Interview 1668 - Iain Davis Dissects the Pseudopandemic
Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
Iain Davis of In-This-Together.com joins us to discuss his new book, Pseudopandemic: New Normal Technocracy. In this conversation Davis lays out the copious documentation demonstrating how the pseudopandemic was generated, identifies the larger agenda behind the push toward implementing the technocratic biosecurity state and talks about what we can do to stop this nightmare from becoming a reality.
Watch on Archive / BitChute / Minds / Odysee or Download the mp4
SHOW NOTES:
Interview 1543 - Iain Davis on COVID-19, LOKIN-20 and the Death of Statistical Sense
Pseudopandemic: New Normal Technocracy
Clinical use of PCR testing totally discredited by the Whooping Cough pandemic that wasn’t
Belgian flu commissioner explains how to sell a pandemic to Chatham House
A State of Fear by Laura Dodsworth
Absolute Zero: The Global Agenda Revealed
WHO Chief warns of "infodemic" at Munich Security Conference
Are You Prepared For The "Infodemic"?
Filed in: Interviews
Subscribe
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it.
Dear Mr. Davis,
Thank you so much for your hard work to enlighten us on an important aspect of the universe.
I would like to make a suggestion that I think you will benefit from, and that is to drape a sheet on your blinds before you begin doing a video. This should diffuse the light so the sun does not shine in your eyes and the audience does not see sunlines across you.
Well, at least there was no dangerous disease.
If the public woke up now, everyone could rejoice about that!
…
Before understanding what the government really is and that a dangerous disease would have been the lesser evil.
To the members of the global death cult, that is actually the worse news imaginable, after having invested so much into this hysteria they would not let go of it easily. I think that’s the most important aspect that really needs to sink to understand the amount of work that is before us.
Some will never come back from this.
However, the silent majority will.
The true Coronazis will still praise Fauci and Schwab even when all the crimes are finally exposed and brought before the tribunals. Some people never stopped believing that their Führer was totally the good guy, either. I personally knew people like that whose brains were apparently broken by what they had done and what was done to them. Men who lost more than their limbs in Stalingrad.
Well, maybe this Milgram experiment will end before everything is ruined.
The true history of our past century has never been clearer for anyone willing and able to look at it. It need not be repeated.
Corbett speaks on bridging the gap between knowledge and action. So what stimulates people to act? Information. More specifically, knowledge and understanding. So, for those inclined to spread reliable information that counters the mainstream-constructed version of reality, this may be one of the most important things that can be done.
I thought the words of the philosopher Alan Watts were applicable to this situation. As Watts writes in his book “The Wisdom of Insecurity”, referring to a mental struggle with anxiety and awareness, The question “What shall we do about it?” is only asked by those who do not understand the problem. If a problem can be solved at all, to understand it and to know what to do about it are the same thing. On the other hand, doing something about a problem which you do not understand is like trying to clear away darkness by thrusting it aside with your hands. When light is brought, the darkness vanishes at once.
This really rings true to me.
For those who have already awakened to reality, action itself is a powerful motivator for those watching. Lead by example. When one person understands the situation and takes action, other people will notice and follow along. If you are living your best life, having fun, being free, etc., this will have a big impact on those on the outside watching.
“So what stimulates people to act? Information. More specifically, knowledge and understanding.”
Wrong. Information is irrelevant. People are motivated by fear, pain, and threat of reprisal.
I too admire Alan Watts enormously. But allow me to suggest that you’re missing the key clause in Watts’ sentiment that you quote: “If a problem can be solved at all, to understand it and to know what to do about it are the same thing.”
The fact is, not all problems can be solved at all. The “problem” of the liquidation of humanity is one that can’t. That is why nobody can think of a solution to any of this. There simply is no solution. The human mind, and human society, have been decoded, hacked, commandeered, and stripped of all defenses, by an indomitable intelligence that humans aren’t even capable of comprehending, let alone opposing.
[Prove Me Wrong, Children. Prove. Me. Wrong.]
Excellent observation. I agree with you. I’m keen to experience the solutions as described about Jesus Christ coming with great power and glory to smash it.
“Trust the Plan,” I suppose.
All optimists have to latch on to one fantasy or another.
I still have faith in you, just as I still have faith in Richard Dawkins. You both know too much, perceive so many things which are verboten to acknowledge, to not come to an acceptance of the reality you claim to not see. You only have to stop saying NO, you only have to stop claiming He’s not there.
🙂
I have pretty much reconciled my outlook on the world with the reality that St. John’s visions appear to be coming true in totality, and the “End Times” prophesied about for over 1900 years are now here. 2029 will be 2000 years from Christ’s Resurrection and Ascension. Coincidence?
As I’ve said before, I was convinced we were almost assuredly in the End Times when Bruce Jenner was put on the cover of Vanity Fair as a “woman.” COVID-19(84) has confirmed it.
The Second Coming of Jesus Christ will come only after the most unimaginable horrors, a Hell on Earth not one of us can humanly fathom. “And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened.” Matthew 24:22. Many Christians are deluded, as well, in regards to believing they have/had no role in being the salt of the Earth, since they falsely believe they will be “raptured” out of the way before the horrors arrive. Our rulers had their agents foist that lie through the usual methods.
My objective for the recent past has been, “save as many as you can,” both in regards to avoiding the Clot Shot / Stroke Poke / Harmful Armful (or as I call it, the Liquid Idol), as well as developing the required relationship with the Only Begotten Son of the Almighty, Jesus Christ, before our personal earthly ends come.
Sorry, but I’m neither as defeatist nor negative as you are.
You write: ” The human mind, and human society, have been decoded, hacked, commandeered, and stripped of all defenses, by an indomitable intelligence that humans aren’t even capable of comprehending, let alone opposing.”
I think you give the “PTSB” far too much credit to say that their “control” is a done deal, or even that “my mind” or anyone’s is hacked, decoded…. There is plenty we still do not understand about “consciousness”.
Here is an interesting video about the nature of consciousness, ranging from insects who seem able to recognize themselves in mirrors to Humans who drive across town, commit murder, clean up the mess and drive back home again, unconscious the whole time. Also the risks we face as we start playing around with brain-to-brain interfaces and Liu etc. “neural lace” (widely recognised after Elon Musk’s Neuralink venture was announced)…..
It raises questions of, what is human consciousness, or in other words, what makes us human, and where are we on this technocratic road to a trans -human future, etc…
Peter Watts: Conscious Ants and Human Hives
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4uwaw_5Q3I
Is there not a higher self that connects to a universal reality, mostly filled by concepts and dimensions we don’t yet even understand. They are often rationalized in religious or spiritual terms, or totally rejected and ignored by materialists? But, don’t you thing it’s a little bit arrogant to suppose that “we know all the answers”.
Personally, I have faith in humanity and our individual conscious capacity, otherwise I wouldn’t be struggling for a future or truth.
arbuckle, thanks for the thoughtful response. (It’s a veritable Watts-Hop!)
I’m glad you watched that Peter Watts talk. (I posted it in another thread just yesterday!) The point Peter Watts was making is that engineers and biotechnologists are dangerously close to achieving brain-networking capabilities that my very well dissolve all individuated consciousnesses (and all the identities that are dependent on those individuated consciousnesses) into an undifferentiated hive mind. (He argues that he would just as soon retain his individuated conscious mind, thank you very much!)
I submit that what Watts warns of is precisely the ultimate vision of the now-ongoing program to infuse the masses with injectable hydrogel. The shots currently being administered (to everyone including children) will create an irreversible link between their nervous systems and the 5-/6G spatial web. To put it in simplified terms, it is conceivable that once the world government has achieved maximal uptake of the brain-hijacking hydrogel, all those multi-panel-array “5G masts” can be activated simultaneously, instantly wiping away all individuality and free will in the injected Masses, and enslaving them to the inhuman Will of a Machine. (Any holdouts who refused the “vaxx” will then be hunted down by the zombified hive-horde.)
You say “I think you give the ‘PTSB’ far too much credit to say that their ‘control’ is a done deal, or even that ‘my mind’ or anyone’s is hacked, decoded”
I perceived clearly that humanity was check mated in Spring 2020, when I saw masses of people lined up like prison-slaves, obediently wearing fear-muzzles and standing at some arbitrary distance from each other, because of an invisible “virus” (ghost/spirit/demon) that the TeeVee told them about. Nothing that has happened since has suggested I should modify that assessment. All we’re seeing now is the equivalent of the figurative “King” being knocked over and set upon by all the victorious chess pieces. You and I may have ducked and dodged to date, but in the aggregate, humanity is done. There’s no coming back from mass contaminated blood.
“There is plenty we still do not understand about ‘consciousness’.”
There is no “we” in the grand sense. You and I don’t know shit. But there is an inhuman Intelligence at work that is clearly capable of manipulating the entirety of humanity with the same ease and totality with which a team of scientists can manage bacteria in a petri dish.
Have you got any evidence to support your 5G theory? I’d love to see it.
I think 5G is much more mundane. It has massive bandwith meaning it can have many more concurrent connections than previous protocols. This means every device will be able to sync to the cloud in real time.
Everywhere you go, everything you do and everywhere you drive will be tracked and you will be taxed per mile.
This is my understanding of 5G, being an invasion of privacy more than a mechanism to physically direct people.
I don’t see how that would work scientifically, unless people are implanted with a brain chip that works with wi-fi technology. I don’t see people signing up for that. You would need a nano chip that had the ability to migrate to the CNS and find the part of the brain that controls behavior. I just don’t think “they” have the capability to do that with humans yet.
“I don’t see people signing up for that.”
The hydrogel in the Covaxx is the first step. Hydrogel, or “neural-lace” can invade the central nervous system without being directly injected into the brain. That’s what all the exotic “nano-lipid-particle” and so forth is for. People will be increasingly injected, knowingly or not, with nano-technology that can deliver payloads of bio-digital infrastructure to any part of the body the Machine wants to target. Any time a new delivery platform is developed, the news just needs to say there’s a new variant, and therefore a new shot.
Sheeple don’t have to be told they are being injected with a brain-machine-interface-enabling device! They just need to be told they are getting “medicine”!
Don’t you even watch the news?!?!?
FC,
The hydrogel biosensor is 3mm that I read about here https://thefreedomarticles.com/hydrogel-biosensor-darpa-gates-implantable-nanotech-covid-vaccine/
The lipid nano-particles are smaller than that. So these particles would have to migrate via the blood stream and assemble in the CNS and know exactly where in the brain to go before they could work.
Perhaps they are working on this type of thing and might even have a prototype, but I would be shocked if they really had this thing up and running. Plus, there’s so much that isn’t known about our brains in all the individual variation and plasticity. I just don’t think remote controlling humans is possible at this point in time and maybe not even in the future.
I don’t doubt they are working on this tech and that the weird experimental injections are to condition people to modification, but I have serious doubts that they could pull that off. Maybe I’m in denial but I don’t think they are ever going to develop a nano particle that can migrate through the blood stream into the brain that assembles and works exactly they way they want it to.
Yes I agree with you: 5G is primarily about real-time surveillance.
I was just trying to suggest a simplified sketch, using an image people have actually seen irl, of what a wireless mass brain-hack could look like. For a full-on animated representation, see this predictive programming/Revelation of the Method in a child’s cartoon: https://www.bitchute.com/video/HmzwyhJKMZ1q/ (The control antennae even look just like 5G masts! Go figure.)
This full-on puppet capture maneuver, though, I expect will be further down the road, as the military-control-grid infrastructure gradually moves into 6- and even 7G. I’m just looking further toward the horizon, and skipping the inevitable intermediary steps, like total surveillance, CBDCs, etc., that will serve as precursors to the Mass Mind-Meld.
But my hypothesis about the ultimate Mass Mind-Meld is based, as Mr. Corbett often puts it, on the “Logic of the Technology” itself. As you say, 5G as-is is capable of tracking “devices” in “real time.” There is no question that the intent is to move the “device” in question into the body itself, in an injectable, implantable, or grafted form. The massive amounts of delirious research and writing from the establishment on the “inevitability” of brain-machine interfaces is no secret, so it only stands to reason that the injections and implants will be intended to commandeer, to the greatest extent possible, the central nervous system of every Herdster. The Peter Watts presentation under discussion here is a stark alarm of what the ultimate implications are for syncing injectable devices to the spatial web.
