterilized environments and often filled with bacteria. Even today, the biggest risk of surgery is often subsequent infection contracted at the hospital.

                I don’t claim to be a medical expert or an epidemiologist, but I would put my faith in people like Anthony Fauci long before I would trust people posting comments or articles in the blogosphere, even if they claim to have genius IQs or some expertise in the field.

                Entire theory of virology is unproven:


                Your response about Spanish flu is nonsensical because the condition of hospitals doesn’t explain what launched a contagion in the first place that lead to ~100 million deaths.

                Also you’re unresponsive to the allegation that for example the IPCC models don’t even back test to the historical empirical data. You dismiss Naomi Seibt out-of-hand without even refuting her points of fact.

                Your trust in others (especially the provably corrupt such as Fauci) to do your thinking for you will be your downfall.

                I could dump a shitload of information about Fauci on you, but you will find a way to stay in your blissful normalcy bias because emotionally that is where you want to be. There is a term for this: cognitive dissonance. The only resolution to that condition is to suffer the consequences of being unaware.

                Another Nazi-esque purge is likely coming.

                Denmark Also Passes Emergency COVID Law Coordinated with Germany – They Are Now Moving Rapidly Globally

              • anonymint says:

                Richard Dawkins author of The Selfish Gene was put in his little place by the venerable Freeman Dyson.

                I would say that both authors have valid points in defending their differing perspectives on evolution. They may both be right, to some extent, but certainly neither of them has been completely accepted or disproven by their peers. You seem to have a bias toward anyone who challenges widely accepted mainstream beliefs. Fringe ideas or so-called proofs rarely reach the point of changing established practices or beliefs, but they certainly have the potential to do so. I guess I don’t have enough time or desire to fully investigate each and every attack on commonly held beliefs, even when they have such a big influence on my day-to-day life like the nature of the pandemic or anthropogenic climate change. I prefer to spend my time improving the quality of my life and those around me. As it is, I am bombarded with massive amounts of data, information and perspectives these days, and it can be overwhelming at times. I think it’s important to relax, enjoy nature, focus on personal health and well being, and improve the quality of one’s relationships, as well as making enough money to pay the bills and enjoy the freedom money can provide.

                Dyson explains that evolution itself evolved to high-levels of competition, from cellular biology, to a Darwinian competition between species and now to a competition within the dominant species — humans. Dawkins’ Darwinian bias is thus entirely incorrect because inter-species competition ended ~10,000 years ago; and Dyson explains that there’s no such thing intra-species genetic competition, e.g. you don’t see one sub-species of humans capable of reproductively isolating themselves (except maybe in the future with biotech reproduction which is Dyson’s point). Any ongoing Darwinian inter-species evolution other than humans is ostensibly irrelevant and subsumed by human terraforming. Dyson explains that cultural (i.e. knowledge and information) transfer is evolving three orders-of-magnitude faster than non-anthropogenic genetic transfer. Instead humans are artificially accelerating horizontal gene transfer with biotech. Other species lose their raison d’être.

                So I must conclude that either you didn’t put much thought into it, or my reading comprehension is higher than yours.

                Even though my SAT was ~100 points lower than yours (and apparently yours was lower than it should have been due to your underdeveloped English skills at that time), I had a near perfect score on the reading comprehension component of the verbal. Granted my mental acuity is diminished by the oscillating dementia I’m experiencing due to some chronic disease. My mind is somewhat sharp at this moment — seems correlated to when I’m fasting.

              • anonymint says:

                @mutig linked above to a very compelling article alleging that the Spanish Flu pandemic was caused by the Rockefeller Foundation providing bacterial meningitis vaccines that were administered to 6 million U.S. soldiers headed into WW1.

                And today the bacterial meningitis vaccine is still murdering people:

                28-year-old volunteer in AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine trial dies

                The volunteer did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine, but was in the control group. Half the people in the clinical trial received the experimental vaccine, and the other half received an established meningitis vaccine. The volunteer is believed to have received the meningitis vaccine. The cause of death has not been released.

        • anonymint says:

          COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless raises the point I discovered in my research which is that for example the sensitivity and specificity testing seems to be based on samples provided by a central authority (e.g. the WHO), so nothing can be trusted at all. If the unbased specificity is hosed then the false positive rate (FPR) can be 80+%:

          Further, the RT-PCR test for coronavirus can return false positives in up to 80% of cases, so it’s entirely possible the majority of these deaths never even had the “virus”.

      • anonymint says:

        This is an important distinction because the fraudulent RT-PCR tests they’re employing have very high false positive rates in the healthy, e.g. Elon Musk tested positive twice and negative twice in the same day at the same lab using the exact same procedure and equipment.

        Correction. Apparently Musk was referring to the rapid serum antibody tests (instead of the RT-PCR tests) which are known (in general not just specifically w.r.t. SARS-CoV-2) to be unable to distinguish between an active infection and past, cured infection.[1] Nevertheless Musk’s bizarre result is still indicative of the potential meaninglessness of SARS-CoV-2 tests.

        I did look up the comprehensive research estimates of false positive rates for the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests and what I found is precisely what COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless states, that the tests and those research estimates are bogus because they’re not based on any gold standard basis. Or as Dr. Andrew Kaufman points out that there’s no control in the research to rule out alternative explanations so as to distinguish noise or non-causal, coincidental correlations from provably causal (i.e. cause and effect) correlation. In clinical research the lack of a control makes any conclusion of the research no better than random guesses or noise.

        The aforelinked article points out that the recently deceased inventor of the RT-PCR test had stated that the test was inappropriate for diagnosing or performing research about viruses. This is how the so called experts in research delude themselves is because they commit the original sin of basing their exquisite technological research on an entirely flawed foundation. In this way they can be supreme, renown experts in their field and still be entirely incorrect and deluded because they started their otherwise exquisite research on broken first principles. They double-down on their delusion because all their peers are doing so also; and because no one wants to admit their entire career and prior body of work is actually a sham. They’re already vested in the lie even if they don’t realize it.

        An analogy is the exquisite technological research and engineering that went into developing the Apache helicopters but the geeks failed to think about how just simple sand would entirely muck up all their exquisite work.

        [1] Note that’s ignoring whether viruses, and separately whether antibody markers, are even a valid disease model. Which is an issue we are separately discussing in these comments.

        • anonymint says:

          An analogy is the exquisite technological research and engineering that went into developing the Apache helicopters but the geeks failed to think about how just simple sand would entirely muck up all their exquisite work.

          [1] Note that’s ignoring whether viruses, and separately whether antibody markers, are even a valid disease model. Which is an issue we are separately discussing in these comments.

          I wrote:

          P.S. I think these investigators are incorrect to presume a viral model of disease. Based on the discussions and information we are digging up here in these comments, I now think viruses are just exosomes excreted by cells when disease is also present. And that viruses are NOT infectious agents and do not cause disease but instead are an effect of disease.

          I wrote:

          The problem I have with Chris is that he doesn’t seem to understand that the mainstream notion of “viruses” is apparently an incorrect, hoax disease model (they’re only exosomes, not infectious particles) and vaccines actually apparently cause epidemics and pandemics instead of protecting against them!

          The conceptual unification is that in each case some key factor SUBSUMES (i.e. makes irrelevant) all the other noise layered on top.

          This also applies wherein I have identified a common, terminal(!) vulnerability in all blockchain consensus algorithms, which subsumes any exquisite sophistication those projects may have advanced in the state-of-the-art because they didn’t resolve the key vulnerability.

          This conceptual point also applies to all the exquisite sophistication of the renown experts who are actually generating junk science because they were fooled or complicit in subverting key foundational principles that subsume all their sophisticated obfuscation layered on top of their “original sin”.

    • WAYNED says:

      Much enjoy your articles. Regarding AIDS and the current covid thing, I was in a position to truly watch the beginning and arc of the aids crisis in my smallish town, I was a popular bartender at the biggest most popular gay bar at its time.. People were dying of something and given the people I knew, it could not be “drugs and lifestyle” for the majority of them. I literally lost all of my friends, people I hoped to get to know for a lifetime, within about a 6 year span. One person was a tennis coach who was a hemophiliac. There was SOME kind of pathogen. Interestingly, I was friends with someone who lived in a house, they called it a house of unwed mothers, in Durham, NC owned by a Bruce Chase, or could have been Bruce Payne, it’s been a lot of years and I knew both, one a Duke History teacher, the other the owner of the home and a medical doctor. I get their surnames confused.
      The medical professional Bruce held a home meeting that was urgent, so I got to attend and he told us about the gay “cancer” as it was being called, just hearing whispers of it, and he told us then, “It will take years before you hear this, so I’m telling you now, it is spread through unprotected anal intercourse.”
      Indeed, many of the friends who did become “positive” and died said they had contracted it by these means.
      I DO now believe the major incidence of the AIDs scam was due to the effects of the medication, but like with Covid (Fauci and the US were putting funding into Wuham for SOMETHING) I think HIV has a “real” component (after all, there was congressional testimony in the 70s that within 10 years we will have a pathogen for which there will be no known cure) but that it was augmented by drugs, numbers. I think AIDS was a test ground for all kinds of immunological tricks that have followed.
      Do you feel this is 100pct made up or only 90pct with some real effect mixed in?

      • anonymint says:

        The posited virus HIV doesn’t cause the illness AIDs. As explained upthread viruses are apparently only exosomes excreted by cells as a reaction to illness. They may perform some function in the immune system but are apparently not infecting cells nor causing disease.

        HIV particles do not cause AIDS, our own immune cells do

        an infected cell can pass the virus to an uninfected cell. The second method, cell to cell transmission, is 100 to 1000 times more efficient, and the new study shows that it is only this method that sets off a cellular chain reaction that ends in the newly infected cells committing suicide.

        “The fundamental ‘killing units’ of CD4 T cells in lymphoid tissues are other infected cells, not the free virus,”

        That aforelinked article then fabricates some nonsense about fragments of HIV in the vicinity of the dying immune cells being indicative of HIV being a causative agent, but this is better explained by them simply being exosomes excretions from the immune cells which are dying due to the disease.

        The deadly disease AIDs is apparently caused by poppers:

        research has found that popper use suppresses natural killer (NK) cell function, which increases vulnerability to infectious agents, produces sustained alterations in the immune system, and may be a Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) cofactor. The combined data implicate that the use of poppers may well pose as a significant risk factor for seroconversion.

        • anonymint says:

          Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent

          “The HIV/AIDS hypothesis is one hell of a mistake”, wrote Kary Mullis in 1996. Mullis – Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, 1993 – and other distinguished scientists have claimed the HIV-causes-AIDS hypothesis is false, unproductive, and unethical. They have done so since 1984, when the hypothesis was proposed.


          For instance, in 1996 Johnson reported 60-plus factors capable of causing a false-positive result on tests for HIV antibodies […] Because they react to these factors, the tests may not be detecting HIV at all. Worthy of notice, among the list, are elements ubiquitous among all populations such as the flu, flu vaccinations, pregnancy in women who have had more than one child, tetanus vaccination, and malaria (an important element to consider in the case of the AIDS epidemic in Africa).


          This means some of the biological markers being used to “flag” the presence of HIV are not “specific to HIV or AIDS patients [and] p24 and p41 are not even specific to illness.” In other words, healthy persons may test positive on a WB but not carry HIV at all


          An example may clarify: if tested in Africa, a WB showing reactivity to any two of the proteins p160, p120, or p41, would be considered positive for HIV. In Britain, the test would be positive only if it showed reactivity to one of these three proteins, together with reactions to two other proteins, p32 and p24 (see mention of p24, above, as occurring in healthy individuals). Therefore, someone whose test reacts to p160 and p120 would be considered HIV-positive in Africa, but not in Britain. A test reaction to p41, p32, and p24 would be considered positive in Britain, but negative in Africa


          According to critics, a definitive answer regarding which protein–antigens are specific to HIV and HIV alone can only come from successful virus isolation and purification. Isolating and purifying “would be required to verify that all of these proteins actually originate from HIV particles”. Attempts at purifying have been made, but have been criticized for their ambiguous findings, or for their use of cultured samples (see discussion below on EM images). To date, the issue of HIV isolation in purified samples has not been addressed to critics’ satisfaction

          […continued in my next comment post…]

        • anonymint says:

          […continued from my prior comment post…]

          Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent

          Despite its enhanced specificity, many mainstream scientists and practitioners recommend caution when using PCR for screening or diagnosing infection. For instance, authors of a study published in JAMA in 2006, in which PCR was used with a sample of almost 3,000 people, concluded: “The PCR assay is not sufficiently accurate to be used for the diagnosis of HIV infection without confirmation”.

          PCR technology evolved quickly since it was introduced in 1983. Although being employed, mostly, for assessing viral load (less for screening and diagnosis), it should give us pause to learn, however, that Dr. Kary Mullis – the scientist who won the 1993 Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test and whose quote introduced this article – has strongly opposed using the technique for determining the amount of virus circulating in plasma.


          Mullis has stated: “Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.” PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers.


          HERVs) as potential confounders, the genetic sequences detected in a PCR test may not be those from an exogenous virus, at all, and may explain the test’s substantial false-positive rates. HERVs consist of retrovirus-like particles produced by host cells that are stressed or dying. In other words, when various infections assail the body, and certain cells experience stress or die in large numbers, they can manufacture by-products similar to retroviruses. These by-products can be reactive when testing for HIV antibodies, protein antigens, and viral loads


          Much of the genetic material attributed to HIV is in fact DNA or RNA from [these] decaying cells


          even purified HIV samples harbor protein particles (called microvesicles), considered to be contaminants. These microvesicles do not disappear during the purifying process. In other words, even when technicians purify HIV samples, certain “cellular proteins bound to non-viral particles (i.e., microvesicles) can copurify with [the] virus,” and appear in the EM images. The question, then, remains: are the EM images seen in these purified samples, pictures of HIV itself, or of other elements/particles?

          […continued in my next comment post…]

        • anonymint says:

          […continued from my prior comment post…]

          Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent

          Ettiene de Harven – the scientist who “produced the first electron micrograph of a retrovirus […]” […] – added to the debate:

          All the images of particles supposedly representing HIV and published in scientific as well as in lay publications derive from EM studies of cell cultures. They never show HIV particles coming directly from an AIDS patient [(7), p. 70 – emphasis added].


          Duesberg cogently argued: retroviruses are not known for killing cells. In other words, retroviruses are not “cytocidal.” If anything, retroviruses were once thought to be associated with cancer because they cause precisely the opposite of cell death; they contribute to cells’ growth or proliferation


          even before AIDS, researchers were documenting the immune-suppressing effects of amyl nitrites or “poppers” (the form of amyl nitrites popular among gay men in the early and mid-80s) and determining both their toxicity and carcinogenic properties in humans and animals


          Anti-retroviral drugs used to treat HIV infection/disease, also, are indicted by Duesberg and those who agree with him as potentially causing AIDS. Because the drug cocktails include “DNA chain-terminators and protease inhibitors” that affect healthy cells as well as the virus, and because “many studies find that people receiving ARV medications experience AIDS-defining diseases to a greater extent than controls not receiving those medications”, antiretrovirals are viewed as potential immune suppressors.


          AIDS epidemics of the US and Europe are caused by recreational drugs, alias lifestyle, and anti-HIV drugs … and by other non-contagious risk factors such as immunosuppressive proteins associated with transfusions of blood clotting factors … pediatric AIDS is due to prenatal consumption of recreational and anti-HIV drugs by unborn babies together with their pregnant mothers … The chemical basis of African AIDS is proposed to be malnutrition and lack of drinkable water

          […continued in my next comment post…]

        • anonymint says:

          […continued from my prior comment post…]

          Questioning the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent

          helps regulate blood pressure as well as “wound repair and host defense [sic] mechanisms”. Excessive amounts, however, lead to T-cell depletion, “inflammation, infection, neoplastic diseases [cancer] liver cirrhosis, [and diabetes”]. This change from adequate-to-excessive amounts of NO in the human body results from multiple factors, including “nitrite inhalation [e.g., using ‘poppers’], microbial antigen, and toxin stimulation [e.g., suffering repeated infections with different viruses/bacteria], immunotoxic medications [e.g., taking ARVs and antibiotics], [and] many other stress factors”


          placing the blame for AIDS on bio-chemical processes gone awry within human cells is the oxidative stress (or redox) hypothesis […] as people become infected with multiple […] latent infections, the immune system embarks on a chain-reaction-response […] the system overloads itself and becomes dysfunctional

        • anonymint says:

          Doctor Robert Willner injects himself with hiv/aids on national tv

          Dr. Willner is author of Deadly Deception: The Proof that Sex and ‘HIV’ Absolutely Do Not Cause ‘AIDS’. So determined was Dr. Willner to prove to the world that ‘AIDS’ was not spread sexually or through blood contamination, that he stunned the nation of Spain in 1993 by inoculating himself on TV with the blood of Pedro Tocino, a haemophiliac said to be ‘HIV positive’. The footage was broadcast throughout Europe. Encouraged by the coverage he was receiving, Willner repeated his performance with different patients in front of the cameras of ABC and NBC. Surprisingly no US network reported this dramatic news on national television. Up until his untimely death, Dr. Willner remained ‘HIV negative’ in spite of constant testing.

    • Kate says:

      You’re opinion that SARS-Cov-2 doesn’t exist, supported by Cowan’s finding that what they say is the virus is ‘cobbled sequences’ is contradicted by Dr. George Tetz who sees a virus with “prion like proteins in two of its structures”, “within the surface of each spike is a prion like domain, localized with the receptor binding domain of its spike.” Tetz doesn’t seem to be “awed by the whole concept of genetic sequencing”, nor conning us with “stage magic”, but Cowan’s theory doesn’t make sense on many fronts, and is impeding our fight against bioweapons.

      Specifically, Cowan’s statement that “A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS Cov-2 infection”, and “solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 – even in high amounts – were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested”, thus “they proved . . . that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human beings.” In contrast, Tetz “analyzed the receptor of the human cells ACE2 for the virus and within alpha 1 helix we found prion like domains, and found amino acids with prion like domains within the viral spike interact with the amino acids within prion like domains on our cells.” So who is correct?

      In the paper ACE2 Receptor Expression and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrom Coronavirus Infection Depend on Differentiation of Human Airway Epithelia, it says “Interestingly, ACE2 expression positively correlated with the differentiation state of epithelia. Undifferentiated cells expressing little ACE2 were poorly infected with SARS-CoV, while well-differentiated cells expressing more ACE2 were readily infected. Expression of ACE2 in poorly differentiated epithelia facilitated SARS spike (S) protein-pseudotyped virus entry.”

      In the paper Exogenous ACE2 Expression Allows Refractory Cell Lines to Support Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Replication, it says “CaCo-2 was the only human cell type of 13 tested that supported efficient SARS-CoV replication. Expression of the SARS-CoV receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), resulted in SARS-CoV replication in all refractory cell lines examined. Titers achieved were variable and dependent upon the method of ACE2 expression.” It goes on to say “Expression of ACE2 from at least one of the two plasmid vectors resulted in SARS-CoV replication in Hec1B, MRC-5, and 17Cl 1 cells, but not A549, 293T, or AK-D cells.” Which proves Dr. Cowans conclusion that SARS-CoV-2 is not infective to humans is incorrect.

      • anonymint says:

        You’re opinion that SARS-Cov-2 doesn’t exist, supported by Cowan’s finding that what they say is the virus is ‘cobbled sequences’ is contradicted by Dr. George Tetz who sees a virus with “prion like proteins in two of its structures”, […]

        Kate as I already explained more than once, you don’t seem to understand the scientific method. In science — as opposed to propaganda, narratives, guess work and other such activities which are not science — the burden of proof isn’t on me to prove that non-falsifiable theories (aka witchcraft or making up stories) are not true. Non-falsifiable “theories” don’t even qualify to be scientific theories and are to be disregarded out-of-hand as equivalent to fiction. I already explained that correlation isn’t equivalent to causation — artifacts can appear to be real when in fact they’re just noise or side-effects.

        You’ve got that totally backasswards. The burden of proof in science is on the scientists who are promulgating a theory. And in science theories must be falsiable. Any so called “experts” who are promulgating theories which are impossible to falsify, are snake oil salesmen, charlatans and willful enemies of science and truth.

        Falsifiability is absolutely a fundamental tenet of science.

        These theories about the functionality (and even existence) of these protein and nucleic acid structures that scientists claim they observe with electron microscopes can’t be falsified. There would be no way to test whether the claimed functionality are not artifacts (i.e. to test whether their theories are false), which is what falsifiability means in this example context. Because as I explained due to the Shannon-Nyquist theorem we must know the frequency range of the phenomenon for the signal we think we are observing before we will know if we are actually observing a true signal or just the artifacts of insufficient sample resolution — i.e. the electron microscope may be generating artifacts.

        Imagine it like this. If you observe a broken clock twice a day at carefully chosen times, the clock will appear to be functioning correctly. These charlatans are also empowered to cherry pick narratives and artifacts because nobody is the wiser to basic tenets of science. Sigh.

        • Kate says:

          In the article Is It Fair to Say that COVID-19 is not infectious? Richard Katz provides evidence that Cowan is spreading untruth by inaccurate and misleading citations of Steiner, he is not convinced by his claim that COVID-19 is not infectious, identifies that although Cowan claims to be applying Koch Postulates, he ignores Koch’s discovery of infected people who were asymptomatic (similar to Kaufman).

          Katz could not find evidence to support Cowan’s claim that viruses are the same thing as exosomes.

          Katz considers Cowan’s hypothesis that viruses are internally generated ‘messengers’ interesting, but it doesn’t prove the disease is not infectious, and believes that Cowan is making a logical fallacy by stating that no bacteria or viruses are pathogenic because modern research has discovered that some are not.

          Katz states “it is an unjustified leap of logic to draw the conclusion that because some viruses and some exosomes have similar shapes and have similar characteristics, that therefore all viruses are the same thing as exosomes. From that conclusion Kaufman and Cowan argue that all viruses are only internally generated and are thus incapable of transmitting disease, and so there is no human-to-human transmission of COVID-19.”

          Katz provides evidence that Kaufman’s quote of James Hildreth ““the virus is fully an exosome in every sense of the word” is inaccurate. To clear up the confusion, Mr. Hildreth stated “I have never said that SARS CoV2 [the virus associated with COVID-19] is an exosome. I have been saying for years that HIV-1 is an exosome but the biogenesis of these two viruses are very different. The exosome hypothesis cannot be applied to all viruses – clearly most viruses are not. And frankly, we are still learning about the SARS CoV2 virus’ biology including its assembly and budding mechanisms.”

          Katz believes Cowan raises some valid concerns about EMF and the structure of water, issues of privacy, freedom of medical choice, and how crises are used to advance the agenda of the elite, but not that COVID is not infectious.

          • manbearpig says:

            This Dr. Katz seems, wittingly or unwittingly, to be a dangerous sorta guy. Indeed, he seems to employ fabulously sound reasoning;

            …Modern research on the microbiome and human virome overturns the conventional thinking that bacteria and virus are all pathogenic. But here is the logical fallacy: that statement does not mean that no bacteria and no viruses are pathogenic. Saying that there are other causes of disease besides microorganisms does not mean that microorganisms have “nothing to do with it” or that there is no such thing as transmission of disease…”

            to promote compulsory testing, lockdowns, tracing and even “The Great Reset” as facilitated by COVID19:

            “…South Korea controlled the epidemic early by extensive testing, quarantine of those who were infected and contact tracing. That seems to be good evidence that transmission is involved, and that social distancing and quarantine methods can make a difference in limiting the spread…”

            And then goes on to denounce another logical fallacy:

            “…There is no contradiction between being concerned about the effects of 5G and other environmental stresses and acknowledging that it is highly likely that COVID-19 is infectious…”

            in order finish his sentence with this slippery bit of propaganda:

            “…and that measures to limit its spread are important…”.

            Yet that last bit does not follow. Why limit the spread of a mostly innocuous, asymptomatic disease? ESPECIALLY when the components of the remedy to date have proven to be far more fatal than the disease itself!

            He continues:

            “…We can follow public health guidelines, while at the same time considering all the other health factors that help us maintain our integrity in face of environmental stress, enhance our life forces, create emotional balance, access our inner sources of spiritual strength, and deal with the massive social, political and economic crises as much as we are able…”

            But how exactly can we live in constant fear of contagion, locked up in our homes, wearing masks and carrying permission papers if we must go out lest we be stopped and/or fined by roding police; while “enhancing our life forces” and “creating emotional balance”?

            He ends with:

            “…We all need to use our collective wisdom and insights to deal with the current international health crisis, which is also a stress test showing the weaknesses and contradictions of our global society. I hope others will be stimulated by what I have written to develop these thoughts further…”

            which sounds like “we need to address the weaknesses and contradictions of our global society! Let’s think about this!”
            In other words he seems to see the virus as a good pretext for a Great Reset!

            And yet he basically propounds what I’d been arguing which is it’s not because COVID19 may not be a virus that viruses don’t exist, are not infectious and/or cannot be pathogenic. Which I still hold to be true while rigorously rejecting his promotion of demonstrably inefficacious, deadly COVID19 pseudo measures and Great Resets.

            • manbearpig says:

              “…those who accept the existence of germs, accept the ‘Great Reset’…”

              I never stated that nor do I think it.
              Or perhaps you were addressing someone else on that point?

              “…Can you provide a quote to support your comment “yet he [Katz] basically propounds what I’d been arguing which is it’s not because COVID19 may not be a virus that viruses don’t exist, are not infectious and/or cannot be pathogenic”…”

              Mr Katz says:

              “…Modern research on the microbiome and human virome overturns the conventional thinking that bacteria and virus are all pathogenic. But here is the logical fallacy: that statement does not mean that no bacteria and no viruses are pathogenic…”

              So for him, it’s not because some or even many bacteria an viruses have proven to be beneficial that no bacteria or viruses are pathogenic. I agree and have stated as much myself. By the same reasoning, COVID19 may not be a virus, but it does not necessarily follow that no viruses exist.

              I tend tentatively towards thinking there is a modified virus with unusual properties designed to kill the very old and or weak or vulnerable

              but that most of the illness and death is caused by co-morbidities and a form of negative mentality voodoo: the constant stress voodoo, the obsession with illness and death voodoo, the fear of my neighbor voodoo, the anger and/or loneliness voodoo, the eat, drink, breath and dwell on existential and financial uncertainty voo doo, a voodoo that rivals ventilators and Rivotril in its powerful efficaciousness.

