I bet you didn't have Greenland on your bingo card of geopolitical hotspots for 2026.
But if you did, you'd be winning right now. President Trump renewing his call
for the U.S. to acquire Greenland.
We need Greenland for national security, so we're going to see what happens.
Let me put it in words you might understand.
Mr. Trump, f**k off. I'm helping Europe, I'm helping NATO, and until the last
few days when I told them about Iceland, they loved me. A new threat from President
Trump in the standoff over Greenland.
The president says he'll impose a 10 percent tariff on Denmark and seven other
European nations opposed to his takeover plans.
We have to respect people's right for self-determination.
And the Greenlandic people have been very clear. They don't want to become Americans.
They're not there for us on Iceland, that I can tell you. The poll found that
only about one quarter of U.S.
Adults approve of the way Trump is handling this issue.
We're negotiating right now for Greenland. Do you believe that President Trump
still wants to own Greenland?
Unfortunately, I think the desire is the same. I mean, our stock market took
the first dip yesterday because of Iceland.
So Iceland's already cost us a lot of money.
Yes, against all odds, Greenland... Iceland.
...has somehow become a bone of geopolitical contention, with Venezuela,
Panama, and Cuba not far behind.
We're told that this is about the mad scramble for resources in the Arctic,
and there may be some truth to that, but it's not the whole truth.
So what is this brouhaha over Greenland really about?
Let's roll up our sleeves and find out.
Welcome back, friends. Welcome back to another edition of the Corbett Report podcast.
I'm your host, James Corbett of CorbettReport.com, coming to you,
as always, from the sunny climes of Western Japan here in February of 2026 with
episode 492 of the Corbett Report podcast.
What's Greenland really about?
So let's answer the question. And like so many other questions of this ilk.
This is a question that has a multifaceted answer. Let's think of it like an onion.
And in order to really get to the core and understand that onion on the inside,
we have to peel back the layers because there are many layers to this answer.
Let's start with the topmost layer, the one that you will get in the propagandistic
purveyors of establishment discourse, like, for example,
the BBC, who deigned to answer this question in a handy dandy little explainer
that they came up with last month.
Why does Trump want Greenland and what could it mean for NATO and the EU?
So let's see what the propagandists at the Big Brother Corporation have to say about this.
And after some waffling, helpfully explaining where is Greenland and why is
it important to Trump, they finally get to something approaching the heart of
the matter or the heart of their explanation,
or as close as we're going to get, where they say he, Trump,
has repeatedly described the threat he perceives from Russia and China in the
region, as in the Arctic.
In one truth social post, he wrote, NATO has been telling Denmark for 20 years
that you have to get the Russian threat away from Greenland.
Unfortunately, Denmark has been unable to do anything about it.
Now it is time and it will be done.
In a text message to Norway's prime minister, Jonas Garstor.
Trump also said that he no longer felt obliged to focus on peace after not being
awarded the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize.
Yada yada. What has Trump said about his Greenland plans? And what have Denmark
and other NATO allies said about Greenland's future?
Why does Denmark control Greenland, etc, etc?
I guess if you want the bare bones Wikipedia style explanation,
you can turn to the propagandists at the BBC. And I suppose it does at least
offer us one window into the answer of this question.
For a slightly more nuanced take on this, we could turn to Zero Hedge,
who brings us why Greenland is at the center of a shifting global order,
where they talk about some of these ideas, the strategic,
geostrategic importance of Greenland in its place there in the Arctic.
It says here, situated at the gateway to the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans,
Greenland has become central to U.S.
Homeland defense. That assessment is reflected in the new U.S.
National Defense Strategy, released on January 23rd. It identifies Greenland
as a key terrain along with the Panama Canal and the Gulf of America.
Well, interesting. Yes, certainly. And you can go and continue reading this
article in your own time if you so desire.
But ultimately, it gets to the point that essentially this is a battle between the U.S.
And China, primarily, or China-Russia, for geostrategic dominance of the Arctic.
And that does make sense because ultimately, this is not coming from zero hedge.
This is coming from the Epoch Times.
So take the anti-China baiting in this article for what it's worth.
But at the very least, it does offer us something of an explanation and a link
to the aforesaid 2026 National Defense Strategy produced by the Department of War.
And if you want some light bedtime reading that will put you to sleep almost
instantly, here you go, guys.
Here is the 2026 National Defense Strategy.
And yeah, let's just do a command F search for Greenland. And yeah,
we see Panama Canal and Greenland being mentioned there.
