Smashing the Lies With 9/11 Truth

09/13/20167 Comments

Thank you for your help in spreading the word about the 9/11 Suspects series. Christine Todd Whitman is now issuing her first (non) "apology" in 15 years, just days after the release of the Whitman suspect video. Can we get any other responses?

9/11 Suspects YouTube playlist

9/11 Suspects audio podcast + hyperlinked transcript

Whitman admits she was wrong to call Ground Zero air safe after 9/11 attacks, report says

Journalist Swarmed by Cops, Arrested for Asking People About Tower 7 on 9/11

The Corbett Report on Patreon

Filed in: Videos
Tagged with:

Comments (7)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. host-addison says:

    James, your videos did a greater service for social-amalgamating the facts of no-Arrests and who is person w what factuality debased! Some dust did remain because the measurements were not made, therefore not concise appraisal for a trace of anxiety yet to be found floundering in dust-Catharsis.

    As we know, every jet-airliner has a balancing need. That ballast of balancing is approximately 1,000 lbs. per aircraft. The replacement of flight #175 w a military craft of approximately same size, would also have to have ballast. That would be 2,000 lbs for WTC #1 & #2, for what I would point whole hand at EPA, since they’re not entirely a spokes-person oriented association. Thus, not-so-depleted uranium-238 (NSDU-238) which is 60% fissile matter was also suspended into the dust and thermite smog of microns until extinguished. Not reported, but highly proponent to maintaining the line of george-Enron protecting his gHW Bushwhacky father from “highway of Death” arrest– known for the worst death from nuclear-Molecular: weapon #1 233,345 crispies.

    I would believe that NSDU-238 had to have contaminated almost all areas of micro-Dust, especially the millions of tons: steel.

  2. Collin says:

    Thanks James, as usual, you air much needed insight into how the efforts of distorting history and continuing the programming, are mindlessly pushed.

  3. VoiceOfArabi says:

    Hi James,

    Thank you for the huge amount of effort you have put into the 9/11 “smashing the lies” this year… it made a difference…

    Off course, it hit me like a sledge hammer, even though i was aware previously that “some” USA Gov dept had something to do with it.

    Off course, this also brings me to a realization i have never had before, mainly because i live in a dictatorship. The Most Powerful element in all this is……. THE PEOPLE ….

    THE PEOPLE (as a collective), are more powerful than any government or dictatorship out there, and it was proven again and again all throughout history, with many examples that shows when the people WAKE UP, they are able to MAKE A CHANGE.

    I can list many people who attempted to WAKE the PEOPLE UP in the last 50 years or so, but they all failed, either killed or had no access to the masses… for the first time in history, you are able to reach the world via the web… will the PEOPLE WAKE UP??

    I don’t know the answer, but i know that I am awake now, in fact, fully awake sitting up and asking the question, “What is NEXT?”

    No doubt, many PEOPLE are in my position around the world.. and the simple answer is, we need more PEOPLE AWAKE, so our job is to spread the word. Those “suspect” videos are ideal, as they are short, and factual.

    Finally, I want to ask you and everyone reading this their opinion on Susan Lindauer? I have stumbled over her video and it appears to be factual, especially since i am aware of middle eastern details. She claims to have prior knowledge on 9/11 via her boss, so he should be a suspect. How come she is not more visible?? here is one of her videos

    Once again, thank you James…

    • Octium says:

      My opinion on Susan Lindauer is she has an annoying habit of mixing Internet memes and hearsay in with what she has personally witnessed. That wouldn’t be so bad if some of the memes she talks about turn out to be easily discredited with a few minutes of research.

      George Bush holding “My Pet Goat” upside down in the classroom on 9/11 is one example.

      I do believe she is telling the truth about the things she has personally experienced and that the bits of misinformation are not deliberate but rather an aspect of her personality. Sibel Edmonds by comparison is a lot more carefull and smarter about what she says in public and is careful to separate facts from speculation.

      For that reason I would not recommend her to people that are new to 9/11 research but anyone who has been at it for a while and has the knowledge to separate the wheat from the chaff should read her book (Extreme Prejudice). Even it is just to learn a bit about how the Patriot Act works in practice.

  4. thoth52 says:

    Your video “9/11-Follow the Trillions’ summed up the financial reasoning for the 9/11 debarcle. After watching literally 100’s of hours of 9/11 analysis I have yet to watch a video or read an article that confirms my suspicions why WTC7 was demolished.
    Here is my answer to this question. WTC7 had a ‘bunker’ on its 20th floor (I think that location is correct)that included a complete ’emergency media braodcast centre’ as well as bullet proof windows.
    It is clear after examining in minute detail that there were NO PLANES at all! The rather inept editing of the ‘imaginary planes’ was done from the media centre in WTC7 and then passed out to the 5 television broadcasters in the USA covering the event.
    WTC7 was then demolished in a controlled fashion using thermite charges which is quite obvious when viewing videos of this event. The media centre and the accompanying ‘evidence’ was then reduced to dust.
    Ask then mayor Guilliani about this…

  5. rrandor says:

    Has anyone confirmed/disproved Judy Wood’s contention that the buildings were brought down with energy weapons?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top