              Happy Full Moon!

          • manbearpig says:

            Just in connection with Rudolf Steiner and Anthroposophy, I stumbled across this bit about the movement’s founder and origins:


            Haven’t studied it enough to have an opinion on it but found the beginning of the article quite provocative, evoking superior peoples, religions etc… perhaps suggesting links with eugenics movements, but as mentioned, I haven’t read it yet.

            In 1902 Steiner joined the Theosophical “Society and almost immediately became General Secretary of its German section. Theosophy was a curious amalgam of esoteric precepts drawn from various traditions, above all Hinduism and Buddhism, refracted through a European occult lens. 6 Its originator, Helena Blavatsky (1831-1891), was the inventor of the “root races” idea; she declared the extinction of indigenous peoples by European colonialism to be a matter of “karmic necessity.” ”

            hmmmm!? just saw that

            • manbearpig says:

              oops. quotation mark in the wrong place and

              I remember Gandhi was a disciple of Helena Blavatsky’s Theosophy…

              “…6 Its originator, Helena Blavatsky (1831-1891), was the inventor of the “root races” idea; she declared the extinction of indigenous peoples by European colonialism to be a matter of “karmic necessity.”… ”

              extinction of indigenous peoples a matter of “karmic necessity”??
              And Gandhi espoused this?
              I’ve really got to check the veracity, or at least the credibility of all this… it seems…
              …then again, Vandana Shiva is Club of Rome, so…
              what a world…!

              • Kate says:

                It’s a long article with plenty of allegations that are passionately criticized by some Steiner/Anthroposophy supporters.

                Daniel Hindes calls the author, Peter Staudenmaier, a Christian fundamentalist, and says that Steiner was denounced by Hitler as an agent of Jewish conspiracy, but today is denounced by some as an anti-semite.

                There is evidence that Steiner was a Mason, and Freemasonry has much in common with Jewish beliefs, so the latter is more than likely true. Steiner led a lodge called Mystica Aeterna within the Masonic Order of Memphis and Mizraim from 1906 to 1914. In the article The Masonic Adventure of Rudolf Steiner on Gangleri dot nl, the author concludes that Steiner’s involvement was “because he wanted his esoteric group to connect to an esoteric current, but as soon as he did, went his own way.”

                In the comments, someone provides a picture of Steiner at the first international convention of Le Droit Humain, an international order of Freemasonry. They date the picture 1921, but Le Droit Humain was established Jan 14, 1882, Steiner looks young in the picture, he was 21 at that time. Steiner was involved in Freemasonry, which is tied to theosophy and the occult, from early adulthood.

                Given that Freemasonry is connected to Judaism, it is unlikely that Steiner was an anti-semite!

                A big issue seems to be Waldorf Education which is criticized by PLANs Inc (People for Legal and Non-sectarian Schools)who Peter Staudenmaier is tied to .

      • anonymint says:

        For example, let’s consider a quote related to Dr. Tetz’s research and theories:

        Tetz studies how bacteriophages can contribute to microbiome dysbiosis in a range of human chronic inflammatory conditions. He also examines how bacteriophages can act as novel mammalian pathogens by interacting directly with human cells and the host immune response. His recent findings show an early role for bacteriophage activity in conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, Type 1 Diabetes and “leaky-gut” syndrome.

        Tetz presumes that some observed effects — involving various particles appearing to enter and leave cells are associated with microbiome dysbiosis — are the actual cause of the dysbiosis. But there’s no way to falsify whether those observed effects aren’t side-effects of the dysbiosis. IOW, the said observed effects could also be just a reaction of the cells to the disease, as Dr. Kaufman has hypothesized.

        If you think we should medicate, vaccinate and lockdown the entire global economy because of some guesses and chosen narratives (aka fiction) that can’t be falsified, then I can only sigh while noting that the sheepeople are certifiably insane and deserve to perish for it. I wish the sheepeople will come to their senses but in all instances in human history they never do.

        P.S. Personally I speculate that virus-like particles and their functionality may be an information messaging system of living cells. I contemplate that they may play a role in both good health and in disease, but not as solitary culprits which can implicated in the simpleton models being currently applied by these overzealous “scientists”. They’re not humble enough to question and consider the limitations of and possible blind spots in their posited understanding. These fools are playing with fire and nature is far too complex for them to understand by poking around in the dark with a probe (election microscope) without a more holistic understanding of nature and cellular biology including an evolutionary perspective. These mofos think they’re God and their drunk on their own power and Koolaid.

      • anonymint says:

        Specifically, Cowan’s statement that “A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS Cov-2 infection”, and “solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 – even in high amounts – were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested”, thus “they proved . . . that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human beings.” In contrast, Tetz “analyzed the receptor of the human cells ACE2 for the virus and within alpha 1 helix we found prion like domains, and found amino acids with prion like domains within the viral spike interact with the amino acids within prion like domains on our cells.” So who is correct?

        Blatantly obvious that Cowan’s statement is derived from an actual, falsifiable experiment aka science. In contrast the charlatan (I won’t acknowledg the title of doctor which he clearly doesn’t deserve) Tetz’s statement is derived from non-falsifiable virtual reality formed by probing around in the dark and finding broken clocks that still report the correct time twice a day.

        Tetz is formulating a hypothesis by restricting his analysis to only the spike protein regions of the genome and then foisting another fable about the posited importance of some concocted narrative about ACE2 protein and the fiction about viruses to erect a strawman fiction.

        It’s absurd. Please stop wasting my time.

        • Kate says:

          Thomas Cowan refers to cell A549 that does not have ACE2 receptors for SARS-CoV-2 and does not replicate the virus as evidence that it is not infective to humans. In the article Jon Rappoport: The COVID Virus Invented Out of Sheer Nonsense, Cowan also refers to “human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells [monkey cells]”. In the paper SARS – Associated Coronavirus Replication in Cell Lines, human cell A549 is confirmed to not support replication, but human HEK-293 and Huh-7, and monkey Vero E6 do. This proves that Cowan based his conclusion on false information.

  4. John Blaid says:

    I don’t think anybody has created a better overview of what these new vaccines actually do and the risks AND also discusses things way beyond the vaccine itself once used like having a bunch of programmable nano particles floating in your bloodstream ready to be “upgraded” by external signals for future vaccinations and what have you and much much much much much more.

    “Human 2.0″? A Wake-Up Call To The World”

  5. Big-_-Brother says:

    Does James linking videos to Alex Jones now makes me think he changed his mind on Alex Jones being controlled opposition

    • Octium says:

      I don’t recall James saying that Alex Jones was controlled opposition, outside of “If the cap fits, wear it”?

  6. Sigyn says:

    I was already wary of this rushed vaccine, but this really brings home how dangerous it can be. Thanks so much for this article and for filling in the details they don’t want to talk about.

  7. cu.h.j says:

    They want to create biological dependency so humans need an “update “ to live. It’s complete slavery that they want. It’s sickening.

    • Octium says:

      Bingo. I think that is where they are going with it.

    • Alchemist says:

      Exactly. Chicken pox & shingles vaccines are good examples. Chicken pox is a mild childhood illness. When parents took care of their mildly ill child, they got a natural “booster” after re-exposure to the virus. If the grandparents were also exposed, they also got the natural booster. But often times grandparents were not exposed, hence they didn’t get the natural booster, and so shingles formed (which is more serious than chicken pox).

      There were no flaws in the natural system. Then the chicken pox vaccine was introduced and changed everything. Before only very old people got shingles. Now we are seeing it in 20 year olds. And now we “need” the chicken pox vaccine, the boosters, the shingles vaccines, the boosters…… and all the medicines to treat our bodies after the injection assault.

      PS. Aborted human fetuses were used to make these vaccines, but your doctor won’t tell you that before injecting you.

      • anonymint says:

        When JC hopefully releases my latest blockbuster comment post from the moderator queue, I think it’s going to make it clear in everyone’s mind the possible strong, posited chronological-causal correlation between issuance of vaccines and the subsequent epidemics and pandemics.

      • cu.h.j says:

        That’s interesting, I never had chickenpox as a kid and then got a vaccine as an adult for nursing school. I had 2 doses and this vaccine never gave me antibodies so it was a total failure. I’m glad it didn’t do any damage, my immune system is actually very good. Who knows about the aluminum though, maybe I will get dementia from it in the future.

        I didn’t know that vaccines could be harmful until I got some weird side effects from the flu shot and researched this more. Many Americans don’t know about vaccine court and are never given a vaccine information sheet or give informed consent because they just don’t know and are uninformed. Many physicians are uninformed too.

        This new “vaccine” I believe is much more dangerous. I’m really shocked this could make it through the FDA given that it’s experimental. Until this Covid panic happened, I never thought that so many physicians could just go along with this. I do think a lot of people will refuse the mRNA “vaccine” though. I also think the harm will become apparent for the people who get it.

        • Alchemist says:

          Whitney Webb & Mercola discuss Operation Warp Speed (~1hr20m):

        • anonymint says:

          Many Americans don’t know about vaccine court

          The pharmaceutical industry has absolute immunity from lawsuits. What a racket.

          Pharmaceutical Companies & Buying Immunity

          Most people are unaware of the EXTREME DANGER posed by the Pharmaceutical Industry and their effort to force vaccines on the entire population by law and at the same time to exempt themselves from any liability. In 1987, Democrat William Herbert Gray sponsored H.R.3545 – Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987. Stuffed in this act was the amendment to exempt the Pharmaceutical Industry from all liability for killing children with even untested vaccines. This is the way corruption flourishes in Washington.


          The Pharmaceutical Industry has launched an all-out effort to deny both human rights and parental rights with respect to their children.

          If Vaccines are Safe Why Did Congress Eliminate Your Right to Sue Pharmaceutical Companies?

          From my understand the scientific rationale for mandatory vaccination is the theory of “herd immunity”, which argues that as many people as possible need to be vaccinated in order to protect those who can not be vaccinated for medical reasons. I have read criticisms of this theory that argue long term herd immunity can not be artificially induced through vaccinations, but rather only through natural exposure to infectious diseases.


          They are putting children at risk ONLY because the Pharmaceutical Companies have a huge lobby. The press will not defend the people. They should ask any politician who makes statements against the anti-vaccine movement if they accept money from any drug-related company or lobby.


          There are way too many combinations when you have 70+ vaccines and that creates a complete unknown that no drug company bothers to investigate. The drug companies have been relieved of ALL liability thanks to Congress. They can even deliberately kill people and never be charged or sued.

        • anonymint says:

          This new “vaccine” I believe is much more dangerous. I’m really shocked this could make it through the FDA given that it’s experimental.

          My prediction has been for several months that they would induce Trump to override Fauci and former head of the FDA to obtain an emergency use exception. So they can blame any of the autoimmunity illness that results on Trump and perhaps cite that as one of the pretexts for his “unfortunate” assassination “by radicals” (but actually planned and executed by the Deep State swamp).

          They’ve ostensibly been fooling Trump all the way through this. For example, inducing (the boastful) Trump to manufacture 100,000s of ventilators so they could murder more people with them and increase the fraudulent, claimed COVID-19 death count to further their goals for the Great Reset totalitarianism.

          As JC points out in this presentation, they have fooled Trump into this Operation Warp Speed so that all the totalitarian infrastructure for mandatory vaccines will be set up when they assassinate Trump and Pence in 2022 so that Nancy Pelosi can choose the interim President.

          The plan has been so obvious to me. I blogged about all of this even in 2018 and 2019 and I even predicted the p(L)andemic/scamdemic in a comment on one of my blogs near the end of 2019.

          Until this Covid panic happened, I never thought that so many physicians could just go along with this.

          The licensing of physicians insures that Rothschild (via the Deep State) controls all the levers, because physicians don’t want to lose their license and source of income. Also to become a doctor requires taking on a huge level of student debt these days.

        • anonymint says:

          Don’t be surprised when everyone goes along with it. Are you willing to shoot authorities who come to force mandatory vaccination?

          1:49, Alan Dershowitz:

          Let me put it very clearly: you have no constitutional right to endanger the public and spread the disease even if you disagree, you have no right not to be vaccinated, you have no right not to wear a mask, you have no right to open up your business wait.

          If you refuse to be vaccinated the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm.

  8. mkey says:


    Bears repeating and is very fitting for discussing the subject at hand.

    • anonymint says:

      I already linked to that in my comment above, but it is waiting in moderator queue for JC to wake up and approve it. I have multiple links (more than two causes the comment to go in the moderator queue) and I also have a summary, explanation and elaboration (such as this) of the video in my post upthread. Presumably it will appear when JC wakes up.

  9. ‘What Really Makes You Ill’ by Dawn Lester and David Parker is a highly recommended read. Modern medicine is built on a foundation of sand.

    • anonymint says:

      Dr. Andrew Kaufman interviews them in two videos What Really Makes You Sick.

      They also discuss that AIDS is not provably caused by the HIV virus. And they discuss the Spanish Flu anomaly that we discussed upthread on this page.

      They implicate vaccines.

      Remember the mycoplasma (bacteria) is not susceptible to most antibiotics.

    • anonymint says:

      A question from Dawn Lester was forwarded to me:

      Thank you Adam, I’ll have a look at those links, but is he suggesting that mycoplasma is responsible for some kind of illness? Or for this so-called pandemic illness? If so, I would want to know where is his evidence that this bacterium can cause disease? Just because mycoplasma survives outside a ‘host’, that does not mean it is pathogenic.

      My reply is…Please tell Dawn that my point is not that mycoplasma is proven to cause the symptoms associated with certain diseases claimed to be caused by viruses. Rather that viruses fail to be proven in any falsifiable, scientific manner. And since viruses can’t be falsified in a disease model, then mycoplasma is no less possible as a cause than the “virus”. Given that mycoplasma are more hardy outside the host, I speculate they have a better chance of being a transmittable pathogen. Whereas viruses are just a narrative corroborated with circumstantial “evidence”, lacking any definitive, falsifiable model.

      Also mycoplasma are living cells. Viruses (exosomes?) are as alive as dandruff.

      IOW, if people can be paid a lot of money to construct elaborate strawmen, then I can express fairytales too of equivalent unscientific standing.

  10. Libertydan says:

    The idea of making Slaves out of the masses has been around for a long time. I think this quote by Daniel Webster (“Webster’s Dictionary”) makes my point:

    “Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster and what has happened once in 6,000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world.”
    ― Daniel Webster

    Also by Daniel Webster:

    “If all my possessions were taken from me with one exception, I would choose to keep the power of communication, for by it I would soon regain all the rest”
    ― Daniel Webster

    Although I expect many in this crowd to have a different view of Anarchy, perhaps they can appreciate the second quote by the same author. Note the value he placed on: “The Power of Communication”. As long as we can maintain “The power of Communication” we can resist being controlled, and those who wish to control us know this.
    (Think Censorship, eh!)

  11. Libertydan says:

    I was using “The Power of Communication” (talking to), with a guy I met in the Park the other day who told me that his daughter and son-in-Law had the CoVID19 Virus and were now selling their Blood Serum. He said that they get $100 each, every two weeks, for their Blood because it contains antigens that can be used to help others.
    Now, it doesn’t take a Conspiracy Nut to ask: What else might their blood serum be used for? However, it does take one to come up with a completely viable Theory, eh!
    That said, let’s just say an A Moral Vaccination Manufacture, Buys and thus Owns, samples of blood from unsuspecting “Suckers” (I think that was the term Zuckerburg used), the Company would be legally free to Manufacture synthetic versions of the Natural Serum that it would Own Patents Rights on.
    Once these Patented organic replicates got into the bodies of unsuspecting “Suckers” getting the Vaccinations, the Company could have some Rights of Ownership over the human being.

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      Interesting story about selling one’s blood following having had Covid.

    • Alchemist says:

      After Tom Hanks “recovered from Covid”, they took his blood to try to create a vaccine. If you think about it, they could use anyone’s blood or organs to make a vaccine… and with that twisted science, Epstein could realize his dream of seeding the world with his DNA.

  12. anonymint says:

    “No one has died from the coronavirus”

    Important revelations shared by Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association

    A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths from the novel coronavirus on that continent.

    Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.

    Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s currently “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus.

    He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.


    Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.

    The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health.


    Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.


    Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.

    • anonymint says:

      I found this independently on my own initiative while digging for evidence of any abnormal spike in 2020 for non-influenza, respiratory illness.

      Non-Influenza Illness Spreads Every Year!

      Skip to the chart on page 3 of aforelinked PDF document (which is also archived at, or click to my gist for a copy of the chart.

      So the point is that this year’s non-influenza, respiratory illness is not statistically any higher than the typical deviation range over the past years.

      For me this was the definitive smoking gun proving that COVID-19 is a scam.

    • anonymint says:

      Are Ventilators Killing People in New York City?

      Posted Apr 29, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

      […click for the nurse’s video…]

      This Nurse’s video has gone viral and has been picked up around the world. As I stated, my first son who was born prematurely died on a ventilator because it forced too much air into his lungs and caused them to burst. Where people are not put on ventilators the death rate is much lower. This has been picked up even down under. No mainstream newspaper will dare investigate in the USA.

      • anonymint says:

        Ventilators Kill

        Posted Sep 3, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

        COMMENT: […] Having taught medical folks at all levels( medical students, residents, fellows and practicing physicians), this makes me feel sick


        REPLY: I do not think people realize how dangerous it is to be put on a ventilator. Here the headline was: “A NYC Coronavirus Patient Died After Her Ventilator was Set Too High Under the Care of Inexperienced Medical Residents.” My first son died on a ventilator at Children’s’ Hospital in Philadelphia for the very same reason. It burst his lungs. You would think that if a car can now parallel park, why can’t a ventilator sense when someone is incapable of accepting that much air?

        Hospitals are DANGEROUS. They killed my mother, as the doctors refused to release her, always finding one excuse or another, and kept her in bed for weeks until they weakened her to the point that she did not have the strength to walk again.

        They threw me into a COVID wing and said I needed two negative tests to be discharged. I received one test before and I told them I was leaving, but they said that my insurance would not pay the bill. I said I did not care, I would not stay there for two tests because they knew they were invalid anyway. I told them I would leave and they would have to call the police and shoot me in the back if they wanted me to stay. They finally administered the second test and I walked out.


        The entire COVID scam is enriching hospitals beyond belief. They have financial incentives to keep you and to put you on a ventilator. I even question their claimed data that blacks are more susceptible to COVID. The government pays 100% of people without insurance as long as the hospital claims it is COVID. Do they really have COVID or are they just milking the system?

      • anonymint says:

        Killing People in NYC All For Politics?

        Posted Apr 30, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

        […click for the nurse’s video…]

        We have another nurse coming out and confirming that people are being left to die[“murdered by hospital staff”] in New York City in an apparent attempt to raise the death toll for political motives. It appears that Trump is afraid to fire Fauci because the press will trash him, despite the fact that doctors are coming out and warning that this is deliberate murder and NOBODY is doing anything. The Justice Department MUST send in a special prosecutor NOT FROM NEW YORK to investigate these hospitals and what is going on.

        Every source I have has been screaming that this is all orchestrated for political purposes. This is an attempt to force the climate change agenda by shutting down the economy under the threat of a virus that is no worse than the flu. They want to scare the hell out of everyone to make sure they achieve their goal of destroying jobs and redesigning the world economy in the vision of Bill Gates’ zero CO2 world. There are plenty of questions, no answers, and NO INVESTIGATIONS!

        • WAYNED says:

          The link with global warming is absolutely right. One other conclusion that must be considered:
          This is 100pct about control, nothing about a virus, really.
          This is about profits.

          They want to control us to maintain their wealth, but on multiple levels. One, they want to control us and keep us sick so there are not so many of us. What better place to stage a mass murder and “culling” than in a hospital being supervised by medical professionals who have no responsibility for legitimate “errors”. The legitimizing comes after the fact, to protect the perps.

          They want to control us and give SOME of us more money so they stop stamping out the required consumer for their BS. They think, I believe, that it’s easier to achieve with fewer people, particularly when the few remaining are convinced that they are only safe when submitting to medical professionals.

          I have been abused by medical professionals. I carry two continuous conditions, one CAUSED by a surgeon, the other has been viewed by 3 doctors, none of whom did more than guess at the cause, and after 6 years, I still have the problem and feel it is beginning to morph into something worse, but who do I call?

          This may be an unpopular thing to say, but all of my doctors were Jewish. I am not. Do they see me as human? They caused me harm with no compunction. And after the surgery, the surgeon told me I was not properly prepared for the surgery and I would have “terrible” issues which now appear to be true. Many years later. I had this overwhelming sense upon waking and hearing this that it was a continuation of a conversation where he asked me what I thought of Israel, to which I recall saying specifically “It’s a pariah.” how, if I was under, would I even be able to think anything? Back surgery, I was out and then I was here, nothing in between. Same with eye surgery.

          The one that has left me with a cancer inducing condition, I had a real sense we had spoken about Israel.

          Now this 80 year old iranian jew is dead. I hope it was painful and slow and that his soul burns in hell. Sometimes, the conventional views have their uses. it keeps me sane to think he may be suffering in death.

          You must treat medical doctors like the person next door and do not grant them authority and trust, be skeptical, ask questions, demand answers. I wish I had.

          One last thing. I had to get a tetanus shot in my late-20s. I recall the nurse taking the exposed needle and vaccine out of the office and return with it. I wanted to demand she throw it out and give me one that did not leave the office, but did not protest.

          for 48 hours I writhed in pain, aches, muscled spasms, terrible terrible pain not unlike a black widow bite I had endured. I always knew it came from that vaccine, but wonder why the nurse left the room with the vaccine and needle exposed.

          • cu.h.j says:

            Maybe the Jewish doctors you had viewed you differently. There is no way to know for a fact. Does this mean all Jews view non-jews as not human? I don’t think so because it’s impossible to generalize. My mother is a jew and she is one of the kindest people in the world.

            She was not raised as a practicing Jew and we never practiced Judaism or identity politics in my household, so not all “jews” are the same.

            I think that some jews might identify as superior, but this isn’t unique to them since other identity groups view themselves similarly, as “other”. I think identity politics are divisive and I think many people hold this opinion, some of them are jews.

            I would object to being put into a category by anyone and treated differently or targeted for violence. I think doing that to anyone is wrong.

            I’m sorry you’ve had a lot of health issues from your surgeries. I think some physicians think they are superior, but this has more to do with their training than their identity. Just my opinion.

            Maybe you can look at reviews for a new doctor who might be able to help you. Maybe you can do some research online and ask people who have had similar issues. It sounds like you had a bad reaction to the tetanus vaccine which is more common than people know. I would probably avoid more of these if it were myself.

      • anonymint says:

        Doctor From NY City Offers His Observations

        Posted Apr 13, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

        […click for the doctor’s video…]

        (doctor essentially implies that patients are being murdered with ventilators)

  13. Denis says:

    Regarding DNA vaccins, maybe worth noticing is that while adverse effects and consequences of DNA vaccines are or might be more severe, these have been in (veretinary) use for a while now. mRNA vaccines have never been used before.

  14. Noahsark723 says:

    Great article James!!!

    This is exactly what the 911 ritual was about – symbolic of the masonic arch which depicts the luciferic plan to invade and remake Creation and invading the body of man towards complete control is the pinnacle of that program, the destruction of the twin towers where symbolic of the destruction of the pillars that hold up the temple of man which is the true temple of God. The mind being the battle field where the war is fought for your soul.

    Do not take the vaccine – the mask is the beginning training for the mark of the beast and the vaccine is just one step along the way.

    Brimstone and FIRE for all of the wicked who are behind all of this – may the hand of the Almighty Creator STRIKE you down for the trespasses you have caused and the trespass you endevour to take.

    Great new song from I Wayne – So Call Friends – On point!

    • WAYNED says:

      Masks are useful when you need people to feel anonymous while carrying out the theft of elections (though the computer did more than the dumped votes,I think) and also, what a great thing to have already for a civil war?!


  15. mellander says:

    So now they’re calling messenger RNA (“mRNA”) a virus….? When I was college taking biochemistry, mRNA was considered part of the normal cell genetic mechanism and as wikipedia defines it is: “Large family of RNA molecules that convey genetic information from DNA to the ribosome, where they specify the amino acid sequence of the protein products”
    Now it’s considered a “virus”….has “the science” AKA false narratives created to create a new scientific paradigm just redefined mRNA? it appears so

    • cu.h.j says:

      The “mRNA” vaccine is a piece of genetic code that functions as mRNA and tells the ribosomes to make the spike protein. Then our bodies will make antibodies to it. There are other ingredients in the “vaccine” as well that would be interesting to know exactly what they are. I read something about nanoparticles, but don’t have an actual ingredients list.

      In summary, the vaccine is an injectible lab-generated strip of mRNA that directs our body to make the antigen (the material the body reacts to), and after that our bodies make the antibodies.

      It’s a new mechanism of action for a vaccine. Normally a vaccine is an injectible lab-generated antigen, but this one is mRNA and our body makes then antigen. There are also other ingredients that I’m very curious about.

      I think this is an experiment on a global scale to see what happens and what they can get away with. I think the next step would be the DNA vaccines. They want to control our genetic code. It’s the fulfillment of the eugenics they all believe in.

      • pearl says:

        Here’s that pdf paper of the Italian investigation which lists the specific vaccines they tested, their manufacturers and the nanoparticle substances they found:

        New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination

        “Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.”

  16. Lumen says:

    Great Article James. T.Y. for explaining the difference between “inoculation,” “immunization,” “vaccination” and “mRNA vaccination”. I do believe that people like you and sites like yours are akin to the Avatar ‘Tree of Souls’, most needed at this difficult time.

  17. kck12 says:


    Very good transcript with lots of solid information and relevant links. Just an idea for future BIOS injection additional knowledge might be to thoroughly investigate the history and work of Dr. Moncef Slauoi, of Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, i.e., his research creations, particularly at GlaxoSmithKline, where, as head of vaccine research, he developed electronic interface nano particle operating systems — injectable as vaccines. The biological mRNA/DNA genome changing part of the vaccines were actually developed by other researchers and combined with Slaoui’s inventions. Of course, Bill Gates was interested, and all have patents and/or investments in such patents, as well as hold bountiful corporate shares in all these pharma patented creations and the “vaccines” (BIOS injections) themselves…
    Interestingly, the internal nano particle operating systems communicate wirelessly…externally, through 5G, to Darpa contractors: Google and Oracle for monitoring over the first two years of vaccinated recipients, who receive their first two doses, 21 days apart.