(NB: I carefully avoid using the expression “cloud” for the spatial web because the “cloud” as it exists now is NOT–as the expression deliberately implies–some kind of decentralized meta-database or -server. Quite to the contrary, the “cloud” as it is is merely a fanciful name for an even more centralized server, that just happens to be off-site. Nine times out of 10 that server is Amazon Web Services, which just so happens to host the NSA and CIA architecture. But that’s perhaps a topic for another thread.)
Such a nattering nabob of negativity you are.
Some people come here for truth research, others for “fact checking” and such. There’s no point in wasting time on that crowd. They’ve chosen their “hobby” and wish to cheer on the NWO from the sidelines while, at most, pretending to care about millions of children abused today by tyranny.
continued:
“Is there not a higher self that connects to a universal reality, mostly filled by concepts and dimensions we don’t yet even understand.”
Maybe, maybe not. But notwithstanding some kind of metaphysical “connection” to this plane of reality, you and I are inescapably bound to this plane of (material) reality. Any higher planes are by all appearances completely apathetic to the processes ongoing in the material realm. (In fact, I would posit that, if anything, those higher forces are by all appearances hostile to humanity, and are complicit with the ongoing liquidation.)
“don’t you thing it’s a little bit arrogant to suppose that ‘we know all the answers’.”
Again, there is no “we.” You and I are struggling even to make sense of a tiny, insignificant corner of the monstrous “universe” that we inhabit. Nonetheless, there is clearly at least one Intelligence that also inhabits this material plane of reality, yet possesses capabilities that dwarf those of humanity. It understands humans far better than humans understand themselves, It has guided and manipulated the course of human history to this very point…and now it is harvest season.
“Personally, I have faith in humanity and our individual conscious capacity, otherwise I wouldn’t be struggling for a future or truth.”
As is your right. Just remember, though: Hope Is Not a Tactic.
Thanks for your considered reply. (by the way “we” refers to humanity.)
You write ” Nonetheless, there is clearly at least one Intelligence that also inhabits this material plane of reality… It understands humans far better than humans understand themselves, It has guided and manipulated the course of human history to this very point…and now it is harvest season…”
I respect your “belief”, but it is just a belief, like any other. Mine are a bit different.
I sometimes imagine a lost driver, stopping at the river at the bottom of my garden and asking an amoeba, swimming by with its flagella, the right road to take to Lisbon….
Well why not, the amoeba are only separated from us humans by a few million years of history, which in relative terms is just a short flash in the pan.
Yes, I know its a stupid story but, what it tries to show is that the amoeba’s life and existence in its complex environment evolved a suitable motility ensuring its survival for millions of years. The human and his environment is far more complex, or so he believes.
Unlike the amoeba the human body and the conscience that it has is made up of billions of differentiated, cells, chemical compositions, parasites, electromagnetic impulses, etc.. working in an amazing synchronicity, whereby 1+1 does in fact equal 3. In other words we can understand the parts, but their relative interaction is a never ending mystery far beyond the sum of the parts.
No, the amoeba dose not need to know the way to Lisbon to move or survive in his river. And humans may never know what some alien life form would like to know from him in a few million years from now.
What I do know now though, is that as a human I need to maintain my “unknown” part that makes the sum of my existence, that which makes me human, to carry on evolving for the next few million years.
It has nothing to do with “hope” and everything to do with “tactics” and chance. It’s a big river, it flows on and provides many environments which avoid technocratic predictors. Perhaps many amoeba get swallowed up because they don’t move fast enough or are unlucky and don’t catch a current that takes them far away. But pressure and change creates needs and opportunities that throughout history have always produced the best results, for the amoeba and humankind alike.
Fact Checkers and Hararis do not like “mysterious souls” and want only “hackable animals” and 100% materialism to explain it all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOsKFOrW5h8
Yet they cannot reproduce or fully explain human consciousness that way. Conclusion: If you do not know that you don’t know, you won’t achieve anything. Unless you wanted to provide some examples of doomer ennui. In that case, it’s been a success so far.
“I sometimes imagine a lost driver, stopping at the river at the bottom of my garden and asking an amoeba, swimming by with its flagella, the right road to take to Lisbon….
Well why not, the amoeba are only separated from us humans by a few million years of history, which in relative terms is just a short flash in the pan.”
This reminds me of a video I saw a few months ago
where two Spanish guys are driving in a car and slow down to ask
a bull on the side of a road which way to go to get to Bolonia.
The bull then turns his head to signal which way to go!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8QLgivorYQ
It’s not “defeatism.” It’s acceptance of reality.
You state: “Personally, I have faith in humanity…”
With all due respect, there’s your problem. I’m not a misanthrope, as I still believe in doing the right thing, “loving thy neighbor,” as much as is humanly possible as enabled by God’s Spirit, but I have NO faith in humanity, besides expecting the masses to remain stupid and deluded, easily manipulated. I do NOT subscribe to the “humanist” delusion that most people tend to be good, based on my intensive study of history, my personal and professional experience working with people, and the driving thrust of the Bible’s commentary on humans.
History has always been made by a minority, since the masses just don’t operate rationally, let alone truly altruistically. Humanity’s enemies understand this very well, and, as a very powerful and extremely well-connected minority, have accomplished most of their goals already through the sham “democracy” they preach to the masses. A system where every borderline mind is given equal weight to a literal genius who eschews the propaganda from Television and chooses to do the right and moral thing most of the time. Voters in such a system, even if the votes are honestly tabulated, are not actually making a free choice that they rationally think is the best course of action for themselves and their loved ones. In reality, the vast majority are just practicing herd mentality programmed into them, “blue” or “red,” “American” vs “Socialist,” and on, and on. Almost none of the masses can even think outside of the Overton Window, let alone act outside of it.
“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”
— Goethe
“Americaaaaa! F*** Yeah!” (rolls eyes)
Maybe you should study history more extensively then and actually read what Goethe & Schiller were all about.
You could start with Schiller’s Bürgschaft.
Or maybe Worte des Glaubens, since you like to pose here as Christian. Obviously, you are not. If you believed that humanity is divine creation, as said in the bible, then you’d be in fear of receiving your god’s wrath for all your blasphemy.
You are amusing.
Your assignment for the day:
1) define “Christian.”
2) define history.
3) define “blasphemy.”
4) define “true Scotsman.”
Why is it always the non-believers are self-proclaimed “experts” about who and what is a Christian?
How nice of you to try and give off assignments.
You really don’t have to.
Believe whatever you want but don’t make ignorant claims about “Jewish” world conspiracies and other such harmful nonsense. Educate yourself or do you, in fact, enjoy supporting an evil anti-human agenda? Either way is the mark of a defective personality.
“There is, he said, only one good, that is, knowledge, and only one evil, that is, ignorance”
https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0258%3Abook%3D2%3Achapter%3D5
LastHumanist:
“Believe whatever you want but don’t make ignorant claims about ‘Jewish’ world conspiracies and other such harmful nonsense.”
Do you write your own talking points, or did the ADL or SPLC write them for you?
What is “ignorant” about telling the truth about Talmudism and its adherents?
Why is telling the truth “harmful,” and to whom?
“Educate yourself or do you, in fact, enjoy supporting an evil anti-human agenda?”
What am I not “educated” on? Or did you mean re-educated?
Lying as you do about who and what is actually behind the destruction of humanity is what is truly evil.
“Either way is the mark of a defective personality.”
LOL – coming from someone too cowardly to face facts.
“There is, he said, only one good, that is, knowledge, and only one evil, that is, ignorance”
LOL – the wise man understands that wisdom, not “knowledge,” is the desired product of thinking.
scpat
“So what stimulates people to act? Information. More specifically, knowledge and understanding.”
factchecker
“Wrong. Information is irrelevant. People are motivated by fear, pain, and threat of reprisal.”
scpat,
For your Big question, here’s a short answer.
In one Tibetan model (which I’ve described here before & is my favorite guess), the flow of awareness/consciousness comes in a sequential recurring cyclic pattern, to wit:
0 emptiness
1 raw force
2 feeling (emotion)
3 cognition (naming of the feeling)
4 action (based on karmic law, or the resulting action is relative to the name given, it can take ten minutes ten seconds, ten years and more depending on what you chose for a name, like when people choose with “I do”,,,).
this pattern can occur on many time scales, and its why monks aim for “right speech” (to minimize karmic debt)
so in a way factchecker is right, fear & pain (stage 2) occur before we understand or know anything (stage 3), but fctchkr only alludes to the bottom end of the spectrum that we can feel. We are also motivated to act by respect or adoration or love of beauty;
I think the nanotech mob would like to takeover steps 2 and 3 to get their desired #4 result (slavery/control/power over stuff)
“on bridging the gap between knowledge and action.”
one definition of “wisdom” is “knowledge in action”
close that gap with luck laughter and abundant friendship
keep it light in the fight for your life and learn to love it
I can’t take anything from fctchkr in good faith.
I think his intention is to paint the current state of humanity as the ultimate Reality, when it is actually just an artificial reality, a product of social engineers.
Freud talked about id, ego, super-ego. Now, after a century of barneysianism that produced a society-of-wants, destroyed society-of-needs, people are transformed into ego, super-id, (mortally) crippled super-ego. This is not true nature of humans, a persistent deep-brain-massage is needed to keep them in this state with a side-effect of rising numbers of psycho-illnesses.
Just because the current state of affairs is the product of molding and manipulation by engineers doesn’t mean it’s any less real.
If I sculpt a graven image of Ba’al out of a stone, the stone no longer exists, even if my little Ba’al figurine is “artificial.”
However “natural” or “true” that stone was, it is gone, and it cannot be restored once it has been transformed into a new form, however nasty or unholy.
hahahaha
naughty, naughty boy, how did you find my comment in less than two hours, how imprudent…it’s not reply to you nor I used your nickname….spare me from bs regarding the above, things are obvious
Language is ambiguous, your playing on that in this instance is not an achievement.
Analogy you used is totally inappropriate. Sick people are not dead people, some die, some stay sick, some recover. You know, it’s a mystery of life….different from your machine dystopia.
You should see what restoration specialists can do with stones.
Even a carved one can be restored to its original shape.
However, idols of superstitious beliefs should be preserved and laid out before the public so that humanity may learn from prior mistakes of which ancient Mesopotamia has plenty of.
Check out their reliefs about how eunuchs were made.
Graphic stuff.
In the end, the chaos they feared and tried to evade by performing countless rituals still destroyed them.
When the coalition of the oppressed destroyed the Neo Assyrian empire’s palaces, for example, they even threw the live eunuchs into wells. Quite a lot of pent up anger manifested itself in violence. It was an evil empire, I’d say. Nazi Germany was, too. Does that mean everything about it was evil towards everyone all the time? No. It does not behove the inquisitive mind wishing to come to a greater understanding of these matters to pretend that ultimate good and evil exist in this world. Be objective instead and work with more refined definitions. How do power structures really work and how can conflicts be resolved peacefully? Understanding war enables peace.
There’s a reason for why Baal received negative connotations.
It’s the result of a process. A formation of consensus about ideas and events within a cultural context.
You are correct (at least for the most part). I am mystified that ANYONE still believes in the utter nonsense of “we just need to get more information to the masses,” and they will react in their own best interests. This completely ignores the history of propaganda and brainwashing. Yuri Bezmenov put to rest the nonsense about “more information” – once the brainwashing gets to a certain level, NO AMOUNT OF TRUE INFORMATION changes the target’s thinking (if any) and behavior.
Humanity’s enemies created psychology and psychiatry, and they remain masters of them. Maslow’s Hierarchy, and, as you succinctly stated, pain, fear, and threat of reprisal. Base instincts, which works for four-legged animals as well as bipedal “animals” (who are increasingly indistinguishable, cognitively, from the former) After all, that’s what humanity’s enemies look at us as, mere animals (cattle, including a certain term in Yiddish).
Defeating a problem or threat is always predicated on a correct understanding OF the problem or threat. That understanding is lacking among most, even those who believe they are “aware” or “enlightened.”