We see, for example, we will guarantee U.S.
Military and commercial access to key terrain, especially the Panama Canal,
Gulf of America and Greenland, et cetera, et cetera.
Yes, there are a number of references to Greenland in this document.
So, yes, this is an aspect of what is happening.
And it does make a certain degree of sense. There is a geostrategic importance
to Greenland as the gateway to the to the Arctic, as it were.
Or gateway from the Arctic, and one that will be of increasing concern as we
step into the 21st century and the opening of a new northern corridor.
And there are aspects of this, again, that do make sense,
but it doesn't quite go all the way towards explaining why now Greenland is
becoming of such military importance, because as task and purpose helpfully
explain in an article, a brief history of the U.S.
Military's presence in Greenland that points out the U.S. troops have long been
based in Greenland. It talks about the U.S.
Military's modern relationship with Greenland began in April 1941 when the American
government signed an agreement with Danish ambassador to the United States,
Henrik Kauffman, that allowed the U.S.
Military to establish bases on the island. It talks about after Denmark rejected a U.S.
Offer in 1946 to buy Greenland for $100 million, both countries struck an agreement
in 1951 that granted the U.S. military access to the island.
The U.S. military had more than a dozen bases in Greenland, along with thousands
of troops during the Cold War.
Although relations were strained between Denmark and the United States when,
in 1968, an American B-52 bomber armed with four nuclear weapons crashed in
Greenland, spreading radioactive debris.
The crash also revealed that the United States had been, shock,
gasp, horror, who would have guessed, violating Denmark's 1957 policy against
having any nuclear weapons in the country or its territories.
Not a surprising story there, but then it goes on to talk about the remaining military, U.S.
Military installation that is currently operating on Greenland,
the Pitufik Space Base, which contains an early warning radar,
which is vital to the U.S.
Military's ability to keep an eye on Russia's nuclear forces.
So there is an already existing military agreement between the U.S. and Denmark.
U.S. military is actively operating one base there.
They certainly have military access to the Arctic already.
So already we're starting to see cracks forming in this narrative.
But if you really want to steel man the idea that this is all about the geopolitical struggle between U.S.
And China slash Russia, you could turn to an analyst like Valina Chakarova,
who has been writing a series of articles over the past couple of years,
actually, but certainly in this year, about the new Cold War in the Arctic,
where she says Russia has significantly expanded its Arctic military posture
compared to the post-Cold War low point over the last years,
particularly through northern fleet infrastructure,
bastion defense, and undersea capabilities.
Meanwhile, China does not have a verified naval or submarine presence in the
G.I.U.K., but its Arctic role is expanding through economic,
scientific and internal institutional engagement alongside Russia.
The northern sea route is being systematically developed by Moscow with Chinese
cooperation, officially commercial, but structurally dual use in an increasingly
militarized Arctic theater.
And she says Greenland is not encircled, but the high north remains a real exposure
and will be key strategic theater in the new Cold War, with the dragon bear
risk vector being asymmetric,
long term and primarily Russian, while China shapes the enabling environment
geoeconomically and indirectly geopolitically through the militarization of
the Indo-Pacific region.
She goes on to write about the Northern Sea Route, aka China's Polar Silk Road,
and talks about the shipping routes that are already operating and that are
opening up in the Arctic that will facilitate this scramble for Arctic positioning,
of which obviously Greenland is very geostrategically situated to provide access
to all of the Arctic shipping routes. So,
So that is, there is certainly a case to be made for this aspect of what is happening right now.
And you can follow the links of this in the show notes for today's episode at
CorbettReport.com slash Greenland for this article, for example,
from Valina Chakarrova, the Northern Corridor Doctrine talking about Cold War
2.0, which is not a revival of 20th century ideological bipolarity.
It is a systemic confrontation between two competing block building systems.
On one side, you have the United States in the Anglosphere, and on the other
side, you have the Dragon Bear.
What is that? It's the global modus operandi of strategic coordination between
China and Russia, fusing China's economic and technological reach with Russia's
military revisionist power and readiness for coercive escalation.
And in this new Cold War, power is no longer measured primarily by territorial
conquest or ideological appeal.
It is measured by the ability to secure corridors, global supply chains,
trade routes, commodities, and strategic technologies have fused with national security.
And again, you can continue reading through this article, and there is a lot
of information in here about this portion of the global chessboard and why it
is such a strategic square and why there is obviously interest from the U.S.
