Welcome back to New World Next Week. This is James Corbett of CorbettReport.com.
And this is James Evan Palato of MediaMonarchy.com.
I don't want to eat a piece of chicken that came from a 3D printer.
We have got that huge story plus rage bait.
But first, pretty big news as well. FDA to tighten vaccine rules after memo
ties COVID-19 shot to child deaths.
Grabbing this from thehill.com. Every inflammatory remark we make on these shows
is actually always sourced and cited down in your show notes.
The Food and Drug Administration, the FDA, is set to implement stricter vaccine
approval guidelines after a memo claimed at least 10 children died after and
because of receiving a COVID-19 shot.
That sounds like a lowball number, but I'll take it.
The guidelines obtained by the New York Times could also impact vaccinations
for other illnesses and viruses, including the FDA standards for the annual
flu shots that are always so
successful. and if Americans should receive multiple vaccines at a time.
The memo also states that shots for pregnant women could be limited and manufacturers
will be required to conduct larger studies before seeking approval for vaccines.
Can we still get the complete, you know, you can't sue us?
I can already see the future, James. They'll probably, they'll stop making them,
or of course, you know, they always just control the spigot.
Just like all those wars for oil, it's about the war for the control of the
spigot of oil. They'll turn the spigot off of their wonderful vaccines They'll
blame all of us again It'll be our fault again,
Vinay Prasad, a top vaccine regulator at the FDA, said pneumonia vaccine manufacturers
must show that their treatments reduce the infection instead of merely developing antibodies to fight it.
The new restrictions would also require drug manufacturers to run larger studies
that would slow the process of developing vaccines, according to the Washington
Post, the other important news agency that also reviewed the memo.
Prasad, who was reinstated to his post in August after being ousted amid conservative
criticism, announced other changes that included a requirement for randomized
studies to include all subgroups.
He also referred to the annual flu shot framework as a catastrophe of low quality evidence.
It's not like these things are being approved without strong scientific evidence.
Jesse Goodman, the FDA's former chief scientist, told the Post,
noting that guidelines are already quite strict.
They're being approved with strong, effective evidence.
Evidence needed. The memo does
not go into detail about the alleged COVID vaccine-related child deaths.
Prasad called the finding a profound revelation, according to the Post.
For the first time, the U.S.
FDA will acknowledge the COVID-19 vaccines have killed American children.
And we were discussing this on My Morning Monarchy this morning,
remembering just all of the insanity of the scandemic era.
But thankfully, a doctor out there sent me the blank inserts you could find
in many of the rushed Operation Warp Speed MAGA jabs.
Just trust the science. I don't even know where I can't even read it to trust it.
They're calling it the FDA memo that shakes the world.
That is from brownstone.org. Meanwhile, vaccine stocks drop after FDA memo links
COVID shots to child deaths.
And from the Korber Report asking the question, can the COVID scamsters stick
the landing? Meaning, can they still get away scot-free?
Yes. And unfortunately, they might very well do just that. In fact, they have so far.
So what's going to change that? Well, maybe this memo is the start of the breaking of the dam.
And I know for a lot of people, they're going to say exactly as you correctly
observed at the beginning. Well, I think it's probably more than 10, right?
But even the memo itself actually acknowledges that it says this is a no doubt
conservative number, but we're going with the most conservative number that
we have right now because we don't have enough research on this, et cetera, et cetera.
So, yes, I get that people will be underwhelmed in our audience might be underwhelmed
by a statement like this.
Oh, big deal. Big whoop. We've known this all along.
Well, what we are dealing with here is not a political figure.
It's not Maha as a political slogan. What we are dealing with is the seeping
down into the public consciousness of the level of the scam that has taken place here.
And it is, of course, tempting to just give in to the schadenfreude of seeing
the mainstream legacy press melting down over this. And, oh,
my God, what are they doing?
But we really should be outraged, absolutely outraged to our core that this
has taken place and that they have so far utterly failed to acknowledge it and
tried to sweep it under the rug.
This is the beginning of lifting up part of the rug. And I know that's not enough.
We have to take the rug and vacuum up all the crap underneath.
But it's the beginning of that process. So I hope that this will lead to other things.
And this will be the beginning of that snowball rolling down the hill and the
beginning of something that might approach at the very least.
At the very least, if not actual justice with people going to prison for what
they have done, at the very least, the title change in public opinion and understanding.
And I think that's already happened to some extent because all of the people
who were saying worship the science and trust Emperor Fauci and anything that
comes from the CDC and the FDA and all of these, the NHS, all of these people
are utterly unquestionable.