    • cu.h.j says:

      Thanks for sharing. Creepy. It’s interesting to speculate on how 5G might play into all of this mandness.

    • anonymint says:

      Interestingly, the internal nano particle operating systems communicate wirelessly…externally, through 5G, to Darpa contractors: Google and Oracle for monitoring over the first two years of vaccinated recipients, who receive their first two doses, 21 days apart.


      How can we reach a wider audience if we don’t provide sources for our “kooky” claims.

      Note upthread I quoted a comment with an ostensibly unsourced claim for a link between 5G to the stuff they are alleged to be injecting into us with vaccines.

      • mkey says:

        That’s a trick question, you can not reach wider audiences. They are too busy burring their heads in the sand, leaving their collective posteriors exposed.

        • anonymint says:

          I’m referring U.S. senators to this page. I am trying to contact Steve Bannon and Catherine Austin Fitts. I need everything well sourced so we don’t look like kooks. There are 7 repairmen installing new fiber in my subdivision right now and I just referred them all to the Corbett Report. They seemed interested.

          • anonymint says:

            I tried to get the message to Steve Bannon on the following linked website, but you can see by comparing the archive I recorded to the live site, that the site deleted my posts:


            Folks so you should understand that we are very close to total blackout on dissenting information. They will shut Corbett Report down and every other possible means of communicating truth, including banning gatherings.

  18. CRM114 says:

    [SNIP – Please do not post links without titles and/or explanations why people should be clicking on them. -JC]

  19. HomeRemedySupply says:

    James Corbett’s November 16th, 2020 article:
    You Won’t Believe What They’re Planning To Do With “Vaccines”
    The Future of Vaccines

    For me personally, this is just what the Doctor ordered.
    Corbett’s article gives an easy to digest rendition and overview about vaccines and the m-RNA, while also giving the reader resources for further understanding.
    This is a nice gradient approach which starts with the fundamentals.
    And fundamentals are extremely important.
    I am still going through the information and links, along with following my own interests into the mechanisms involved.
    I got a lot of homework to do.
    One thing for sure… This m-RNA topic will be around from now on.

  20. WAYNED says:

    Yes, these DNA and RNA vaccines are the incredible new technologies being touted by esteemed microbiologists like Bill Gates as the way to “warp speed” these “vaccines” directly into our arms in a matter of mere months.

    But make no mistake: these are not your grandma’s vaccines (let alone your great-great-great-grandma’s inoculations).

    I would add to that last paragraph: “And make no mistake, Gates is not a microbiologist, he excels only at corporate espionage so we think he’s the world’s greatest software developer. How did we make the leap to believe he is a microbiologist?

  21. WAYNED says:

    The annual flu season was just that, something that happened and you hope you don’t get it. Then there were vaccines to stop this, and it seems that the increase of vaccines has been leading the increase in concerns of actual deadly viruses.
    About 6 years ago, I moved from Long Beach CA to Encino CA (I do not recommend such a move, Encino is trash) and there was a Walgreens in the shopping center a block from the worst apartment I ever lived.

    I was struck quite powerfully by a huge sign outside the walgreens in Early June in Encino offering whooping Cough vaccines. I was not aware it was a problem. They had that sign up for a few months at least, then replaced by flu vaccines I think in fall or late summer. It was about a year later when I heard reports (nationally) of whooping cough being a problem in our area.

    I was swamped with working at the time, so I never could verify, but this seemed to me to confirm what I always thought: Vaccines are there to keep the vaccinators in business, to ensure things continue.

    I also was lucky to know a man named Jim Crow (for real!) and you will have read about him. From time to time US or People magazine or the like would print stories about his miraculous cures for truly horrible diseases that affected no more than about 2000 people worldwide, but truly horrible diseases. One night after he purchased a home in a different town, I was invited with the friend who had introduced us, to go to his new home for dinner. I was young and not paying particular attention, except that aids had made me more aware. He said he was taking the retirement offer, think it was because of all the buyouts, but he also implied “we could have a cure for the cold tomorrow” but it was not a cost-effective outcome for a company that gets its money from MANAGING disease, rather than curing it.

  22. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Monday Nov 16th – “The World Cheered!”…again

    Note how Moderna and Pfizer time their Press Release for an early Monday market day. Moderna stock was up over 10% after the opening bell.
    No one is really talking about how the economy and unemployment are in shredded ruins, or that Fauci and Gates say that the vaccines alone will not be the solution in total…that masks, social distancing and other measures will be needed.

    Yahoo Finance
    Dow soars to a record high after Moderna releases upbeat vaccine efficacy data

    The Dow soared to a record high Monday after Moderna (MRNA) became the latest major drug-maker to announce upbeat data for its COVID-19 vaccine candidate, building on hopes that an effective inoculation will soon be available.

    The Dow rose more than 450 points, or 1.5%, topping its previous record intraday high of 29,933.83 from Nov. 9. The S&P 500 also increased, while the Nasdaq hugged the flat line. Shares of airlines, cruise lines, hotels, and restaurant companies surged anew as the latest vaccine data suggested consumers might return more enthusiastically to these businesses. Moderna’s stock jumped more than 9% to a record high shortly after market open.

    Moderna said Monday that preliminary data from its late-stage clinical trial showed its vaccine candidate was 94.5% effective in preventing COVID-19 in participants. That followed Pfizer’s (PFE) announcement last week that its own vaccine candidate, which uses similar new messenger RNA technology, had an efficacy rate of more than 90%, or well above what many public health officials had been expecting.

    Traders looked beyond the increasingly dire coronavirus situation in the U.S., as hopes that a vaccine would be approved and distributed in the near-term helped to assuage some fears. The S&P 500 jumped to an all-time closing high on Friday as each of the three major indices posted weekly gains. Stocks and sectors that were hardest-hit by the pandemic made up some ground after lagging for the year-to-date, while tech stocks underperformed. Shares of Zoom Video Communications (ZM), Slack (WORK) and Netflix (NFLX) were each pressured.

    (…EXCERPT continued…)

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      (…EXCERPT continuing…)

      “As we hear more positive news on the COVID-19 vaccine, the overblown work-from-home trade is beginning to unwind because some of those stocks had baked in no vaccine at all,” David Trainer, CEO of investment research firm New Constructs, said in an email Monday morning. “The rotation into value stocks that started last week will continue.”

      But with a vaccine still unlikely to be available en masse for months, the pandemic remains a present threat.

      The U.S. topped the grim milestone of 11 million coronavirus cases as of Sunday as deaths approached 250,000, according to data from Johns Hopkins. An average of nearly 150,000 new infections have been reported per day in the U.S. over the past week, for a sharp increase after first crossing the 100,000 mark for the first time during the pandemic earlier this month.

      In recent days, more cities and states have added curfews and tightened their restrictions on daily activities as case counts soar. New Jersey’s new daily COVID-19 cases hit a record high on Saturday, and Illinois and Ohio both saw record numbers of new cases on Friday. Chicago posted a stay-at-home advisory late last week, and New York state had a new 10 p.m. curfew on bars, restaurants and gyms go into effect Friday. Oregon ordered a two-week “freeze” on non-essential business activity and large social gatherings, with Gov. Kate Brown warning of fines or arrests for violations.

      “The story of the next few weeks will be a gradual and uneven—but unambiguous—tightening of anti-COVID restrictions across the country,” Ian Shepherdson, chief economist for Pantheon Macroeconomics, said in a note Sunday. “The rapid rate of growth of cases and infections threatens to overwhelm the hospital system by the end of the year, at which point current trends suggest that perhaps 250K people will be hospitalized with Covid, with about 60K in ICUs.”

      “Politicians, therefore, will have no choice but to respond to the unfolding nightmare in hospitals,” he added. “They will restrict activity in the leisure and hospitality sector— perhaps closing bars and restaurants completely in the hardest-hit cities—and by limiting indoor gatherings, in homes and elsewhere. These measures work, but they exact a real cost on the economy.”….

      (Specific market news updates on the feed)

      • HomeRemedySupply says:

        …In a statement Monday, Moderna announced that its clinical trial data showed its vaccine candidate was 94.5% effective in preventing COVID-19 in participants.

        Moderna’s trial, conducted alongside the National Institute of Allergy and infectious Diseases, had enrolled more than 30,000 participants in the U.S. The preliminary data included an analysis of 95 participants who had developed confirmed cases of COVID-19. Moderna said it intends to submit for an emergency use authorization with the Food and Drug Administration “in the coming weeks and anticipates having the EUA informed by the final safety and efficacy data (with a median duration of at least 2 months).”

        By the end of the year, Moderna expects to have about 20 million doses of its vaccine, called mRNA -1273, ready to ship in the U.S. It also remains on track to produce between 500 million and 1 billion doses in 2021. Last week, Pfizer said it expected to produce 50 million doses of its own vaccine in 2020 and up to 1.3 billion doses in 2021….

        Moderna’s PRESS RELEASE – 6:56 AM
        Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate Meets its Primary Efficacy Endpoint in the First Interim Analysis of the Phase 3 COVE Study

  23. CreativeLife says:

    I for one will be looking forward to the upcoming report by JC that he says will be appearing in the near future. The historical account of the evolution of poisoned injections presented in this current writing certainly lacks in depth study, especially regarding the fundamental tradition of ‘v’ in the medical religion people practice daily.

    Since Darwinism and horrid medical experimentations are tied in the EVOLUTION of mankind’s demise, it will be interesting. Many of the books, articles and references have surfaced now and again in comments that help to fit the pieces of the puzzle closer together. Usually, they are quickly over ridden in popularity contests. It has always been that way Thomas Kuhn and Giorgio Agamben will have a meeting of minds, so to speak. Well JC, may you be moved from Diagnosis to Epignosis. It’s now or never wouldn’t you say?

  24. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Monday Nov 16th, 2020
    Zero Hedge talking about the Survey of “Harmony Healthcare IT”

    Only 46% Of Americans Would Receive COVID Vaccine As Soon As It Is Available
    (Charts in article and SOURCE LINK)


    …Harmony Healthcare IT recently surveyed 2,000 Americans from across the country to try and gauge what percentage of Americans would be willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccination.

    Here’s what they found:

    ~~ Only 46% of Americans say they would receive a COVID-19 vaccination as soon as it was made available.

    ~~ 40% said they would get the vaccine, but prefer to see how effective and safe it is before receiving it. 14% said they would not get the vaccine under any circumstances.

    ~~ Top reasons against getting vaccinated: 1. Side effects (67%); 2. Safety and effectiveness (38%); 3. I won’t need a vaccination (21%); 4. Don’t believe in vaccinations (9%); 5. Cost concerns (8%).

    ~~ 55% of Americans believe the government should require everyone to get vaccinated although 70% would not receive a vaccine if it isn’t approved by the FDA first.

    ~~ 53% believe they will be able to be vaccinated within a year.

    ~~ Once vaccinated, a quarter of respondents feel that it will still take between 1-to-2 years before a return to normalcy while 24% believe it will happen sooner (6 months to a year)….

  25. Fact Checker says:

    Thanks to JC for linking to the Alex Jones interview on Bitchute.

    I was aware of this Tim Pool guy, but I didn’t realize what a sniveling worm he is.

    Un-ironically citing “NewsGuard” ratings? Really?

    Swooning at the rhetorical mention of “firing squads”? For rizzle, thizzle?

    What a dork.

  26. FlyingAxblade says:

    was the first R rated movie to which that my dad took me.
    sorry english is my third language

  27. HomeRemedySupply says:


    The Highwire with Del Bigtree
    (Nov 16th upload – 4 Minute Bitchute Video)

    The UK is preparing for a mass Covid vaccination campaign, anticipating the injection of millions of citizens with the experimental vaccine. As the date approaches to launch this unprecedented measure, the UK’s top health body, the MHRA, makes a shocking, urgent request which begs the question: ‘Is the Covid Vaccine safe?

    IMAGE – “Description of the procurement”
    IMAGE – “Explanation”

    #MHRA #AI #AdverseReactions #ADR #Vaccines #TED #Covid19 #AstraZeneca

  28. Alchemist says:

    Anyone know Bible code? There are gematria calculators online if you need a cheat sheet. Plug in “vaccination” and see what happens…

  29. randallsnyderjr says:

    Here’s a brilliant display of intellect from Bruce H. Lipton, Ph.D. that makes common sense a hero again. This is how we end state closures, lock downs and masking while restoring faith in good health practices including good food, vitamins and exercise.

  30. 8Gc58 says:

    Thanks for this very important article, James!

    Related “the next killer (or utterly banal) virus” the article I mention here should be relevant:

    And thanks for the Akira Kurosawa link. Awesome video on movement! Do I see some “Shichinin no Samurai” inspiration in the Mamachari video? Hmmm…

    Kodomosan’s Mamachari (music video with JC):

    • anonymint says:

      They discuss that viral particles can be communicated between cells.

      But they also incorporate an unproven assumption that viral particles are a causative agent of disease.

      Let’s start from first principles to show that the entire theory of virology is unproven! (Geez why doesn’t anyone do this?)

      The first evidence of the existence of viruses came from experiments with filters that had pores small enough to retain bacteria.


      Later, in 1892, the Russian biologist Dmitry Ivanovsky (1864–1920) used a Chamberland filter to study what is now known as the tobacco mosaic virus. His experiments showed that crushed leaf extracts from infected tobacco plants remain infectious after filtration. Ivanovsky suggested the infection might be caused by a toxin produced by bacteria, but did not pursue the idea.

      As with other filters of its kind, it cannot filter very small particles like viruses or mycoplasma.

      Appears that science hasn’t eliminated mycoplasma or other (even unknown) unfilterable toxins from the filtered milieu. Thus science hasn’t proven anything about causation of disease alleged to have a viral cause.

      Prevention and Detection of Mycoplasma Contamination in Cell Culture:

      Mycoplasma has generated considerable interest due to its ability to contaminate cell lines used in research as well as in manufacturing bioproducts […] One of the differences between mycoplasma and the other bacteria is the absence of cell wall and their flexible membrane in mycoplasma which results in taking different shapes and consequently difficulties in identifying even under a high powered electron microscope. The small size of mycoplasma (0.15-0.3µm) is the main reason for their escape through filtering systems […] Live mycoplasma could be successfully recovered from the surface of the laminar flow hood even four to six days later! […] These results show how quickly and easily mycoplasma can spread […] Mycoplasmas can pass into the filter membranes […] since they are too small and pliable due to the absence of a cell wall […] To remove mycoplasmas with filtration, the method of filtering plays an important role. Low pressure differential (5-10 psi) is less likely to force mycoplasma through a membrane than filter systems using 20 psi or higher pressure. Filters with 0.1µm pore size should be used instead of 0.2 µm ones […] Elimination of mycoplasma is very difficult, if not impossible, because some mycoplasmas hide […] Mycoplasma contamination can be detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) […] The specificity of primers in this method should be broad enough […] but narrow enough to prevent amplification of common bacteria which might exist in the PCR reagents

      So many possible ways for previously unknown agents to slip through any assumed elimination methodology. This is why fulfilling Koch’s postulates with appropriate controls is critical to establishing a causative disease model.

      • manbearpig says:

        “They discuss that viral particles can be communicated between cells.

        But they also incorporate an unproven assumption that viral particles are a causative agent of disease.”

        (A preliminary and partial response:)

        Yes but they do make a distinction between “viral particles” and “exosomes”.

        They do not say that viruses are exosomes and they do describe the various ways in which viral particles and even entire full-length viral genomic RNA sequences are carried as cargo by exosomes.

        I agree that establishing a causal relationship between a virus and a disease is another pair of gloves as clearly explained in this article:

        that concludes thusly:

        Viral metagenomics has been having a great impact on the discovery of new viruses because it enables the detection of all viral genomes present in a given sample independently from antisera tests, from previous knowledge of the viral genome (unlike other molecular biology techniques such as polymerase chain reaction, microarray, and in situ hybridization), and from cell culture isolation.2,16,27

        However, the causal association between a virus and a disease in humans and other animals still depends on a set of clinical, epidemiological, and laboratory investigations; on the use of strict criteria to associate these elements, such as those in Koch’s postulates and their adapted versions; and on common sense during data analysis.

        I also agree, off the cuff, without having really explored the question, that it’s highly plausible, and would even seem logical, that vaccination campaigns have caused disease epidemics/pandemics.

        But given the colossal body of work on naturally existing and lab-produced viruses, vaccines, patents etc. I have trouble espousing the notion that “viruses” don’t exist or that they are simply exosomes as some have reportedly been identified before being incorporated into an exosome as cargo.

        Though SARS-CoV-2 itself may or may not have been isolated or produced in a lab and may or may not cause disease, P4 lab research facilities handling viral particles do exist and can produce either pathogenic substances or substances that cause our bodies to produce pathogens that are not of bacteriological origin. Whether we call these substances viruses or not does not remove the fact that there is the possibility of causing disease in people and/or making people vulnerable to bacteriological disease through infection and replication of cells.

        Or at least that’s my modest understanding of the status of viruses from what little time I’ve devoted to understanding them.

        They exist independantly from exosomes whether or not they directly cause disease or not.

        I have not looked into the question of mycoplasma and will try as soon as possible to explore that notion and the material you posted just above.

        • HomeRemedySupply says:

          Thanks for this. I really appreciate it.
          You helped me sort out some muddy water. You brought up some very relevant stable datums.

          • anonymint says:

            You brought up some very relevant stable datums.

            I hope you will change that assessment after reading my responses.

        • anonymint says:

          Yes but they do make a distinction between “viral particles” and “exosomes”.

          I will need to more carefully review his presentations but originally I interpreted (upthread on this page) Dr. Andrew Kaufman’s association of viruses as exosomes not to mean that free virus particles don’t exist (i.e. not that he asserted that viruses are only ever cargo of exosomes and are synonymous with exosomes) but rather that viruses are only meaningful as excreted by-products of disease and are NOT proven to be the key infectious agent which transfers disease from a diseased host to a healthy host.

          The metagenomics paper you cited has me thinking that if “virus-like structures” (terminology I chose to de-emphasize the unproven causal correlation to disease) are so egregiously varied and ubiquitous in the environment, then these capsid encapsulated nucleic acid (i.e. genetic) structures may be instead a biological information highway for horizontal genetic transfer analogous to our Internet in the theoretical model that 180 IQ Freeman Dyson espoused.

          Metagenomics and future perspectives in virus discovery

          Viral metagenomic analyses of environmental samples suggest that the field of virology has explored less than 1% of the extant viral diversity […] Phylogenetically, some of these viruses are distantly related to previously discovered viruses. In addition, 60–99% of the sequences generated in different viral metagenomic studies are not homologous to known viruses.


          viruses are the most abundant entities in the biosphere totaling an estimated number of 1.2 × 1030, 2.6 × 1030, 3.5 × 1031, and 0.25–2.5 × 1031 in the open ocean, in soil and in oceanic and terrestrial subsurfaces, respectively.

          In the human holobiont, the 1013 human cells are outnumbered 10-fold by bacteria and 100-fold by viruses.


          the consensus is that we have barely begun to chart the viral world, which is the ‘dark matter’ of the biological universe and a rich source of future discoveries

          […continued in my next comment post…]

          • manbearpig says:

            Responding to LibertyDan upthread you posted:

            “anonymint says:
            11/16/2020 at 6:44 am
            I believe you’re missing the point entirely.

            1. Viruses are not even proven to exist…The entire “viruses” charade is probably a grand hoax…”

            which is slightly different than what you posted in response to me just above:

            “…viruses are only meaningful as excreted by-products of disease and are NOT proven to be the key infectious agent which transfers disease from a diseased host to a healthy host…”

            which is slightly different than this observation you made below:

            “The widely accepted notion that viruses act as obligatory pathogens is beginning to give way to the concept that viruses can be part of the normal flora of the human body…”

            (“can be” being the operative words of the above sentence”)

            So are viruses a grand hoax that are not proven to exist?


            are viruses are only meaningful as excreted by-products of disease?


            are viruses part of the normal flora of the human body?

            • anonymint says:

              Those three statements aren’t conflicting nor inconsistent.

              1. Viruses as defined as infectious agents are a hoax that doesn’t exist, at least a minimum because the claim is unproven and probably also incorrect.

              2. Viruses in the context of being alleged to be infectious agents “are only meaningful as excreted by-products of disease and are NOT proven to be key infectious agents which transfer disease” was my interpretation of what Dr. Andrew Kaufman was presenting. And I agree with that in that context.

              3. Virus-like structures that are not (i.e. not ‘viruses’ that are) presented and defined as infectious agents are part of the normal flora of the human body and even the environment outside the host, according to the research I cited.

              That should have been obvious from what I wrote and the context, although I am happy to respond by repeating myself for clarity. Actually I was predicting (the thought crossed my mind) that some readers would incorrectly attribute my interpretation of Kaufman as my own claim and conflate it with my other statements. Even you are ostensibly conflating a quote from a research paper as my statement — although I concede that I am implying I agree with it.

              • manbearpig says:

                Would you concede the plausibility of the following extract of the second (neckbeards) paper I referenced?:

                Rather than being the primary cause of pathogenesis

                “…a virus found in CSF [which is generally sterile] can be a coinfectious agent – which would play a secondary role in disease pathology and could increase disease severity or facilitate the entry of other pathogens…”


              • manbearpig says:

                Are you saying that viral particles can not be introduced into an organism from an outside agent?

              • anonymint says:

                Why should we concede anything which is not proven in a disease model based in reality that can’t be forged with technological obfuscation? Either fulfill Koch’s postulates or stop. No more neckbeard virtual realities being abused by power elites to enslave us.

                Whose side are you on? (Don’t claim you’re on the side of science, unless you mean junk science propaganda)

              • anonymint says:

                Are you saying that viral particles can not be introduced into an organism from an outside agent?

                It’s not necessary to make that strong claim for which I have no evidence.

                It’s only necessary to show that virus-like structures have never been proven to cause any disease. And then further to cite the research that they are so ubiquitous in the environment (e.g. sea water) essentially populating the Shannon entropy (aka information content) of the genomic permutations that it’s preposterous to focus on them as an agent of disease. They appear to be an information communication system of the ancestral cellular organism biology that preceding the evolution of species.

            • mkey says:

              Lets at least come to terms regarding the origin.

              That even according to the offcial theory, virus is not alive but a lump of lifeless protein.

              In our current predicament, and in an artist rendition, a spiked lump of protein. Lifeless lumps that latch on onto cell barriers, penetrate the cell, infect the cell and repurpose the cell into a virus producing factory.

              All of this functionality encoded in a lifeless lump of proetin. I may have a tendancy to oversimplify, but this theory is a mixture of fabulous storytelling, superfluous complexity and bad science.

              • anonymint says:

                This is a another reply to @manbearpig, but I will put it under your comment because it’s also relevant.

                Live mycoplasma could be successfully recovered from the surface of the laminar flow hood even four to six days later! […] These results show how quickly and easily mycoplasma can spread

                I have read that typically except under extremely ideal conditions viruses tend to be degenerate within 24 hours or less on many surfaces, especially when subject to warmth, low humidity and/or UV light.

                So mycoplasma is inherently more likely to be a causative agent of transmitting disease between hosts. Mycoplasma are bacteria without a cell wall. Meaning they are a cellular organism that is functionally alive. Viruses ostensibly depend on cells in order to be replicated and participate in biology.

                The tail doesn’t wag the dog, except in virtual reality where the laws of the physics of mass can be disregarded.

                Perhaps what is really going on with medical research (that side-steps the necessary controls for unequivocal proof because those controls are implausible or impractical) is the streetlight effect (c.f. also) combined with placebo-effect hallucination. Ditto many of those who believe their healthcare benefits from the toxic, iatrogenic medications.

        • anonymint says:

          […continued from my prior comment post…]

          the metagenomic approach will generate a plethora of genetic information from unknown and potentially infectious agents, some of which could be associated with human diseases. The discovery of viruses will start to precede the characterization of the diseases they cause, well before the pathogenicity of these agents is defined


          PCR using consensus primers based on previously characterized viruses have little or no value in detecting completely novel viruses

          a well-known virus discovered with microarrays is SARS-CoV, a highly divergent coronavirus discovered amid a worldwide outbreak […] Reproducibility of results between microarray tests is frequently poor


          sequence-independent viral metagenomic approaches do not rely on prior knowledge of viruses in the samples

          The ostensibly want to access the entire realm of genetic communication to (mis)identify any moire pattern noise as causative agents. This appears to me to possibly be madness of neckbeards run amok!

          Taken in context of my prior comment, PCR verifies whatever you want it to verify!

          The phylogenetic claim that SARS-CoV-2 shares ~78% of its genome with SARS-CoV should be considered in the light that humans share 98% of our genome with Chimpanzees. And note my upthread comment post that the alleged bat virus genome for SARS-CoV-2 was apparently uploaded in late January by the Wuhan biolab after it had been taken over by the PLA according to my source.

          […continued in my next comment post…]

          • mkey says:

            Taken in context of my prior comment, PCR verifies whatever you want it to verify!

            This has also been stated by Kary Mullis a number of times. He was speaking about AIDS at the time, but it’s the same malarkey all over again.

            • anonymint says:

              COVID19 – Evidence Of Global Fraud

              COVID 19 […] appear[s] to be part of an international conspiracy to commit fraud […] there is no evidence that a virus called SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called COVID 19 […] research published by the Spanish medical journal D-Salud-Discovery. Their advisory board of eminently qualified physicians and scientists […] Their claim is astounding.

              The genetic primers and probes used in RT-PCR tests to identify SARS-CoV-2 do not target anything specific.


              D-Salud-Discovery state there are no tests capable of identifying SARS-CoV-2. Consequently, all claims about the alleged impact of COVID 19 on population health are groundless.

              The entire official COVID 19 narrative is a deception […] If these claims are accurate we can state that there is no evidence of a pandemic […] We have suffered incalculable loss for no evident reason, other than the ambitions of unscrupulous despots who wish to transform the global economy and our society to suit their purposes.