Anglosphere side as well as the Dragon Bear side if that is how you want to frame it.
And again, it's not simply military in interest here.
As Chakarrova points out, this Cold War 2.0 is not about territorial conquest per se.
It is about securing supply chains, trade routes, commodities,
strategic technologies.
For example, you have no doubt heard about rare earths and the importance of
rare earths in this day and age and the abundance of rare earths to be found,
for example, in Greenland.
And if you want to drill down on that topic, I will point not for the first
time to an article that from the Golden Geopolitics Substack called Weaponizing
the Periodic Table that is voluminous, but definitely worth your time.
And if you start reading through this, you'll start to see a very interesting
picture that is very persuasively painted by the author of this article,
who talks about, for example, in July 2023,
China announced export licensing requirements for gallium and germanium.
Who cares? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
October 2023 brought graphite export controls.
China produces over 90% of the world's processed graphite, the material that
enables lithium-ion battery anodes, every electric vehicle, every grid-scale
battery, every piece of consumer electronics.
The West wants an energy transition?
Beijing will decide the pace. September 15, 2024 marked the implementation of
antimony licensing requirements. requirements. Okay.
All right. Uh, April, 2025 introduced export licensing for seven heavy rare
earth elements, Samarium, Gala, Gatolinium, Terbium, Dysprosium,
Lutetium, Scandium, and Yttrium.
And again, you could go through this at just.
Rare earth element after rare earth element, after material and supply,
cesium and getting into tungsten and bismuth and all of these various elements
that are being strategically controlled,
increasingly so by China and controlled through export controls that they have
been using in this leveraged trade war between Beijing and Washington that's
been off and on for several years now.
And again, this is a very, very, very voluminous, documented,
detailed case that is quite persuasive in showing that, yes,
there are certainly there is a rare earth element aspect to this Cold War 2.0
on the geopolitical chessboard.
And that's surely part of what's going on with Greenland and why Greenland is
suddenly becoming so important.
But let's put some brakes on that narrative. at the very least,
maybe it's not the all-encompassing explanation that some people might make it out to be.
China's rare earth monopoly and why markets will break it coming from the daily
economy last month, where they talk about what are rare earth elements anyway? What does that mean?
Rare earth elements are a group of 17 metals, mostly in the first row below
the main periodic table in the lanthanide series, elements 57 to 71,
plus scandium, number 21, and yttrium number 39, which share similar properties
and are found in the same deposits as the lanthanides.
They are transition metals with distinctive magnetic and fluorescent characteristics.
Think of these elements not as bulk materials, but as metallurgical spices used
in tiny quantities to produce dramatic improvements in performance.
Add neodymium to iron and boron and get the strongest permanent magnet known.
Add yttrium to turbine alloys and jet engines can tolerate extraordinary heat.
Europium makes modern display screens possible. Terbium enables efficient electric motors.
Sumerium strengthens guidance systems and sensors.
But dot dot dot, here's the rub. Despite their name, rare earths are widespread.
Significant deposits exist in the United States, Australia, Brazil, India and elsewhere.
And it goes on to talk about the challenge is not in the scarcity of these materials,
it's in their processing. And that is certainly one way in which China has cornered
the markets in recent years.
It has been left essentially to China to take care of the details of all of
this processing. And that is what is biting the U.S.
Anglosphere side of the geopolitical world order in the butt right now,
because suddenly, oh, maybe this is important.
And all these export controls and other such things do have an effect when there
is no infrastructure in place to process these materials, let alone actually
secure them. So that is an aspect of what's happening right now.
But as this article points out, it's actually quite a rare earths are not rare in and of themselves.
They are actually quite widespread and found in a number of places.
So it cannot be the explanation for the mad rush and scramble for Greenland right now. So.
What else could be going on here? See, a lot of this sounds like that sort of
two-dimensional geopolitical chess that, James, you've talked about before.
That's not what the real game is about. It's about the three-dimensional chess.
And there are puppeteers over top the two-dimensional chessboard who are moving
pieces around on both sides of the chessboard that the US-China or US-Russia
or whatever rivalry it is painted as in the mainstream geopolitical press is
not quite the full understanding of what's going on here.
So what could be the third dimensional understanding of what is happening here?
Well, let's take a look at a curious little map.
It is called Technate of America.
And you can take it from a number of places. The Cornell Library has a particularly
good one that you can download in super high quality, high res.
And it does have a little explanation of what it is we are seeing here.