Well, guess what? Now, even they have to admit that these institutions are fundamentally
political, run by political people for political processes. Even if they disagree
with what this FDA memo is saying, now they have to admit, yeah,
it's a political process.
And so we don't have to listen to this FDA.
We should have listened to the Biden FDA because they're wonderful.
But now they at least have to admit that this is not about science. This is about politics.
Anyway, all that being said, can the COVID scamsters stick the landing?
I will exhort people to go and read that.
Obviously, the clot shot agenda was definitely part of that.
And who knows, we might be in the process of turning this gigantic ship of biosecurity
state around and heading towards something approaching a more rational approach
to gigantic medical interventions.
Let's all hold our breath and
wait. Anyway, it's the beginning and we'll see where it goes from here.
James, I've never really gotten over it at all.
And even just now thinking, imagine your feelings in 2006 in regards to 9-11
truth and lies for world war.
If we could grab that kind of energy again and hold on to that.
Again, it's only been five years since this, what I call the greatest scam of
our lifetimes so far. Yeah.
That is how we get going on New World Next Week, episode 611,
our second story, another biggie.
Campbell's Soup vice president out after saying it's for poor people with meat from a 3D printer.
Grabbing this from the organic prepper who note in their headline.
It's, it's for poor, it's, it's not, it's, they have to fix their tab headline,
James. Language is a weapon.
Campbell's Soup, a brand so iconic that Andy Warhol captured it on one of his
most famous works of pop art in a leaked recording.
It was revealed that the soups contained lab-grown meat.
Really, I know they didn't have that on my bingo card as an overused phrase,
but that's definitely on there.
Chicken that came from a 3D printer.
Campbell's strenuously refutes this comment, though the company does use genetically
modified ingredients such as canola, corn, soybeans, sugar beets.
Robert Garza is our whistleblower hero in this case.
He was a cybersecurity analyst for Campbell's, and he had a meeting at a restaurant.
This is straight up Project Veritas kind of style.
At a meeting at a restaurant with Martin Balli, one of Campbell's vice presidents.
Companies don't have a vice president like America has a vice president.
They've got tons of them.
They were hanging out to discuss his salary. He secretly recorded statements
made by the VP and Chief Information Security Officer during a November 2024 meeting.
And I know it might sound strange, but I always tape everything.
Any kind of calls, any kind of interviews, it's really just kind of good practice.
I don't do anything with the recordings. You take them in case in the future,
someone purports that you said something you didn't say and you've got your
own backup. You gotta have your own guardian drone jewel protecting you at all times, James.
In a rant that lasted over an hour, a speaker identified as Martin Bally is
heard saying, we have isht for effing poor people. Who buys our isht?
I don't buy Campbell's products barely anymore.
It's not healthy now that I know what the F's in it.
He also referenced bioengineered meat saying, I don't wanna eat a piece of chicken
that came from a 3D printer.
Bud Light Cracker Barrel could not be reached for comment. James,
this is shocking the word again.
It's just all the masks are all falling off to use a mixed scamdemic phrase
there, James. But had you heard about this one?
I had heard about it. And here's my take on it.
So this is the VP and chief information security officer. So I don't know the
extent to which he knows the day-to-day operations of what's going into these
products. But two things to note.
One is that as the company itself notes, yes, well, OK, no, we're not using
3D printed chicken, but we are using genetically modified canola,
corn, soybeans and sugar beets.
So that should be enough reason for people to reject this isht.
As we're saying here. But it does remind me, it reminds me very specifically,
back in university, I took a course on Marx and Engels, a philosophy course.
And there was a student in that course who was the conspiracy guy.
Believe it or not, I was not the conspiracy guy in that class.
And I remember he was an interesting character.
In fact, he went to the battle in Seattle and And he, you know,
all that stuff that was going on.
And so he knew a thing or two about a thing or two, but he also had the zany off the wall stuff.
And I remember one time he was talking about, you know, KFC chickens aren't
real chickens. They're growing them in labs, man.
And someone pointed out, you know, wouldn't it cost so much more for them to
grow chicken in labs than to just have chickens?
And to which he had no adequate response. In this case, I tend to think,
yeah, I'm not sure I do believe that they are using actual 3D printed chicken
yet because it probably would be much more expensive than just using chickens
that they raise in their factory farm system.
But anyway, but but if we do want a conspiracy take on this,
you know, I would say it's like so many things. They do seed it into the public
consciousness before it becomes a reality.
And we know that they're trying to head towards the lab printed meat,
you know, reality of the future.
And how do you start that conversation? How do you break down the walls of people's
immediate reaction to that?