              In doing so this “parasite class” have potentially committed countless crimes


              According to the WHO and Chinese researchers, these tests will find the virus that causes COVID 19.

              Yet the WHO also state:

              Working directly from sequence information, the team developed a series of genetic amplification (PCR) assays used by laboratories.”

              The Wuhan scientists developed their genetic amplification assays from “sequence information” because there was no isolated, purified sample of the so called SARS-CoV-2 virus. They also showed electron microscope images of the newly discovered virions (the spiky protein ball containing the viral RNA.)

              However, such protein structures are not unique. They look just like other round vesicles, such as endocytic vesicles and exosomes.


              Whenever we check the so-called unique genetic markers for SARS-CoV-2, recorded in the WHO protocols, we find complete or high percentage matches with various fragments of the human genome. This suggests that the genetic sequences, which are supposed to identify SARS-CoV-2, are not unique. They could be anything from microbial sequences to fragments of human chromosomes.

              The article then proceeds to explain Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’, The virus that isn’t there, genetic sequencing, and the magic trick and a more detailed dive into my point that humans share 98% of our genome with chimpanzees.

              • mkey says:

                The fraud is encoded in the very meaning of the word “pandemic”.

                Its declaration means cessation of the rule of law (to the extent it protects “rights”, otherwise it is running rampant) internationally, triggering a descent into dictatorship in many independent legal jurisdictions at once.

                I could be persuaded that this may be necessary in special circumstances, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

                If it is not clear under which conditions a pandemic is declared (a metric, an exact definition should be obvious and readilly available) then how will anyone what conditions need to be met for it to cease to exist?

                The pandemic, such as has been delcared, is a fraud that seeks the cover of darkness to operate. The good will happen in broad daylight while evil can come to pass only under the shroud of darkness, insecurity, obfuscation and that what is left unsaid.

        • anonymint says:

          […continued from my prior comment post…]

          The widely accepted notion that viruses act as obligatory pathogens is beginning to give way to the concept that viruses can be part of the normal flora of the human body […] The abundance of viruses, particularly phages, in the lung — an environment previously thought to be sterile — may reflect their beneficial role in keeping bacterial populations in check.

          From the paper you cited:

          considered the inoculation of the infectious agent in a healthy individual as a criterion for the confirmation of causality (this criterion was inherited from Koch’s postulates). However, because of ethical issues, it is not possible to inoculate a suspected pathogen in human beings, and with exceptions such as the SARS-related human coronavirus, few etiological agents have a susceptible experimental animal model.


          These authors affirmed that, considering the current knowledge, it is impossible to establish a causal association between this virus and the disease according to Koch’s criteria or their adapted versions.

          Oh how convenient. So neckbeards have found an excuse to discard any foundation at all, so they can be paid to play with their exciting new virtual reality toys, which have no provable correlation with reality, yet have egregious societalcide implications as utilized by the powers-that-be (e.g. the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset underway).

          And note the introduction of a posited animal host model for SARS as a means of attempting to establish some level of acceptance in the scientific community. So then we will need to climb down into the rabbit hole of fraud that has been leaking out about the claimed SARS animal models. I will follow-up on that!

          Moreover, Lipkin suggested […] that a causal association can be confirmed if the disease can be attenuated or prevented with the use of microorganism-specific vaccines, drugs, or antibodies.

          OTOH, according to […] Fredericks & Relman for establishing microbial disease causation, there is no need to isolate a virus or inoculate it in a host. These guidelines are based on the identification of the microbial genome using in situ hybridization in tissue samples with pathological changes and on the analysis of the copy number of pathogen-associated nucleic acid sequences in tissue samples with or without lesions during several phases of the disease

          They establish a virtual reality that can be anything they want it to be.

          • mkey says:

            It is immoral not to inject a mixture of chemicals (such as formaldehyde), heavy metals (such as mercury), animal DNA, aborted fetal tissue and cell fragments into an unsuspecting subject, including newborns, children, elderly, chronically ill and the infirm.

            I’m not a vindictive man, at least not as much as I used to be in my unbegun years, but if by some crazy chance they pick me to sit in a jury that will deliberate on culpability of these monsters I’ll make sure to bring my own rope. Lots and lots of rope.

      • mkey says:

        So many possible ways for previously unknown agents to slip through any assumed elimination methodology.

        This was never an issue because they never planned to deal with it. In the world of make believe where up is down and black is white these people can act whatever they like. The bigger the lie, harder the people will fall for it.

        • anonymint says:

          A Youtubular comment:

          I’ve been wondering the exact thing when Catherine was discussing why the elite want to control and enslave the human population. It just doesn’t make any sense to me unless they aren’t human.

          It’s all human nature, not lizard people although incorporating our ancestral lizard brain.

          I wrote previously:

          The discovery of truths on the Internet about the vaccine and viruses hoax that the global elite have been foisting on human civilization for more than a century, might explain why they’re so desperate to move to 1984 totalitarianism before the wide access to information on the Internet undermines their control and results in their decapitations.

          1. The mass (and social mass) media along with Big Tech are sucked into the alliance because they’re reaping in massive profits and inflated stock prices with their monopolies and they know Trump wants to attack dismantle the fake media and social media monopolies in his second POTUS term.

          2. The WHO had a financial incentive in declaring this a pandemic because it issued Pandemic Bonds which are now voided by the pandemic declaration.

          3. They want an excuse to eliminate cash, c.f. also. Big Tech receives a larger slice of the pie in banking (and everything).

          4. Politicians benefit from crises (including some reciving bribes from the conspirators). “It’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled.” — Mark Twain.

          5. We forced our leaders to do it to us! The sovereign debt crisis, especially in the EU, had reached the Minsky Moment collapse as signaled by the Repo Crisis in late 2018. The marginal utility of debt had gone negative (c.f. also and also) as socialism and big government had run out of other people’s money with global debts and unfunded actuarial liabilities (e.g. pensions, healthcare, etc) in the $100s of trillions. So instead of allowing a natural collapse and adjustment to the technological unemployment coming from robotics and shift to online versus local business services, wherein lalala-land sheepeople constituents expect their debt-inflated lifestyle should continue indefinitely, politicians would be blamed and voted out for the egregious collapse, failure of promises and losses, with the pain of economic collapse distributed meritoriously throughout most economic sectors, the powers-that-be formed alliances to amplify their monopolies and control by instead by foisting a mass propaganda to trap the world in the WEF’s Great Reset (c.f. also) communist/fascist totalitarianism to eliminate their competition, eliminate democracy, eliminate meaningful voting and eliminate private property.

          Armstrong elaborated in a blog, another blog, starting from the 3 minute juncture in an interview and the 13 minute juncture in a more recent interview.

          6. This is the Bankster Master Plan.

    • cu.h.j says:

      Thanks for this, I will check it out. I like to learn more about exosomes.

      The thing is that as fascinating as this all is, I know that I have “caught viruses”. I had a virus cultured even and it responds to acyclovir when I need it for outbreaks of HSV-1 (cold sore virus). I have also “caught” colds and “stomach bugs” from people with identical symptoms.

      Can anyone explain why this happens if viruses don’t really exist? Has anyone explained the mechanism of disease development if viruses don’t exist?

      I am a germ theory believer but am willing to see other perspectives. I actually think both terrain and germ theory together explain why people get sick.

      • flammable says:

        I agree that both terrain and germ theory can work together. The biggest obstacle is the narratives created by government officials and special interest groups. It has muddied the waters of scientific fields that study bacteria and viruses.

        I find it sad when there are virologists, microbiologists, and geneticists that agree with us but get attacked because they merely explain how an article is incorrect in explaining RT-PCR and viral sequencing. We need to practice discernment and not play into the hands of the manipulative authorities.

      • anonymint says:

        Koch’s Postulates, Carnivorous Cows, and Tuberculosis Today

        Although Vibrio cholerae was isolated from patients with cholera in the time of Koch, it was also isolated from healthy subjects, thereby defying the specificity of association demanded by Koch’s second postulate […] and herpes simplex virus or other viruses cannot be grown alone, i.e., in cell-free culture, and hence cannot fulfill Koch’s postulates, yet they are unequivocally pathogenic […] Many viruses do not cause illness in all infected individuals, a requirement of postulate #1. An example is poliovirus, which causes paralytic disease in about 1% of those infected. Further compromising postulate #1 is the fact that infection with the same virus may lead to markedly different diseases, while different viruses may cause the same disease. Postulates #2 and #3 cannot be fulfilled for viruses that do not replicate in cell culture, or for which a suitable animal model has not been identified

        Herpes simplex virus infection, with particular reference to the progression and complications of primary herpetic gingivostomatitis

        a study of 4000 children seropositive for HSV-1, only 12% had evident signs and symptoms of infection […] it is accepted generally [it’s not proven, so we will just presume] that HSV-1 gains access through disruptions of skin integrity or mucous membrane […] these viruses […] remain latent in neural immune-privileged tissues […] to elude the immune system […] HSV epithelial replication is followed by transport of virus to the trigeminal or other ganglia […] Transport […] via the microtubules of the neurones

        Acyclovir appears to disrupt excretions of HSV from cells. It appears to lessen the severity and duration of outbreaks, but has no effect in recurrence. Thus it appears to have no impact on the actual cause of disease, can’t be proven to cause disease and instead is squelching a signaling mechanism of an active disease mode. Acyclovir can be highly toxic to the kidneys.

        We have no way of knowing for viruses that can’t be cultured independently of a milieu or host, whether there’s something in the milieu or host causing the disease. The viruses may just be an information signaling mechanism of the disease.

        • anonymint says:

          Typo: /no effect in recurrence/no effect on recurrence/

          They present the narrative that HSV is hiding from the immune system in the nerve cells and transported to replicate in epithelial cells during an outbreak. That could all be true without it necessarily being the case that the HSV virons are the actual controlling (instigating) agent. They may just be message carriers held in reserve for an information communication system between cells being orchestrated by some other causative agent such as perhaps mycoplasma or some yet undetected pathogen or dysbiosys.

          My problem with it all it is that since nothing can proved unequivocally and since epidemiological evidence can be manipulated by for example fraudulent tests as in the well established case for SARS-CoV-2, there’s too much leeway for medical fraud and totalitarianism.

          For example, in the 1981 research “The herpesvirus hypothesis”—Are Koch’s postulates satisfied? they proclaimed to have fulfilled all necessary requirements to causally associate HSV with cervical cancer. Yet by now that has been invalidated and HPV is now presumed to be the culprit.

          @flammable I agree with your comment.

          • manbearpig says:

            “…My problem with it all it is that since nothing can proved unequivocally and since epidemiological evidence can be manipulated by for example fraudulent tests as in the well established case for SARS-CoV-2, there’s too much leeway for medical fraud and totalitarianism…”

            Certainly a very true and laudable concern.

            The problem is that the vast majority of the public, which includes me, are completely unaware of how all that science functions so not only will a campaign to enforce the respect of Koch’s postulates not make any impact on the opinion the ignorant concerning SARS, we are, on the contrary, very susceptible to easy slogans.

            …easy slogans such as “Viruses are a Hoax and don’t exist!”.

            And many people will retain such a message and not bother to put it into context.

            MY concern is that by making such declarations at the moment, whether they turn out to be true or not, so-called conspiracy theorists will be annihilating their credibility on more easily demonstrable negations of the validity of this plandemic and its measures which are indeed part and parcel of a sort of sinister Hoax.

            I fear that by making such declarations with or without context, not only will credibility on other valuable points be annihilated but in addition, those professionals evoked by Flammable; the microbiologists, virologists and geneticists, who represent valuable and potentially persuasive allies, will be completely alienated and we’ll lose them.

            Furthermore, I’m surprised you should ask me “whose side are you on anyway?” as you did upthread because I’m certain that someone with such a self-proclaimed high IQ as yourself wouldn’t have such a binary vision of my motives.

            “You’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists!”

            In such a spirit I might ask you if you’re a George Bush acolyte.

            To answer what I assume was a rhetorical question (which is probably a reckless thing to do) I guess I’m on the side of clarity.

            And I know the devil’s in the details.

            So thanks for taking time to clarify what you mean by these spectacular announcements proclaiming the non-existence of viruses, even if it all seemed clear to you in your stipulated context.

            Personally, though I’m certain I’m coming from the point of view of a perfectly mediocre IQ, and though I’m completely against being vaccinated for anything, I’m not convinced that viral particles can not sometimes play an essential role in the manifestation of disease.

            • anonymint says:

              I was also thinking last night about how certain statements could be interpreted out-of-context. I agree with you and happy that you raised the point that we “kooks” need to be very careful how we articulate and summarize our analyses.

              Please note that when I started commenting on this page, I hadn’t yet formed a coherent understanding of the issue. I was dumping the information I had accumulated over the past several months which I had been planning to assimilate and blog about, but hadn’t yet found the time. Because the Great Reset totalitarianism is accelerating and humanity appears to be in such danger at this juncture, I grabbed the opportunity with JC’s report on vaccines to start to dump the information in the comments in an attempt to crowdsource some analyses. That process is a bit messy and so now we are arriving closer to some reasonable understanding of the issues albeit probably not the final conclusions.

              I have dealt with such vicious online trolls over the past several years, my anxiety increases significantly when I detect that someone may be intentionally misinterpreting my statements. I’m happy to read that was not the case for you.

              P.S. Hey IQ isn’t everything; and you seem sentient and articulate. My IQ is not that high, apparently borderline Mensa only likely somewhere between 125 and 140 based on two SAT tests and the ostensibly well verified 137 IQ of mother, although I was always more interested than her in math and less capable and interested in esoteric vocabulary. Maybe borderline autistic or Asperger’s because I used to read and spell backwards sometimes, although I also trend extrovert but also have some bouts of introversion. My intellect is focused more in conceptual visualization including math wherein I seem to compete with those in the 3 SD range (145 IQ), than in intricate, computational pattern matching and expansive memory. I could do arithmetic fast in my head before. Whatever intellect I had is diminished because I am for past years suffering from dementia that varies between stage 1 to 3 from hour-to-hour and day-to-day because of some chronic illness ostensibly involving my liver, digestion and endocrine system. That brain fog impacts my mental acuity significantly especially causing amnesia and inability to keep a lot of information or even mundane details in my head as I used to, as evident by numerous sloppy typos, e.g. ‘the’ instead of ‘they’.

            • anonymint says:

              …easy slogans such as “Viruses are a Hoax and don’t exist!”.

              What was meant is NOT that virus-like particles and their observed interactions with cells provably don’t exist. That part may all be true, although I read in for example the HIV research I cited that there’s still some controversy among dissenting experts about that as well. I meant (and I was at that time attempting to interpret Dr. Andrew Kaufman’s thesis) that viruses as defined to be infectious agents that hijack cells and being in control and the cause of disease DO NOT PROVABLY EXIST. It has not been established with unequivocal proof that “viruses” exist — where the term “viruses” is so defined in mainstream. I mean the concept of viruses as defined in the mainstream does not provably exist. The virus-like structures and interactions documented in research may exist. That is ostensibly an important distinction and people need to be sophisticated enough and have sufficient mental acuity to make that discernment, so they will not be fooled.

              In such a spirit I might ask you if you’re a George Bush acolyte.

              Why in the heck would I follow someone who was complicit in the now exquisitely proven 9/11 false flag. The recent release of that new WTC7 engineering study is perhaps another reason the powers-that-be had to accelerate the totalitarianism recently. We’re sharpening the guillotines.

        • anonymint says:

          Let me make this sentence more coherent:

          “Thus Acyclovir appears to have no impact on the actual cause of disease, HSV can’t be proven to cause disease and instead Acyclovir is squelching […]”

      • Fawlty Towers says:

        Great discussion going on here about viruses vs. exosomes.

        I have a science/biology/genetics background and so I can easily understand the technical jargon that’s been introduced so far.

        For the time being I am sitting on the fence in the viruses vs. exosomes debate.

        However I will quickly and happily join the exosome team if anyone here can explain one simple phenomenon in a logical way.

        Clusters. In this case, cases of Covid-19 clusters.

        The terrain theory could certainly cover illnesses experienced by people around the world who are being exposed to the same/similar toxins from the environment (especially 5G etc. if it is alive and well in their area).

        But there is a BIG problem for me with clusters.

        Lets take a group of 50 people or so gathered in a confined area.
        Why would 5, 10, 15 of these people who were in closest contact with each other come down with ‘Covid-19’ symptoms (or virus ‘x’)?

        No one has been able to answer this question yet satisfactorily, even Dr. Kaufman.

        • mkey says:

          Symptoms? You mean dry cough and slightly increased body temperature? Not to forget that the vast majority of those “afflicted” are not ill to any extent of the word.

          • Fawlty Towers says:

            Yes those are the (cough) symptoms I’m referring to in this case. 🙂
            However benign they are, what terrain theory could be so selective as to affect only a few people who were in close proximity to each other.

            Once again, if the explanation was logical, I’d jump on board with the team.

            No one has proposed one that I’m aware of and I’m hoping someone here will be able to do so.

            • mkey says:

              I have to say, looking for this answer from your part is akin to the type of discussion an aspiring anarchist may run into when talking to a statist who practically demands answers to any given societal questions related to organizational matters they deem the anarchist is unable to provide a (in their opinion) good enough replacement system, producing it from the sleeve.

              There is such a process as discovery that needs to be undertaken to reach understanding.

              I’m not concerned by benignity of symptoms, but their specificity. Dry cough is an extremely non specific symptom of: dry air in the room, cold air in the area during a walk/jog, a cigarette too many, too much mucus coming down from sinuses and who knows what else.

              Similar can be said about increased body temperature. How much increase related to one’s typical body temperature? Which are of the body? What’s the difference between one’s standard body temperature for the given body area, given time of day, given activity and surrounding and the “standard expected” body temperature?

              Who says several people in any given setting are getting non specific symptoms from the same cause? What about general health that won’t be generally on the same level between different individuals? What about susceptibility?

              What’s the evidence that “covid-19” is related to dry cough and increased body temperature? Because tests say so? There are extremely illogical assumptions being made. Why do we take for granted things that have never been proven, especially after their foundations collapse?

              Fox example, sometimes I’ll feel as “getting down with something” following a scratching sensation in my chest only to later realize the feeling was coming from esophagus due to an acid reflux. So nothing going down, just things moving back up.

              You may believe what you wish, but from my point of view one of the most obdurate canards is thinking that one symptom can be engendered by only one disease. And that must be whatever is currently being pushed in the media leading to salacious logic that misattributes like there is no tomorrow.

              • Fawlty Towers says:

                Thanks for your detailed response mkey!

                We are on the same team, make no mistake about it.
                But we can still engage in thoughtful conversation/debate
                at the same time.

                I disagree with your opening statement (something I have heard before).
                I am not demanding anything. I am simply stating that I, personally, would not
                be able to become a ‘terrain theory convert’ until a logical ‘cluster theory’ explanation has been given that satisfies me.

                I certainly agree that the general ‘Covid-19 symptoms’ are often meaningless, as they apply to any number of other illnesses.

                Who says several people in any given setting are getting non specific symptoms from the same cause? What about general health that won’t be generally on the same level between different individuals? What about susceptibility?

                Well that’s exactly the confounding part.

                How likely would it be that several people in close proximity to each other would get the same ‘symptoms’ of an illness from different causes?

                And how likely would it be that several people in close proximity to each other would get the same ‘symptoms’ of an illness, even when the general health of these people were on different levels?

                And how likely would it be that several people in close proximity to each other would get the same ‘symptoms’ of an illness, even when the susceptibility of these people were on different levels?

                What’s the evidence that “covid-19” is related to dry cough and increased body temperature? Because tests say so? There are extremely illogical assumptions being made. Why do we take for granted things that have never been proven, especially after their foundations collapse?

                A person presents themselves to a medical clinic exhibiting the above symptoms.
                They could be suffering from a cold, flu, ‘Covid-19’ or any other myriad number of illnesses.
                Some clinics don’t even test, but label the illness as Covid-19.
                Those that do test, often have their PCR machines jacked up to 35-40 cycles, so ‘false positives’ are often diagnosed.
                In other words, there is no definitive evidence, just ‘going through the motions’ evidence.

                You may believe what you wish, but from my point of view one of the most obdurate canards is thinking that one symptom can be engendered by only one disease. And that must be whatever is currently being pushed in the media leading to salacious logic that misattributes like there is no tomorrow.

                As I mentioned just above, it is well-established that dry cough, fever, etc. is associated with many different illnesses.

                But my point is that when you have a small cluster of individuals all coming down with the same symptoms, at the same time, though it is possible that each one could be exhibiting their symptoms as a result of a different cause, the odds are not likely for this result.

              • anonymint says:

                @FawltyTowers you presume that the hoax PCR test establishes SARS-CoV-2 present in the illness cluster as an infectious agent.

                Yet that presumption depends on linkages which have not been provably established as I have explained in my numerous comments on this page.

                Do I need to repeat myself?

              • Fawlty Towers says:

                First I would request that you scale back a notch on the ‘tone’ meter please. 🙂

                “anonymint says:
                11/25/2020 at 5:01 am

                @FawltyTowers you presume that the hoax PCR test establishes SARS-CoV-2 present in the illness cluster as an infectious agent.

                Yet that presumption depends on linkages which have not been provably established as I have explained in my numerous comments on this page.

                Do I need to repeat myself?”

                I have made NO presumptions.
                I did not refer to any PCR tests to validate illnesses.

                I will try to be as excruciatingly clear as possible now.

                If someone can give me a logical explanation as to why clusters occur for illnesses (such as we see with Covid now) I will jump over to the ‘exosome’ team with open arms.

                A room full of 50 or so people.
                Five or six who were in gathered together in one section of the room come down with ‘CV symptoms’ shortly after assembling together.

                A perfectly logical explanation for this would be?

              • anonymint says:

                I don’t know what tone you think you read in my message. I was simply speaking about the merits to the issue.

                I can’t understand how you could have read my two replies and not understand that there could be other infectious agents causing the disease cluster. I asked you why you assume the infectious agent must be a virus and specifically the SARS-CoV-2 virus given all the lack of proof that virus even exists, lack of proof that it infects humans and lack of proof that viruses as a theory of infectious disease.

                For example why not bacterial mycoplasma as the infectious agent causing the disease cluster?

                Again I repeat myself.

            • anonymint says:

              Why do suspect SARS-CoV-2 to be the cause of disease given I posited that mycoplasma is much more capable of surviving in the environment to infect hosts?

              Why do you suspect SARS-CoV-2 when in my first comments on this page I cited Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’ which explains how the genome of this purported virus was constructed only in virtual reality in a computer?

              I have already documented in my comments that experts have explained that RT-PCR tests are circular reasoning when employed to establish the existence of a virus, because they have to be calibrated with an presumption that we know a priori the signal we are attempt to observe. Note my new comment downthread explaining the fundamental concept of aliasing error and why all of this appears to be junk science that can’t be falsified. I previously quoted from research:

              The specificity of primers in this method should be broad enough […] but narrow enough to prevent amplification of common bacteria which might exist in the PCR reagents

              I cited the chart that showed non-Influenza, respiratory illness is not statistically higher in 2020 than it has been.

              Yet curiously death by heart attack and cancer have plummeted in 2020 because hospitals and doctors have been bribed to classify all deaths as COVID-19 on the death certificates.

              • mkey says:

                Will you post that song to the Truth music podcast page or shall I?

              • Fawlty Towers says:

                May I assume that your post above was addressed at me?

                “Why do suspect SARS-CoV-2 to be the cause of disease given I posited that mycoplasma is much more capable of surviving in the environment to infect hosts?”

                As I told mkey, we are on the same team!
                Get it?

                I am as skeptical of CV as you are!
                But that doesn’t mean I will jump blindly and with open arms to the ‘exosome’ terrain theory without logical explanations to certain phenomena.

                I don’t think anyone should.

              • anonymint says:

                Why can’t you accept that maybe science has no explanation.

                Clusters of disease are not a new phenomenon. Been around since humanity has clustered 3000+ years ago.

                Why the sudden urgency FUD porn?

                Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds

  31. anonymint says:

    Mercola has a new article First COVID-19 Vaccine 90% Effective? citing a video by Dr. Chris Martenson who apparently has a PhD in pathology.

    The article casts a negative light on Pfizer’s claim of 90% efficacy. The problem I have with Chris is that he doesn’t seem to understand that the mainstream notion of “viruses” is apparently an incorrect, hoax disease model (they’re only exosomes, not infectious particles) and vaccines actually apparently cause epidemics and pandemics instead of protecting against them!

    Chris’ antibody enhancement syndrome (ADE) hypothesis may merely be toxic vaccines causing autoimmunity-like illness. ← Click to go back to discussion earlier in these comments if you missed the comment posts that presented the relevant information supporting the thesis that viruses are NOT infectious agents causing disease.

  32. John Jacob Astor IV says:

    Its a great vaccine. The best vaccine. I love the people who made this vaccine. Its really amazing. Me and Melania are going to get it first because we really really love this amazing new vaccine!

  33. scpat says:

    More negative consequences of lockdowns. The Seen & the Unseen.

    ‘It’s literally at record levels’: Prosecutors up and down California say they’ve seen a rise in domestic violence amidst the pandemic – The Mercury News – November 18, 2020

    State and federal prosecutors across California are trying to raise awareness about a disturbing trend that has held across the state since the start of the pandemic: domestic violence appears to be going up, as avenues for victims to report it are closing.

    The Alameda County Family Justice Center typically serves around 15,000 people per year. In March 2020, as shutdown orders were issued across the Bay Area, they saw a drastic drop in walk-ins, according to Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley.

    “We had only about 50 people contact the justice center. As a result, we called the victims,” O’Malley said. “We had over 140 women who identified themselves as needing to get out of the home because they were sheltered in place with their abusers.”

    She later added, “Since that time, the number of people coming to the family justice center now … is over 400. We know reaching out to the community and telling people help is available made a difference to them.”

    Schubert says her office has seen a 39 percent increase in police bringing domestic violence cases to county prosecutors for filing since the pandemic hit. In Ventura County, the increase has been drastic, Ventura District Attorney Gregory Totten said.

    “We’ve also seen a 90 percent increase in child abuse and child sex crimes referrals to us,” Totten said, adding that the number of domestic violence seeking shelter has increased by 120 percent. “It’s literally at record levels since COVID-19 occurred.”

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      Important post.