Most people who consider themselves “the resistance” denounce or at least do not advocate violent solutions because such solutions are “illegal.” This is understandable. However, as for me, I do not currently support violent solutions for a pragmatic reason: 99.8% of humanity simply do NOT understand the real problem. What would violence against a target, whether living or non-living, accomplish, if the motivation was rooted within the Problem itself, such as “anti-socialism” (right-wing) or “anti-fascism” (left-wing)? There is some reason to believe that our rulers actually want violence, at least the erroneously-targeted violence which would ensue if led by those part of the Problem and/or dependent upon the faux “reality” of this System? January 6th, while not truly a “violent insurrection” by any means, was a failure because those involved failed to recognize the Problem. The Problem was not “Democrats”/”Liberals”/”Socialists,” but the shadow rulers of this planet who gives orders to those Democrats/Liberals/Socialists AND THEIR “REPUBLICAN” “leaders,” including Donald Trump. The same leader who betrayed them – as should have been expected based on his history of lies and broken promises – after inciting them to totally in-effective action.
Personal, individual resistance – NO! – is the only resistance that means anything at this time. Of course, millions of individuals saying NO! in synchrony is getting noticed. NO testing, NO injections, NO masks, NO mandates. It won’t solve the Problem, but it will slow down their anti-human, anti-Christ agenda.
(continued)
I liken these indivudals to a dog chasing a car; even if the dog caught up with it, what the hell is a dog going to do with a car?
Regarding the things you label as useless, voting is certainly not useless. It’s a cult ceremony, meant to disempower and drive deeper the stake of mind control.
To that extent, I would not state that not voting is useless, either.
Protesting has an important role to shedding light on any given issue. The problem is, as alredy explained in detail, that people have no idea what they are protesting against or for.
If people were not so clueless, protesting could help swing over the gulllible. Various strata of people can have influence where others are not even able to show their face.
Petitioning the gubment is 100% useless. Probably the same can be said about relying on the “representatives” or the courts. Not to mention that for many it’s technically impossible to contact their representative as we don’t have one nor could we ever recognize their authority.
When I said something is useless, I refer to OUR needs, not those of our rulers. Most definitely, voting is very meaningful to our rulers; why else would they push “voting” at every possible opportunity? They self-evidently do NOT care about what we really want. If you choose to vote, you have your say, you “lost fair & square,” now “shut up and embrace ‘democracy’.” Voting is consent, and I do not consent, even if my consent is a joke to our rulers.
When I’ve been asked who my “elected representatives” are, I truthfully tell them, “I don’t have any; I don’t have enough money.”
beacon, this is a great comment and I am in strong agreement with almost all of it–especially your point about violent “uprising” being either futile or counterproductive because there is no suitable target of such hypothetical “uprising,” and there is no shared or consensual goal of any such “uprising.” You’re on-point there.
Let me just suggest one difference in thought about your point that “bipedal ‘animals’ [] are increasingly indistinguishable, cognitively, from [quadrupeds]”. To me it’s self-evident that humans aren’t being led to think like animals, but are rather being led to think like computers. No animal would be willing or able to self-regulate the distance it keeps from its fellows, or to don a bridle just because a glowing screen told them to. Animals instinctively fend off the approach of a dangerous, sharp object. Animals are visceral, unpredictable, spirited, and feisty. Current Year humans on the other hand are drab, repressed, numb, and compliant. Not wild, but programmable. They are completely disconnected from their material bodies, to the point they increasingly resent their own physicality and would just as soon retreat into a sterile VR pod.
I submit that the transformative process taking place is the ultimate purging of the animal spirit from humanity, in favor or a soulless algorithmic behavior set. Humans should have every instinctive impulse, welling up from our animal spirit, to recognize an injection as a threat and an injury to our bodily integrity. Yet, here we are, with the masses robotically lining up and “rolling up their sleeves” to accept a direct attack on their bodies. A long process of domestication, deceit and programming were required to convince the masses to “disable” their instinctive aversion to such weapons. Now, in the final push to extinguish the animal spirit from humanity, the Herd has been deluged with a pitched terroristic campaign of propaganda and punishment, to get them to accept injections not just in principle, but in routine, omnipresent practice. I submit this is the behavior of a fleet of mindless machines not animals.
Your points are correct. Not animals, but computerized automatons. “Non-Playable Characters” (NPCs) in the popular meme.
Yeah, “lesser” animals would follow their instincts when someone was trying to “help” them with poison. So my comparison was an unintended insult to animals.
The NPC meme is another one of these psyops designed to make “the enlightened” look down on their fellow men and women.
Out of curiosity, did you become a JewAnon on 4Chan or was your real antisemitism (as opposed to the mislabeled criticism of people like Soros and rogue states like Israel that the media is throwing around as antisemitism these days) already a family tradition?
I have met people like you in real life, too. My guess is that the shocking revelation of the real NWO conspiracy broke their brains and made them unable to think logically while also locking in their long-held but never really questioned biases.
I suppose, like Icarus, coming too close to the truth made their wings melt down. People like Gustav Landauer were better than that. Who cares about the Jewish background?
Personal merit, or lack thereof, comes from what is said and done. Nothing more, nothing less.
“NPC” is an excellent and apt metonymic shorthand for “normies” in our particular mechanized, computerized techno-tyranny. Sort of like “sheeple” of the past, but loaded with far more symbolic connotation that conveys the peculiarly robotic way in which the masses now conform to the Signal.
My question is: how did you get so pozzed on the JQ? Did they beat it into you in “Schule,” the synagogue, Jesuit seminary, or college?
Israel a “rogue state”? I frankly can’t tell which side you’re on with such a wacky assertion.
The NPC meme is so popular among those who value the truth since it succinctly encapsulates the true nature of these vaunted “men and women” you imply exercise the unique traits of human beings. They don’t. They function, as Fact Checker has correctly asserted, like computers – robots.
Oh noes, he accused me of “antisemitism.” LOL
The “poor, helpless Jews” meme has always been a lie for me, since both sides of my family actually dealt with Jews in the Old World. “Family tradition”? I guess you could call it that. Not that you are a fraction of a man of my forebears. Those of us of Ukrainian descent don’t spew and spew and spew, literally daily, about the Holocaust™ and the Kaballistic magic number of Six Million™ (which was seen in World War ONE, as well). Even though SEVEN million Ukrainians were slaughtered via engineered starvation by the Jewish Bolshevists of the USSR. But we do remember, and rather than spewing lies and hatred, we tell the truth, which, for Talmud Jews, is far worse!
Israel, a “rogue state,” LOL. Israel is EXACTLY what it was expected to be. It gave Jewry a state with which to increase its ability to wage war. Not against the Palestinians: against humanity. How many gangsters and other criminals have fled to Israel to avoid justice? How much of the control grid was created in Israel? It would have been much harder without a state with sovereign privileges.
Jews can easily declare allegiance to humanity by renouncing and denouncing the Talmud and all of its derivatives, including Marxism. Few can do this, since their identity is central to who they are. NOT “individuals,” but parts of a whole.
I looked up Landauer. Oh, the laugh I had. An “anarchist.” LOL
“[Landauer] was briefly Commissioner of Enlightenment and Public Instruction of the short-lived Bavarian Soviet Republic.”
Some “anarchist.” Decreeing what was “true” to the Goyim…I mean, proletariat.
While he was advocating an utopian (i.e., impossible) dream, at least Goyish Mikhail Bakunin offered a consistent, sincere philosophy, one I find very respectable, albeit unworkable outside of a small community of very like-minded folks (a very high trust society).
You should look up his take on Zionism.
He did not see the need for a Jewish state and preferred that Jewish heritage be merely a personal trait- a shared history.
He did not want a state of Israel that would run the Gaza strip as the largest concentration camp the world had ever seen. The state of Israel is, in many way, a successor state to Nazi Germany.
https://electronicintifada.net/search/site/nazi?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_llzusPAs3mjC8ii15JL6QrV6AhqM0lGDBd5n.UUUsJU-1634751773-0-gqNtZGzNAhCjcnBszQg9
I am and will always be on the side of humanity.
I’ll call out BS and injustice regardless of where it’s coming from. I have neither bias nor hatred towards anyone and act only as an arbiter and voice of reason.
My history in the educational system is vast enough to have surpassed it. I am free of its dogma and have listened to all the “arguments” of the “Jewish” world conspiracy which are easily falsifiable.
I have listened to people who claim to desire truth and freedom yet praise Hitler, only to fall silent when I put the overwhelming evidence of Nazi tyranny against them.
Have you ever truly questioned your beliefs?
I can prove to you, very conclusively, that you are wrong in your hybris and no better than any “normie”.
All we have to ask here is what a “fact checker” is.
The term implies that a singular entity can be a legitimate judge of whether a statement is true or false. Where could that legitimacy come from? This one entity would have to be in possession of full knowledge about objective reality, which I’d say denotes the things that exist regardless of our subjective will.
Naturally, that is not possible. It would require full perception and understanding of all that is and that goes far beyond what anyone can ever achieve.
Fact Checkers are not omniscient and their ability to understand reality is limited like that of a “normie” is.
We must therefore practice humility and pursue greater wisdom by opening our minds to all ideas and see whether they match with the evidence we have and logical thought.
If you can, for example, prove that the world conspiracy is “Jewish” then do so. We are all looking at the why, what and who of the NWO. However, I’ll not pretend that baseless attacks on minorities are part of this search for truth.
These are the perpetuation of lies that have brought harm on too many people already.
But I believe in freedom of speech and the concept of letting everyone speak to hear all the arguments and counterarguments in order to form a consensus that is the current “sum of our errors”. Audiatur et altera pars!
Man, I’m not sure whether to laugh or be woefully sad for you:
“I have neither bias nor hatred towards anyone and act only as an arbiter and voice of reason.”
—
Is this a lie, or a sign you are dangerously deluded” –
“I am free of its dogma…”
—
I’m all ears…please proceed to tell us you’re not just a politically-correct windbag:
“[H]ave listened to all the ‘arguments’ of the ‘Jewish’ world conspiracy which are easily falsifiable.
—
“I have listened to people who claim to desire truth and freedom yet praise Hitler, only to fall silent when I put the overwhelming evidence of Nazi tyranny against it.”
But you love to dismiss the much greater horrors of the Jewish Soviet Union, and even claim it was “antisemitic.” (LOL)
Hitler was a product of the wrongs of the aftermath of World War I, the latter which was engineered by the same elements which created and sustained the USSR. From an objective standpoint, Hitler was far less of a threat to the world than both Stalin and FDR (who forced Japan towards Pearl Harbor with his acts of war, with the ultimate objective to give a “reason” to get America to fight Germany to save “Jewish interests,” including the USSR).
—
“Have you ever truly questioned your beliefs?”
Routinely. I strive to embrace truth, not “be” a faux “truth.”
The more important question: have YOU? I mean, sincerely. I doubt it.
—
“I can prove to you, very conclusively, that you are wrong in your hybris and no better than any “normie’.”
Please proceed! I can always use more humor in my life!
No, you are just another one of those “edgy” Hitler apologists. What perverse satisfaction do you derive from your effusions over the death, destruction and totalitarian descend of much of my family? Does it please you to see generational trauma from total war, scorched earth and genocide?
There isn’t much out there as pathetic and lowly as that.
So, I’ll spend my time more productively.
Go read some Stürmer. Knock yourself out.
Every page has a reminder that “die Juden sind an allem schuld!” so that you are constantly confirmed in your bias and distracted from what is really going on.
“…much of my family”
Victim Card = PLAYED!
Hasbara intensifies.
LastHumanist, it would behoove you to do some basic algebra regarding the supposed 6 million. That’s not even the official figure put forward by Hilberg, 6 million is a rumor, nothing else. First mention of it, that I saw, goes back to new articles from 1890. The absolute reality of the matter is: the basic math does not sustain the official narrative, the same as with many other narratives.
beaconterraone,
Your mention of the holocaust in Russia is important because this did result in more deaths than the Nazi holocaust. It was horrendous, absolutely deplorable. It set the precedent for Hitlers regime. It is important to admit that people who call themselves Jews can commit atrocities, vile murders and torture, just like any other “tribe” can.
Yet, I don’t think that this necessarily means that everyone who is a practicing Jew, or who is considered a Jew is complicit or supportive of atrocities. It is wrong to transfer the hate of Stalin and his regime to other Jews, similar to how it is wrong to transfer hate of Germans, or descendants of slave owners in the Unites States.
As a person of Jewish decent, depending on how this is defined, I can attest to the fact that most of my Jewish relatives were not murders or conspirators. As far as I know, never attended Zionist meetings in Eastern Europe, but just wanted to live as citizens in general society. I think many of them were secular, even the ones who died. I was fortunate to have some relatives who escaped or else I would not be here today. I know that they had to wear a yellow star and did not feel welcome in Germany, similar to how people are being labeled “anti-vaxxer” now.
