Comments on: Sibel Edmonds Answers Your Questions on Gladio B

By: Colin Green

Colin Green — Wed, 21 Jan 2015 06:03:14 +0000

Hardly surprising that the fire of enlightenment is absent in so many, when the wood cutter’s need for wood is somehow obstructed by the forest in front of them. A sad state of affairs indeed.

By: casual observer

casual observer — Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:44:47 +0000

I don’t recall such an election either, I am simply making the point that 5 of the past 6 articles here have been all Gladio, this is James’s site & he can publish what ever he likes & I am drawn to the site for probably the same reasons as you however I also consider reader’s comments to be a good indicator of interest, I think there are other interesting stories out there that James could write an article on, that’s all…

By: RobinHood77

RobinHood77 — Tue, 02 Dec 2014 18:18:13 +0000

I also disagree with Casual Observer.

I don’t recall electing anyone as “readership” spokesperson.

I find his comments about Sibel, offensive.

I for one am VERY interested in what Sibel has to say and agree with Hermetic that “There is a lot of information to digest here” and it takes time to ponder on it.

Through understanding the Gladio B program I think we can better understand the STRATEGY of the POWERS THAT BE, whereas if we concentrate only on the current TACTICS, we might miss the bigger picture.

The world needs this information.

So please, James and Sibel, keep going.

By: Corbett

Corbett — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 23:53:02 +0000

At this point let me just remind everyone that one of the only rules for discourse in the comment section is to refrain from personal attacks, so let’s keep this to a discussion of Gladio B and its importance.

By: casual observer

casual observer — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 14:50:54 +0000

sorry – if that was for me I don’t get it, please elaborate?

By: Hermetic

Hermetic — Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:50:23 +0000

I have to disagree with what you’re saying, and I am a little weary as to why you’re saying what you’re saying. I feel as if this is some of the most important information we have in understanding the direction in which the monster of NATO will be stomping forward into the future; it is information like this which can be used to string together all the geopolitical pieces of this incredible puzzle.

There are a few reasons that come to mind when asked why members are not responding to this article: 1) This is a transcript, and I feel as if people may rather watch the video format instead. 2) There is a lot of information to digest here, and a good amount of general grammar to be learned before being able to ask questions; my own situation, I know there’s much more research I need to do before I am able to start asking questions.

Yes Sibel is a good looking lady, but can we please move beyond that and focus on the content of the discussion instead?

By: kris weston

kris weston — Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:25:51 +0000

the word plum comes to mind for some reason

By: kris weston

kris weston — Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:22:48 +0000

fbi/cia – tomato tamaytoe, theyre all fascists.

By: casual observer

casual observer — Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:06:04 +0000

I’m a member too & accept that “just because people dont post comments doesnt mean they dont watch the videos” if they can, but members comments could be considered a good indicator of their interest in the subject nonetheless, the MH17 story had 240 member comments, this story has 0 (content related) so far,

By: macburns

macburns — Sun, 30 Nov 2014 02:13:59 +0000

She was actually an FBI, not CIA, translator, and yes her work is very valuable and revealing. I expect the vast majority of subscribers here are also focused on what she has to say and on what she has shown us about her experiences. I think this is as far as the crumbs will be tossed to Mr. Observer..