You have to start seeding it ahead of time. And now, of course,
the fact checkers can come along and say, well, actually, Campbell's isn't using 3D printed chicken.
Those crazy conspiracy theorists are talking about this. But it's that process
I've talked about so many times.
That doesn't exist. That doesn't exist. You're crazy for even talking about
that. That doesn't exist. That doesn't. And eventually it becomes,
yes, that exists. And it's a good thing.
We've seen that so many times in so many different ways. I have a feeling that's
part of what the long term agenda is here.
I don't know to what extent this is playing into it. But why is this conversation from a year ago,
Getting attention now in December of 2025, it seems like that only happens when
there is some sort of agenda to be pushed, at least in introducing this to the public conversation.
When dude should have probably just leaked it and then it would have all have been out.
I mean, I would imagine that's why this is all taken so long.
This is being covered in mainstream, lamestream media because it's hit basically the legal route.
So because the lawyers are now involved I'm sure it suddenly became okay for
them to cover and go on television to start to talk about this again,
a lot of limited hangouts we are two for three on limited hangouts I have a breaking news update,
apparently Organic Prepper has changed the tab headline it is now,
it's with an apostrophe so they were listening to you,
you know how I'm a word nerd, get all messed up So stick with me here.
Maybe part of his job as cybersecurity was keeping all of this a secret and
not letting people find out.
And the question asked in my chat this morning, would that actually maybe be
healthier, the 3D printing, than all the weird GMOs that we know are already in there?
Also, ished for poop backwards. That's, you know, that's how we edit rap songs here in the radio biz.
James, we are, when you turn it, when you turn it, you flip the word around
backwards. That's what it sounds like. You go, isht.
Zigga, please. We're two for three on limited hangout stories as we get punchy
here towards the end of 2025.
Again, I work in radio. That's what happens when you reverse the stuff.
It's the easiest way to edit music instead of going back to the artist or the
label asking, can you send us a radio clean copy for this? You could just do it yourself.
We're two for three on limited hangout stories. Let's see how we do for our third and final.
As OPB writes, that is Oregon Public Broadcasting, don't get angry,
but the 2025 Oxford Word of the Year is rage bait.
That's two words. Again, word nerd.
They should call it the Pop Hall of Fame, not the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame
that has rappers and Dolly Parton in it.
Words are weapons. Ban all the knives. Makes you wonder how the other half lies.
Take a deep breath and think of your happy place.
Rage bait is the Oxford word of the year.
After three days of online voting by more than 30,000 participants,
Oxford University Press announced Monday that rage bait is the official pick,
beating out fellow shortlist nominees.
Aura farming and biohack, which is actually one word, defined as online content
deliberately designed to elicit anger or outrage by being frustrating,
provocative or offensive.
Rage bait is typically posted in order to increase traffic or engagement with
a particular web page or social media account.
This, according to Oxford, when an internet, when internet content produces
a charged and negative emotional reaction from viewers, whether intentionally
or not, it likely falls into the category of rage bait.
Before the term entered the English lexicon around 2002, so it only took,
you know, a couple of decades.
The internet was focused on grabbing our attention by sparking curiosity in
exchange for clicks, says Caspar Grathwal, president of Oxford Languages Division
at Oxford University Press.
Now we've seen a dramatic shift to it, hijacking and influencing our emotions and how we respond.
Again, is this for people that just got the end? I hear there's jerks on the internet.
In recent months, the word gained popularity after Weinstein widget Jennifer
Lawrence revealed she has a secret Tiktard account she uses to get in fights with strangers online.
Oxford calls Ragebait the internet's most effective hook used to stimulate that
ever-sensitive feeling of human anger existing, though perhaps in different forms, within us all.
And they're growing it quite well this last five to ten years.
This year, says Oxford, has been a year defined by the transformation of humanity
in a tech-driven world. Again, all this just happened.
They list deep fake celebrities, AI-generated influencers, and things we've
called on this show out for the previous decades as examples of tech seeping
into our minds and particularly our emoticons.
Is it possible to be rage-baited by ChatGPT or rage-bait the chatbot itself?
Perhaps now more than ever. But it's not just machine learning technologies
that can rage bait their users or vice versa.
General social unrest and concerns
over digital well-being caused usage of the word to spike in 2025.
For the past few years, Oxford Press and every other day late dollar short cash
grabber has used social media to gather public opinions on its word of the year shortlist.
This year, they intentionally used their Zuckergram page to run a digital campaign
for these three shortlisted words. So the word of the year was chosen by girls
who like to type on the picture app.
Rage bait personified as an anonymous individual wearing what appears to be
an alien lizard mask because conspiracy is super hot cha-ching business.