It is important though to recognize that no group of people is above depravity and also that it is important not to paint everyone from a group with the same brush.
The psychology of crowds does not mean that humans are necessarily mindless robots. Maybe some are pretending to be, but a lot of people are just afraid to speak up and fear reprisals.
Has a person who you thought was a mindless, masked, “hackable animal” ever surprised you?
I have been surprised on occasion in my work with the general public and have had to re-evaluate my contempt for people these days.
I think you are biased FC like everyone is.
Your assessment is correct. We are all different but equal in dignity and rights because of our shared humanity. I am human and I think nothing human (regardless of whether it’s good or bad) is alien to me.
“Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto” as Terence put it.
The bottom line is that I am not above anyone else and nobody else is above me, either.
Pretending that the masses are mindless automata is the dehumanisation that the vile masters of mankind desire because they truly fail to grasp human concepts.
We should pity, rather than fear them.
Mostly, we need to stop them.
I am constantly surprised at the totality of their mindlessness, and the irrational slavishness of their behavior.
Why are you constantly surprised about something you have apparently been observing for months?
Sounds more like you’re trying to dunk on the public here.
Not feeling very euergetic and energetic these days, I take it. It’s a rough time for us all. It’s not irrational for doomers to not even fight this attack on them once they believe in the “inevitable” Harari. They’ve merely been blinded by the shock and awe of the new world order they’ve been predictively programmed for through the media. I could not say how many people even know what’s real these days.
I’d guess that you don’t have Aristotle’s Prior Anayltics in your bookshelf, either. I’d recommend it. A statement can be true or false and it is the job of our logical syllogism to figure that out. Tried and true methodology.
Anyway, it’s a world of mass psychosis today. We all see that. Opportunities for improvement are thus everywhere.
Other “resistance”…
Voting – USELESS
Protesting with signs – USELESS
Writing letters/emails – USELESS
Filing lawsuits – 9 times out 10, USELESS
THEY control the “voting.”
THEY don’t care what you have to say or believe or want.
THEY control the courts, and only a tiny percentage of “judges” care about constitutions, laws, or liberties…and more often than not, not even about what is true.
Those are not the only reasons to motivate a person to act. Perhaps these are reasons to do something out of survival, or a task one does not want to do but must.
I don’t think every human is “hackable.” There is individual variation. But group psychology appears relatively predictable.
“Flying monkeys” are the only hackable animals. Be better than that.
https://reportingforbeauty.substack.com/p/ourpsychopathproblem
“Respectful dialogue is one of our most precious capacities. Nurture it. Tend it. Relish it. Test your ability to form cohesive and rational arguments. And when you can’t do so, ask yourself why. Where you are unable to find a rational argument against something, you can no longer dismiss it and maintain integrity – and this is the road to true integrity. The road to recovery. The now common suggestion that we can be ‘infected’ with bad ideas is perhaps the ultimate infantilization. The more you encounter different ideas, the more you can really know – and really test – your own. Please – genuinely challenge yourself with ideas that are uncomfortable. This is the responsibility of a humane being. Aristotle taught that the mark of an educated mind is to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.”
Fact Checker = sophist.
When you make an assertion, the burden of proof is entirely yours. Try proving that a problem — any problem — is insolvable. And be sure to let us know how that works out for you.
scpat,
That was an excellent post!
Profound …and simple.
I agree with HRS that your post is profound and straight to the point. In fact I think it was in the back of my mind when I wrote my own speaking of the merits of setting an example.
If you are living your best life, having fun, being free, etc., this will have a big impact on those on the outside watching.
The more I think about it, the more I think it’s the most effective if not the only solution to surviving ambient madness and helping others to do so as well.
scpat ,
“Information. More specifically, knowledge and understanding.”
Agree, particularly with “lead by example”. Yes, lead, since majority of people are followers, conformity is a fact and I don’t think this is bad in itself, certainly it is a backdoor for abusers.
Information is data-with-meaning. We attach meaning to data. Beside cognition we also use judgement. We judge something is good or bad, or this or that, we attach probabilities. Cognition helps to judgement, which at the end makes decision that is, when it really matters, ultimately based on individual’s values.
Judging this days is reserved for judges, experts, scientists, ordinary people refrain from it and prefer to regurgitate what they’ve got from “priest class” ….supposedly world and life is now to complex for plebs, yeah, imaginary information overload….
I think the main problem with people’s inability to judge is debasement of values. It seems to me like we are living in “beyond good and evil”.
I’ll go now full on materialistic (on top simplistic). Information, reasoning, knowledge, judgement helps fill brain neural-networks with rich connected patterns. More patterns, more connections, better functionality. Looking this way, the notion of information overload is total bs.
excellent!
Ian Davis: “you can shove as much information in front of people as you like, but if they are disinclined,,”
Iching: “pre-potent systems of arrangement”
,,in the beginning of the game all the back row is wiped out, nothing but foot soldiers on our side, some more footsie than others, but turns out weve got lotsa pawns. The black bishops have been claiming that they have most pawns captured, but when I’m out on a sortie it looks like they dont have what they claim, hard tellin’ not knowin’.
heres what eastern oz indigenous people are saying about the jab (the actual name of the mission near where the video was shot is called jabulam.,bad joke). They had a visit from the pushers about a month ago, I heard mixed reviews and then just received this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbQcQNhGUvs
Thanks vadoum,
A unique perspective was presented in the video.
Oct 17th
A message to all Original peoples across Australia and around the world.
(10 minutes or less)
This “disinclination” has roots, experiential roots.
I realized years ago that I could not convince persons who had lived in a city their entire lives that it was difficult, toxic, and disabling. They knew nothing else, and to attempt to explain the effects of a natural space or life they had never known gave them no reference. I also noticed in those years that there is an instilled fear of anything “wild”, which is a fear of their own innate nature.
I suppose that most of us here realize that many persons have multiple and unconscious fears. It’s not an exaggeration to say they are afraid of just about everything. The best method of communication that I’ve known for helping dissolve fear is humor, and comedy.
We need a Monty Python version of this entire insanity real quick. They hate being laughed at, and seriously, that stage-hand Schwab must have raided the costume shop and before they knew it…had taken over the stage.
Time for lights out.
An old popular meme kept repeating in my head recently: What if they had a war, and nobody came?
That’s pretty much the core of it, maybe.
Awesome info re: the pseudo epidemic of whooping cough at Dartmouth. That is very very strange to me, for I have a connection re: that institution and MD’s , and a specific mention of meningitis at one point. Astounding!!
The Gardasil trials were also done at Dartmouth. A big Ivy League stronghold there.
Thank you James, I’m eager to look into that document.
Thank you Mr. Davis. Are you aware of two science educational videos put out by the US govt in the late 50’s? One of them states unequivocally that there would be a flu-like, worldwide pandemic in 2020. This was published in 2020 by Deborah Tavares of stopthecrime.net. Also, these magnetic properties of the injections were already being experimented with as early as 49 years ago in Oregon. I met a woman, before these jabs came out, who showed me that a magnet will stick to an injection site she received from the school.
Their timing has a lot to do with astrology, I’ve noticed again and again.
Oh, lord, the video associated with State of Fear in this link is true evil. One hit after another. They knew that far back that at least 50% would die with intubation plus. And of course, never a mention of the reason for the increased incidences, which I would suggest can be seen clearly in the skies.
Right in the beginning of this they show how the microbiology was negative, yet the PCR test confirmed pandemic influenza. Catchy, that.
Clear thinking and articulate speaking is so therapeutic to listen to.
Disinclination to recognize hard facts.
It’s true that in the face of such deeply ingrained prejudices and delusional assumptions sprung from generations of meticulously cultivated fear
example would seem to be the only effective method of persuasion.
Giving the example of something better.
For the moment I need to continue concentrating on closing that gap between awareness and action
as this is perhaps the only thing I can do to keep my first two children from yielding to the pressure of getting the poison injection
and, more challenging still, dissuading my third from getting any boosters despite pressure from and the bad example provided by his father.
Man’s behavior is not dictated by logic, but perhaps more by imitation.
Giving the example would seem to be the best hope for humanity.
As people are disinclined to recognize information, Mr Davis’ book cannot reach anyone in my entourage (whose members are all definitely 89% doubly-injected, if not more, young and old alike); it can only offer informational and moral support to people like me who are
already fully aware of the dynamics of the global project to eradicate most if not all of humanity and help us evolve and clarify our own thinking.
It’s natural to be disinclined to recognize the end of the world and the onslaught of technocratic tyranny and murder,
so short of proving that it’s humanity’s only hope for survival,
we have to eloquently show there’re very wonderful alternatives.
This interview was very instrumental in bringing that home to me.
Without even having acquired your book yet, I’d like to thank you Iaian Davis and the Corbett Report for that, at least.
shall we composite a list of examples,
for your kids and mine and all those still uncaptured?
I’m not the most organised (re links et al)
but off the cuff:
Italian protests
French protests
romanian
english
australian
german
the 50% of LA nurses
the 45% of chicago police
the nurses in NL
the US military
the NBA stars (3 of which folded but Brooklyn stands strong)
the 700,000 vaers injuries reported which conservatively translates to 7 million
the 60,000 vaers reported deaths which translates to 1/2 million+
the isareli Drs now saying theyre having outbreaks of vx’ers getting sick
the texan Gov.
the simplest logic is that the testing and trialing hasn’t been done. the standards are 5-10 years, not 8 months.
(Theres stacks of other reasons to be sus, but theres no comeback that can beat that.)
&
“most adverse events happen in 1 to 2 years after the jab” (B gates)
&
healthy people are not at risk (whether this is bio weapon deployment or not), but more and more jabbed are.
&
what is the proof of “minimizing symptoms”. just like the poli vx claimed to eradicate the disease but the curve of incidence had well and truely come and gone before that jab was introduced. these people claim but cannot prove. They’re just sales reps and charlatans. delete the elite.
Then theres the excellent chance that double blind placebo jabs are being administered on a large scale as well.
Some are so stubborn they just refuse to listen before any conversation has started. Thats just ignorance (ignoring). The raw antidote/inverse is a wide open horizon: maybe take them to the desert to see the stars.
the simplest logic is that the testing and trialing hasn’t been done. the standards are 5-10 years, not 8 months.
This is the only argument that momentarily makes people’s eyes glaze over before their brains come up with (example from Saturday morning:) “I trust the science!”
I kid you not. That is what one of my Saturday morning students came out with verbatim.
Protesters they just find selfish and annoying. Statistics that don’t coincide with their worldview have “been manipulated”.
Then theres the excellent chance that double blind placebo jabs are being administered on a large scale as well.
I was praying for this to be the case and that my son had received such a placebo dose.
The raw antidote/inverse is a wide open horizon: maybe take them to the desert to see the stars.
Your idea of teaching people to change their mental and physical landscapes and to wonder again at the stars might be a solution. Perhaps the only gateway to helping them fully grasp the scope and nature of the crime being committed against them.
NoSoapRadio,
I appreciate these examples which you give.
The examples highlight a “mind-view” or “mind-think” of many people.
For all of us here, the “mind-view” doesn’t make sense. Yet, for those unaware folks it fits nicely.
Your examples correlate with some of my observations.
— Saline Vials of Vaccines —
Some of the news agencies have reported about counterfeit or fake vaccines being sold.
Occasionally, I hear of people testing vials and finding a saline solution in some vials.
If the manufacturers were smart, they would include some saline solutions in their batches. It makes sense from a PR perspective. Their mission is to promote the vaccine, and to mitigate potential barriers to that promotion.
There is a lot of recent hype about Dr. Franc Zalewski, a Polish Scientist, who said that some of the vials he tested had a saline solution.
He also said that some other vials had odd components, such as Aluminum “Parasite” like structures.
I’ve visited his website and browsed some year old videos, but I don’t speak Polish and really don’t know what to make of the guy.
For now, I’m taking what he says with a grain of salt.
Vaccines under microscope – Dr Franc Zalewski – English script
(14 minutes or less)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/45rx8vafSfWS/
“— Saline Vials of Vaccines —
Some of the news agencies have reported about counterfeit or fake vaccines being sold.
Occasionally, I hear of people testing vials and finding a saline solution in some vials.
If the manufacturers were smart, they would include some saline solutions in their batches. It makes sense from a PR perspective. Their mission is to promote the vaccine, and to mitigate potential barriers to that promotion.