This is technet of America, and of course, we do see the United States of America.
Really, we see, well, not just North America, we also see parts of Latin and
South America. And oh, what's this over here?
What? Let's zoom in on that. Oh, right.
Greenland. Interesting. So what on earth does this map depict?
Well, as this goes on to say, this map illustrates the American technate,
a radical geopolitical proposal based
on pseudoscientific economics and authoritarian nationalist politics.
As the Great Depression deepened in the early 1930s, Americans looked in desperation
to a variety of radical social and political solutions.
One of the most popular was technocracy, which offered a seemingly scientific
explanation of America's ills, namely the disastrous inefficiency of the wage
price system, the very heart of capitalism.
The technocrats proposed abandoning business and representative government as
the driving forces of our economy and replacing them with massive social engineering
censored on technicians,
especially engineers, as the efficient, scientific, anti-capitalistic elite
capable of reorienting the economic order around rational production and distribution.
Theirs was a clarion call for technicians to plan and engineer the new order.
The new world order? Well, at least to start with, the new technate order,
starting with the technate of America.
And as this goes on to point out, Greenland turns out to be one of the parts
of this technate of America, the continental technate that was proposed by Scott.
He says, along with these proposed steps, Scott wrote that the territory of
the United States must be expanded in order to defend it properly.
The new tech native America was to include all of Canada, Greenland,
Central America, the Caribbean, and parts of Colombia, Venezuela, and the Guyanas.
Defense bases were to be established around the perimeter as far afield as Atu,
Pago Pago, the Galapagos, Georgetown, Guyana, Bermuda, St.
John's, Newfoundland, and Cape Farewell, Greenland.
In Scott's words, on the maps accompanying this issue is delineated the geographical
territory required for the adequate defense and operation.
Of this continental area. So you may have seen this map floating around in social
media recently, and there's a reason for it.
There is a very important political pedigree to this idea and to the fact that
Greenland is part of the defense of North America,
specifically the securing of its resources for the privileged few technocratic
elitists who presume to steward over the entire economic order in the interests of us mere peons.
Now, if you do not know about technocracy, boy, do I have some viewing for you
to get caught up to speed.
You could start, for example, with my handy-dandy questions for Corbett on this very subject.
What is technocracy? Where I go through the origins of this idea and its development
by the charlatan Howard Scott and how that became a guiding ideology for the
elitists moving forward.
Obviously, Technocracy Inc., although there is still a rump organization that
exists, did not become the driving factor in the promotion of technocracy.
No, it was then taken up by the Brzezinski's of the world, for example,
and forwarded through the Trilateral Commission, etc., etc.
There is a rich and important historical thread there that I invite you to start
pulling on to unravel the tapestry of our current world order.
And you could start with that question from Corbett.
You could continue with why big oil conquered the world, where I have a dedicated
section talking about technocracy and how that explains this transition that
we have been undergoing for some time now, the post-fossil fuel world.
And why is big oil on board with this?
Oh, because it is about technocracy and the securing of the natural resources of the world.
And you can, of course, continue diving in with not only my interviews with
Patrick Wood on his books about technocracy and his work on this subject,
but then you can, of course,
also read Patrick Wood's books themselves to come up to speed on what technocracy
is and why it is an important.
If not determinative, but certainly an important factor in what is happening
on the global geopolitical chessboard right now.
It is not about the dragon bear versus the U.S.
Anglosphere, so much as it is about a guiding ideology that animates both sides
of this two-pronged conflict, or every side, if you want to think of it as a
multipolar world order.
So how do we start situating Greenland and what is happening there in the context
of this story of technocracy and the desire of a few to rule over the resources
in order to ultimately control the global economy?
Well, we don't have to go far afield to find the answer to that.
We can go to a handy dandy and very important research article from Global Research
at globalresearch.ca. It was posted up late last month.
It is by David Skripik and it is Greenland, Donald Trump, technocracy and the
globalist new world order.
And this is a voluminous, very interesting and well-written article.
I suggest you read it in its entirety, but let's just drill down on it. Who is David Skripek?
As a pilot who frequently traveled to Greenland while serving in the Canadian
Armed Forces, I can say with assurance that Greenland is already fully integrated
into the American Empire's network of strategic possessions and has been since the early 1950s.
And as he goes on to point out, yes, in his own, even his own personal experience,
let alone his research, it is certainly the case that America already has a
very dominant strategic foothold in Greenland.