    • cu.h.j says:

      At the hospital I work in I have seen an increase in fentanyl ODs attempted suicides and cases of mental health issues and anxiety. This is making people miserable.

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      Abnormal Behavior and Volatile Emotions resulting from wearing MASKS all day

      I am of the opinion that many folks who are always wearing a mask may find their behavior and emotional state being affected.

      I remember seeing a short mention of “behavior” on an OSHA mask document months ago.
      More importantly than some authority statement, it is something that I have observed on occasions.
      However, it is difficult to “measure” or compare, especially with folks who I don’t know well.

      A few things which I have noticed occasionally in my interactions with some (not all) folks who are always wearing a mask…
      ~~ A panic or frantic look in their eyes. Sometimes it manifests along with a wild, erratic fast moving action. Or sometimes a frantic verbal tirade.
      ~~ Agitation or irritation. Or more easily prone to being irritated.
      ~~ Bloodshot eyes.
      ~~ A wooden, almost robotic, resigned stoic attitude of “continuing one’s job duties”.
      ~~ I have observed eyes that seemed close to grief, eyes full of resentment or loathing, and eyes dulled by the apathy within.

      Some of these observations include “what I sense” – not visually see with my eyes. So, there is that juju, nebulous side to this opinion of mine which may not hold water.

      One thing that I do know…when a person is close to drowning or suffocating, a franticness occurs.
      Back when I was young and a Life Guard, I saved two different people from drowning. The look in their eyes kind of matches the look I sometimes see of those wearing masks.
      Just by holding one’s breath until the very last “I can’t stand it,” a person can feel those sensations.

      • cu.h.j says:

        I think people wear it to obey. On a certain level, they know what is going on. People are not “dropping like flies” around them. Have you also noticed that flu isn’t being discussed? We aren’t even testing for it anymore where I work like it’s vanished or something.

        It’s also gross to wear a mask all the time. They must get dirty from all the bacteria from our mouths.

      • mkey says:

        I do believe cognitive dissonance is getting too much for many to bare with anymore. They probably don’t even understand the source of the discomfort and may misattribute it to the “covid situation”. Or to that damn passer by who isn’t wearing his mask.

        • anonymint says:

          The masses are being bombarded by full spectrum emotional support to help sustain their cognitive dissonance. And the conspirators are building their mass media, political case to shut down all truther websites. Unfortunately even the 25% of Americans who are on the side of truth are highly confused, because they don’t have access to the distillation of the situation that we’re doing here on the Corbett Report.

          COVID-19 Denial Still Rampant In Some Virus Hotspots

          And still, Craig Mann, walked out of the grocery store, past the signs and toward his truck, maskless and resolute.

          The pandemic everyone’s talking about?

          “It’s absolute garbage,” he said. “There has been plenty of proof that the coronavirus ‘pandemic,’ if you will, links back to Communist China. It’s communist Marxism that they’re trying to push on this country.”

          As healthcare professionals grapple with soaring numbers of COVID-19 sickened people around the country, they’re also combatting another quick-spreading and frustrating contagion: misinformation.

          “I don’t know, I can’t decide if it’s a conspiracy theory or not,” said shopper Shauna Unger, outside of the same grocery store. “I don’t known what’s really happening. It doesn’t seem like it’s as critical as everyone’s making it out to be.”


          “These conspiracy theorists and these groups who are against [masks] have been so vocal on social media that at some point, it starts to resonate with people and starts to have as big of a voice as the medical community – if not more,” said Anita Kisseé, the public relations manager for St. Luke’s, the largest hospital network in Idaho, where coronavirus cases are also surging.


          The effectiveness of masks is a good example. Scientists now know that wearing a mask protects the wearer, not just others. That point was only emphasized by the Centers for Disease Control last week.

          • flammable says:

            The conspiracy theorists that make up such a tiny percentage of the media are not to blame. The reason people are not listening and treating COVID as a hoax is because their illnesses and suffering gets treated like a hoax. People have seen their loved ones suffer and die for years and government officials never cared. Even when they do acknowledge it, the long existing illnesses are only regarded as vulnerabilities to the new illness.

            Every year there is this theatrics of savings lives from a new viral strain but treating the vast majority of illnesses that cause misery and death as normal. If our public officials treat nearly all death and disease as normal what difference does a new disease make?

            • mkey says:

              Don’t forget about all the iatrogenic death. How often are those noted on the death certificate as the leading cause?

            • anonymint says:

              @flammable I don’t make empathetic excuses for the afflicted, self-important, witless and pointless masses[sheepeople] who don’t, can’t and won’t do their independent research instead of defaulting to Sheep Logic. Nature is culling the herd. They’ll perish for it.

              I bet by the time you have suffered a horrific deprivation and disruption of your life soon because of their collective ignorance, you will hate the sheepeople with a passion. This will be the transformation of psychology to “every man for himself” reality that amplifies to the scorched earth. Hopefully the south of the USA will collectively wise up, but everyone I ask knows nothing about the WEF Great Reset and seems to careless. Even my closer freedom-minded, Libertarian friends avoid me now if they know I want to speak with them about it. The cognitive dissonance and “deer in the headlights” inaction speaks to the waterfall collapse that seems to be just around the corner.

              Those who want know the truth should be reading Corbett Report. If they’re not, it’s nobody’s fault but their own. I don’t want to perpetuate the moral hazard and affliction by promoting a Nanny State and the notion that it’s the government’s responsibility to take care and inform people. Hell no. That’s the safety “porn” culture and debt-inflated, elephant-sized government statism that got us into the Orwellian 1984 doublethink, totalitarian overlord, World Economic Forum Great Reset Armageddon we are sinking into now. Only if people will seek out truth independently and stop relying on a Nanny State, will human civilization have any chance of avoiding[it’s too late already, “pack you’re bags folks we’re going away”] another 900 year Dark Age (← MUST READ about the “third such sequence of the Sixth Wave”!) that we appear to be rapidly “Waterfall Event” collapsing into now.

              • anonymint says:

                Armstrong wrote on Feb 27:


                It is very hard to pinpoint a place at this stage in the game. The USA will be better than the other Anglo-Saxon countries, but that may last only until 2024 at best. Southeast Asia will be OK, but keep in mind it has already seen protests against foreigners in places like Singapore.

                Catherine Austin Fitts says be prepared to move 10 times.

                The WEF is threatening a cyber attack, taking down also the power grid and I would guess also the food supply processing/network.


                So we can imagine that they will at least attack the locales that are resisting the virus hoax, e.g. red states of the USA and possibly Mexico although rural Mexico probably wouldn’t bat an eye because the people are too poor to depend that much on Internet or electricity. I don’t think they will go to an EMF attack yet because it might disrupt some of their control grid systems and it would be a very risky chaos with uncertain outcomes.

                Instead I think they want to instill fear in those locales that are resisting so they can turn the politics towards the typical majority-rule, sheepeople reaction to FUD of “government do something even if it means enslaving me.” Because sheepeople disobey 1 Samuel 8, employ Sheep Logic and idol the Nanny State.

              • anonymint says:

                I commented:


                Well you have to rally around a King or have no King at all. The latter is not compatible with human civilization. This is why the Bible says we are not of this world. Come out from the Great Harlot and walk with nothing from town to town as Jesus said is the only way to be truly righteous.


                Those who have disobeyed 1 Samuel 8 will wish they could die. They have a worst fate of burning in sulfur for eternity and wishing they could get one drop of water on their tongue to ease the incessant pain.

                I can now envision how this Hell will actually exist on earth. As science gains the ability to keep our brains nourished, alive indefinitely sans our body and taps into the brain with a virtual reality computer to provide the sensory input, it’s plausible to envision the sensory inputs being fed inexorable excruciating pain.

                I remember the perforated peptic ulcer I had survived (without surgery!) in May 2012 with my stomach bloated akin to pregnancy from ascites. No doctor can understand how I survived that without surgery, but perhaps it was only marginally perforated. I was counting to 10 over and over, huffing and puffing while my insides were burning with an incessant fire. It was so painful I wanted to die. I was begging for morphine but they wouldn’t provide it in the Philippines at that time. After the excruciating aspect of the pain subsided after several days, I went on for days extremely intolerant (in a horrible, indescribable symptoms manner) being inside my own skin — I wanted so much to die but couldn’t bring myself to the act of suicide and instead decide to fight on hoping for relief to come eventually. I can’t imagine how horrific it would be to be stuck in that for eternity.

                All these witless fools who are worried about dying and thus embracing Satan’s FUD, should instead be worrying about not being able to die!

              • anonymint says:

                Correction, s/stomach/abdomen/

                That should be clear from the definition of ascites.

          • mkey says:

            That article is laden with emotional appeals to the brim. With almost every sentence uttered some truth and real perspective is left unspoken.

            Infection rates in the state are among the highest in the country.

            As health care professionals grapple with soaring numbers of COVID-19 cases across the country

            Cases of what exactly? How many of the infected are ill?

            It’s not going anywhere quickly, so we need to get back to the basics: social distancing, washing your hands, wearing a mask.

            Reads like a medical advice. What gives the good doctor the authority to enforce his opinion upon another?

            At work, they’re seeing community members and colleagues get sick with COVID-19. They’re seeing people die.

            Deaths caused by what exactly? How many more deaths comparing to the same period one, two, three, four, five years back?

            They’re pushing out new numbers and information as soon as they get them.

            Repeat, repeat, repeat. People are bound to start believing it sooner rather than later.

            If I can do CPR on a person that’s dying because of #COVID19 while I wear a mask, you can probably wear a mask while you walk around the store.

            Who’s giving CPR to those who are dying of preventable disease? Huh, Agnes? I bet those wretched souls would take it even from evil antimaskers.

            Health care workers in other parts of the country are taking a similar tack.

            Which other parts, exactly? How widespread all of this actually is? What’s with those reports of empty hospitals all geared up but with nobody to cure?

            n South Dakota, which recently led the nation for most deaths and new cases per capita, emergency room nurse Jodi Doering went viral

            I’ll pardon the pun. What’s the deal with South Dakota governor?

            We call on Nebraskans to rise up once again to do everything we can for our state’s health and safety

            That’s what it’s all about, protect the state.

        • anonymint says:

          The effectiveness of masks is a good example. Scientists now know that wearing a mask protects the wearer, not just others. That point was only emphasized by the Centers for Disease Control last week.

          It’s also gross to wear a mask all the time. They must get dirty from all the bacteria from our mouths.

          Vernon Coleman’s banned PDF Proof That Face Masks Do More Harm Than Good.

          • anonymint says:

            Kaufman reviews censored Danish study on the ineffectivity of masks. Could someone please download it from Youtube and upload it to, odyssey or bitchute?

            U.S. government trained OSHA mask experts Tammy Clark and Kristen Meghan blow the whistle on masks.

            “Masks do literally nothing to protect you from disease transmission!” — Tammy Clark

            “That Mask is not protecting anyone around you, at all” — Tammy Clark

            “It’s illegal to force employees in the workplace to wear masks without testing to see if they can medically tolerate it, first!” — Tammy Clark

            “Masks are actually dangerous!” — Kristen Meghan

            • Paul says:

              Saw Dr Kaufman’s review on this also. He does excellent work helping us understand these papers and teaches us what to look for.

  34. des2021 says:

    hey there
    I know that Trudeau gave close to 850M to GAVI/Gates this summer, but I can’t find any articles that convey that transaction….
    Does anyone have some links about that so I can wave the evidences at my fellow Canadians’s faces?

  35. anonymint says:

    Former HUD Undersecretary under Jack Kemp and Wall Street guru Catherine Austin Fitts talks about the egregious instances of injury from injected vaccines.

  36. Kate says:

    COVID 19 is a fraud but I believe THEY have set us up for a large number of casualties from all types of viruses and disease by poisoning our food and water supply.

    Consider that our iodine consumption has been reduced over the last few decades by removing it from bread, at the same time adding bromide, a known carcinogen, AND halogen that blocks iodine from the thyroid, AND at the same time as they add the halogen fluoride to the water supply!

    This is no accident! Iodine can kill bacteria and fungus, both of which can be causes of pneumonia. The homeopath Prof. T. F. Allen claimed that a treatment of iodine in pneumonia sufferers “would arrest the process of hepatization (the consolidation of tissue in the lungs) within twenty-four hours”.

    We must stop trusting our overlords and take care of our own health before it is too late!

    • cu.h.j says:

      It’s important to look at the ingredients list for any pre-packaged food bought. Also, a reverse osmosis filter for water is essential. I have had one for several years now and it was a very good investment.

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      Thanks for highlighting Iodine. That pneumonia link is a great fundamental.

      I well remember back in the 1960’s washing dishes in the restaurant kitchens, and using an iodine rinse. It was standard practice in those days. So simple.

      • Kate says:

        I use iodine to sterilize the tools, containers, and bottles to make wine. Iodine disinfects on contact. What’s more it does good and no harm, unlike antibiotics.

        If you search for iodine on archive dot org, there are many papers about the importance of iodine to health,treating disease, even cancer, and using it to disinfect drinking water and in swimming pools. Dr. Brownstein’s book Iodine Why You Need It is available for free in pdf, and the book The Iodine Crisis by Lynne Farrow.

        As you stated “So simple” 🙂

    • anonymint says:

      Jason Hommel has written about the importance of minerals and did go into detail about the benefits of iodine and misinformation we are fed about high dosages being harmful. The Japanese ingest on average 13mg per day.

      I have written extensively upthread that there’s ostensibly no proof that viruses are the cause of any disease. They may just be incidental. And the likelihood that they transmit disease seems to very slim because viruses do not even survive long on most surfaces whereas for example mycoplasma bacteria do.

      They may be putting mycoplasma in our food and/or in the vaccines. Which may be why they have us all looking at viruses instead. It’s the magician’s trick, to divert the audience’s focus away from the activity that enables the trick.

      Indeed all the toxic halides (e.g. bromide, fluoride) compete with nutrient-fungicide-bacterialcide iodine. Hommel wrote that all our cells need iodine not just our thyroid. He claims iodine supplementation will increase IQ by 5 points or so.

      It’s important to look at the ingredients list for any pre-packaged food bought.

      That’s insufficient, because even the method of preparation can alter the chemical constitution of the stated ingredients. For example all chicken in the USA is bathed in bleach.

      I think there only way to be sure is source food directly from a farmer you trust.

      • anonymint says:

        Not only alter the chemical composition but food processing systems also destroy the important enzymes and good bacterial (flora) diversity, i.e. dysbiosis.

        For example the powers-that-be are making it nearly impossible to obtain healthy milk:

        Even though there are farmers who supposedly sell it in Texas, when I call them up they seem to be wary of selling to anyone who has not been a long-term friend and customer. They’re presumably afraid of lawsuits and perhaps culpability to some laws.

        The dairy we are being fed from grocery stores is toxic.

        • anonymint says:

          Someone emailed me this. It’s eloquently summarized and I agree, so I am sharing it:

          I agree that most of our food is lacking in nutritional value these days. Part of it is monoculture farming that is depleting the soil. Part is industrial pollution seeping into farmlands. The rest is, as you said, over processing of food. I’ve read several articles about raw milk, and I understand both sides of this controversy. If you get raw milk from small, well run dairy farms using proven traditional organic cow-friendly approaches, you are probably safe and certainly getting a more nutritious product than what you find on the shelves in grocery stores. Unfortunately, most dairy farms are overcrowded, and the cows are fed less than ideal non-grass feed products, and they are either highly susceptible to disease or pumped full of antibiotics, so the end result is less than ideal, and the risk of getting sick from unpasteurized milk of that sort is significant.

          Note homogenization (in addition to pasteurization) is also alleged to turn milk into a less nutritious, if not toxic, “food”.

          Seems perhaps ostensibly often there is an economic justification for processing or constituting our food to be less nutritious or even toxic “Fraken(stein)food”, to decrease costs and increase profits. Sometimes the justification is to facilitate mass production which via economies-of-scale decreases costs and increases profits.

          • Kate says:

            Fermentation is a critical part of food preparation. Microorganisms eliminate toxins and add healthy bacteria critical to our health.

            Take bread for example. THEY shortened fermentation time when THEY developed yeast which did the job in a few hours. I think this was in the 70’s. But the bugs in wild yeast eliminate bad stuff in the wheat, like gluten (reduced substantially), and toxins. Look at the article Sourdough Lactic Acid Bacteria Antifungal and Mycotoxin-Controlling.

            What’s more, when we eat bread that hasn’t been properly fermented, it spikes our blood sugar more than a Mars bar. Consider that diabetes has grown to epidemic proportions. Sourdough bread stabilized blood sugar for 24 hours. Also, sugar feeds cancer which has also become epidemic.

            Our microbiome protects us from illness and disease!

            • mkey says:

              I’m wondering how much longer will it take for me to get off of my ass and start baking my bread.

              The most sizable issue being that I’ll have a hard time finding non-industrial flower. The upside being monsatan poison is not very much used in my failed state. Bit then again, there’s a lot of imported wheat, so who knows.

              • Kate says:

                Use what ever flour is available. I started using regular white flour, and I have some in storage that I’m using up rather than throw it out. The cost of the organic is quite a bit more too.

              • mkey says:

                Cost of organic does not worry me, but the source. People like to stick various labels on their products, with all the fake regulation going on that’s usually very easy.

                Without knowing the producer you really don’t have anything to hold on to.

              • Kate says:

                Sourdough is growing in popularity. If there any bakeries close to you, they may make sourdough bread. If there are people around you who make their own bread, they may be able to help you. If anyone has a sourdough starter they can share it would easier than making your own.

        • anonymint says:

          Another economic incentive to produce toxic food is for example adding HFCs creates addiction and stimulates sales. The fatty liver craves more and more and then the sickened individual becomes extremely profitable for the corrupt iatrogenic Western medical establishment. And then it’s all charged on the backs of the productive with universal healthcare and soon UBI for everyone. This is roughly how it went down in Wiemar Republic and then finally Hitler’s universal healthcare which when they could no longer pay for it, they just started mass murdering everyone by the millions. Appears we are about to repeat this once again and yet so many people are totally oblivious to medical totalitarianism taking form.

          As Western Rome collapsed into a 900 year Dark Age, there was also widespread environmental devastation due to over intensive farming and clear cutting forests. This lead to desertification in some areas and collapse in food production. This was concomitant with the overall decade economically and social decay, as we are also observing now as the West is on the precipice about to collapse into another 900 year Dark Age.

        • anonymint says:


          I had to stop dairy also when my digestive function changed after the perforated ulcer event May 2012.

          We need some healthy fats. Apparently more healthy than obtaining those calories from carbs:

          • Kate says:

            There is some debate about whether we need milk in our diet or not. Maybe it’s another case of switchero where they changed something healthy into a poison, so we need to try and reverse the change.

            Consider what I said about fermentation of wheat. I believe we need wheat in our diet but it must be fermented. 25 years ago I suffered from ulcerative colitis. Doing my own dietary experimentation (in-spite of my doctor telling me diet doesn’t affect our health), I realized I couldn’t eat regular bread, or anything with wheat or suger, but I could eat sourdough bread. What’s more, eating sourdough bread made me feel better. Probably because it is a prebiotic which feeds the microbiome.

            I make sourdough bread with organic, unbleached, non-fortified wheat. The flour we buy in the store is loaded with glyphosates (because they dump it on wheat at harvest time to dry it, to make it easier to harvest),and fortified with stuff like folic acid (which some believe blocks folate).

            I also make kefir from organic milk. Like the sourdough bugs, the kefir bugs remove the toxins, and they add good bugs that enhance our microbiome. Some believe that kefir protects against cancer. I should get a goat and start with a healthier milk.

            • anonymint says:

              I’m begging to think chronic illness is caused by an imbalance in PH:


              My chronic illness involving my liver and metabolic syndrome seems to be much less symptomatic when I employ intermittent fasting (for ketones) and minimize total carbs to less than 50g per day. Lately I have only been eating whole gain, steel cut oats for carbs.

              Perhaps infectious mycoplasma manipulates our endocrine system to make us crave carbs to keep our ketones muted.

              Note both Artemisia annua and HCQ employ zinc to disrupt pathogens and they are effective against mycoplasma.


              • Kate says:

                Years ago when I first had ulcerative colitis, oats was one of the few foods I could tolerate. I went on the Specific Carbohydrate Diet and was making a big pot of homemade yogurt to which I could only add honey (allowed on the diet). I was using ground almonds (almond flour) to make a pizza crust.

                Today, my diet is really simple, an apple, kefir with berries and ground flax, a little bit of bacon with 2 egg and fermented veggies, then either sourdough bread with ghee,honey, and nut butter or asparagus with wild Alaskan salmon, finishing off with a glass of wine.

                NAFLD is apparently epidemic. I wonder if I have some issues because I have the abdominal fat which is one of the symptoms.

                I have added more healthy fats, omega 3 instead of 6 (from vegetable oils), since that causes NAFLD. Many alternative doctors recommend avoiding all vegetable oils.

                I did a spreadsheet to look at the vitamins and minerals I was getting in my diet and without eggs I wasn’t getting enough choline which is necessary for a healthy liver, without the sourdough bread I wasn’t getting enough folate. It’s really difficult to get enough zinc from the diet alone so supplementation is probably a good idea.

                Some foods are engineered to be addictive, like wheat. When people remove it from their diet they have withdrawal symptoms. Corn is similar. My husband is addicted to potato chips.

                Wheat is very acid forming. I wonder about corn? Fermentation lowers PH which is probably why sourdough is healthy. An alkaline diet may be good for our microbiome. Healthy salt, pink Himalayan or Real Salt for example, added to water is alkalizing. That was another bad change to the food supply, they stripped all the minerals from salt leaving just sodium chloride. So much to consider 🙂

              • anonymint says:

                Kate I agree with all you wrote in that comment.

                Based on our ancestral environment healthy meats are superior to vegetable oils as a staple. Or at least we should obtain oils from unprocessed, unpressed seeds in their natural form.

                C.f. also the comment I posted today (on the Great Reset vlog) about imitation meat, wherein I describe then rebuke the motivations of the eugenicists who are foisting this on humanity.

      • manbearpig says:

        “…Try the easiest bit of slightest tiniest effort consistently, non stop, for months and months at a time, until it becomes a habbit and a new way of life, and it will be nearly effortless…”

        This is awesome! Thanks very much! I need this!

      • Kate says:

        I agree with you 100% that viruses are not the cause of any disease. THEY have confused the situation so thoroughly that we can’t even find the correct word for things anymore.

        When COVID started, Dr. Purlmutter had an interview with a gentleman who confirmed it had animal DNA, which told me if someone has it, it was injected into them because animal diseases don’t infect humans.

        If you search for iodine on archive dot org, many interesting articles come up, some of them back to the 1800’s revealing when they discovered its existence and importance to the development and health of all living organisms. Then they removed it from the food supply and added iodine blockers, and we didn’t know what hit us.

        The first thing we must do for our health is ensure we are getting enough iodine. Dr. Brownstein’s book is on there also, Iodine Why You Need It. I’ve been taking 50 mg (yes mg’s not mcg’s)for almost a year now and I feel great. I even put some into my dogs drinking water, and one is 16 1/2 years old and doing fine.

      • Kate says:

        Maybe we need to consider the broader use of the term ‘virus’ because we might be more aligned in our opinions than we think.

        – A virus is an infective agent that typically consists of a nucleic acid molecule in a protein coat, that is able to multiply only within the cells of a living host.

        – Prions are infectious proteins that can mimic viral and bacterial pathogens.

        – Bacteriophages are viruses that infect and replicate only in bacterial cells.

        In Dr. Purlmutters interview with Dr. George Tetz’s, whose research focuses on the study of bacteriophages: viruses that infect bacteria. Tetz studies how bacteriophages can contribute to microbiome dysbiosis in a range of human chronic inflammatory conditions. He also examines how bacteriophages can act as novel mammalian pathogens by interacting directly with human cells and the host immune response. His recent findings show an early role for bacteriophage activity in conditions such as Parkinson’s disease, Type 1 Diabetes, and “leaky-gut” syndrome.

        In this excerpt from the book Phages: Their Role in Bacterial Pathogenesis and Biotechnology, Chapter 11 Mycoplasma Phages:

        “The class Mollicutes consists of several genera of wall-less bacteria, including Mycoplasma, Spiroplasma, and Acholeplasma. Mycoplasmas are ubiquitous microbes that cause disease in a wide variety of animals.”

        “Pathogenic species of mycoplasmas generally produce diseases of the respiratory and genital tracts and joints. These diseases are largely immunological. A strong host immune response is required to prevent dissemination and systemic disease, but the resulting inflammation is responsible for the development of lesions at the site of infection.”

        Many, if not all, chronic disease result in inflammation, as is Covid-19!

        • anonymint says:

          I disagree. None of it has been proven in a falsiable model.

          I will not blindly follow fiction and assign it to reality.

          I am into science, not witchcraft.

          You seem to think just because they make up fancy names and narratives that they have proven something.

          Many, if not all, chronic disease result in inflammation, as is Covid-19!

          Now you’re making some sense. When you use your own mind you tend to make sense. When you cite so called experts, you are somehow swayed into promulgating elaborate fiction.

          Ditch the storytellers!

        • mkey says:

          A virus is an infective agent that typically consists of a nucleic acid molecule in a protein coat, that is able to multiply only within the cells of a living host.

          This is something that has never been observed in reality. The best they could ever produce was force some poisoned cells to excrete something in vitro.

          It is not up to anyone to prove a negative as that is impossible. What instead needs to happen is we need to demand evidence for any claims that are being made. More extraordinary the claim, more extraordinary the evidence needs to be.

  37. Fawlty Towers says:

    Let the games begin!

    Two sets of games.

    1. The electronic/digital passport game has already begun!
    It will develop in stages, to be sure, but we are off to the slippery slope races already. 🙁


    Requirements for entering Canada by air

    “As of November 21, 2020, if you’re flying to Canada as your final destination, you MUST use ArriveCAN to submit your:

    – travel and contact information
    – quarantine plan (unless exempted under conditions set out in the mandatory isolation order)
    – COVID-19 symptom self-assessments

    You must use ArriveCAN before you board your flight to Canada. ”

    Dominican Republic:
    “Welcome to the Electronic Ticket portal for entering and leaving the Dominican Republic


    It is a digital form required by multiple institutions for entering or leaving the national territory.