There is a lot of recent hype about Dr. Franc Zalewski, a Polish Scientist, who said that some of the vials he tested had a saline solution.”
Given that close to half the world is double-vaxxed and most haven’t dropped dead (just yet anyway) I am going to go out on a limb and say that a large number are in fact getting saline solutions.
And likely people are being given different potencies of the jab.
Heck here are notes inside the following Israeli patent paper written in March 2021,
discussing this strategy:
“METHODS AND SYSTEMS OF PRIORITIZING TREATMENTS , VACCINATION , TESTING AND / OR ACTIVITIES WHILE PROTECTING THE PRIVACY OF INDIVIDUALS”
Section 0400:
In some embodiments , the system is used to identify which individuals will receive which types of vaccines in relation to their potency . For example , individuals that received and / or were identified as a high super spreading score by the system would be vaccinated with more potent vaccines , when compared with other individuals having lower superspreading scores . In some embodiments , those individuals having lower superspreading scores might either receive later a vaccination or receive a vaccine having a lower potency .
That is very interesting. Thanks Fawlty Towers.
My gut tells me that some vaccines are intentionally saline.
But I want documentation from various sources.
I find it difficult to wrap my head around the fact that some folks have adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines, while others seem fine.
Of course, it worked that way with mercury in the vaccines…some folks could tolerate it, and some not.
The Stew Peters formula:
Four parts Truth…One part outrageous lie to poison the whole pot.
Fact Checker, Good phrasing.
That guy is a train wreck.
While I appreciate it that attention is drawn to certain issues and whistleblowers, he pollutes the environment.
Placebo injections taking place of a “vaccine” (or a vaccine) are immoral.
That made me laugh.
nosoap: (example from Saturday morning student:) “I trust the science!”
bridge that gap! “so which science is that?”
Youve just stated the science is 5-10 years, but the reply is “8 months is now the science”. these flea brained responses merit a gatlin gun of rosey scented questions. no gaps fire your questions at will (only rule is to remain cool friendly and open to being wrong)
8 months ffs!
somewhere someone would of chucked a hyperbolic half greek diatribe to spell some panel of “judges” into a rubberstamping frenzy, while “kaching” was all anyone was really hearing; all except for the quiet guy in the corner who knew how the real power would play out if only the dry leaves of deception would stay jostled together for long enough,,
suddenly,
a lion roared
nosoap: (example from Saturday morning student:) “I trust the science!”
bridge that gap! “so which science is that?”
Did that! Been tryin’ to do it for years. and years. With students I also try to remember to ask questions, as that is the name of the game; making them talk. Sometimes, unfortunately, I get carried away.
Appreciate the encouragement and advice though.
Really enjoyed that second part… I trust the jostled leaves blew apart…? Did anyone actually see anything or were the illusions hanging too thick like curtains before their eyes?
ever hear a lion roar? upclose? mgm’s pussycat is cute, but the real deal,, atomic bonding interference.
as for the jostle scatter and hung lusions,, (just now out of time: more to come)
There is not a single epidemic or pandemic that humans have ended via injections. Even when taking the mainstream science and medicine at face value, eradication of viral diseases still takes decades to occur.
Mass vaccinations of over 90% of a population in less than a year has been done numerous times in the past and did not result in eradication. In fact it often resulted in increase illness and death. This phenomenon was previously explained away by saying that producing too much of the same vaccine at once results in waning effectiveness.
To solve this problem, long term vaccination programs were created that provided updates to the vaccines and these programs were credited with eradicated diseases. It goes against decades of history to claim a vaccine program was only planned for one version of the injection but the unvaccinated ruin the plan. Every vaccine program is planned for multiple years with multiple updated versions of the vaccines.
Proof of minimizing symptoms is purely observational. There is no measured data on the specific immunity other than “antibodies” created. We have not been given any measurement on what the injection does to T-cell levels, T-Helper 2 cell levels, IgM, IgG, IgA, CD4, CD8, Interferon levels. Only natural immunity studies on former Covid patients have provided improvement in measured data in multiple different aspects of immunity.
Good evening Vadoum!
“most adverse events happen in 1 to 2 years after the jab” (B gates)
D’ya have a reference for that one? Did he really say that??
Hey HRS!
Actually Vadoum was the first to evoke the saline solution placebo jabs!
Now I’ll go check out your Polish guy!
sorry no link for that quote, I saw & heard him saying that in a recent clip, (promise), there are so many I cant keep track of it all plus live. But this will nudge me to be more organized thanks.
We are in a war of attrition (among many other aspects of warfare).
All of our protests inspire hope, but such hope is delusional.
Unless we recognize the Problem that is creating an endless stream of more problems, including total government schemes, and then apply targeted direct action to neutralize the Problem, we will simply be worn down, and down, and down. That was the real purpose of flatten the economy and the house arrest lock downs.
I suspect the anti-humans have something special cooked up just for us this Winter. Maybe a REAL pandemic. Maybe an EMP. Maybe escalation of the building “pandemic-related shortages” we’re seeing across the planet, which evidence shows is synthetic, by design. The cattle have raised their hands against the Master Race, and that cannot go unpunished.
Iain Davis is a good encapsulator, clear and sincere. This is one to be circulated.
That said, let’s be careful of opposing “talk” to “action”, as if we can’t or shouldn’t have both. There is no need to “move on” from discussion as if it were some kind of substitute for real solutions. What’s that all about?
If I had moved on from discussing the fakery and malevolence of the GPPP I wouldn’t have spent the last 53 minutes listening to Iain. Did he say some things I’d already heard? Probably. But it was good to hear it again anyway, particularly from someone of convictions.
Talk. Act. Walk. Chew gum. We can do it all.
Two hours after posting this video on YouTube, it got removed for violating YouTube’s Community Guidelines, it is a book review and interview with the author and it is in violation of their community guidelines.
It’s getting ridiculous.
Just accept that J*wtube is enemy territory.
Odysee is my recommended alternative for crimethink videos.
A community is what you make of it.
Plenty of JewAnon types and other crazies on Odysee, too.
In order to build a resilient community, you’ll need the thing you seem to hate the most in this world: good people.
Where they come from makes no difference. It’s silly to pretend that everything on Youtube is evil and everything on Odysee is great. That’s false for both the people and the content.
What matters is coming from the morally higher ground of love rather than hatred. Division benefits only a certain group that I’m not part of. I am interested in sanity and honesty and the credibility and respect that comes from integrity.
There’s that Jewish tactic again: accuse someone of “hate.” You don’t know me, and you have zero evidence from my posts here to declare who I “hate.”
Good people are wonderful. Too bad there are so few of them. Alas, yes, as a “humanist” you believe that humans “tend to be good.” Of course, the Christian perspective is the opposite. History shows, both Christian and secular, that when given a choice, most people choose the path of least resistance, which is corruption.
And then, another Jewish tactic: you are “dividing” us. And then follow with the cognitive dissonance of claiming to believe in “sanity” or “honesty” or “credibility.”
Telling the truth, even if one is alone, is integrity.
Asserting what actually is, not what one wishes, is honesty.
Your Red Herring about my stance on Odysee is juvenile.
I believe that humans are ambivalent and have potential for creation and destruction.
Many things are terrible/great but nothing is more terrible/great than humans.
[“polla ta deina kouden anthropu deinoteron pelei”
Soph. Antig. 332]
Is a “Jewish tactic” a tactic only Jews employ? Is everyone who employs it automatically a Jew? I do not think the Rockefellers funded the Nazis because they liked Jews much. I don’t see how the Rothschilds liked other Jews much, either, when they funded the Bolsheviks.
The state of Israel has been fairly hostile towards Jewish non-Zionists.
On the other hand, there are also Christian Zionists so the lines are blurred.
Judaism is not the religion of the world conspiracy and all who engage in the pursuit of power over others religiously are psychopaths first and foremost.
Upon closer examination, “the” Jews do not exist. Every human being is an individual first and foremost. Generalisations are therefore never helpful and always harmful.
Maybe follow your own statement and assert what actually is, then?
The MSM will point at JewAnons like yourself and discredit conspiracy realism that way. Why not be objective rather than obsessed about Judaism? It’s not nice of you to discredit the work of people like James Corbett.
I call them Jewish tactics since they were perfected and are most readily used by those who adhere to the Talmud and its derivatives. False witness, dissimulation, duplicity – all of them extending back to the “sages” of the “traditions of the elders.” Jesus Christ had such tactics applied to Him, so we must expect those of us much, much less noble will also be targets.
After all, who are the experts of the “anti-hate” industry? The quintessence is the ADL, which, far from being truly anti-hate, is an institution that spews hatred for all things not in accord with the interests of Jewry, including the truth. Even the facts about COVID-19(84) are classed as “hate” – the “Center for Countering Digital Hate” has taken a leading role against so-called “misinformation.” (and, yes, its leader is a Shabbos Goy).
I’m pretty certain at this point you are a member of the Sayanim. Arguing with you is the enterprise of a fool, if it weren’t for the fact others are viewing this. Hence, I’ll challenge your false assertions.
You assert yet another typical Jewish canard: claiming the Bolsheviks were “anti-Semitic.” LOL – anyone can review the actual history of the Bolshevists, and see that Jews were overwhelmingly “over represented.” Even Lenin was Jewish. Allegedly “anti-Semitic” Stalin retained as his right hand man for many years, one Lazar Kaganovich, a key player in the Holodomor and related extermination of unwanted Goyim. His blood sacrifice of my grandmother’s people is, admittedly, a key element in my insisting upon the truth about Judaism and Jewry.
Dissimulation: “Judaism is not the religion of the world conspiracy and all who engage in the pursuit of power over others religiously are psychopaths first and foremost.”
The twin pillars of this world system are finance and media. It’s not the Amish who created and control both of those monolithic monstrosities. The leading element was brought from Babylon via the Babylonian Talmud. And the Talmudic mind is what drives the “news” and “entertainment” media. The “products” dished out are not actually the product: the target of the programming is the product. The Talmud is a series of tomes chock-full of psychotic and filthy “thinking.” That mentality carried over to both its willing and often unsuspecting adherents. And via “Judaism for Gentiles,” Judeo-Freemasonry, tens of millions of Goyim have become valued partners.
The State of Israel and every Rabbi on Earth declare your statement that Jewry does not exist to be false. Jews can gain citizenship with Israel by ethnicity alone – “atheism” is a non-factor. And DNA tests are often administered. “Everyone is an individual” is a limited truism, but you dissimulate in claiming that destroys the anthropological fact that humans are community creatures.
(continues)
Yet more Jewish tactics from you:
“The MSM will point at JewAnons like yourself and discredit conspiracy realism that way. Why not be objective rather than obsessed about Judaism? It’s not nice of you to discredit the work of people like James Corbett.”
NO ONE in the liesmedia will dare publish, at least not without serious redaction and dissimilitude, anything I write here. They are obsessed with keeping the “poor, persecuted, helpless Jews” narrative alive in perpetuity. Pointing out what I note crashes the narrative for too many folks, even dullards.
As for me “discrediting the work” of JC, wow, that’s quite the whopper there. Only one person can discredit James Corbett’s work, and that’s James Corbett. His quality work stands alone. His principles of individual freedom, including allowing me to speak freely here, are clear. Only fools and liars would weigh JC’s work in comparison to my opinions (for someone who claims he’s all for “individuals,” this is amusing). It’s a bully tactic: “you don’t want to be associated with THOSE opinions, right?”
You are a manipulator, a skilled disinformation specialist.
I do not want to be associated with your opinions, no.
Most thinking people would not because they do not blindly follow a single source to explain the world to them. Somehow you believe that Jews are evil because they have always been and killed Jesus. The bible didn’t have anything positive to say about Pharisees, sure. Yet Jesus was also a Jew so you end up in a weird love/hate relationship with this Semitic culture instead of seeing it for what it is.
Jews were both persecuted and persecutors throughout history. Ask the Hasidic Jews what a time they had in the USSR.
Most of the “evil Judaism” you assume here is actually just secular in nature and has no metaphysical component anymore. This makes the “Jewish” part of it utterly irrelevant and replaceable.
You seem to think that you are in possession of some arcane forbidden knowledge about the inner workings of the world when ,in reality, you merely went down the anti-Semitic rabbit hole that has been the source of much blind hatred and justification for tyranny over the centuries.
Structurally, you are the same as the SJWs of “wokeness”.
LastHumanist:
“I do not want to be associated with your opinions, no.”