And so the idea that this is about some sort of we better secure Greenland before
the Ruskies get to it rings untrue, shall we say.
So why the sudden focus on Greenland? Well, David writes, aside from rich and
largely untapped natural resources,
huge, unproven and unexploited oil deposits, potentially 7.3 billion barrels,
natural gas reserves estimated to be anywhere from 50 trillion to 150 trillion
cubic feet, and extensive mineral deposits, there is, I believe,
one other main reason for this sudden attention being paid to Greenland.
Namely, Trump is being leaned on to annex Greenland by certain highly influential
individuals who contributed handsomely to his second presidential election campaign.
These men, namely Elon Musk, Howard Lutnick, Peter Thiel, and Sam Altman are
now in a position to steer the president in whatever direction they desire for
the purpose of fulfilling their primary goal.
They are chomping at the bit to form what is known as the North American Technate,
the linchpin to a full-blown and ultimately worldwide technocracy.
And he goes through just the short bullet points of what is technocracy,
where did it come from, etc. He highlights this 1940 map of the Technate of
America and then goes on to talk about the multi-pillar map.
Globalist New World Order. We've all heard about the multipolar World Order,
that those valiant bricks are spearheading right now and is going to be the
savior from this American-led bad old World Order.
We're going to get the multipolar New World Order. Yay.
Well, in contrast to that, David Skripek talks about the multi-pillar globalist
New World Order, a globalist New World Order vision, in which five pillars hold up a square canopy.
And that canopy represents the technocracy, the overarching ideology,
which of course is the system itself.
And each pillar of this globalist New World Order is supporting that canopy.
So what is David's vision of
this? How does it work? What does Greenland have to do with technocracy?
These are good questions. So I asked them to David Skripik himself.
As your readers and listeners will know, whenever we're dealing with a geopolitical
situation like this, there's always an economic dimension to this, to any situation,
be it World War I, World War II, any conflict, especially Greenland.
We have to look at the economic dimension, then we get the full picture.
So, as we already discussed, okay, there's a military dimension.
Now, the economic dimension is there's incredible sums of oil.
Some estimates are 7.3 billion barrels of oil, possible reserves in Greenland.
There's 50, depending on estimates, 50 to 150 trillion cubic feet of natural
gas that is yet to be explored in Greenland.
The mining resources, the rare earth minerals, as they call them,
especially in the southern point of Greenland,
there's a massive mine called Tanbrize in the southern tip of Greenland.
That's where vast sums of zirconium, cryolite, tantalum.
These are all important minerals for if you would like to have a cell phone,
if you want to make a computer like the device we're speaking to right now,
if you would like to manufacture F-35 fighter aircraft.
These are key, key mineral deposits, which Greenland has in abundance.
So that is my, I wish to posit that, that is my belief that that's what they're
really going after. Now, the rhetoric that we're hearing from Washington,
from Donald Trump's regime, it's just rhetoric.
It's a way to put maybe pressure on the Danish government to say,
well, look, why don't we just get to the table and let's make a business arrangement?
Because we already have our military bases there, but we need mining rights
to get out these incredible resources, not to mention iron ore.
I didn't mention iron ore as well.
Greenland holds vast amounts of ore. So the benefits are clearly there.
So maybe this is just a tactic that the Trump regime is using to pressure the Danish government.
Let's sit down at the table and let's come to agreement because there is a movement
in Greenland that is seeking independence to move away from the kingdom of Denmark.
Greenland is a part of the kingdom of Denmark. So that will not bode well for
Uncle Sam and the American empire.
So that's where I think it's really going to the crux of the matter here.
I completely concur with that assessment, and I think people fail to realize
the importance of things like rare earths in this new scramble of neocolonization,
whatever is happening in the Arctic right now.
There's a lot of a lot of different factors that make Greenland actually a strategic location.
But beyond that, we don't even have to think about the current struggles or
whatever may be taking place on the geopolitical chessboard between U.S.
And China and some of these other players.
We could travel back to the past. And I note that in your recently published
global research article, you reproduce the 1940 map of the Technate of America,
which of course comes from our old friend Howard Scott,
the charlatan behind Technocracy Inc.
Tell people about this map and what it shows about where we are heading as America
starts to consolidate North America into a single security unit.
Yes, that's right. So we have, like we discussed, the military aspect, the economic aspect.
Now, what better way to get this economic aspect than to bring it into the North
American technique as envisioned by the technocracy movement?
In a nutshell, as your listeners will know, technocracy is the distribution,
organization, and control of all of the world's resources for the benefit of a very few.
