Tag: political philosophy
Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol” – FLNWO #22
 |
On this edition of Film, Literature and the New World Order we are joined by Roderick Long of the Austro-Athenian Empire blog to discuss Charles Dickens’ classic, “A Christmas Carol.” Is Ebeneezer Scrooge a model of the modern libertarian, or is this image a distortion of what it means to be libertarian? Join us for this very philosophical examination of the ghosts of Christmas past, present and future. |
Interview 875 – The BFP Roundtable Debates Anarchy, Socialism and Libertarianism
What is anarchy, anyway, and why would anyone want it? Is our political potential circumscribed by “human nature” or is “human nature” an artificial construct designed merely to reinforce the status quo? And who will scrub the toilets in an anarchist society? Tune in to this heated edition of the BFP Roundtable for the answers to these questions and many more.
Episode 259 – Meet Adam Curtis, Establishment Contrarian
The Power of Nightmares. The Century of the Self. Pandora’s Box. All Watched Over By Machines of Loving Grace. If you’re familiar with the alternative media, you’ve doubtless come across references to the documentary work of Adam Curtis. But besides the well-known examples of brilliance within Curtis’ work is a deeply doctrinaire strain that seeks to normalize mainstream history and convince us that the driving ideologies of the political elite are exactly what they say they are. Join us today on The Corbett Report as we deconstruct Curtis’ documentaries and look for the deeper meaning behind the globalist ideology.
Episode 245 – Slaying the Mythical Winged Unicorn Beast
We are enslaved in our minds by the most pernicious of creatures: one that doesn’t even exist. Join us today on The Corbett Report as we go in search of that mythical beast called government and imagine a world in which we simply stopped believing in it.
Corbett Report Radio 195 – Central Planning Sucks
There is a school of thought which believes that our society would be better off if its decision-making processes were centralized in the hands of an elite few technocrats (or, better yet, computers). In their view, we will be better off when questions over resource allocation, production and investment are answered by recourse to data and equations, without regard to the fundamental market institution: money. Today on the program, James explores not just why this idea is fundamentally wrong, but why it is fundamentally dangerous.
Recent Comments