Hi, James Corbett here, CorbettReports.com. By now you know and you love Reportage,
Essays on the New World Order, and you have your copy, a paperback copy,
or even perhaps a hard cover edition of the book from ReportageBook.com.
And maybe, if you're so linguistically inclined, you might even have a German
edition of the book, or a Romanian edition of the book, or maybe not.
Well, at any rate, of course, you can find the book at ReportageBook.com.
I will throw in the link to the German and Romanian editions in case you're interested.
More translations on the way. But long story short, of course,
Reportage Essays on the New World Order is out and available for purchase.
And I would like to now announce, finally, after a very long wait,
the audiobook edition of Reportage is now available at reportagebook.com.
Please go to the website for more details about that. It is an audiobook,
an unabridged, complete reading of the entire book by yours truly,
myself, James Corbett, as well as a foreword written and narrated by Whitney Webb.
So if you're interested in checking that out, please go to reportagebook.com for the details.
But in honor of this momentous occasion, I thought I would share
something regarding the book with you guys. You might remember that back in
May, I had a book launch in Osaka.
And at that book launch, the people who were there physically in person to help
me launch this book into the world got to see a little visual treat,
specifically a visualization of part of one of the essays that video editor
extraordinaire Brock West whipped up for the occasion.
And now I would like to share that visualization with you.
Specifically, this is a visualization of the end of one of the essays called
Biotech Billionaires and GMO Doomsday.
And that is one of the longest and most comprehensive essays in this collection.
Of course, there are 20 different essays on various different topics.
But in the Biotech Billionaires and GMO Doomsday essay in particular,
I talk about the creation of the biotech industry, the GMO giants that are seeding
the global food supply with their GMO monstrosities.
I talk about some of the scientific studies talking about the health effects
of the glyphosate and other associated products that go along with such monstrosities.
I talk about the suppression of that scientific evidence. I talk about the creation
of the GMO seed cartel and how it has cartelized the global food supply.
And towards the end of the essay, I
talk about the Svalbard GMO doomsday
seed vault that has been carved out of the icy tundra
out there in the arctic and why is
that being done who is it being done by for what purpose
and most importantly of all i conclude
by talking a little bit about what we can do about this agenda because that
is perhaps the most important part of it all we do have a part to play in this
so this is episode 489 of the corbett report podcast the secret of the doomsday
seed vault i hope you enjoy.
You're listening to The Corbett Report.
The convergence of corporate, philanthropic, governmental, and intergovernmental
interests promoting GM crops around the world can be seen in the bewildering
array of research institutes, industry associations, and consultative groups
that have invaded this field.
They include the Rockefeller-founded International Rice Research Institute,
the Rockefeller-Monsanto USAID Brainchild International Service for the Acquisition
of Agrobiotech Applications, the Rockefeller-Ford World Bank-created Consultative
Group of International Agricultural Research,
and dozens of other bland and benign-sounding organizations set up for the sole
purpose of creating and popularizing GM crops.
Through the combined efforts of public and private groups in funding and publicizing
GM research, the GM cartel has succeeded in sowing its synthetic seed all across the planet.
One sign, if any were needed, that the ultimate aim of this cartel may not be
benign is the Svalbard Global Seed Vault.
Like something out of a James Bond movie, the Seed Vault is carved into the
side of a mountain on a remote archipelago halfway between Norway and the North Pole.
And, as the Vault's own website informs us, it is designed to store duplicates,
backups, of seed samples from the world's crop collections as the ultimate insurance
policy for the world food supply.
Specifically, the permafrost and thick rock of the arctic tundra are meant to
ensure that the seed samples will remain frozen and preserved even without power,
meaning that the Vault and its contents will survive in the event of a worldwide disaster.
The vault contains more than 1 million non-GMO seed samples from all over the
world and has the capacity to store as many as 4.5 million varieties of crops within its icy walls.
It is administered by the Crop Trust, an organization founded by the aforementioned
CGIAR and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, along with the Rockefeller
Foundation, DuPont Pioneer Hybrid, Syngenta AG, and a score of governments,
UN-affiliated organizations, and other corporations and foundations.
So, what exactly is the Crop Trust? Long story short, in 2001,
the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization adopted the International Treaty
on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, shortened to the Plant Treaty,
which aims to improve global food security by making it easier for scientists
and farmers to obtain and use seeds and other plant material for crop improvement,
research, and training.
The treaty created a mechanism called the Multilateral System to make 64 valuable
food crops available in an easily accessible global pool of genetic resources
that is freely available to potential users in the treaty's ratifying nations for some uses.