And since we're discussing in our economic aspect resources,
what better way to try to get all of Greenland's goodies into the North American technique?
And that holds true as well. We're seeing events in Venezuela.
Venezuela has vast amounts of oil resources that would fit very well into the technique.
So we are already, Venezuela's coming into the orbit. Greenland is going to be next in the orbit.
Cuba doesn't obviously have much to offer in terms of resources,
but it does have sugar and other natural resources on the land,
which also will be incorporated.
Sadly, that will be the situation. I think sometime in this year,
Cuba will collapse and will be absorbed by the Pax Americana, by the American Empire.
But overall, when we look at the Technate, the
1940 tech native North America that fits perfectly Greenland
you can clearly see is is in that map so
is cuba uh so is puerto rico and
another dominican republic the latin america is in there and the northern tip
of south america and that that's what i believe is is the grand picture that's
all being formed yes russia has a presence in the arctic and clearly because
of where they're geographically located,
but will Russia, and Russia knows exactly that the American military presence
is there in Greenland, so they're not going to all of a sudden start a war for
that, but that's the two-dimensional aspect.
Three-dimensional chess, it's a whole different ballgame.
They're all in on it, they're all on the same team, and they all want these prizes.
This is exactly right. And this is something that sometimes gets lost in the
geopolitical analysis.
Yes, there is a 2D chessboard. There are players who genuinely are seeing the
game that way, but there is the 3D chessboard.
And once we start to understand the technocracy ideology that is guiding not
just the United States and Washington, but basically every of the major players on this table,
we start to see a very different idea of what this struggle or presumed struggle
for dominance is really about.
Yes there is technocracy which is about securing resources
so that they can then be stewarded over and doled out
by the wonderful loving technocrats to the
population or at least that's what they want you to believe but really
it is about consolidation of resources within geographical domains
that were mapped out the better part of a century ago and
are literally there sitting there on the map and we
are seeing that come to fruition so in that
regard it poses a very different view
of the world than the one posed um by certain geopolitical
analysts who talk about the multi-polar world and we're moving
into this you know bricks versus the nato type
of situation um as opposed to that you propose something called the multi-pillar
globalist new world order can you explain what that is yeah because uh i i one
one time was a true believer in the multi-polar aspect until the scamdemic of 2020.
Once the scamdemic started to roll out, I started to realize, wait a second.
Why is every single government marching, as the Rockefellers would say,
in lockstep, implementing exactly the same dystopian protocols,
one country after another, after another, after another, including China?
Beijing is fully in on it, including Russia. Moscow is in on it.
South Africa, all of Europe, Mexico, Latin America. So that's when I started
to realize, wait a second.
And that to me, this pandemic was kind of a litmus test to see,
OK, who's on board with this globalist agenda? Who is not? Clearly, they were all on board.
So when that's when I came up with an idea, I'll try to explain it to somebody
because they were always asking, OK, David, but what is the deep state?
Is the deep state the Rockefeller syndicate? Is it the city of London? No. Is it the Pentagon?
No. Is the World Economic Forum or the Council on Foreign Relations?
I say, well, it's basically all of the above.
They're all working together to hold up, as I would call it,
the globalist one world new one world government canopy.
So all these nation states are, as I described, pillars.
We have five important groups that are supporting this pillar of the globalist one world agenda.
And that's the way I try to explain to people so they can envision a structure
that's holding up this canopy of globalism.
And so you have in the center, you have with Pax Americana,
the American empire, which is seated in the center, holding up this canopy that
has all of these globalist organizations emanating from it.
You have the UN, which is donated on Rockefeller land. You have the World Economic
Forum, even though I know it's based in Davos, Switzerland, but.
It's tied to the UN, which is based in New York City, and all of its offshoot organizations.
And, of course, then you have the Council on Foreign Relations,
which forms a center pillar, which is very important to dole out the policies
of whatever Neocom think tanks are trying to think about.
And all these other organizations. So that's in the center pillar.
And, of course, you have the American military industrial complex,
which is very important because should a nation state decide,
well, no, we're not going to play by this game anymore.
We want to chart our own sovereign course.
That's when the American military is useful. That's when they will then bring
Venezuela or whatever country, Libya, under the heels of the,
again, bring it into the canopy of the one world government.
Then, of course, we have in one other corner, so that's in the center.
We have in another corner, we have the United Kingdom with the Commonwealth of Nations.