    It is MANDATORY for each passenger to truthfully complete the information on the electronic Ticket for the General Immigration Office, the General Customs Office and the Ministry of Public Health, according to dominican laws 285-04, 115-17, 72-02 and 226-06. ”

    2. The vaccine game

    There are now more than 100 companies worldwide working on a Covid-19 vaccine.

    People might have naively thought that when Mr. Gates said all 7 billion people will be vaccinated for Covid, he was talking about one vaccine.

    There will be dozens of Covid-19 vaccines coming in all sorts of different flavors.

    Now here’s the thing.

    Countries A, B and C will each have their own vaccine and digital vaccine certificates.
    Country A gives permission for citizens from Country B to enter their country using Country B’s vaccine, but decides not to let citizens from Country C into their country because they don’t like Country C’s vaccine.

    And the same will occur with Countries D, E and F. etc., etc.

    So what will the game be?
    Black/grey markets for fake digital vaccine certificates.
    It will be a total circus very soon.

    * I already got the inside scoop about Russian tourists getting fake negative Covid test papers to bring with them on vacation.

  38. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Dissemination & “Viruses don’t exist”

    Today I will be passing out 1,000 flyers about 9/11 Truth. They will say:
    “WAKE UP! The airplanes on 9/11/01 were holograms! The World Trade Center Towers were brought down by space beams. Because the earth is flat, NASA won’t tell the truth.”
    Morgan Reynolds sent me the word copy.
    I will be making lots of hazy videos with auto-voice in order to spread my message.

    😉 ha!… Of course I am not going to do that. I’d slap anyone who did.

    I want to highlight a point which ManBearPig made:
    “The problem is that the vast majority of the public…are completely unaware of how all that science functions so not only will a campaign to enforce the respect of Koch’s postulates not make any impact on the opinion of the ignorant concerning SARS, we are, on the contrary, very susceptible to easy slogans.

    …easy slogans such as “Viruses are a Hoax and don’t exist!”.

    MY concern is that by making such declarations…conspiracy theorists will be annihilating their credibility on more easily demonstrable negations of the validity of this plandemic….

    She goes on. The comment and following discussion is worth a looksee.

    This here comment of mine is NOT about the Koch’s postulates nor Exosomes nor the existence of viruses. I don’t want to get into a back-n-forth on that issue.
    I am all for others wanting to civilly discuss it. That is great.

    This comment is about protecting the credibility of conspiracy realists in the eyes of the public.
    Dissemination of a hard-to-grasp, unusual concept to the general public is not going to benefit anyone except for “The Powers That Should Not Be”.

    Also, I want to make a precautionary statement, a lesson learned from the 9/11 Truth Movement.
    During the movement, some topics & issues became so heated that it fractured the movement into many un-unified parts. The Pentagon issue is a prime example.

    What got lost was a primary purpose of the 9/11 Truth Movement:
    “To inform the broad public that there was a 9/11 Cover-up.”

    Instead, “Truthers” spent countless hours and tremendous amounts of energy debating contentions about aspects of 9/11. The movement splintered.
    Dissemination and the InfoWar faded away.

    Veterans of the 9/11 Activist Movement know what I am talking about.

    We should learn from our past failings.
    With this current window of opportunity, I hope we don’t muff it.

    • mkey says:

      One has to choose at which level to get involved in and what will they support with their weight. Stating that viruses do not exist is not the same as bringing their functionality in question. While movements can get fractured, and they usually do and for good reason, there’s a lot that can be said about striking the tree of evil at its roots.

      In context of 9/11 you could have a million people debating on the modality of how the buddings were brought down. Or in the case of JFK the number of assassins could be discussed. Or in the case of covid “real” CFR or R0 could be discussed. All of these subjects are divisive and are employed to obfuscate the truth and derail the discussion.

      I would say it is better to have one guy striking at the roots and hundred people watching instead of wailing at the branches.

      • anonymint says:

        Stating that viruses do not exist is not the same as bringing their functionality in question.

        Disagree. They are equivalent statements.

        Viruses as perceived and defined by everyone are infectious agents that jump between hosts, hijack cells and are the primary causative culprits of the diseases they are claimed to cause.

        And that illusion does NOT provably exist.

        Some particles and function that are associated with what the mainstreams defines as viruses might exist, but if their function has nothing to do with causal and infectious reason that the name virus was chosen (or at least hasn’t been unequivocally proven to be), then the phenomenon “virus” does not provably exist.

        I suggest looking up the etymology of the term ‘virus’:

        late Middle English (denoting the venom of a snake): from Latin, literally ‘slimy liquid, poison’.

        • mkey says:

          I’ll disagree with that.

          If I would point to a player and said he’s playing offense, would it be correct for someone to claim the player does not exist because he’s not playing offense but defense?

          • anonymint says:


            “Offensive player” does not exist in your scenario; “player” exists.

            The term “virus” does not mean “virus-like particles that are not provably causal of disease and infectious between hosts.” Thus “virus” is analogous to “offensive player” and not ”player”. Which was my point.

            Thanks for the imaginative example. I hope it helps to illuminate the distinction I am making.

        • Kate says:

          If we say viruses don’t exist, we need to explain why people are getting sick and some dying.

          Using an example like the Spanish Flu, we can prove it wasn’t a virus because the #’s decreased when sanitary conditions (drinking water)were improved, before the vaccine.

          HIV was in the blood supply.

          Cancer SV40 aka ‘monkey virus’ was in the polio vaccinations, but there is evidence it continued to be in vaccines. On ouralexander dot org, parents of Alexander, prove (although the courts disagree) their son contracted SV40 through his vaccinations and died of cancer at 2 1/2 years old. This explains why cancer has reached epidemic proportions, and why children and pets get cancer.

          In the case of COVID, Dr Purlmutter interviewed Dr. George Tetz on Apr 5, 2020, and he stated that there were animal prions in covid-19 which supports it is man-made. Since transfer from animal to human doesn’t occur naturally, exposure must come though injection, or maybe in those with leaky gut, exposure could come through food.

          • mkey says:

            How do we know what’s inside the virus that causes the covid disease (that’s the name of the disease, remeber?) if said virus has never been isolated? And we know for a fact that that virus has never been isolated.

            When I say “isolated” I mean what any sane indivudal would understand as isolation, not what some of these lunatics claim it to be.

            • Kate says:

              Go to Purlmutter’s interview of Dr. Tetz. He identified that there are 2 prions associated with coronavirus, which bind to RNA. Read the comments too because they are shocked. This information isn’t in other ‘news’ about coronavirus. It is being covered up!

              • manbearpig says:

                So, Kate, I listened to your recommended Perlmutter/Tetz interview and far from questioning the existence of viruses their conversation made me think of something I posted in reply to John Blaid about a French documentary that describes the SARS virus being spliced with malaria and 157 proteins (which could include prions) and Dr. Tetz speaks about the surface of the spikes on the corona virus as having a “prion domain” and the distinguished geneticist, Alexandra Henrion-Caude, who I also mentioned in my reply speaks about the unique properties of the surface of the spike protein. This is part of my reply to John Blaid:

                “…a lab owner named Jean-Bernard Fourtillon, an expert in toxicology and pharmacology, claims to present the patents filed by the Institut Pasteur of both SARS-CoV-1 (which he claims is SARS-CoV (a relatively “non-dangerous” virus) spliced with the genetic sequence of Malaria and 157 other fragments of proteins and DNA; and also the patent of SARS-CoV-2, which he says is exactly the same thing, that there’s been no modification…

                …Also, a distinguished geneticist who appears in this documentary, also explains why she thinks the virus was created in a laboratory and even, in another interview, presents a patent and explains that the gain of function of this SARS-CoV-2 virus was placed in a location of the virus that has been patented. In other words, the gain of function sequence (that enhances its infectiousness among humans) was inserted in a particular ideal place which does not occur naturally: she explains she knows that this does not occur naturally precisely because it was patented and naturally occurring processes are not patented…”

                Tetz insists this corona virus is really “something new” and strongly implies it’s lab made of course, which seems to concur with Fourtillon’s brandished patents and Henrion-Caude’s remarks about the unique placement of the new sequence and the patent that covers that specific spot on the virus.

              • anonymint says:

                Kate you mean well and you’re intelligent. Unplug from the virtual reality matrix. You’re fooling yourself. Find all the rebuttals I posted today 11/24. I don’t want to repeat myself again.

                In virtual reality the tail can wag the dog, because the physics of mass does not have to be obeyed.

                Find my comment about circular reasoning, aliasing error, employing a designed conclusion to establish the premise employed to form said conclusion, etc.

                This response is not evasive. I have already stated the specific rebuttals to your points in other comment posts on this page.

              • anonymint says:

                @manbearpig, you’re unwittingly a disinformation meme bot.

              • manbearpig says:

                Flattery will get you nowhere.

              • Kate says:

                Tetz said “Within the viral proteins, there are a number of proteins that have prion like domains”, so he was talking about both virus and prion working together. He indicated this wasn’t the case with other Corona-viruses. That is the NEW aspect of Covid-19. I’m not sure if the “other proteins and DNA” Fourtillon was referring to are prions.

                The term prions is important because they are infectious proteins that can mimic viral and bacterial pathogens, reproduce by recruiting the normal cellular isoform of the prion protein and stimulating its conversion into the disease-causing isoform.

                The first identified prion infectious disease was CJD which was caused by an abnormal infectious protein in the brain called a prion. The source is alleged to be from eating beef infected with mad cow disease, but who knows. The article Prion Disease on NIAID specifies transmission is from human to human through blood.

                In the article Prions as Bioweapons, James Giordano says the threats are synthetic proteins, aerosolized transmissibility, gain of function, gene editing, cross-species transmissibility, and interactions with other pathogens. Covid-19 is an example of viruses interacting with prions as Dr. Tetz was talking about, likely modified in a lab to cross species, possibly with gain of function.

                Setting aside all the propaganda, the faulty testing and attribution of many deaths to Covid-19 when the victims have co-morbidities, it doesn’t seem to have aerosolized transmission. Many doctors, including those I trust, are confirming the existence of Covid-19. THEY will never say, but I believe transmission is still only through direct contact with the prion/virus through injection or tainted blood. That is why I’m concerned about the vaccine because it will have prions in it to fight the prions in Covid-19.

              • manbearpig says:

                Well, Kate, it’s interesting to see where various “dissenting” doctors, researchers and other professionals in the medical domain converge in their findings. A virus spliced or otherwise endowed with “new” properties (prions?) in strategic patented places…

                My vague impressions, offered gratuitously here and with full knowledge that they are mere impressions derived from subjective experience is that the virus does exist, it could very well be aerosolized infecting large swathes of the population whose members are more or less vulnerable and who manifest a wide range of symptoms, from none to very severe, many of which, of course, are those associated with the typical annual epidemics of flu, the common cold, pneumonia etc. It would seem obvious that pollution would exacerbate these symptoms as would bacterial imbalances in the intestinal tract.

                At any rate, it’s a very intersting study for those carrying out the experiment: observing the effects on a massive scale of potentially synthesized proteins, RNAs etc… (along with everyone’s reactions)

                And until present, according to Alexandra Henrion-Caude, merely suggesting that Covid-19 was created in a lab was wildly stigmatizing and verboten among professionals despite and probably because of the fact that because of its apparently unique and unprecedented properties, it’s utterly obvious that it was.

              • anonymint says:

                You two and presumably numerous others engage this fiction as if it is meaningful to discuss.

                Garbage in => garbage out

                You cite junk scientists who have deluded themselves and ARE PAID TO DO SO. I do not mean they are wittingly corrupt. But people are very willing to do things which they are paid as a form of a vocation to do. They have no incentive to seek out and point out the UNPROVEN foundations as I have done in my comments on this vlog.

              • manbearpig says:

                Though I do indeed persist in believing there’s a lab-created biological pathogenic agent being employed in this global magic trick

                I also think that the voodoo mindcontrol is even much more powerful.

                But why, in addition to (officially) launching the Great Reset, deprive yourself of mass testing and studying the capacity of your Frankenstein/CRISPR et al synthetic RNAs, proteins, viruses etc. and vaccines to illicit physical responses in humans?

                Oh and speaking of making bread:


              • manbearpig says:

                Actually the article linked below actually looks like a more explanatory version with a closing paragraph that better articulates my point above:

                “…This is just one of many cases where people have been used as test subjects for experiments without their knowledge. It’s not surprising that the agencies involved are keeping mum about it, and it looks like those who were affected, like so many other victims of mass human experiments, may never know what really happened…”


              • mkey says:

                People forget that they are not what they do. Our “job” is a role we are playing, just an experience in this life of ours.

              • Kate says:

                The LSD laced wheat is comparable to wheat modified to increase gluten proteins, which combined with the change to shorter fermentation times, cause leaky gut which may be the cause of autoimmune disease (including bowel diseases like crohns, ulcerative colitis, etc.) and diabetes (now epidemic), and brain disorders like alzheimer’s (epidemic), dementia (early-onset dementia results in symptoms as early as the 20’s), bi-polar, depression (epidemic among all ages), and it may feed cancer (sugar feeds cancer and eating unfermented bread spikes blood sugar more than eating a Mars bar).

                It’s becoming increasingly difficult to find the truth today. If you search for ‘wheat leaky gut’ some sites pop up that confirm it exists and is caused by wheat, but the first site that pops up has an article “Debunking the Myth of ‘Leaky Gut Syndrome’”. This is due to the changes Google has made to their search engine, which makes it increasingly difficult to research health issues. Alternative doctors, like Mercola, used to show up in search results but now google has flagged them as misinformation, and we can only access their information directly from their sites.

                But even among alternative doctors, the wheat problem is difficult to understand. A few years ago, Dr. Mercola had an article where he talked about adding sourdough bread to his diet, and his followers were outraged, some even threatening to unsubscribe to his site. Dr. William Davis (the Wheat Belly) believes we can’t and shouldn’t consume wheat at all.

                Some say that humans haven’t been eating wheat for long, which I think is ridiculous since it’s mentioned in the Hebrew Bible, and the diet of ancient Egypt revolved around several staple crops including einkorn and emmer wheat.

                Consider the claim that soils are depleted and thus not providing us with the vitamins and minerals we need. I wonder if it isn’t eating unfermented wheat which has phytic acid, an ‘anti-nutrient’ that stops the body from absorbing nutrients is the true culprit!

              • HomeRemedySupply says:

                That is a good post which covers a lot of things.

                Like you point out, Google makes it difficult to find good sources of information.

                The anecdote about Mercola and sour dough is worth noting. Repeatedly, he has been ahead of the curve, and I have seen readers get upset by the data he reveals.

          • anonymint says:

            HIV was in the blood supply.

            That’s spreading fear via disinformation and propaganda, because it has never been provably established. The claimed junk science for this claim is not falsifiable.

            Westerners demand absolutely security even for things that science does not provably understand. The Bible speaks about the evil of seeking surety instead of accepting that there are some things we do not know. We get all bent into a frantic stampede by our lust for absolute safety and fear of death.

            How do you know what was in the blood that is claimed to have caused illness in transfusion or transfer to the newborn?

            Circular reasoning based PCR or antibody tests?

            Additionally HIV has never been provably established as the cause of the AIDS disease syndrome. Methodologies employed have lacked sufficient controls to eliminate all possible unknown possibilities and the unscientific findings are not falsifiable. Science is only established with falsifiable hypotheses — that just fundamental.

            The virus theory can’t even fulfill a falsifiable disease model. Instead they punt to circular reasoning based methodologies.

            How is that Westerners (even Republicans) allow their economies to be decimated by unproven, not falsifiable ghosts, shadows and imagined narratives about disease? Because Westerners have forsaken the well grounded wisdom in the Bible and sanity. Everyone is afraid of everything and spoiled rotten by too much convenience and easy lifestyle so they’ve forgotten to guard the goose that lays the golden eggs that prevent deprivation.

            • Kate says:

              You are absolutely correct. I’m an accountant by trade and only know what they tell me about these hidden enemies.

              People were very sick before Covid-19 from the Western diet. Cancer, Diabetes, heart disease, autoimmune disease are all epidemic.

              The only reason I’m trying to understand Covid-19 is so I don’t make the same mistake I made in 2009 and take their vaccine.


            • Kate says:

              HIV was in the blood because Hemophiliacs contracted it.

              • anonymint says:

                You have no valid proof that HIV was in their blood or that the fictional concept of a virus caused any disease they experienced. I have already explained why in my numerous comments on this page. Circular reasoning (i.e. RT-PCR or antibody) tests are not proof.

                It’s all a fiction.

                Hemophiliacs already have a health problem. No wonder they get very sick and some of them may even develop and AIDS-like death spiral. The HIV fiction is not proven to have any relevance to the matter.

              • cu.h.j says:

                Thank you for the links. I’ve worked as a nurse for 10 years and have treated many HIV positive people and have also had friends with the disease who report having an exposure to blood or body fluids.

                I have also observed the syndrome of Covid in patients and am inclined to believe it’s a viral infection. However many here say it hasn’t been isolated. That should be explored in more depth.

                I am inclined to believe that both terrain theory and germ theory together explain disease.

                Just wanted to say I like your contributions here.

              • anonymint says:

                Doctor Robert Willner injects himself with hiv/aids on national tv

                Dr. Willner is author of Deadly Deception: The Proof that Sex and ‘HIV’ Absolutely Do Not Cause ‘AIDS’. So determined was Dr. Willner to prove to the world that ‘AIDS’ was not spread sexually or through blood contamination, that he stunned the nation of Spain in 1993 by inoculating himself on TV with the blood of Pedro Tocino, a haemophiliac said to be ‘HIV positive’. The footage was broadcast throughout Europe. Encouraged by the coverage he was receiving, Willner repeated his performance with different patients in front of the cameras of ABC and NBC. Surprisingly no US network reported this dramatic news on national television. Up until his untimely death, Dr. Willner remained ‘HIV negative’ in spite of constant testing.

              • Kate says:

                Your report says Willner ‘inoculated’ himself, and this one says he ‘injected himself’

                But the Washington Post says “He stuck a 20-gauge hypodermic needle deep into the infected man’s finger and quickly jabbed the bloody needle into his own hand. Twice.”

                Which sounds more like a needlestick injury that has little risk of infection according to this article

            • Kate says:

              The Terrence Higgins Trust states “Haemophilia is a genetic condition which impairs the blood clotting process in the body. In the 1970s and 1980s in the UK many people with haemophilia were infected with HIV through blood transfusions.” They quote the Haemophilia Society “In the 1970s and 1980s around 5,000 people with haemophilia and other bleeding disorders were multiply-infected with HIV, hepatitis B and C and a range of other blood-borne viruses. Over 2,400 people have since died and of the 1,200 people infected with HIV less than 250 are still alive.”

              In the article Hemophila: An Amazing 35-Year Journey from the Depths of HIV to the Threshold of Cure, author Gilbert White “AIDS was first described in December 1981 in a paper by Gottlieb and colleagues in the New England Journal of Medicine (2). The first description of AIDS in hemophilia appeared about six months later in the Center for Disease Control’s Medical and Morbidity Weekly Report (3). The CDC report provided strong evidence that AIDS was spread by blood. Altogether, almost 5000 hemophiliacs were to become infected with HIV before concentrates were rendered safe, and more than 4000 of the estimated 10,000 hemophiliacs in the US would eventually die of AIDS (Fig. 1).”

              Yet you say it isn’t proven?

              • anonymint says:

                Yet you say it isn’t proven?

                Why is that you think incorrectly that what you just cited is any refutation whatsoever to the points I had made in the comments on this page?

                It exemplifies that you don’t fully comprehend the points I have made and thus you are likely to continue to be deceived.

              • Kate says:

                Jonathan Jerry debunks Dr. Kaufman’s theory, and reveals how dangerous they are in the article Psychiatrist Who Calmly Denies Reality

                Dr. Kaufman is a psychiatrist turned Naturopath who claims appendicitis is simply constipation, and viruses don’t exist, they are really just exosomes. He is in league with Kelly Brogan (the wife of GreenMedInfo’s Sayer Ji), who is also a psychiatrist that denies the existence of viruses.

                The tactic Kaufman uses to propagate his faulty logic is like building a bridge by laying down a number of planks using valid science, then finishing with planks which are not, that only an expert would notice.

                What he says about exosomes is mostly true, our body is made up of cells which exosomes bud from. Exosomes carry genetic material and act as transporters inside our body, and look like viruses. Sometimes a virus will infect a cell and an exosome containing the virus’ genetic material will bud off and infect another cell, like a virus would. Then Dr. Kaufman “takes a leap and claims the virus does not exist. It’s all exosomes.”, and in doing so denies the existence of “the viruses behind the common cold, polio, HIV-AIDS, viral hepatitis, chickenpox, COVID-19, and measles”.

                Jerry explains that microbiologist Robert Koch realized his postulate made during the Victorian era (just before we even really knew what DNA and viruses were) that to prove a microbe caused disease, you need to isolate it from living things with the disease and not find it in living things without the disease, and if you took it from a living thing that had it and gave it to a living thing that did not, it should produce disease and you should be able to then isolate this microbe within it, was not fulfilled every time, for example, with typhoid fever and cholera where people had the infectious agent but not the disease.

                I’m dumbfounded you are using his faulty logic to spread this dangerous fallacy around. In my opinion, you are either counter agent spreading misinformation, or you aren’t as smart as you claim.

              • anonymint says:

                I’m dumbfounded you are using his faulty logic […]

                I’m not entirely relying on Dr. Kaufman’s logic, as I explained in a comment post which apparently either didn’t grok or are ignoring?

                I followed up my aforelinked comment post by explaining that all the junk science that so called “experts” such as the ones you are citing, is not falsifiable. If you do not understand that anything that can’t be falsified is by definition not science, then you will be fooled by the charlatans posing as “scientists”. I know it is difficult to accept that the entire Western medical science establishment is a fraud and has deceived even themselves.

                And I probably will not be able to convince you, which is entirely expected at the stage of decadence in our society is why you must perish with all the other delusional sheep in a mass mania of epic proportions. C.f. the book Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds by Charles Mackay.

                You are forcing me to repeat what I have already explained in the numerous comments I wrote already on this page. Why are you making extra work for me? Can you assimilate my comment posts?

              • anonymint says:

                I’m dumbfounded you are using his faulty logic to spread this dangerous fallacy around. In my opinion, you are either counter agent spreading misinformation, or you aren’t as smart as you claim.

                The dangerous fallacy is regurgitating junk science and sustaining the prison planet that is going to murder you.

                I already provided an example where the scientists were absolutely sure their their junk science, non-falsifiable theories had concluded that HSV was the certain cause of cervical cancer and then by now they conclude that is not true and their new junk science is that HPV must be the cause.

                These corrupt assholes have been spreading fallacious propaganda every decade since the 1960s at least.

                I think maybe you are suffering Stockholm syndrome. You seem determined to consume more junk science even though you admit the modern medical system has done nothing for you but make you ill. You go back for sloppy seconds, thirds, fourths…the definition of insanity is repeating the same error over and over again.

              • anonymint says:

                Kate here’s a quote from Jonathan Kerry’s vacuous, fact-free, ad hominem propaganda which are you are promulgating to help keep all the sheep herded together near the precipice of the megadeath cliff:

                When that bridge is almost complete, he runs out of planks and takes a leap of faith, but that leap may only be noticeable by an expert.

                He accuses Dr. Kaufman of exactly what the junk scientists are doing by failing to establish a falsifiable disease model.

                And to you that is meaningful. Sigh.

                In fact, sometimes a virus will infect a cell and an exosome containing the virus’ genetic material will bud off and go on to infect another cell, just like a viral particle would!

                That has never been proven in a falsifiable disease model. He’s disingenuous.

                The problem is that Koch himself realized that requiring his postulates to be fulfilled each and every time was mistaken. He noticed people who were carriers of typhoid fever and of cholera who did not have symptoms. They had the infectious agent but not the disease. Was it proof these microbes did not after all cause the disease? No.

                More deception. The infectious agent has never been provably identified for any of those cited diseases in falsifiable disease model. He is pulling junk science fables out of his arse.

                Kate you are the unwitting disinformation agent. You’re even citing a corrupt person who claims COVID-19 isn’t a grand hoax to launch the Great Reset — which we know it is.

              • cu.h.j says:

                Kate, the information from this link


                contains a lot of adhominem attacks on this person. Have you found any scientific articles that use evidence to prove Germ theory with Covid?

                I’ll look around too. I think it would be great to have someone debate Kaufman that doesn’t insult him but addresses his exosome hypothesis with evidence.

                Though I agree that Germs play a part in disease, viruses, bacteria, and prions, I also didn’t like how the article you posted conflates his “anti-mask” position and calls him a denier. That is not a good way to debate.

                I guess I’m an “anti masker” too outside of a medical setting and if I’m not sick in a public space and coughing.

                I think a much better approach to this whole thing would have been to shelter the elderly and infirm and allow herd immunity to build. This would be voluntary and people who didn’t want to stay home and shelter didn’t have to, but it could have been suggested.

                Anyway, I’ll look around for some articles, and if I find them re-post.

              • anonymint says:

                bad ‘Viruses’ are actually GOOD ‘Exosomes’ – inter cellular messengers generated by our body’s defences

                Another prior comment:

                See the videos and work of Judy Mikovitz to understand this. Yet even Judy does not understand that viruses do not exist. What she isolated was not an AIDS virus but rather exosomes which are manifestations of the mycoplasma infections, the root cause of all neuro-systemic diseases.

                Mycoplasma are bacterial lacking a cell wall. They survive on surfaces for up a week or longer because unlike “viruses” (i.e. exosomes), bacterial are cellular organisms and thus alive. Hygiene and healthy environment (i.e. territory) is apparently important for good health.

              • anonymint says:

                Please re-read the entire sub-thread of discussion wherein I elaborated in several comment posts about my current understanding of the issue of whether viruses are exosomes.

              • mkey says:

                Kate, you are quoting absolute garbage.

              • mkey says:

                I’ll provide some context to claims made by Jerry regarding the Lanka trial. To call his article a “debunk” is both insidious and ignorant. Jerry is a bald faced liar who could only gain traction among those who don’t follow through with sources of presented information.