Oh noes, what ever shall I do now!
“Somehow you believe that Jews are evil because they have always been and killed Jesus.”
Nope. Not what I’ve said.
“Yet Jesus was also a Jew so you end up in a weird love/hate relationship with this Semitic culture instead of seeing it for what it is.”
If Jesus was a “Jew” – meaning the same as these Talmudists who call themselves Jews – why did He say to what the New Testament describes as “the Jews” that they are sons of their father the Devil?
“Jesus was a Jew” is more of the dissimulation you people are famous for.
Jesus was a Judean, and most definitely not a Talmudist.
“Jews were both persecuted and persecutors throughout history. Ask the Hasidic Jews what a time they had in the USSR.”
LOL
The Jews were/are “persecuted,” because the Jews say they were/are. You literally tell us to do that – ask the Jews!
Why have the Jews been despised for so long? Is EVERYONE who has proscribed their behavior, actions, and sometimes presence wrong about them, and the Jews are poor, little, innocent folk only trying to help humanity? Of course, that’s the approved narrative. In reality, the peoples subject to the treatment by “the Jews” came up with sayings like “he cries out in pain as he strikes you” for a good reason.
Most “anti-Semitism” involves: 1) telling the truth about their satanic, filthy Talmud (and Kabbalah), 2) telling the truth about what the New Testament says about them, or 3) telling the truth about what Jews have DONE TO GOYIM.
Most hilarious is if you condemn the generic “banksters,” you are called “anti-Semitic.” LOL – an implicit admission that banking is run by the Jews.
Even the Six Million™ is a blatant lie, and a lie so phenomenal that the current belief in COVID-19(84) is directly attributable to the success of the so-called Holocaust™ mythology. Did Jews die in World War II? Of course! How many? Several hundred thousands, mostly from disease and starvation, the latter due to the collapse of Germany from massive bombing. The soap, the lampshades, the gas chambers, all lies, but knowing the gullibility of Goyim, the Jews continue to milk that mythology as a weapon to today. Fortunately, the fake “survivors” are dying off and the increase of “diversity” in White societies is leading to severe corrosion of the mythology (including Black folk recognizing who and what ran the slave trade, and then bucking the expectation that we all consider “The Holocaust™” “unique” and the “pinnacle of evil”).
The so-called “persecution” in the USSR was an intra-Jewish conflict, a schism between sects of Judaism, the Hasidim vs. the Bolshevists.
(continues)
“Most of the ‘evil Judaism’ you assume here is actually just secular in nature and has no metaphysical component anymore. This makes the “Jewish” part of it utterly irrelevant and replaceable.”
The ideological foundation of this current System is Talmudic. You can’t dismiss it, you can’t credibly deny it. The Babylonian Woe of modern banking came to “the West” via the Talmud. The self-chosen Master Race ideology and the twisted Talmudic way of “thinking” of “the Jews” governs ALL of the actions of adherent Talmudists, which makes the sophistry, duplicity, and dissimulation of the media understandable, and expected.
“You seem to think that you are in possession of some arcane forbidden knowledge about the inner workings of the world when ,in reality, you merely went down the anti-Semitic rabbit hole that has been the source of much blind hatred and justification for tyranny over the centuries.”
More ADL talking points.
I am conveying facts which have been suppressed for centuries (yet a small number of folks continue to expose them to the world, to those who actually care about truth). The “sages” of the Talmud declare: “Every Goy who studies the Talmud, and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die.”
I didn’t make it “forbidden.” They did.
“Structurally, you are the same as the SJWs of ‘wokeness’.”
“Wokeness” is Jewish in origin. As is political correctness. Most of the “civil rights” agenda was and is run by Jews. I’m sure you’re very proud that Richard “Rachel” Levine was promoted to “four-star admiral” (LOL) solely because he/it is a transsexual.
You’re the one preaching dogma here, not I. I invite everyone to look FOR THEMSELVES into what I claim. Unlike you and other Sayanim – and the Jewsmedia itself – I don’t tell people they must not do their own research. The Goyim must not “go down the anti-Semitic rabbit hole,” and must only dive into things – distractions – we want them to!
I believe that freedom of speech is important and that you should not be arrested for any statements, not even the one above which is considered illegal in several countries including mine.
To quote from chapter 2 of John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty: “If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind. Were an opinion a personal possession of no value except to the owner; if to be obstructed in the enjoyment of it were simply a private injury, it would make some difference whether the injury was inflicted only on a few persons or on many. But the peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.”
The revised history of WW2 is not one that attempts to gloss over the ample evidence of Nazi crimes against humanity. Instead, it asks the question of who provided funding to the Kaiser Wilhelm Institut and who delivered the oil that powered the Nazi warmachine.
It also asks about the continuities of Nazi ideology and personnel that survived the war and persist to this day.
I have first-hand knowledge of this history. I did not spend my days reading 4Chan posts about “the Jews” but went out into the archives to do research on the primary sources and also put my own shovel in the ground at times to excavate pieces of the world that used to be.
Your world view does not match objective reality.
So, how did you become this way and why do you remain like that? I never published anything on modern history that I probably should have because of your crowd.
JewAnon will never be on the right side of history but Vera Sharav is:
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Ausschuss:3/Ausschuss44_Part4_Sharav:0
LastHumanist:
“I believe that freedom of speech is important and that you should not be arrested for any statements, not even the one above which is considered illegal in several countries including mine.”
I don’t doubt for a second you are one of those who – in other venues – claims “hate speech is not free speech.” You can claim anything here, to save face.
WHO made such freedom of thought and expression “illegal”? Why, those people who aren’t running a world wide conspiracy, of course! They’re only concerned about people “thinking incorrectly.” LOL
“The revised history of WW2 is not one that attempts to gloss over the ample evidence of Nazi crimes against humanity.”
Please explain which “Nazi crimes against humanity” were UNIQUE to the Third Reich, and which were NOT also committed by the “Allies.”
The Third Reich, even using the approved narrative, stands a distant THIRD compared to the crimes of Stalin and Mao, and their associates. But we don’t have Holodomor or Great Leap Forward “education,” do we? – just “Holocaust™ education. One might think that who and what the real or alleged victims were determines which tragedies were important.
“It also asks about the continuities of Nazi ideology and personnel that survived the war and persist to this day.”
The only dangerous Nazi ideology threatening the world currently is practiced in Israel and by “Jewish leaders” around the world.
“I have first-hand knowledge of this history. I did not spend my days reading 4Chan posts about “the Jews” but went out into the archives to do research on the primary sources and also put my own shovel in the ground at times to excavate pieces of the world that used to be.”
Tell about your experience in analyzing the alleged “gas chambers.” Tell us about your experience in assessing the “holy” Six Million™ number in light of numerous “revisions” by “the authorities” about how many Jews were allegedly “gassed” or otherwise killed. At Nuremberg, it was alleged “4 million” Jews were killed at Auschwitz. Now, the assertion is “1.5 million.” Did the Six Million™ figure go down? Nope.
“Your world view does not match objective reality.”
LOL, what a tremendously sweeping generalization!
What part of my world view does not match “objective” (sic) reality?
(continues)
“So, how did you become this way and why do you remain like that?”
Gaslighting. There is nothing “wrong” with me because I refuse to subscribe to your lies.
You consistently use the tactics of the ADL and allied entities.
“I never published anything on modern history that I probably should have because of your crowd.”
Ah, you are an unsung savior of mensch! You could have “saved” the world by publishing yet another tome of nonsense and fake “data,” from people like me! HA HA
“JewAnon will never be on the right side of history…”
History is a lie agreed upon.
“but Vera Sharav is:
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Ausschuss:3/Ausschuss44_Part4_Sharav:0”
I salute Vera for being one of the very few “Holocaust™ survivors™” speaking out against the Jewish-led “vaccination” genocide against humanity. At least she is consistent in condemning wrong, like Dr. Norman Finkelstein. But she still plays the false narrative about: 1) a “plan” to “exterminate all Jews”; and 2) the Six Million™ gassed lie.
Here’s a video for you!
https://odysee.com/@johnctokalenko:4/jewish-vaccines:a
Vaccination, in the mid-20th Century, to now, has been a thoroughly Kosher affair, from Salk’s SV40 injections which gave untold millions of Goyim cancer, to chief “vaccine” cheerleader Peter Hortez, to these mRNA abominations.
Be proud, “LastHumanist,” look at how the Jews have “saved” humanity with their injections! Opposing “vaccines” is “anti-Semitic.” LOL
I don’t think the actions of wealthy psychopathic cabals who follow a specific religion should speak for everyone else who might follow the same religion or who by circumstance has been born into an ethnic category.
There are plenty of Jews, even in Israel who have tried to stop what their government is doing. On top of that, Israelis are being experimented on with the jabs which to me proves that the “elites” don’t actually have any loyalty to Jews.
You are correct. It’s rather obvious already from the surface.
When we dig deeper, we discover the historical reasons for why some Jews ended up as evil banksters. It wasn’t because they were treated with respect and fairness. Quite the opposite.
Violence only ever leads to more violence.
When the Israeli mobs started attacking Arabs some months ago, they were proclaiming that they had “become the Nazis”.
https://electronicintifada.net/content/today-we-are-nazis-says-member-israeli-jewish-extremist-group/33081
Sadly, they have. Israel is a fascist apartheid regime that militarised and brainwashed its population to become the enemy they were supposedly fighting.
https://www.btselem.org/publications/fulltext/202101_this_is_apartheid
We are all losers of this history. My ancestors who oppressed the Jewish minority were just as dead as the Jews in the end.
They could have lived together harmoniously instead and avoided falling for tyranny and self-destruction.
All harm we do to someone else is harm we ultimately do to ourselves. There is a better way to live than that.
Define “oppressed” in the context of your ancestors allegedly “oppressing” a Jewish minority. [the Polish maxim, “he cries out in pain as he strikes you” comes to mind]
LastHumanist’s utopian vision: “starving wolves and fattened sheep can live together harmoniously!”
In reality, Israel’s “government” is the application of the ORIGINAL Master Race ideology which Adolf stole from them. They’re not “fighting against” anything in running a “Nazi” state; it’s the penultimate achievement of the Talmud’s automessianism, the last step before a worldwide apartheid state under Satan.
Here’s one of countless examples:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4e/Liber_Chronicarum_f_220v.jpg
Hartmann Schedel wrote in his 1492 chronicle that the “miserable Jewish people” had been “rightfully burned for Host desecration” on numerous occasions in southern German towns.
It seems you never looked at the legal codes from those days. Jews were not given the right to live, essentially.
They could buy a “letter of protection” from the emperor but that didn’t always protect from a murderous mob, either.
I don’t think that’s ok. It is utterly indefensible to project all evil on Jews or anyone else and then murder them for simply existing.
The problem with your “revisionist” take on history is that it goes against objective reality. The historical and archaeological evidence is overwhelming.
Does that mean Jews were all saints? Of course not. What it means is that they were an oppressed minority and suffering under tremendous injustice. More so than the average feudal serf.
As one of the uninjected, I am facing similar prospects in the neofeudal system that is currently being constructed.
This is wrong and unjust now, just as it was wrong and unjust then.
Judaism is not a religion, but an ideology created to oppose Christianity. It was built on the “traditions of the elders” condemned by Christ, and now written down as the Babylonian Talmud (the so-called “Oral Torah”). It was later adapted for Shabbos Goyim and allies in occult orders such as Freemasonry (“Judaism for Gentiles”).
Jews who do bad things are doing so not in a vacuum, but in the context of their “religion.” Judaism sanctions a variety of anti-social and outright evil actions, particularly against Goyim (Gentiles), including sexual abuse of little kids. Jews who do good things for non-Jews are doing so in spite of what the Talmud teaches about Christians and Goyim in general.
Of course, the “elders of Zion” don’t really care about little Jews, especially those who do not lockstep embrace Talmudism. Their hatred for the Karaites is notorious. The objective is collective “success” for Jewry, not individual benefit. Automessianism – “Jewry is its own Messiah.” The decent folks in Israel are every bit as much victims of the Talmudists as Goyim, but that does not diminish the criminal culpability of the Talmud in advancing an ideology that is far, far more outrageous than anything in Mein Kampf or its alleged predecessor, Von den Jüden und iren Lügen.
An illustration of the Problem:
https://imgur.com/K61uepe
“How Are They Connected?”
Is this the only source you have?