As we could see during this pandemic, their protocols were absolutely vicious,
the way they rolled out everything.
And that emanated, all started in Mother England and then went all throughout
the Commonwealth, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc.
So that was formulated from that corner. And then in another corner,
we have the European Parliament.
Which is modeled, the system of the European Parliament is modeled after the
Soviet system with no democratic oversight.
Members are appointed. They're not elected by anyone in the European Commission.
Most of them are bankers. So it's great to roll out any dystopian nightmare.
And of course, the five key objectives for this to work is, of course,
digital biometric ids thought crime
laws in canada were labeled as hot
hate crime laws but the same meaning so thought crime
uh carbon credit system social credit
system and of course digital central bank currencies
so some nations have really implemented all
five of those objectives to create the technate
uh the perfect technocracy technate for example
china which is another pillar and its influence
or sphere of nations that it controls for example
right now as we speak China's trying to help Vietnam to develop a central bank
digital currency for Vietnam so that's how it's starting so they're in charge
of that sphere so China is now already a full technique all five objectives
have been met and then in another corner we have Russia.
Under Vladimir Putin.
They're rolling out everything as fast as possible as well. Central bank digital
currency, it's all being rolled out.
They don't have a real social credit system yet or carbon credit system,
but I'm sure they're working on that.
They don't have an actual hate crime in the books or thought crime laws in the
books, but they don't need that.
Because if you do criticize how Moscow is conducting the special military operation
in Ukraine, well, the FSB will be knocking at your door.
So indirectly, it's already been constructed.
And then so that I believe I've covered all there, the EU, China,
UK and European Union. So those are the five pillars that are supporting this
one world globalist government.
But the pillars need a solid foundation to stand on.
None of what I've just described for the past 10 minutes would be possible if
it was not for the financial monetary system of the world.
That's all the central banks, the Bank of International Settlements,
the Bank of England, the United States Federal Reserve, et cetera,
et cetera, and all of their banking institutions. Without the help of the central
banking establishment, none of this would be possible.
If you pull the BIS out of the equation, all the banks, all the money,
the entire structure would collapse in a matter of days.
But that's unfortunately, that's where we are right now.
Once again, that is David Skripik, the research associate at the Center for
Research on Globalization at globalresearch.ca.
And I will once again recommend that interested parties read his article,
Greenland, Donald Trump, Technocracy, and the Globalist New World Order,
for more of the bones of what we fleshed out there.
But I think you get the point. This multipolar global world order that is much
ballyhooed in certain geopolitical circles is better described as a multi-pillar
globalist world order that is coming into view,
that is being propped up by all of the parties playing their part in this gigantic charade.
And that is not to say, of course, that there is no two-dimensional aspect to
what is happening here, that there is no rivalry or jockeying of position between
the various factions within this multi-pillar globalist world order.
Surely there is, and many of the people involved in the nation-state apparatus
of these various pillars of the globalist world order no doubt do believe themselves
to be virtuous nationalist warriors fighting for their particular nation-state.
But as usual, we have to keep in mind that the people at the very top of the
power pyramid do not identify with the nation state structure that they dangle
out before us as the one totalizing answer to this puzzle of what is happening
on the geopolitical chessboard.
But having said that, this is an hypothesis, and like any hypothesis, it is open to testing.
Evaluation, and reinterpretation, as need be, as different data come along to
either bolster or to go against that hypothesis.
So let's see if we can test this with what is happening in the real world right now.
Is there a multipolar, genuine struggle for dominance going on between distinct
areas of the geopolitical circus? Is there a U.S.
Anglosphere order that's competing against a BRICS multipolar order led by Russia and China?
Or is there some degree of collaboration and a broader agenda to implement technocracy?
How can we possibly adjudicate this question?
Well, why don't we look back again at that map of the technate of America as
proposed by Howard Scott back in 1940 and how that maps onto or fails to map
onto the current geopolitical reality of the U.S.
National security doctrine and what is actually taking place on the grand chessboard and.
Let's see if there's some correlation there that might point to the fact that
this is a deeper explanation of what is going on, not just in Greenland,
but in other points around the world.
So let's turn to an observation that was made on a recent edition of the Cognitive
Dissidence podcast by Hervoye Morich of Geopolitics and Empire,
who points out that, yes, in fact,
when you map the U.S.'s current geopolitical ambitions onto this Technate of
America map from Howard Scott, But it points out exactly what we see taking place right now.
Technically, Greenland is tectonically part of the technate.