                Knowing that the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), contrary to its legal duty, had not published a single paper on the alleged existence of the measles virus, I offered a €100,000 prize for a scientific paper from the RKI containing the scientific evidence for the existence of the measles virus. A young doctor from Saarland presented me with six papers but none from the RKI; the papers were: the one from Enders published the 1st of June 1954 and five others, based exclusively on Enders’ original paper, one of them being the most comprehensive review of other papers on the measles virus. In this “review” we can find a description of the laborious consensus building process which lasted for decades and included dilemmas such as which parts of the dead tissue are to be ascribed to the measles virus model and also how the measles virus model had to be constantly modified.

                I replied to the young doctor (who urgently recommended me to waive the (indeed) costly “legal dispute” and to immediately pay him the prize money) that in none of the six publications was there any identifiable viral structure, but rather easily recognisable typical cellular particles and structures. Thereupon he filed a suit with the Ravensburg Local Court, this however, without submitting the six publications to the court. The Ravensburg Court decided against me, even though the six publications never appeared in the legal files. Apart from that, the verdict of the Ravenburg Local Court occurred under more than unusual circumstances.

                The plaintiff admitted to the judge during the appeal at the Stuttgart Higher Court that he himself had never read the six publications. So he was planning to shut me down and thus silence the central refutation of the vaccination through the “tedious legal battle”. He may have been a victim of the false belief in viruses himself, because he probably trusted his colleagues, which is normal, but who themselves had no idea about the erroneous development in medicine since 1858 and did not do any historical research with respect to their false beliefs, this becoming simultaneously culprits and perpetrators and victims of their fatal belief in the germ theories and their trust in vaccinations.

              • mkey says:

                Excerpt continued:

                It is plausible that the plaintiff did not read the six publications he presented to me, but not to the court. At least it is clear that he didn’t look for them himself, because they are the only publications in the entire field of about 30,000 technical articles about “measles” in which a reference to the accepted existence of the measles virus is made. However, all the tons of other papers, which nobody can ever finish reading, assume “a priori” the existence of the measles virus and always refer to citations of citations, which are finally and exclusively based on the alleged “evidence” supplied by Enders on the 1st of June 1954.

                The Ravensburg Local Court decided in 2014 to accept the lawsuit of Dr Bardens and concluded that the prize money was to be paid out even without any publication from the RKI. Apart from that, the Ravensburg Local Court decided that it wouldn’t be necessary for the scientific evidence for the existence of the measles virus to be published in one single paper, but rather that the overall 3,366 papers (the sum of all the papers cited in the six submitted publications) from 1954 to 2007 was to be accepted as proof.

                The legally appointed expert Professor Podbielski from Rostock argued accordingly (or the local court adjusted its opening decision to the expert opinion): “I have to expressly clarify that one cannot provide evidence in the classical sense in biology as one can in mathematics or physics. In biology one can only gather clues, which at some point in time in their entirety attain probative value.“

                Based on this extremely unscientific claim arising from Podbielski’s lack of arguments and his bias due to the discrepancies between reality and the beliefs he had grown so fond of, something happened which behavioural scientists call “displacement”. Podbielski invented a desperate excuse, namely that biology and the medicine based thereon as well as vaccinations are per se unscientific and without evidence, without proof: In his opinion, only a collection of clues could “some day” and “somehow” (practically) attain probative value. A more explicit admission of the existent unscientific nature of current biology and medicine has never been expressed with such clarity.

                What is most important at present is to make legal use of all this evidence for the unscientific nature of the infection theory and the vaccination policies, which are already impacting our constitutional rights. We need to make the mandatory measles vaccination, voted upon and implemented in Germany as of 1 March 2020, simply disappear.

              • Kate says:

                The thing I like about Richard Katz’s analysis is the way he methodically goes through one point at a time, not assuming everything Cowan says it either true or untrue, not falling into the faulty logic of binary thinking.

                There’s probably no person alive who I agree with on all things. It’s just the reality of life.

                I agree with both Katz and Jonathon Jerry that Cowan has not fully considered Robert Koch’s work, and applies his postulates as if he never went on to discover they weren’t accurate. I believe Katz is correct that Cowan makes it appear that Steiner is the source of his opinion that viruses are exosomes, when he has oversimplified Steiner’s opinion on infectious disease. I consider this to be misleading, and it lowers my opinion of Cowan as a result.

                I agree with Jonathon Jerry that Kaufman builds a bridge based on facts and then throws down some planks that are his own assumptions, and we are supposed to take it all as fact. Katz proves that Kaufman misquotes James Hildreth to make it appear he believes viruses are exosomes when he doesn’t. This lowers my opinion of Kaufman as a result.

                I haven’t looked at the $100 k bet, or Jerry’s opinion on what happened, but it is an interesting case and I may just do so if I have time.

                I disagree with Katz about the value of testing, masks and the lockdown. I don’t believe COVID is airborne, so I don’t think masks stop the spread. I agree with you “Why limit the spread of a mostly innocuous, asymptomatic disease?”
                SARS-CoV-2 has prions, evidence it is of animal origin which normally doesn’t infect humans. I think it was in the flu vaccine which many received previous to the ‘outbreak’. This will never be proven because they never question a person’s vaccine history when they take ill. I believe they make a point of keeping shoddy records on vaccines to prevent their damaging effects from being exposed.

                I think you are using faulty logic in believing those who accept the existence of germs, accept the ‘Great Reset’. I believe in the existence of germs but I think COVID should have been handled like we do the flu virus, the vulnerable are protected and the rest of society continues business as normal. It is this over reaction, the opposite of what it should be, that is the problem, and I’m more concerned about the effects on the food supply and the economy than virus.

                Can you provide a quote to support your comment “yet he [Katz] basically propounds what I’d been arguing which is it’s not because COVID19 may not be a virus that viruses don’t exist, are not infectious and/or cannot be pathogenic”. Maybe it’s the double negative that has me confused, but I don’t see him saying that.

                I can’t understand how seemingly intelligent people just accept 100% of what Kaufman and Cowan say as a fact, especially when there is evidence that proves they are mistaken on some critical points.

                [SNIP – Please keep comments to 500 words or less. Longer comments can be split into multiple posts. -JC]

              • Fawlty Towers says:


                “I believe they make a point of keeping shoddy records on vaccines to prevent their damaging effects from being exposed.”

                How could they keep shoddy records on vaccines going forward if they are to implement their immunity passport agenda?

              • Kate says:

                Fawlty Tower, Once they have injected us with THEIR retro-virus they will be keeping track. Isn’t it supposed to have a tracking device in it? But before this it’s all smoke and mirrors, we don’t know what were infected with, when, or how. It’s a turkey shoot and we are the turkeys!

            • Kate says:

              You haven’t replied to my comment that counters Cowan’s evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is not infective to humans

              • anonymint says:

                I have responded. Kate I know you mean well. Please wrap your mind around what I wish you could have assimilated from my prior comments. I suppose I had to explain it more with examples so that you could grasp the relevance of the generative essence points I had already made.

                I hope you stop falling prey to charlatans and deceptions.

              • flammable says:

                I think infection was proven but never through natural means and that is the argument. I understand we cannot perfectly replicate the human body in lab settings but the overuse of technology and chemicals to induce infection is too unnatural. That does not mean possibility of infection in real humans is false. But it means I have to conclude that infection happens by abnormal means. Basically the body has to be sick in order to be infected with a virus or our cells forcefully injected with a virus. The viral infection was a contributing factor to overall illness but it was not the catalyst of disease that we are led to believe.

              • Kate says:

                anonymint, please don’t patronize me!

              • Kate says:

                Flammable, I thought it strange that some of the cells they used to test for ACE2 receptors for SARS-CoV-2 are from people with cancer. Take cell A549 for example, it is an adenocarcinomic human epithelial cells from cancerous lung tissue of a 58 year old Caucasian male. On a site selling the A549 cell for study purposes, it states “cells may also contain inclusion bodies although they are not known to carry any human pathogen”. I’m not sure how studying damaged cells can help us the viruses’ behaviour in healthy cells.

    • anonymint says:

      Let’s note some recent highly fact-checked revelations about the 9/11 false flag.

      There’s now a pending case that NIST is compelled by law to reply in detail.

      And note the timing of this new release compared to the timing of the recent corona stock market crash. Hmm. The midwit, minions elite such as those leading the Great Reset (not Rothschild who I posit is playing all sides against each other) are ostensibly becoming desperate.

      Btw, Bill Cooper did predict the 9/11 event on-air during his radio broadcast on my 36th birthday June 28, 2001.

      University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse on 9/11

      On March 25, 2020, researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks issued the final report of a four-year computer modeling study on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.

      The 47-story WTC 7 was the third skyscraper to be completely destroyed on September 11, 2001, collapsing rapidly and symmetrically into its footprint at 5:20 PM. Seven years later, investigators at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed high-rise ever to have collapsed solely as a result of normal office fires.

      Contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team found that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fires but by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

      Following the release of this report, AE911Truth and 10 family members of 9/11 victims submitted a formal request for correction to NIST’s report on WTC 7 based partially on the UAF findings. The request is currently pending.

    • anonymint says:

      NIST Issues Update on Pending Request for Correction to Building 7 Report

      June 15, 2020

      [NIST] this past Friday issued an update regarding the pending “request for correction” to its 2008 report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. In an email sent to [AE911Truth], Daniel G. Cipra, a senior analyst in NIST’s Management and Organization office, wrote:

      Your request for correction of information under the […] (NIST) Guidelines for Ensuring the Quality of Information Disseminated to the Public dated April 15, 2020, is currently under review. While our goal is to respond within [60 days], we are unable to do so […] A response […] will be forwarded to you [asap].


      Under the procedure governing [such] requests […] NIST […] must provide an initial decision within 120 days […] on August 13, 2020.

      If NIST elects not to [correct its report, it must] provide a “point-by-point response […].” The requesters would then have 30 days to file an appeal with NIST Associate Director of Laboratory Programs James K. Olthoff.


      Should NIST fail in any way to comply with the procedure governing requests or should it fail to rectify the information quality violations documented in the request, AE911Truth and its fellow requesters will consider legal action under the Administrative Procedure Act.

      The request for correction, which comprises more than 100 pages and five exhibits, covers eight separate items of information that it says violate the agency’s information quality standards. Only if NIST revises its “probable collapse sequence” — effectively reversing its conclusion that fires caused the building’s destruction — can it correct these violations, the request contends.

      The request is based in part on a report issued in March 2020 by researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, who concluded definitively that the destruction of the 47-story Building 7 was not caused by fires. Their extensive, four-year computer modeling effort, funded by AE911Truth, was followed by a robust peer review process, which included dozens of comments from the public as well as review by two external, independent experts.

    • anonymint says:

      Statement: 9/11 Families and Experts to Appeal Egregious NIST Building 7 Decision

      August 31, 2020

      […] (NIST) issued its initial decision denying the request for correction that we — together with ten 9/11 family members and 88 architects and structural engineers — submitted on April 15, 2020, regarding NIST’s 2008 report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7


      In this regard, NIST’s response to our request is nothing short of egregious.

      Even a cursory reading of NIST’s letter, prepared by the staff of the Engineering Laboratory headquarters, reveals NIST’s response to be a blatant avoidance of the arguments and facts contained in the request, written with the intention of misleading the uninformed reader into believing an adequate response has been provided.

      For example, NIST’s only response to the first claim in the request is to describe the position of a key girder and column in relation to each other at room temperature — implying that lateral displacement and walk-off of the girder was possible from this position — when NIST knows full well that what matters is the position of the girder and column in relation to each other at the elevated temperatures claimed by NIST


      The pseudo-response NIST has issued makes abundantly clear that NIST is unable to rebut any of our claims. Yet rather than comply with the Data Quality Act and correct its deeply unscientific report — or even amend its report to include basic information substantiating its currently unsubstantiated conclusions — NIST has elected to stand by its report and make a mockery of the Data Quality Act.

      We and our fellow requesters will appeal NIST’s egregious decision by the September 28, 2020, deadline.

      • Jed says:

        Just like JFK’s magic bullet — utter nonsense but of keystone importance to the lie.

    • anonymint says:

      Experts and 9/11 Families Appeal NIST Decision on Building 7 Report

      September 29, 2020

      Families of 9/11 victims and [AE911Truth] filed an administrative appeal late yesterday condemning the decision made by […] (NIST) to deny the group’s “request for correction” regarding NIST’s 2008 report on the controversial collapse of [WTC7].

      “The explanations given by NIST for its decision to deny our request are preposterous and totally avoid addressing our arguments,”


      The appeal […] alleges that NIST’s decision to deny the request is “demonstrably in error and fails to provide a response to most of the relevant data quality arguments contained in the request.”

      Among other[s…] the appeal [aims] at NIST’s refusal to study a melted piece of steel […] on the flimsy [claim it] cannot be confirmed as coming from Building 7 — an […] “brazenly unscientific [excuse].”

      The appeal also targets NIST’s refusal to perform new computer simulations that would include a structural feature NIST now admits was excluded from the modeling. AE911Truth argues that […] would have prevented the failure that NIST claims initiated the collapse.


      “They are refusing to conduct new analyses that they know they should, and their justifications are beyond absurd,”

    • anonymint says:

      Analysis: Dominant Hypothesis Among Reporters on 9/11 Was that Explosions Brought Down Twin Towers

      July 8, 2020

      [AE911Truth] today published a groundbreaking paper by researchers Ted Walter and Graeme MacQueen documenting the findings from their review of 70 hours of 9/11 news footage.

      In total, Walter and MacQueen identified 36 news reporters across 11 different channels who either reported the occurrence of explosions during the Twin Towers’ destruction or who afterward referred to the destruction as an explosion-based event or who reported the possible use of explosives based on information from government sources.

      The 36 reporters include, by network, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos and Cynthia McFadden; CBS’s Harold Dow, Tom Flynn, Mika Brzezinski, and Carol Marin (appearing on WCBS); NBC’s Pat Dawson and Anne Thompson; CNN’s Aaron Brown, Rose Arce, Patty Sabga, and Alan Dodds Frank; Fox News’ David Lee Miller and Rick Leventhal; MSNBC’s Ashleigh Banfield and Rick Sanchez; CNBC’s John Bussey, Ron Insana, and Bob Pisani; WABC’s N.J. Burkett, Michelle Charlesworth, Nina Pineda, Cheryl Fiandaca, and Joe Torres; WCBS’s John Slattery, Marcella Palmer, Vince DeMentri, and Marcia Kramer; WNBC’s Walter Perez; New York 1’s Kristen Shaughnessy, Andrew Siff, John Schiumo, and Andrew Kirtzman; USA Today’s Jack Kelley; and two unidentified reporters (1 and 2) who attended a press conference with Mayor Giuliani and Governor Pataki.

      The paper, titled “How 36 Reporters Brought Us the Twin Towers’ Explosive Demolition on 9/11,” includes extensive appendices where every news clip can be viewed.

      Walter and MacQueen conclude that the hypothesis of explosions bringing down the Twin Towers was not only prevalent among reporters but was, in fact, the dominant hypothesis. Next, they plan to publish a follow-up paper examining how the hypothesis of fire-induced collapse so quickly supplanted the originally dominant explosion hypothesis.

    • anonymint says:

      Ganser, Whitehead, Corbett Place 9/11 Truth in Wider Context: Justice Rising Day 3

      October 24, 2020

      Over the first two days of the Justice Rising conference, we learned about where the 9/11 Truth Movement has been, what it is doing now, and where it is heading. On the third and final day, we heard about how 9/11 and related events fit into the “big picture.”

      “Big Picture Sunday” featured three outstanding speakers who outlined different ways that our rights to think and speak as we choose are being steadily taken away.

      In “False Flags and Wars of Terror,” Swiss historian Daniele Ganser provided us with an overview of where the “war on terror” has taken the world since 9/11 almost two decades ago.


      The second speaker was constitutional lawyer and activist John Whitehead, who outlined how [as kicked off by the Patriot Act and mass hysteria enabled by the 9/11 false flag] the U.S. is being turned into an increasingly Orwellian police state that punishes dissent and restricts free speech.


      Closing the conference was [our very own!] investigative journalist James Corbett, who raised alarms over rapidly intensifying internet censorship that has been silencing alternative and dissenting voices — particularly those challenging the official narrative of 9/11 — in recent years. His talk, “The Library of Alexandria is on Fire: Internet Censorship from 9/11 to Today,” chronicled the way information challenging the truth about events like 9/11 is being purged from the internet or at least made much more difficult to find.

      Yep JC it seems societalcide is intent on burning the books, but note the Christian monasteries kept copies of the intellectual books during our (Westerner) prior 600 – 900 year Dark Age and I’ve already wrote that I’m also working on something technological.

    • anonymint says:

      I had blogged extensively about the 9/11 false flag two and three years ago.

      In the following linked thread I had explained why the hypothesis for collapse due to fires for either of twin WTC towers was preposterous, absurd and implausible:

      It’s also archived at and

    • anonymint says:

      Since you raised the controversy and confusion about the 9/11 issue, I will dump some links to some irrefutable analyses I did about two years ago.

      Another 9/11 blog I wrote two years ago: Debunking Mark Roberts’ 9/11 Disinformation Tactics.

      If ever a link goes dead, every link I provide is always archived at the two archival sites I mentioned in my prior comment post.

    • anonymint says:

      During the movement, some topics & issues became so heated that it fractured the movement into many un-unified parts. The Pentagon issue is a prime example.

      I solved the Pentagon puzzle two years ago in my blog Plane Flyover; Explosives Planted Inside The Pentagon.

      Additionally, I was able to figure out what likely happened to the passengers of the airplanes in my blog Disembarkment of the 9/11 Passengers.

      • Kate says:

        I think we need to study 3/11 the Fukushima disaster with the same rigour as 9/11. On Bitchute, Level 9 News provides evidence that the earthquake was not natural, and building #4 was blown up.

        In Feb 2010 a news report stated that Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran, and shortly after an Israeli company, Magma BSP, was given responsibility for security at the Daiichi nuclear plant. They left the plant one week before the disaster.

        There’s also the Stuznet worm created by US and Israel, designed to cause components of the system to stop functioning and not be detected. There’s a documentary Zero Day that provides some interesting information about this weapon.

        There has been ongoing radiation exposure for Japan, and the world with the contaminated water going into the ocean.

    • anonymint says:

      As C.A.F. noted in her recent inteview with the Dark Journalist, Trump has threatened to release JFK files but is not yet doing so, perhaps because he knows he will likely be a dead man walking if he does. He is ostensibly using that threat as a negotiating tactic with the Deep State.

  39. nexangelus says:

    Not sure if anyone has posted the link to the UK’s NHS drive (actual letters) to raise the flu vaccine numbers this year:

  40. manbearpig says:


    “If I claim to be a wise man, surely means that I don’t know!”

    (oops! youtube… sorry…)

    • manbearpig says:

      well ok, that wasn’t very original… a repeat for me so

      Here’s something incredible an old (younger by 3 months) Corbett commenter sent me:

      give it 40 seconds…

      • anonymint says:

        The (probably near genius) Catherine Austin Fitts (former HUD undersecretary under Jack Kemp and former, very well connected Wall Street guru) laments how the sheepeople would prefer to be satiated with entertainment to keep their mind off of actually dealing with the huge social problem we are mired in.

        She explains that QAnon was a controlled opposition hopium to keep patriots stalled like “deer in the headlights” instead of organizing grassroots action.

        We are nothing like the patriots who decimated the British at Lexington (← listen to 55+ minutes) and those patriots who my lateral ancestor Isaac Shelby lead into battle in the Revolutionary War.

        • manbearpig says:

          Guess that means you didn’t enjoy that amazing a capella concert… oh well.
          Music comforts me and helps give me strength to be a daily “conspiracy communicator” despite the profound disapproval of my closest family and entourage (and probably my employers too, were they aware of it).

          Wish I knew more about my family lineage. Have only traced back as far as late 19th century. Very eclectic in terms of professional occupations.

          I’ve always claimed on these boards that the Qanon phenomenon was merely a manifestation and manipulation of people’s need to idolize somebody and transfer personal responsability to someone else.

  41. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Related to Corbett’s article You Won’t Believe What They’re Planning To Do With “Vaccines”

    Article published November 19, 2020
    Robert F. Kennedy Jr:
    COVID19 vaccine should be avoided at all cost

    (Note: The Wikipedia link at the article is long and interesting.)

    I would like to draw your attention urgently to important issues related to the next Covid-19 vaccination. For the first time in the history of vaccination, the so-called last generation mRNA vaccines intervene directly in the genetic material of the patient and therefore alter the individual genetic material, which represents the genetic manipulation, something that was already forbidden and until then considered criminal.

    This intervention can be compared to genetically manipulated food, which is also highly controversial. Even if the media and politicians currently trivialize the problem and even stupidly call for a new type of vaccine to return to normality, this vaccination is problematic in terms of health, morality and ethics, and also in terms of genetic damage that, unlike the damage caused by previous vaccines, will be irreversible and irreparable.

    Dear patients, after an unprecedented mRNA vaccine, you will no longer be able to treat the vaccine symptoms in a complementary way. They will have to live with the consequences, because they can no longer be cured simply by removing toxins from the human body, just as a person with a genetic defect like Down syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome, genetic cardiac arrest, hemophilia, cystic fibrosis, Rett syndrome, etc.), because the genetic defect is forever!

    This means clearly: if a vaccination symptom develops after an mRNA vaccination, neither I nor any other therapist can help you, because the damage caused by the vaccination will be genetically irreversible. In my opinion, these new vaccines represent a crime against humanity that has never been committed in such a big way in history. As Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, an experienced doctor, said: In fact, this “promising vaccine” for the vast majority of people should be FORBIDDEN, because it is genetic manipulation! ”

    The vaccine, developed and endorsed by Anthony Fauci and funded by Bill Gates, uses experimental mRNA technology. Three of the 15 human guinea pigs (20%) experienced a “serious adverse event”.

    Note: messenger RNA or mRNA is the ribonucleic acid that transfers the genetic code of the DNA of the cell nucleus to a ribosome in the cytoplasm, that is, the one that determines the order in which the amino acids of a protein bind and act as a mold or pattern for the synthesis of that protein.

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      (Below the article is this…)

      Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. ( )


      Yes, like many other viruses.

      Yes, if you use the proper medicines and do not leave your health in the hands of corrupt and mercantile health systems.

      Yes and many, some are acting discreetly giving appropriate treatments, others have been bolder and there are many videos in the networks talking about these treatments, and many have been threatened, disqualified or silenced.

      Yes, and there is a world union calling for more doctors and scientists called Doctors and Scientists for Truth, to expose the falsity of the treatment they have given to the bug issue.

      5. IS IT A PANDEMIC?
      No. The WHO changed the term that referred to the pandemic, before the bug was launched in order to end the pandemic.

      Yes, like all flu.

      No. If you have symptoms, just take the appropriate medicine from the first day (strengthen the immune system, take anti-inflammatory and anti-influenza) and cure yourself at home.

      Yes, being as clean as you should be, and maintaining a high immune system. And you also have: Ozone Therapy, Chlorine Dioxide with the preventive protocol.

      No. In the USA it was discovered that any data, would be in fact 10% of that number, because the causes of deaths were other diseases, and the tests are not reliable, they give false positives.

      The human being has many microorganisms and viruses in the body and this does not mean that you are a sick or infected person, or that you have the virus, however, the viruses that are supposedly “so aggressive” present some symptoms in the patients because the body releases alarms from an intruder (fever, headache, vomiting, etc.) and according to Koch’s theory the answer is NO.

      Yes, in a laboratory.

      To be the excuse to restrict freedoms, to change the current economic system to a more oppressive / enslaving, scary, blind flock obedience.


      • manbearpig says:

        If only Mr. Kennedy weren’t so pro-Al Gore and gung-ho on so-called man-made climate change… sigh…

        • HomeRemedySupply says:

          No kidding ManBearPig.
          I am very uncomfortable with Kennedy’s push on the carbon dioxide Climate Change front. ha!…CO2 is not a toxic pollutant.

          There are other indicators which I sometimes see that raise my eyebrows.
          Example: Here is a recent article which talks about pay. It hints at UBI, Universal Basic Income.
          Report Details How Taxpayers Subsidize Cruel Low Wages Paid by Corporate Giants

          • mkey says:

            That article was penned by one Jon Queally.

            • HomeRemedySupply says:

              Yea, I should have noted that.

              To his credit, Robert F Kennedy, Jr. recently launched The Defender, where that Jon Queally article on wages is posted, and there is a comment section which gives people an opportunity to express their views.

              QUOTING from “About Defender”
              The Defender is a unique platform for frank, civil, nonpartisan discussions of evidence-based science and medicine.
              The site hosts a space where writers of every viewpoint may safely air contrary science-based views.
              It will include a robust comment and discussion section, which will be closely monitored to maintain an atmosphere of polite, gracious, genial, and high-minded conversation devoid of vitriol and partisanship.

      • HomeRemedySupply says:

        15. WILL WE GET OUT OF THIS?
        Yes. And all those who contributed to the deaths and the plan will fall, and they will pay for what they did.

        16. MUST I BE AFRAID?
        No. Fear diminishes your immune system and makes you mentally controllable.

        Yes. The owners of the media are accomplices. This is called mind control.

        18. WHAT SHOULD I DO?
        You protect yourself, and if you get sick you already know how to heal yourself at home, or with your trusted doctor who will not commit to the abandonment protocol.

        No. If you get healthy, vaccines bring chemicals, heavy metals and a series of “bugs” that will only affect your health more in the medium and long term, both physically and mentally. It’s your body, and it’s your right to decide about it, and about your physical and mental health. Would you trust a vaccine after a virus has been created to exterminate humanity?

        20. IS THIS A WAR?
        Yes.! And we will be victorious! We need to stay together and wake other people up, giving a lot of information.

        “Forced to wear a mask, but not to shut up.”

        About the author: Robert F Kennedy Jr is the son of the former U.S. Attorney General under his brother President John F. Kennedy. In his work as a vaccine injury lawyer Robert Jr. has produced the suppressed vaccine documentary, ‘VAXXED’ and the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN).

        HomeRemedySupply…My Note:

        Something about this publication piece smells. It doesn’t quite jive with how RFK, Jr. normally presents things.
        Some aspects seem amiss.
        For example:
        Notice the last statement which says that RFK, Jr. produced VAXXED.
        I do not think that he was a producer for the first VAXXED film.
        However, RFK, Jr. may have played a role with VAXXED 2, which was ramrodded by Polly Tommey. Polly Tommey and RFK, Jr. often do video interviews together.