To help it reach this lofty goal, the governing body of the plant treaty entered
into an agreement with the Global Crop Diversity Trust, a.k.a.
The Crop Trust, An international non-profit organization charged with raising
and dispersing funds to preserve crop diversity, to provide tools and financial
support for gene banks worldwide, and to conserve gene bank specimens ex situ.
That is, buried in the side of a mountain in Svalbard's icy Arctic tundra.
Until 2012, the Crop Trust was chaired by Margaret Catley Carson,
a former president of the J.D.
Rockefeller III-founded Population Council, the American Eugenics Society by another name.
Her connections prove that no matter where you turn in the realm of genetics,
you always end up back at the doorstep of the same elitist, eugenics-obsessed
families and the corporate oligopoly they have nurtured into existence.
What on earth are the eugenicists preparing for with the seed vault?
Why does humanity need a backup of millions of seed varieties that have presumably
been around, for the most part, throughout human history?
What kind of environmental catastrophe could possibly contaminate the gene pool
to the point where we need to repopulate the earth with heirloom non-GMO seeds?
The answers you receive to these questions depend, as usual, on whom you ask.
The Crop Trust itself has offered some scenarios that appear to justify the
existence of the seed vault.
There are big and small doomsdays going on around the world every day.
The Trust's former executive director, Marie Haga, told Time in 2017,
genetic material is being lost all over the globe.
To which one property manager in charge of overseeing the vault's day-to-day
operations added, it is away from the places on Earth where you have war and
terror, everything maybe you are afraid of in other places.
Two years earlier, in 2015, the Crop Trust announced that the Svalbard Seed
Bank had had its first-ever withdrawal that year after a gene bank in war-torn
Aleppo was damaged by the U.S.-backed terrorist insurgency in Syria.
At the time, Crop Trust spokesman Brian Lainoff opined that the withdrawal actually
serves as proof that such a vault is necessary.
More recently, the case has even been made by the Independent that the vault
is required to protect the world's genetic heritage in times of global catastrophe,
like the raging COVID-19 pandemic.
Who knew that COVID was such a threat to crop diversity?
War? Terrorism? COVID? True, geopolitical turmoil and natural disasters do present
a threat to crop diversity in various locales.
But these threats alone could not be the real reason that the multi-billion
dollar foundations and NGOs behind the gene revolution are creating a disaster-proof seed bank.
No, there must be something more than these concerns to explain their obsession
with repopulating the Earth with heirloom non-GMO seeds in the wake of a worldwide catastrophe.
The only logical conclusion is that the very eugenicists who have spearheaded
the genetic engineering of the food supply are aware that their Machiavellian
machinations threaten life on Earth to such an alarming extent that a backup
of the natural world may be needed to one day reboot the planet.
Our first reaction to this sobering information and its implication might be to panic.
Then, a feeling of helplessness might set in, causing us to simply cave to the
seemingly unstoppable GMO takeover.
After all, how could there possibly be a solution to an agenda as meticulously
planned, massively funded, and monumentally overwhelming as this one?
It has been suggested that governments should be lobbied to institute national
bans on the planting or cultivation of GM crops.
Yet, given that these national governments are increasingly ensnared in a web
of international treaties and organizations, the FAO, the WHO,
the UN, the World Trade Organization, the Plant Treaty, the Crop Trust, etc.
And given that these organizations and agreements are themselves tied into the
biotech agenda through groups like IRRI and ISAAA and CGIAR,
it seems unlikely that individual nation-states will be able to buck the onslaught
of the multi-billion dollar, multi-decade,
multinational agenda of the agribusiness giants for very long.
On an even more fundamental level, though, the answer to bad science is not
to ban science any more than the answer to hate speech is to ban speech.
Giving governments the power to ban, or by implication,
permit, this or that field of research is to assign the power over the future
direction of society to the very eugenicists and corporate fatcats who control
the legislatures of each nation-state.
Certainly, by all means, we should be engaged in whatever efforts we can to
stop state funds from underwriting this type of research.
But lobbying for laws to ban the research altogether would almost certainly backfire.
The ban hammer may strike in the direction we want, banning GM crops,
for example, but it may just as easily swing in a direction we don't want,
approving GM crops for cultivation.
And, given the resources at the disposal of the GMO-crazed eugenicists,
It is difficult to imagine how we citizens would ever win that political fight.
So then, is there a way to stop the scourge of GMOs from taking over the planet?
Thankfully, that isn't a rhetorical question. And thankfully,
the answer is a resounding yes.
In fact, it has already been demonstrated that we can win this war by employing
one of the simplest weapons at our disposal. The boycott.