It's because Greenland is part of the North American tectonic plate, which I find funny.
And then just my trends again, this is a little peek for my paid subscriber material.
But you notice the trend. Like, given the work that we've done on CDE the past
months, the trend continues of the formation of the tech name.
When we talk about Venezuela and all that in Mexico.
So I have a Mexican friend of mine. He works somehow related to law.
And he doesn't believe. He believes that the Mexican government is going to
do whatever Washington wants.
And we're seeing that so far. He doesn't think we're going to see, like, a war with Mexico.
And the most recent examples you had
FBI apparently acting on Mexican
territory which is against Mexican law and Scheinbaum says oh la la la I don't
know what's going on it didn't happen because there was this Canadian he was
a former Canadian athlete you know that story Ryan something Canadian athlete
who was running drugs in Mexico so the FBI breaking Mexican sovereignty.
Scheinbaum doesn't care then you have Scheinbaum being forced to cut off oil to Cuba.
Doing whatever Washington wants. Then the cartel transfers. They've done like
100 cartel members, shipped them off to America.
Apparently those are illegal according to Mexican law. Yeah,
what was that about? I couldn't.
The U.S. says we want these cartel guys and Mexico just sends them.
And apparently that is against Mexican law.
And so they're doing whatever the empire wants. And then goes to Colombia,
which I was, this was crazy. I just saw this story.
Gustavo Petro is going to meet with Trump a few days before that.
But Colombia is doing narco cleanup.
They just got like half a dozen Colombian narco cocaine cartel members.
So it's like you said, OK, Colombia is doing whatever Washington wants.
Costa Rica just got a new kind of like MAGA-ish technocratic right wing president.
There you go. Costa Rica is falling into line. The Panama Canal ports,
right? They just ruled against the Chinese, the Hong Kong company.
That's falling into line. Venezuela is privatizing its oil sector now.
Wow, that's falling into line.
And here's the story from CNN, U.S. planning CIA foothold in post-Maduro Venezuela.
So then when you talk about Greenland, it's just kind of like.
It's all coming together. Once again, that is Hervoy Morich of geopolitics and
empire.com speaking on a recent edition of the Cognitive Dissidence podcast.
So I will throw that link in the show notes, along with absolutely everything
else discussed and or shown here on today's podcast at CorbettReport.com slash Greenland.
So you can start going into in more in greater detail the specific items in today's podcast.
But having said that, I hope people understand what is being presented here.
There is a Cold War 2.0 that is taking place and taking shape right now.
We are seeing the outlines of a grand geoeconomic slash geostrategic slash geopolitical
struggle that is manifesting in a number of ways in various places,
including the Northern Corridor, and for a number of reasons,
including the control of resources.
But this is not being done in the service of a two-dimensional geopolitical
agenda in which nation states are competing against each other for national self-interest.
This is part of a much, much broader agenda.
Idea, an agenda that is being shaped by an ideology, the ideology.
The guiding ideology of technocracy.
And that is being implemented in country after country all around the world, including in Russia,
including in China, including in the United States and the UK and Japan and
Taiwan and Scotland and everywhere else on the geopolitical chessboard.
Because as I have had cause to point out many times before and will no doubt
many times again in the future.
This is a struggle of the ruling oligarchs against you and me and everybody
else. This is not about nation states and national interest.
This is about a ruling oligarchy that is consolidating their control over the
geopolitical chessboard and trying to recruit us to be pawns in their two dimensional fights.
Yes, there is jockeying for position that goes on within this multi-pillar globalist
world order, but it is not a straightforward two-dimensional chess match as
is presented in the mainstream propaganda establishment media.
Anyway, there's plenty of food for thought in today's episode and much,
much more to explore in the various
links that I will be linking up at corbettreport.com/greenland.
So I invite you to explore that information on your own time.
And please do report back to headquarters with other pieces of this geopolitical
puzzle that you find interesting.
And as always, Corbett Report members are invited to log on to corbettereport.com
and leave your comments in the comments for today's podcast.
I'm looking forward to seeing your feedback on this and exploring this subject
in much greater detail in the future. But that's going to do it for today.
I am James Corbett of corbettreport.com thanking you for investing your time
in today's exploration.
The deep state,
false flags 9-11 truth,
the federal reserve secret wars and hidden histories,
fake news medical martial law ceaseless propaganda,
James Corbett. Reportage: Essays on the New World Order. Available where books
are sold. Until they're not.