No surprises there.
Yes. I noticed this too.
https://justpaste.it/4vpdf
Unfortunately yt is the only site (afaik) with automated subtitles, these are important for people like me, with poor English skills.
@James Is it possible for you (next time) to save the subtitle file from youtube?
I mean the file you can get with youtube-dl:
youtube-dl –write-auto-sub http:THEYTVIDEOLINK
Of course it isn’t 100% correct, but useful.
Many thanks for your helpful work.
Was COVID vaccine fetal tissue obtained by the murder of an infant?
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/10/18/was-covid-vaccine-fetal-tissue-obtained-by-the-murder-of-an-infant/
I’ll have to read up a bit more to given an accurate assessment of my disgust on the scale 1-10.
Butchering live babies with no anesthesia
It is true.
They have to harvest live organs. If the fetus is dead, then the organs are of no value. It is not uncommon to induce labor on a 5 or 6 or 7 month old fetus. While the fetus is still alive… …while the heart is pumping… …they will cut out its heart or its brain…with no anesthesia.
Dr. Theresa Deisher is a world expert in molecular and cellular physiology and has years of experience in the field.
On June 15th, 2020, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. interviewed the founder and president of Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, Dr. Theresa Deisher, on the use of aborted fetal DNA in vaccines.
RFK, Jr. Discusses Aborted Fetal DNA and Vaccines with Dr. Theresa Deisher
(Go to the 12 minute mark)
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/robert-f-kennedy-jr-q-a-with-dr-theresa-deisher/
I had to track this interview down, because I remembered it and had posted it. You can’t forget something like this.
I found my post here which linked the YouTube video (now censored)…
~~WWW corbettreport.com/is-there-a-flu-shot-covid-link-questions-for-corbett-068/#comment-93822
(But dumb me, I did not include a complete description of the video.)
…and Corbett Member lovetodust‘s post which gave “RFK Jr and Dr. Theresa Deisher – she explains in detail the aborted fetus’s used in vaccinations.”
~~WWW corbettreport.com/how-to-deal-with-vocal-vaccine-deniers-propagandawatch/#comment-91679
More and more, I am finding how crucial it is as a Corbett Member to write a description of an important video or link.
Correcting this phrase:
“…they will cut out its heart or its brain…”
The phrase should be:
“…they will cut out the person’s heart or person’s brain…”
While normally I don’t focus on pronouns (e.g. they/them, ze/hir), I am focused on man’s humanity. Calling a human an “it” – This seems dehumanizing.
In similar fashion I don’t like to refer to people as “personas”. It creates a kind of a mental puppet devoid of human attributes.
Murders of unborn infants greatly exceed the approved number allegedly killed in The Holocaust™ by a factor of 11, just in the United States. Most Americans have been completely cool with that, most even supporting the so-called “right to choose” (the baby gets no choice).
Many still claim America was and is a “Christian Nation.” That “Christian Nation” has killed tens of millions of unborn babies not because they threatened the life of the mother, not because the mother was raped, not because the infant would be born with horrible, likely fatal defects. They were killed for egoism, for “self-actualization.” America’s form of the age-old human sacrifice, whether it was throwing babies on the fires of Molech or putting “unblemished” young folks in volcanoes or Wicker Men, or now in the clean, out-of-sight “medical” clinics.
Really, do we Americans have any right to claim we don’t deserve this controlled demolition of a society that not only tolerated but enabled that?
How about nobody deserves to be murdered by any government?
It’s seriously deranged to pretend that one atrocity is better than another.
All atrocities are atrocities and the government is not allowed to decide over the death of even a single person.
I agree with this in part. I believe torture is worse than murder because it causes greater suffering. What governments are doing to their citizens amounts to psychological torture and is an atrocity. Just my opinions though.
“It’s seriously deranged to pretend that one atrocity is better than another.”
LOL – that is literally what the Holocaust™ mythology teaches! That the Holocaust™ was “unique” and “far more morally repugnant than any other mass murder.” “You can’t compare the horrors of the Holocaust™ with mundane things like what the Armenians faced.”
Thank you for admitting that Jewish mythology is deranged. We’re making progress, finally! 🙂
Yes, I claim we do not deserve it. People who have abortions bear the weight of that decision as individuals. Government is enacting “collective punishment” on us. They are no longer serving us, but are robbing us of wealth and trying to violate basic natural rights that speak for themselves.
Abortion has been around a long time in many cultures around the world. It’s not unique to America.
The government should not be involved in individual morality and at this point has become a cancer that has metastasized.
You are right. The social contract has been broken.
It is now a civic duty to no longer comply.
Abortions are sad but can prevent great suffering of all parties involved. It’s a personal choice and responsibility that I cannot judge.
I do not have any delusions of grandeur that I am free to dictate how people should live and what they have to do. People who do harbour such feelings can benefit greatly from asking themselves why it is that they became this way and whether there’s a way for them to change and stop being misanthropic under the guise of caring about human suffering and sacred traditions.
Human rights pragmatically start with birth. The unborn human life should also be respected and considered according to its various stages of development. The details of that can be debated.
“Abortions are sad but can prevent great suffering of all parties involved.”
“Prevent great suffering”? Describe this.
If we could ask the murdered baby, how would he or she describe being killed, often by brutal methods?
Very few women get pregnant against their will. The rest all exercised their freedom of choice, but then insist that their failure to account for or accept consequences justifies killing a human being.
“Human rights pragmatically start with birth.”
Why?
“The unborn human life should also be respected and considered according to its various stages of development.”
Duplicitous sophistry.
Why is it acceptable to murder an unborn baby if the baby is seriously defective, or “not viable”? If those are acceptable, why is it not acceptable to kill anyone else who we find “unwanted”? Grandma with Alzheimer’s? A profoundly retarded adult? Wouldn’t putting those folks down “prevent great suffering of all parties involved”? Your statement there is EXACTLY what the Germans claimed about the T-4 Program. “Lives not worth living.”
Support for abortion enabled the very mass murder we are currently witnessing. Denial of reality at all costs, “the fetus is not a human being” is morally identical to “the ‘vaccines’ are safe & effective.”
“Yes, I claim we do not deserve it.”
You can deny responsibility all you like, but if you have supported abortion on-demand, for any reason, then you are culpable.
“People who have abortions bear the weight of that decision as individuals.”
Yes, they do. But the people who have enabled abortion on-demand, for any reason, share guilt, at least as accessories.
“Abortion has been around a long time in many cultures around the world. It’s not unique to America.”
Of course it has, just as with any evil. But America has led the world in making it FASHIONABLE. Part of the deception of the world by the Mystery Babylon System. Perhaps it should be called Mystery America? America’s media has deceived the entire world.
BTW, why do you say “people” rather than “women” who have abortions? On-board with the agenda? “Pregnant people”?
“The government should not be involved in individual morality…”
LOL
ALL laws are “legislating morality.” Should murder and rape be legal? Or merely “private matters”? Kill someone without family or friends, and the killer goes unpunished? Isn’t that the hard-line “libertarian” claim, about “private justice”?
Why so much cowardice in standing up for the unborn human beings who are slaughtered via abortion, “just because”? Single-digits of women get abortions because they were raped or the pregnancy truly endangers her life and/or the baby is defective.
Abortion fanatics accept NO restrictions whatsoever. “My body, my choice.” Absolutely! You have the freedom to choose to engage in a behavior that might lead to conception. After conception, you’re not dealing with JUST the “mother’s body” anymore.
The cognitive dissonance of Americans on abortion is easily illustrated. If the mother wants the baby, an OB/GYN and most others refer to the unborn as a baby. If the mothers don’t want the baby, it’s just a fetus or “unwanted tissue.” Classic dehumanization.
If abortion is some sort of “God-given right,” why stop at in the womb? Why not allow infanticide out to say, nine months from birth? What logical or scientific reason is there to claim that passage through the vagina or via a Caesarean Section is a “magic” delinator between “unperson” and “person”? Obviously, I do NOT condone infanticide, but let’s be honest on the topic. In fact, Bolshevists like Ralph Northam not in the distant past suggested it. Not because he wanted to be honest, but because he wants to advance the next phase of the agenda. Abortion on-demand is but a stage in the agenda for euthanasia on-demand.
Anyone who claims they are against evil and anti-humans better understand that.
Women are people who have babies. Yes women are people. People have control and ownership of their own bodies. If there were technology that allowed a pregnancy to survive outside of the body at 3-6 weeks, and that would be an alternative to an abortion, I’m sure some women would opt for doing that.
I don’t think abortion should be used as birth control, but I won’t judge or condemn someone for an early abortion. She might be a psychopathic pedophile for all I know. I’ve seen some very monstrous examples of child abuse working as a nurse.
Some women should not have children and some men should also not have children, mainly parents with a history of abusing their children.
A person dying a miserable death who wants to be given a lethal dose of morphine should be allowed in my opinion. But it’s up to the person because they own their own body.
My body, my choice is a good principle that will also spare us the needle rape of the NWO. Live and let live. Bodily autonomy!
As we have seen so perfectly clearly, “my body, my choice” was a lie. The correlation between those who demand abortion on-demand, to end a human life, with those who DEMAND we must take the sham “vaccines,” is very, very high.
My refusal to take the sham “vaccines” harms NO ONE.
Someone getting an abortion ends a human life, each time.
But “my body, my choice” is not allowed for those who decline these “vaccines,” by the vast majority of those who support abortion.
Cheap slogans are usually manifestations of Mencken’s maxim:
“For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.”
You completely side-step the primary issue:
The baby is a human being. A human being that is murdered because the mother decides his/her life is “not worth living.”
Why is that acceptable?
Effecting “I don’t want a baby” is as easy as not having sex. Or using whatever form of birth control, contingent on the fact all birth control methods fail to one degree or another. Failure of the birth control is NOT a moral or ethical excuse to murder the baby that is often the logical consequence of having sex.
Using the so-called “reasoning” of those who support abortion, there is no logical reason not to expand infanticide to newborns, and apply (involuntary) euthanasia to those who cannot live “viable” independent lives.
Again, you people spew about “choice,” but the baby does NOT get a choice. And to vainly attempt to rationalize the cognitive dissonance required to support such “choice,” you MUST dehumanize the unborn baby into “unwanted tissue” or “not viable” (as though that means anything – a newborn cannot survive without intense direct care from someone).
I think you may be misinterpreting what I am trying to convey, and grouping me into “you people” instead of considering my point of view from an individual perspective.
I agree that abortion has been painted as a birth control mechanism by the elites that want to kill us off and that Margret Sanger was a sick eugenicist and planned parenthood is corrupt organization. That is true.
What I am saying is that despite all this, I believe that some women and men will subject their children to horrendous abuse. They won’t adopt their children out because they collect a welfare check. I don’t know if child abuse is better than an early death. Also, a woman who pursues abortion at any stage bears the consequences of this decision, every day and that’s something she works out with God. God can judge her, not me.
I am talking about early abortion here. As far as I know the baby still isn’t viable as an intact individual thus it is still part of the mother and part of her body. Can it live without the mother’s body at this point? If it could be removed and survive with medical intervention, there are plenty of loving families who would adopt it.
At what point is the young developing baby an individual if they mother says I don’t want my body to support it anymore? And should the government decide? Does state intervention help and is that its job to determine what is right and what is wrong?
Should the state kill, or have a monopoly on violence? I don’t think it should decide, but this should be left for the community to decide. If someone murdered my mother or a family member and I knew who did it and could confirm it, I would feel justified in taking their life. I would bear the weight of the decision. I may spare their life, I might not. Should I then be stoned to death, or jailed?
These types of decisions aren’t the job of the state, neither is forced “medical” therapy like vaccines or gene therapy shots.
There was the case of Jahi McMath, a little brain dead girl who was kept alive as a rotting corpse at the expense of tax payers for years. Was that right? I don’t think so.
cu h j says, “I think you may be … grouping me into ‘you people’ instead of considering my point of view from an individual perspective.”
This is quite clearly what beacon is doing. Beacon is constantly shadow-boxing with the hypocrisies of the establishment narrative and with mass political movements (Leftism, etc.), rather than addressing the points the Last Humanist and cu hj are making. Not only does this amount to straw-man after straw-man, but it ultimately descends into pure “whataboutism.” For instance, beacon’s constant reference to the hypocrisy of “pro-abortion people” supporting vaxx mandates: neither LH nor cu hj are exhibiting this particular hypocrisy, so it’s completely irrelevant to this exchange.