I'm glad you're mad, reads the blurb on its campaign poster,
intentionally misspelled.
Your, you are. Is it any surprise that last year's word of the year was brain
rot? And we do have the official press release, Oxford Rage Bait press release.
Again, this is not new news by any stretch of the imagination. And...
It's twice as many syllables as troll. It's troll. You know, trolling?
St. Carlin would grudge love this timeline, James.
Yeah, it's so many. I, you know, I got to hand it. I'm glad you're mad.
Y-O-U-R. That is brilliant. That is rage bait in one image.
But actually, I will defend, although Oxford apparently is going with two words.
I would, if I was just to write the word rage bait, I would absolutely write it as a compound word.
It would be a word if I wrote it, rage bait.
But anyway, that being what it is, yeah,
talk about a word that could have been the word of the year in,
I don't know, 2011 or 2014 or 2017 or any year since, you know,
the dawn of the worldwide web, or at least since the dawn of social media.
So yeah, what on earth is new about this? I'm not exactly sure.
And certainly the word rage bait or the words rage bait i have heard many many
times over many years so this is not at all something that i would define 2025 by um.
But if you wanted to go for a online word that seemed to come to prominence
in 2025, although certainly wasn't coined in 2025, I think we'd have to go with initiification.
I got to say it because it is a word. It is not a swear word.
And shittification has become, as people know, it was coined by Cory Doctorow.
Am I getting that right? Anyway, it was coined years ago. But for some reason,
I saw many, many, many articles about it in the last several months.
So if you wanted to come with an online word that gained popularity over the
past year, maybe that would be more appropriate.
Rage bait does not particularly define 2025 to me.
What word does particularly define 2025 for me?
Well, actually, I just recorded a subscriber video with Sean where we upheld
the Japanese tradition.
Every year at the end of the year, there's this Japanese society that creates, that has a character.
You know, the Japanese use the Chinese characters, right? And they choose one
character that describes, defines the year.
So me and Sean just recorded a video here where we did that ourselves,
and we came up with our own words.
So if you're interested in that, if you're a Corporate Report member,
you'll be able to sign in and watch that subscriber video this weekend.
Kanji yes i mean they're
keeping us mad they're trying to keep us mad oh the most popular the word of
the year is definitely rage bait super freak out troll angry trump at least
maybe hyphenated rage bait james i have it on good authority next year's word will be virtual reality.
I get to play the exclusive audio of these New World Next Week episodes before
it's published anywhere on my radio stream at mediamonarchy.com slash listen
after my Thursday morning monarchy.
Only me, Sean, Corbett, and Brock have heard it.
And really now, Jameson, I'm glad we got this one into the can.
We were having some technical difficulties. Only one more regular episode after
this one before our highly anticipated annual year-end show,
New World Next Year 2026.
That is coming up Thursday, December 18th, 2025.
And we do run newworldnextweek.com. And James, we've got our annual holiday
sale coming up and you've got the deets.
That's right. So for people who don't know every year, I offer a discount code for everyone.
All and sundry are welcome to use this code at the New World Next Week store
in order to get 25% off any corporate report media, as in the USBs or the online courses or the DVDs.
Not the merch not the merch yeah uh but
uh if anyone is interested in that from today until december
25th you can use the christmas discount code it is christmas 25 spelt the full
way not xmas not speaking of language as a weapon no christmas spell it all
out as christmas 25 and you will be able to get 25 off any of that corporate
report media at the new world next Week store.
For subscribers of the Corbett Report, specifically, if you are a member,
the 50% discount code, which will be again available on all of that Corbett
media at the New World Next Week store, is available from now until December 25th.
That code is at the bottom of the most recent newsletter. If you have no idea
what that means or how to access it, just contact me and me or Sean will be
able to help you out with that.
But that's only for Corbett Report members, paid up subscribers of The Corporate Report, get 50% off.
And discounts do not apply to new products. We have got the Korber Report 2018
USB just about ready to go on the store.
Just showed up today. They are hot off of the presses.
So discounts do not apply to brand new products.
And again, you've never seen any ads. You've never seen us shilling a bunch of weird products.
You've only seen us giving our work. And again, doing this over a combined nearly 40 years.
James, that is New World Next Week, episode 611, buddy. I'm glad we were able to get it done.
Absolutely. And only a couple more. And one of those is going to be New World Next Year, 2026.
So I hope everybody's getting their party festive hats ready and starting to
think about the year that was and the year that is ahead.
But on that note, let's leave it there for today. James, thanks for these stories.
Thanks so much, buddy. Take care.