Let me explain. Pozolac is the trade name for Monsanto's genetically engineered
recombinant bovine growth hormone, RBGH, which is injected into lactating dairy
cows to increase milk production.
In 1993, Pozolac was approved by the FDA for use in the dairy industry despite
warnings from medical researchers about the potential dangers it posed to humans
who consumed the milk from cows treated with these injections.
The milk from Posillac-treated cows was sold unlabeled, despite being chemically,
nutritionally, and pharmacologically different from non-treated milk.
Not only did the RBGH milk contain significantly higher levels of the cancer-accelerating
hormone IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor,
than does regular dairy milk, but it also contained pus and antibiotics from
the mastitis caused by the use of the drug.
Multiple FDA insiders were warning in the 1990s that safety data about the RBGH
milk was being manipulated by compromised FDA staffers to help Pozolak pass
the agency's approval process Nonetheless,
and unsurprisingly the approval went ahead anyway Equally unsurprisingly the
whistleblowers who raised these concerns about the process were forced out of
the agency and their testimony was disregarded.
But the suppression of this data did not stop there.
In a case made famous by the 2003 documentary The Corporation,
two investigative reporters at a Fox News Channel affiliate television station
produced an expose on the RBGH scandal.
After Monsanto put pressure on the network, their story never erred, and the two were fired.
By 2004, however, the public had begun to become informed about the issue,
and consumers began to put massive pressure on stores to stop selling RBGH milk.
This movement scored success after success with major national retailers,
including Kroger, Safeway, Starbucks, and Walmart, and producers,
including Breyers, Burn Dairy, and General Mills,
agreeing to stop selling or producing milk from cows treated with artificial growth hormones.
Today, RBGH milk, once nearly ubiquitous across America, is a rarity in the dairy section,
This change didn't come about through sweeping government action It didn't come
about through violence or coercion Instead,
it came about when consumers educated themselves about the problem Put pressure
on the producers to address the problem And continued that pressure until their
demands for RBGH-free milk were met.
Granted, the overall struggle against GM foods will not be won as easily or
as straightforwardly as it was in the specific instance of RBGH.
Yet, we can take the kernel of wisdom found in the story of the struggle against
RBGH milk and plant that kernel in the rich seedbed of the struggle against GMOs.
Because it is within our power as consumers to reject products that we have concerns about,
whether on health or safety or moral grounds there is really no one else to
blame but ourselves for the fact these GMO foods are so prevalent on our plates today,
it is our responsibility to know what is in the products we are eating and to
withhold our support from the companies that are using genetically engineered
ingredients in their products.
Thankfully, technologies are coming online that will make coordinated consumer
action against GMOs easier than it was even a decade ago.
The BuyCot app, for example, promises to allow users to join the buycotting
of non-GMO products, that is, to commit to buying only certified non-GMO goods,
and also to join a boycott campaign that targets producers of GMO products.
An organic consumers group on the Bycott website has organized a pro-GMO or
pro-right-to-know campaign that lists 243 companies to either avoid or back
based on those companies opposition to or support of GMO labeling laws.
Of the million-plus members of the Bycott site who are voting with their wallets,
more than half of them are signed up to champion the GMO labeling campaign.
Other initiatives include the Institute for Responsible Technologies Non-GMO
Shopping Guide, which lists thousands of consumer products that have been verified as GMO-free.
There's also the no-tech solution to GMOs, guerrilla gardening.
This approach encompasses a wide variety of actions, from growing food on your
own land, to participating in a community garden, to sourcing organic food from
local producers via the local farmer's market.
If all of this sounds like a lot of work, it is.
If it sounds like the switch to 100% non-GMO foods will be a gradual process
of weaning yourself off of certain products and sourcing appropriate alternatives, it will.
If it sounds like there's no one to blame but ourselves, if we don't start taking
these steps towards securing a non-GM world for our children, there isn't.
In the end, we can't directly determine what happens in our neighbor's house,
let alone what happens in other countries or on other continents.
But the buck stops where it has always stopped, at our own kitchen table.
For the most part, we still have the freedom to choose what we eat and what we won't eat.
But unless we start taking that freedom seriously and treating it as the grave responsibility it is,
the gene revolution just might be the planet-wide disaster that makes the seed
vault in the frozen tundra of Norway a necessity.
The Deep State,
False Flags 9-11 Truth The Federal Reserve Secret Wars and Hidden Histories,
Fake News Medical Martial Law Ceaseless Propaganda,
James Corbett Reportage Essays on the New World Order Available where books
are sold Until they're not.