      • anonymint says:

        If only Mr. Kennedy weren’t so pro-Al Gore and gung-ho on so-called man-made climate change… sigh…

        His apparent inability to understand the correct analysis of climate science is a good indication of his inability to understand biochemistry and medical science.

        So Kennedy’s claim that the virus is real, has been ostensibly discredited by the information we have explored in the comments on this page.

        It seems @HomeRemedySupply is determined to push narratives which undermine the facts, apparently because he says he does not want to form judgements about facts.

        How can we be unified if we will not unify around facts?

        • HomeRemedySupply says:

          anonymint says:
          It seems @HomeRemedySupply is determined to push narratives which undermine the facts, apparently because he says he does not want to form judgements about facts.

          You got it completely wrong on your evaluation of me and my intent.
          I am not pushing a narrative.

          Notice that I reprinted this entire article’s content so that others could better grasp what was there, not because “it confirms a belief system of mine”.

          Also, you need to see my final note at the tail of the publication.

          Check your evaluations of others and what they think at the door.

          • anonymint says:

            You’re manufacturing your own demise by posting disinformation, wasting time, not being focused, etc:



            It’s too late for entertainment. Get focused or perish. Your choice.

            • Kate says:

              Ezekiel 31 describes conditions in Eden which have continued on to this very day.

              Organized religion has mislead us into believing we are made in God’s image, but we are made from the dust of the ground. They have made us believe our hope is in this world, but Yahshua said his kingdom was not of this world. There are many, many other lies they have propagated.

              This is a testing ground to separate the wheat from the chaff. We must be a branch on Yahshua’s vine to inherit eternal life in the New Jerusalem, by loving Yahweh and our neighbour. Love does no harm. The good news is anyone that harms their neighbour will be destroyed in Yahweh’s fire on judgment day.

              • cu.h.j says:

                I respectfully disagree with this. I believe we must focus on the here and now. Our earthly lives are important and we can’t be passive.

        • manbearpig says:

          “…So Kennedy’s claim that the virus is real, has been ostensibly discredited by the information we have explored in the comments on this page…”

          Not as far as I’m concerned.

          As wary as I am of Rockefeller medecine and motives, particularly concerning vaccines, I’m not ready to scrap a century of work historically linking certain bacteria and viruses (including mycoplasma) to the manifestation of disease.

          Conversely, I watched the climate hoax unfold and have spent considerable time following the debate about the nature of climate change and observing the tactics employed to communicate and propagandize on the topic. Furthermore, in addition to elucidating and explaining how information and statistics surrounding this topic are manipulated, Mr Corbett has rigorously and extensively demonstrated how this agenda fits into a much larger picture.

          I don’t agree that the information presented on this page convincingly debunks the role of bacteria and viruses in the manifestation of disease. Moreover, though it’s all very interesting, instructive and provocative to read, as I’ve already stated, be they true or false, I don’t think attempting to negate these fundamental principles within the context of “waking people up” to the nature of this engineered plandemic is constructive. Quite the opposite, in fact.

          • flammable says:

            The role bacteria and viruses play in the manifestation of disease is adding to the damage and disorder. They possess no mechanism to dictate and act as the catalyst of disease on their own. If our cells are not functioning correctly this will cause a chain reaction of disorder to other systems which are connected to our cells such as the microbiome (bacteria, viruses, other microorganisms).

            Think about if your body was a home and bacteria and viruses was the gas supplied to your home. If a gas line broke and led to a fire you wouldn’t blame the gas but the system being damaged or faulty. Or think if they were electrons. You wouldn’t blame an electrocution on electrons. Yes it’s accurate to say it played a part of disease but a more sensible approach is to look at the disorder our body constantly faces.

            • manbearpig says:

              Excellent analogies that I both understand and have entertained (with similar ones).

              Nevertheless, I maintain that trying to explain that nuance to conspiracy-allergic people, while claiming that viruses don’t exist, will not only not help, but will seriously hinder when trying to make people understand the dire issues related to this plandemic.

              Especially in my case, as I’m constantly communicating with employees of drug-testing laboratories and Big Pharma.

              But even if I tried to explain to my sister or colleagues that viruses don’t exist so we must resist the measures imposed by this pandemic

              they’d just laugh and shake their heads and feel very comfortable dismissing anything else I had to say about the pandemic.

              • anonymint says:

                Forget about convincing fools. It’s too late for that now.

                You need to be preparing for the collapse of Western civilization. Chaos, war, devastation.

          • anonymint says:

            You’re ostensibly not qualified to form correct analyses about what a century of junk and corrupt science has foisted on humanity.

          • Kate says:

            I think it is critical to put no faith in the medical system. All who have faith in the medical system will die.

            I haven’t had contact with doctors for decades and I’m healthier as a result. If I get cancer it will be from the vaccinations I’ve received. I won’t get covid-19 because I haven’t received vaccinations since I fell for the Swine Flu ‘trial balloon’ in 2009.

            My goal with my family is to get them to stop trusting doctors in the medical system.

            • anonymint says:

              Very wise. The Western medical system is not health care. It is a killing machine in disguise.

              And the idiots want it to be universal and force the productive people to pay for it.

              This insanity leads to holocaust, megadeath outcomes akin to the Nazi gas chambers or Holodomor. The Nazis first provided universal healthcare and then could not afford it so they have to start culling the population.

              We can utilize the medical system for setting broken bones, laser surgery on eyes, etc..

      • Kate says:

        It is not contagious. Dr. Purlmutter interview Dr. George Tetz who stated the ‘virus’ has prions which means it is of animal origin. ‘Viruses’ don’t cross species so it must have been injected in vaccines, or tainted blood.

        The only ‘proper medicines’ are natural things that boost our immune system without toxic effects, like iodine.

        Dr Purlmutter interviewed Dr. Jeffrey Bland about Immune System Rejuvenation, and after decades of study he has proven that fasting is the best way to boost our immune system.

        We must stop turning to the Allopathic medical system for anything other than emergency care because they are killing us.

    • mkey says:

      I have seen this article carried on 21st century wire. What struck me was this:

      This means clearly: if a vaccination symptom develops after an mRNA vaccination, neither I nor any other therapist can help you, because the damage caused by the vaccination will be genetically irreversible.

      RFK is a lawyer and I don’t think he’s suffering from split personality issues where one of the fragmented selves work as a therapist.

      • HomeRemedySupply says:

        Excellent EXAMPLE which raises further questions about the nature of this article.

  42. anonymint says:

    Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests “Unreliable” & Quarantines “Unlawful”

    An appeals court in Portugal has ruled that the PCR process is not a reliable test for Sars-Cov-2, and therefore any enforced quarantine based on those test results is unlawful.

    • manbearpig says:

      Yes, PCR tests, as described by their inventor himself and especially when the cycle threshold is over 35 are not reliable indicators of the presence of pathogenic viruses.

      And yes, many, many people have been saying say that if Kary Mullis had not died he would have been screaming this fact from the rooftops as he had been for HIV and denouncing the fraud of a certain Doctor Fauci at the same time.

      However these facts do not imply that viruses and bacteria can not be implicated in the manifestation of disease.

      • anonymint says:

        You’re manufacturing your own demise.

        How many times do I have to elucidate that there is no proof that viruses exist as the infectious agents they are claimed to be

        There could be a zillion other particles and mechanisms going on which they could concoct some bogus narrative about disease and you would be defending it here.

        • manbearpig says:

          “…How many times do I have to elucidate that there is no proof that viruses exist as the infectious agents they are claimed to be…”

          How many times do I have to tell you that you may be right but I don’t think elucidating that potential fact right now amongst the general public is going to help our Great Reset situation any.  On the Contrary. At least not coming from me it won’t!

          However if you care to seize this moment to illuminate the world with this knowledge, then PLEASE BE MY GUEST!  Have a ball! It is indeed very interesting!

          You’re hell bent on defending a theory!  Not me! I don’t have a theory! I gotta “teach” English and pay my bills! And get people to talk about the World Economic Forum and it’s plans. Nobody knows the World Economic Forum let alone the intricacies and impenetrable mysteries of the human immune system! I don’t have time to figure out a century and a half of infectious disease science before this Great Reset train flattens us all in its path.

          But don’t let that rain on your non-infectious virus parade! To each his own!

          • anonymint says:

            An apt aphorism is never argue with an idiot.

            How many times do I have to tell you that you may be right but I don’t think elucidating that potential fact right now amongst the general public is going to help our Great Reset situation any. On the Contrary. At least not coming from me it won’t!

            What utility is there in attempting to convince idiots to not destroy themselves? All you will accomplish is not focusing on the prosperity gained through truth and clear thinking.

            Westerners will not wise up until they hit rock bottom in deprivation again. It’s a repeating cycle and people believe whatever nonsense they want to believe.

            You’re hell bent on defending a theory! Not me!

            You have low reading comprehension. I’ve not promulgating any health sciences theory whatsoever. I am pointing out that the insane theories of junk and corrupt science have not been falsified nor proven. Any theory which can’t be falsified is by definition unscientific. This crap they’re doing is pseudo-science more akin to witchcraft.

            You’re the one who is telling me that I have to put some credence in outlandish, unproven theories.



            60‘s: Oil reserves will be depleted in 10 years.
            70’s: Another Ice Age in 10 years [Time Magazine et al, etc.].
            80’s: Acid rain will destroy all crops.
            90’s: The ozone layer will be destroyed in 10 years.
            00’s: The ice caps will be gone in 10 years.

            NONE OF THESE CATASTROPHES HAPPENED, but all results in more government regulation and taxation.

            Our overlords and their prostitutes such as politicians need to fool us into being afraid of shit that doesn’t exist so they can enslave us.

            And yet you argue we should pander to those who are fooled.

            But don’t let that rain on your non-infectious virus parade! To each his own!

            Hope you realize I’m not arguing that there’s no infectious disease. I’m stating that the junk “science” claimed to be supporting the theory of viruses is unproven and vacuous. For all we know if could be mycoplasma bacterial infections that are causing all infectious disease.

            Why do you think it helps for you to slobber your low comprehension on the extensive effort I expended into the comments I put on this page trying to help inform the public as to the fraud that is being perpetrated against humanity?

            Have you even watched the two part video “What Really Makes You Sick”?

            • mkey says:

              Do you have any sources that deal with more esoteric theories regarding the nature of oil? The chance of it being a “fossil fuel” is somewhere in ball park of the probability of having a plane flown by a hillbilly, way above its top theoretical cruising speed at optimal altitude, ten thousand feet below that altitude, hit a building and penetrate it while at it.

          • anonymint says:

            I suspect that many readers may not grok the relevance and gravity of my upthread point about aliasing error and moire patterns.

            The Shannon-Nyquist theorem informs us that if we attempt to sample a signal at less than twice the highest frequency and less than twice the longest period in the signal, we will observe aliasing error artifacts. These artifacts can appear to be real things, e.g. undersampling an image can produce artifacts of things that didn’t appear in the source image.

            Since these junk scientists who are masquerading as actual scientists, do not know what the actual signal is that they want to observe, thus they don’t know if the observation samples they are collecting (e.g. with an electron microscope) are generating artifacts which do not even actually exist in what they are observing! And they have no way of falsifying their results. They leverage proxy mechanisms such as epidemiological data to claim support for their theories, but that is not falsification because there can be alternative explanations, e.g. mycoplasma or other unknowns.

            We don’t even know unequivocally if the electron microscope is itself creating artifacts. Think of the analogy of the Heisenburg principle in that to observe something at the scale of the fundamental constants we alter the experiment by observing it.

            And on top of all that even if these claimed viral structures and functions exist, there’s no proof nor falsification that they are causative of infecting hosts and being the source causative agent of disease.

            And yet you want to put credence into ghosts and other imagined but unproven claims.

          • anonymint says:

            I again emphasize that we need to stop deluding ourselves about the prospects of saving ourselves by convincing the masses of sheepeople fools to resist:



            Catherine Austin Fitts said in her recent 3 hour interview discussion, we must laser beam focus on what really matters, turn up our inner snobbery (cast off those who defocus, who will be liabilities, troublemakers and potential snitches) and stop pursuing delusional hopium.

        • Kate says:

          Last winter, my sister-in-law came to visit and her son came down with a bad gastro-intestinal illness. Previous to this, they had been visited by a relative with the same illness. Explain what happened if viruses do not exist.

  43. anonymint says:

    Scathing admonishment of the criminal FUD promulgated with this virus hoax, issued by an expert pathologist who is also virologist.

    • manbearpig says:

      Yes, very gratifying. Someone had already posted the transcript of this message.
      You’ll notice of course that at no time does he question the existence either of the Covid19 virus or of viruses in general. On the contrary.

      • anonymint says:

        You’ll notice of course that at no time does he question the existence either of the Covid19 virus or of viruses in general. On the contrary.

        Only those Pointless and Witless (i.e. those in the aspirant, actuarially worthless Power Rangers class) who are suffering from the Common Psychosis confuse another’s half-truths with complete truth.

        Obviously they’re not going to risk their court case on trying to convince fools that a century of health science is corrupt and junk.

  44. manbearpig says:

    “Obviously they’re not going to risk their court case on trying to convince fools that a century of health science is corrupt and junk.”


    So with pointless half-truths and soulful witlessness shall we stumble and slobber through this life of existential risk, savouring, ever skeptical, offen walking, naturally ever, over and understanding

    the impenetrable mysteries of contagious psychosis and mass hysteria.

  45. anonymint says:

    No vaccine, no entry

    Global Vaccine Passport Will Be Required for Travel

    In an April 2020 white paper, The Rockefeller Foundation laid out a strategic framework clearly intended to become part of a permanent surveillance and social control structure that severely limits personal liberty and freedom of choice.


    That the Rockefeller Foundation is one of the three founders of CommonPass should surprise no one, considering they basically laid the groundwork for it in their April 21, 2020, white paper


    It also warns that elimination of privacy will be required […] The tracking system proposed by The Rockefeller Foundation also demands access to other medical data


    This no longer sounds so far-fetched when you consider that technocracy requires social engineering to work. It requires total surveillance. It requires each person to be tied to the digital matrix — physically, mentally and financially — such that they cannot rebel.


    When world leaders now talk about “building back better” and spin tales about a utopia in which humanity no longer has a negative impact on the environment, what they’re really talking about is the transition to a world in which mankind is no longer free to do any of the things we’ve previously engaged in and typically enjoyed.


    Artificial intelligence algorithms make decisions for you, and if you disobey or start thinking fancy thoughts all on your own, you can expect to be financially and socially disenfranchised. Effectively eliminating an individual from society will be as easy as pressing a button and putting a freeze on your digital wallet and identification.


    the medical tyranny and censorship of anti-groupthink that has emerged during this pandemic are an unavoidable element of the Great Reset, and if you think it’s bad now, just wait until the whole system is brought fully online.

    The mere idea of dissent will become a thought of the past, because your life — your health, educational and work opportunities, your finances and your very identity — will be so meshed with the automated technological infrastructure that any attempt to break free will result in you being locked out or erased from the system, leaving you with no ability to learn, work, travel or purchase anything.

    Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. — Benjamin Franklin

    • Kate says:

      I gave up travel years ago because I realized how dangerous it was.

      • anonymint says:

        This above doesn’t apply only to international travel or even only domestic travel.

        Hope readers don’t miss the bold text near the end of what I quoted.

        “will be so meshed with the automated technological infrastructure that any attempt to break free will result in you being locked out or erased from the system, leaving you with no ability to learn, work, travel or purchase anything.”

        C.f. also the comment I posted today (on the Great Reset vlog) about imitation meat, wherein I describe then rebuke the motivations of the eugenicists who are foisting this on humanity.

  46. manbearpig says:

    As an aside to the poison/prion/exosome/virus debate:

    Apparently Whitney Webb announced on Infowars that she will be coming out with a big scoop suggesting the pathogen in question is a modified version of Fentanyl.

    or rather a modified version of the modified version of Fentanyl?

  47. anonymint says:

    Aluminum in vaccines is claimed to be the nano particle variant which is alleged to be much more toxic than elemental aluminum.

    Jason Hommel at (formerly the Silver Stock Report) has written about aluminum in vaccines.

    • mkey says:

      This would make a lot of sense since a lot of smaller particles have a lot more surface area to which the organism will react with the additional bonus of a smaller diameter vessel being able to move around and through various obstacles in the tissue.

  48. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Tuesday November 24th, 2020 – updated 29th
    Older people, Black and Latinx Americans say they would be hesitant about getting a coronavirus vaccine
    Many Americans say they’re hesitant to get a vaccine, even if one was approved by the Food and Drug Administration

    Progress is being made on a coronavirus vaccine — already two candidates have reported Phase 3 clinical trials that indicate an efficacy rate that is higher than 90%. But the effectiveness of these vaccines also depends on people’s willingness to get vaccinated if one becomes readily available to the general public.

    As it stands, many Americans say they are hesitant to get vaccinated, especially those who are over 50 years old and/or from Black and Latinx communities.

    Some 46% of Americans ages 50 to 80 would rather wait for others to get vaccinated first before doing it themselves, according to survey findings published Tuesday in the University of Michigan’s National Poll on Healthy Aging. Among people in that age group, 14% of the more than 1,500 Americans surveyed said they don’t want to get a COVID-19 vaccine at all.

    That’s worrisome to health experts because older Americans are considered at a higher risk of contracting and developing serious cases of coronavirus.

    “Effective vaccines will be crucial to getting this pandemic under control and preventing serious illness and death from COVID-19, especially among people over 50 and those with underlying health issues,” said Dr. Preeti Malani, the poll’s director and a specialist in geriatrics and infectious diseases at Michigan Medicine.

    “Our findings point to a strong need to communicate effectively and transparently about how well the vaccines work, the safeguards built in to protect the safety of recipients, and the public health importance of widespread vaccination starting with priority groups.”

    Frontline public health care workers are expected to receive priority access to a COVID-19 vaccine if one becomes available.

    “As the public sees health care workers taking vaccinations and being the first ones to do it, as we see the effectiveness, and we see the clinical results, that will then build confidence depending on what the evidence is, and what we’re seeing about the initial safety from the initial groups,” Dr. Atul Gawande, a member of President-elect Joe Biden’s coronavirus task force, told MarketWatch in a Nov 9. interview.


    • HomeRemedySupply says:


      The Trump administration has said a vaccine will be free of charge, but for many Americans, hesitation to receive vaccination boils down to out-of-pocket costs. A third of respondents in a Sept. Axios/Ipsos Coronavirus Index poll said they wouldn’t be willing to pay any amount of money for a vaccine.

      In addition to concerns over cost, efforts to distribute a vaccine could be stymied by many Americans’ distrust of the medical establishment.

      Black Americans still bear the psychological scars of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study that began in the 1930s and lasted through the 1970s. Researchers on that study withheld treatment from uneducated Black men who had syphilis, and never told them they had the disease. Distrust of health care workers and clinical trials among Black Americans prevails to the present day.

      Some 14% of Black Americans trust that a coronavirus vaccine will be safe, according to a survey findings published Monday by COVID Collaborative, a nonprofit coalition of health experts. That’s compared to 34% of Latinx Americans who trust that it would be safe. (The survey did not include white Americans.)

      The survey was conducted from Sept. 1 through Sept. 15, before Moderna MRNA, +16.34%, AstraZeneca AZN, +0.01% and Pfizer PFE, +1.91% /BioNTech BNTX, +4.79% Phase 3 trial data were publicly released.

      “The negative correlation between Black identity and vaccine intention suggests that education efforts should work to acknowledge the harm that historical vaccination efforts have caused (notably, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study),” the authors of the study wrote.

      The resistance to vaccination in Latinx communities is “markedly lower” when compared to Black communities because “levels of trust in institutions and institutional messengers is markedly higher — suggesting that more traditional public health efforts may gain more traction in Latinx communities,” the authors concluded.

      Among white U.S. adults, 61% indicated that they would be willing to get a coronavirus vaccine at no cost if it was approved by the Food and Drug Administration, according to a Gallup survey of nearly 3,000 U.S. adults conducted in October. That’s compared to 48% of non-white Americans who said they would be willing to get vaccinated under the same conditions.

  49. anonymint says:

    I quote:

    I’m not really qualified to interpret/judge this report, but it looks like one of the most commonly used PCR test kits for SARS-CoV2 (incidentally developed by the ‘German Fauci’) might be suffering from serious flaws and might even pick up common cold coronaviruses etc.

    Meaning the rising cases are not even largely harmless wu flu, but just the cold.

    The conspiratards may well have been right on that one.

    The PCR testing leading to a high number of false positives has been trending for a while. Ron Paul mentioned it during one of his Liberty Report videos. Everything touched by the state is bound to be corrupted and be distorted. I don’t think we necessarily needed empirical evidence to see it.

  50. anonymint says:

    Vaccine Whistle-blower Found Dead After Saying She Wouldn’t Commit Suicide

    Points out that Wuflu vaccines are “up to 98% effective, but orange juice and our immune system is 99% effective.”

    • HomeRemedySupply says:

      I detest that type of “alternative news”! – HRS

      In Texas, we call that Trailer Trash News.
      Not that living in trailers or being poor is a bad thing…I’ve lived in mobile homes and I am poor.

      Trailer Trash – Definition
      Derogatory description for person who seems well-suited to residential life in a mobile home park and is distinguished by poor hygiene, foul language, slovenly or slutty clothing, and general ignorance, with a tattered sofa on the front lawn & piles of empty beer cans by its sides, along with broken down cars & old tires littered around the landscape. Recreations include drinking malt liquor in lawn chairs under tattered R.V. awning and teenage pregnancy. – See Joe Bob Briggs of the mid to late 1980’s for more information.

      This type of “Alternative Media” pollutes the entire space. It is extremely harmful. I hate seeing this crap.

      Here is more about the lady who died…

  51. anonymint says:

    Researchers discover that COVID symptoms are caused by autoimmunity instead of a virus. And they even implicate autoimmunity in cancer death.

    ‘Autoantibodies’ may be driving severe Covid cases, study shows

    Researchers at Yale University found that Covid-19 patients had large numbers of misguided antibodies in their blood that targeted the organs, tissues and the immune system itself […] hese blocked antiviral defences, wiped out helpful immune cells, and attacked the body on multiple fronts, from the brain, blood vessels and liver to connective tissue and the gastrointestinal tract.

    Further tests revealed that the more “autoantibodies” patients had in their blood, the worse their disease. The Covid-19 patients had more antibodies that had turned on them than people with lupus, an autoimmune disease caused by similar wayward antibodies.


    More than 5% of hospitalised patients had autoantibodies that weakened a key arm of the immune defence that is orchestrated by proteins called interferons. These patients were unable to control the amount of virus[exosomes] in their bodies and so developed more serious illness.


    In two particularly grim examples of friendly fire, other patients had autoantibodies that targeted B cells […] while one patient had autoantibodies that appeared to wipe out many of their protective T-cells.


    Scientists have long known that conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus and multiple sclerosis are driven by the immune system malfunctioning and attacking the body. But less is known about viral infections and their ability to induce autoimmune reactions. Work is now under way to investigate whether autoantibodies are to blame for long-term symptoms in diseases like Ebola and Chikungunya, and also in cancer patients after immunotherapy.

  52. anonymint says:

    Someone asked me in my Telegram group chat:

    Did you save a copy of your post concerning aliasing error and moire patterns as it appears to have been removed from the Corbett website?

    I wholeheartedly agree with you that if a scientific theory does not make a testable prediction, it is akin to divination.

    Crtl+F invokes the search function on a non-mobile web browser:

    • anonymint says:

      Dawn is a close acquaintance of mine and her blog posts are superb.

      How long do you suspect it will be before the American economy implodes? I know we are living on borrowed time but never envisioned they would be able to keep it propped up this long.

      I linked to What Really Makes You Ill on that Corbett Report web page.

      Please communicate my Shannon-Nyquisit theorem and aliasing error point to Dawn. I approach it from an information theory perspective because my vocation is in computer science.

      I also made the point that mycoplasma survives outside a host much more hardily than the non-falsified theory that infectious viruses jump between hosts.

      A recession is underway in the U.S. to worsen into 2022. I suppose Greater Depression implosion will be 8.6 – 12.9 years from Jan 2020. Scorched earth Mad Max will be perhaps drawn out to ~2085.

      • anonymint says:

        I added:

        If the South does not secede preemptively (which I doubt the South will do, as the people must be severely abused before they will disrupt their normalcy bias) then ten years under Kamala Harris after assassinating Trump would probably erode some of the normalcy bias and “too nice” attitudes of Americans. So maybe after the Waterfall Collapse expected for 2032 to 2037, then the U.S. may rebound into 2047 on Armstrong’s cycle chart, upon which it falls off the cliff again into Mad Max by 2085.

  53. anonymint says:

    Read this:

    Are Prions in the COVID Vaccines?

    This is of life and death importance. Share far and wide! Your life depends on it!

    I am now 100% certain that covid-19 vaccines contain genetically engineered prions with long incubation periods designed to cause transmissible encephalopathy, thus brain damage that leads to death.


    Click the link to read the entire comment post which cites references.

    • anonymint says:

      Whites-only to be targeted with deadly vaccines?

      Students at Cornell University can use their status as a “person of color” to be exempt from the university’s flu vaccine requirement.

      “We recognize that, due to longstanding systemic racism and health inequities in this country, individuals from some marginalized communities may have concerns about needing to agree to such requirements,”

      What they are actually saying is that the obligation of the vaccine applies only to “persons of non-color“.


      Worth thinking about that, isn’t it—but let me break it down a ways for you:

      if the vaccine is good for you, not a killing agent, why would they want to deny it to treasured blacks, injuns and other persons of color—does this make sense?

      On the other hand if whites are identified as the prime enemy to be culled or exterminated, then it proves beyond doubt that the vaccine is indeed a biochemical compound and program of genocide.

      And it will be interesting when it comes into broader application, i.e. admittance into public spaces, institutions, banking, travel (esp. flying)—the whites will be harassed at checkpoints, asked to produce passports, certificates, booted from participation while the coloreds will be exempt as the new nobility along with white-seeming Jews.

  54. anonymint says:

    Only white students of Cornell will be required to take the vaccine:

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top