In fact, the “whataboutism” is so thick in beacon’s diatribes, that it’s more like soliloquy or soap-boxing than it is an argument with anyone else.
beacon, even if you’re not going to acknowledge that abortion is a very dicey and morally complicated issue, about which reasonable people can disagree (which it is), you should at least address the points being made, rather than shadow-boxing with the cultic dogma of Planned Parenthood. Otherwise, you are neither persuading nor honing your own arguments. You’re merely preaching.
Fact is, cu hj makes a crucial point about the untold human suffering that is prevented by an early abortion. This is a point too often overlooked that I suggest beacon cannot, and should not, just shout down with emotionalistic cries of “murder!” Especially in light of the fact that human beings are, by and large, prisoners of a monstrous and tyrannical Hellscape, the case is becoming more and more reasonable every day that “coming into existence is always a harm [and] it would be better if we aborted fetuses at the earlier stages of gestation” before they have “come into existence in the morally relevant sense” (as philosopher of ethics David Benatar puts it in his introduction to Better Never to Have Been). (Benatar made this argument in 2006, when humans had far, far better quality of life than they do today, so putting aside the strength of his position then, it is critical to honestly evaluate it now, in light of changed circumstances and the massive, punitive increase of human suffering, worldwide.)
I’m sure beacon’s impulse is to simply dismiss this substantially supportable position as “sophistry!“…but to do so is in my opinion a callous and cavalier refusal to acknowledge the massive harm that results from birthing a child into the global meat-grinder that we live in.
It’s a pretty dark hypocrisy to allegedly defend the unborn life in one case and support government death camps in another.
I think some people are really struggling to make sense of the world but instead of rising to the task, they sink into a bias confirmation loop and end up QAnon, BlueAnon or JewAnon like this fellow.
Infowars is such a good example of that. The war for our minds is real but what that show will never tell its audience is the side that it’s actually on in this war.
Man, these Garrison caricatures are dumb, too, and nobody who knows the first thing about fluoride filtration would buy what infowars is selling.
But Alex will make a weird face and say that the holy spirit has possessed him and a certain crowd will buy it.
I wonder what possessed the Jones family to establish CIA ties. It’s certainly not the human spirit. Oh, well.
Maybe we can use the “gay frog memes” that have been seeded into the subconsciousness to actually educate people that much of this horrible stuff is sadly real.
LH,
I think beaconterraone is not necessarily condoning death camps, rather he thinks that abortion is just as bad or worse.
He seems to harbor a lot of anger for persons who may be descendants of “Jews” or persons who follow certain “brands” of Judaism because there have been murderous psychopaths have been Jews.
To me psychopathy should not be rationalized or hidden and facts should not be manipulated for putting forward an agenda, that does not really benefit the people on the bottom who also might be defined as Jews.
There are certain sects of practicing Jews who have committed atrocities and continue to do so, perhaps because there is some tribalism going on. The book “The Wandering Who” by Giliad Atzmon was pretty interesting to read and shed light on how identity politics corrupt morality and justice.
However, this still does not mean that bigotry and hatred of people who may practice a religion or be identified a certain way (perhaps not even by the individual) is right.
I really believe that the Book of Mathew, the sermon on the mount is enough to show why this is wrong.
I think I read something by MLK “Returning hate for hate multiplies hate, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”
This hate is transferred from the sick psychopathic murderers to random strangers who might just practice Jewish Holidays and make traditional foods. It does not allow for this random person to demonstrate that they can do good in the world. It’s wrong.
The greatest problem with JewAnon people who argue about whether the Holocaust took place and how many died is that they lack all empathy and humanity once they finally admit that there was even a single camp in which even a single person was locked up and killed by the state.
Even one is one too many. By trying to argue that Hitler was better than Stalin they completely miss the point that all totalitarianism is deeply dehumanising and morally corrupt.
They themselves also become dehumanising and morally corrupt by believing in this way of thinking instead of applying the principle that all life is precious to every life.
Ultimately, they get caught up in more and more irrelevant details. What matters is that people in power do wrong not whether they are from a Jewish family or not.
What matters is that Nazis are terrible criminals who murder other people. When you condone the murder of “the right group of people” and think that anyone can and should determine who that group is then you condone murder and that is utterly disgusting.
Auschwitz was a crime.
The Gaza strip is a crime.
All concentration camps are crimes.
It’s simple. Either you are against tyranny or you’re not. JewAnons are not. They desire “the right” tyranny.
I absolutely can not believe you went there. I guess Cuomo would be proud.
I don’t understand what you mean by that.
From what I know, Cuomo has responsibility for plenty of avoidable deaths in nursing homes so he’s another example of the statist refusal to respect human life.
cu.h.j:
If you are sincere and not duplicitous as I usually encounter with “pro-choice” people, I withdraw and apologize for my comment of “you people.”
I have no illusion about limiting abortion being any sort of panacea for many social ills, and it should only be tried in a comprehension effort to tackle the degeneration and impending social structure collapse in “the West.” I recognize that many unwanted kids do suffer tremendously. But is their death the only alternative to a “life not worth living” within the current society?
My step-daughter, who was molested, recently explained to me, with heart-felt detail, about why should supports abortion (“pro-choice”). I cried. She recounted ALL of what happened to her (long before I was in her life). She meant it, totally sincere, even if morally wrong. She believed the baby is better off dead. In a twisted culture like we have, I can understand the line of reasoning, though it is repugnant to me.
I don’t think ALL women who seek abortions are evil, far from it. I have never advocated criminal penalties for women who have felt compelled to choose that route. Criminal penalties for providers, that’s another story.
I don’t have answers as to when a human being experiences “ensoulment.” Christians have debated that for nearly two millennia, and the Buddhists have their own criteria, it’s like 28 days or so after conception. I would be totally willing to compromise in order to ban the most egregious slaughter of clearly human “fetuses.” Say, something like Texas’ six-week limit, especially for those women who did NOT get the right to choose to have sex (rape). But the fanatics in support of abortion demand up to natural birth, including so-called “partial-birth abortion.”
Ultimately, the problem is the culture of this so-called “civilization,” where children are, at best, a “burden,” at worst, a piece of unwanted meat to be discarded like toxic waste (and, apparently, often used as body parts). Any culture that gets to the point of no longer treating as sacred the next generations is asking for its own death. We’re actually seeing that right now.
“‘Fact’ (sic) Checker” says:
Blah buh Blah buh Blah buh Blah!
The only people who whine about “whataboutism” are those who are incensed by the exposure of hypocrisy. They think a cute little quip – “whataboutism” – excuses the often-grotesque hypocrisy.
“[A] callous and cavalier refusal to acknowledge the massive harm that results from birthing a child into the global meat-grinder that we live in.”
So then, you advocate mass murder. OK, got it!
“Birthing a child into the global meat-grinder” is a “life not worth living.”
LastHumanist:
“It’s a pretty dark hypocrisy to allegedly defend the unborn life in one case and support government death camps in another.”
There’s the Jewish tactics again!
These tactics extend far back into the past, and documented in the New Testament, when “the Jews” accused Christ of “having a demon.” Pretty much the prototype to telling all opponents of Jewry that they are a “Nazi.”
NOT once I have suggested that concentration camps are an acceptable institution. Let alone “death camps,” which actually didn’t exist (people died in them because of typhus and starvation 90%+ of the time, as direct effects of Allied bombing – Anne Frank herself, a weak, sickly girl, survived the “death camp” of Auschwitz).
“I think some people are really struggling to make sense of the world but instead of rising to the task, they sink into a bias confirmation loop and end up QAnon, BlueAnon or JewAnon like this fellow.”
What, actually, IS “BlueAnon” or “JewAnon”? I’ve never followed Q-Anonsense, and called it out as controlled “opposition” disinformation from its beginnings.
“Infowars is such a good example of that.”
Like Bill Cooper, I have long called out Jonestown as a controlled “opposition” enterprise, one which aims to give some truth along with a large helping of disinformation. You and Jones have something in common, “LastHumanist” – a psychotic aversion to naming the Problem. “Globalists,” “insiders,” even “Illuminati.” But never…OMG, OMG…”J*ws”!
When someone demands we categorically dismiss a certain possibility, then you know that someone is a disinformation agent pretending to be your “friend.”
cu.h.j:
Psychopaths/sociopaths come about one of two ways:
1) they are born that way;
2) they are brought up that way.
Unlike many so-called “anti-Semites,” I do NOT believe Jews – real or pretend – are “born evil,” and incapable of doing good for others (besides other Jews).
Hence, that leaves the other possibility. And, with Jews, the occult religious aspects of “Jewish culture” are what breeds psychopaths.
If someone were to raise a child with posters of Adolf and SS-Men and flags and uniforms, have them read Mein Kampf by 10, and so on, everyone would rightly say the person was raised to be a “Nazi” (either a Hollywood Nazi or, in much lesser cases, a “National Socialist”).
If someone raises a child within “Judaism,” they are exposed to both the publicly-admitted aspects of Talmudism, along with the unspoken and even hidden aspects of the ideology. Some kids will grow up not believing it all, even disagreeing with it, just like many Catholic kids grow up to be faithless.
The trouble is, as I’ve noted before, the Talmud contains filth, obscenity and “racist” or “xenophobic” elements that are far, far beyond anything in Mein Kampf or even George Lincoln Rockwell’s material. The Talmud is the origin of the Master Race concept, and Adolf jacked that from them, adding insult to injury. Is a child raised in “Judaism” any different than the stiff-armed kid I described above? Within the Overton Window, yes. In reality, NO!
Most people simply cannot grasp that “Judaism” is very, very different than what they visualize “being Jewish” as. As I’ve noted, the Karaites, hated by the Rabbis of Talmudism, are the people who actually fit this usually-false image of what a “Jew” is. They reject the Talmud and embrace only the WRITTEN Torah and Tanakh.
If you want to understand how psychopaths and sociopaths who don’t “only happen to be” Jewish are created, you MUST understand the culture that created them. It’s a story over 2000 years old, and a story that has been actively suppressed and denied all along. There is nothing wrong with eating Kashrut (Kosher) or playing with the Dreidle or lighting up a Menorah – BIBLICAL things or innocuous culture. The self-chosen Master Race belief, of automessianism, is the problem. That problem usually manifests in Jews doing things to Goyim, and even little Jews, that are simply immoral or outright evil.
We are, after all, just “Goyim” to Talmudists. And the Talmudists will insist “Goyim” means “the nations.” Jewish sources intended for Jews will admit that Goyim is actually colloquial for “cattle” or “beasts.”
LastHumanist says:
“The greatest problem with JewAnon people who argue about whether the Holocaust took place and how many died is that they lack all empathy and humanity once they finally admit that there was even a single camp in which even a single person was locked up and killed by the state.”
You want to pretend the camps were established in a vacuum.
In reality, Hitler would have remained a nobody save for the fact “the West” screwed over Germany and the German People so badly with Versailles. Hitler was a symptom, not the disease.
For all the spew about “freedom” and “democracy” (then as now, actually), the “Allies” of WW I stole huge parts of Germany from the German People and weighed them down with onerous punishments. They utterly denied the will of the people in the Ostmark (“Austria”) to join Germany, and even denied Slavs the right to self-determination in the artificial entity once known as “Czechoslovakia.” (funny thing, no one mentions that POLAND also invaded Czechoslovakia when Germany did, and annexed a small part of Polish-dominated territory).
World War II should never have occurred. Hypocrisy and evil – by the “Allies” – dictated it had to come.
And when it did come, only by the choice of the same “Allies” of WW I, horrors galore followed.
I know you blame Hitler for “starting World War II.” Tell us, wise one, why did Britain and France not declare war on the USSR when it, too, invaded Poland?
[perhaps you’d prefer people to forget that the USSR was the product of American, British, French, and German banks]
“What matters is that people in power do wrong not whether they are from a Jewish family or not.”
Nope. I’ve never asserted that.
Sayanim like yourself have one purpose: serve Jewry. Among which involves maintaining the official, and only approved World War II narrative. Germany must be painted as “uniquely” evil, and dissimulation must occur if someone notes “the Allies” did everything Germany actually or allegedly did.
(continues)
“Auschwitz was a crime.
“The Gaza strip is a crime.
“All concentration camps are crimes.”
Yet, for some bizarre reason, you are only hung up on events over 70 years ago! PLENTY of Nazism in Israel right now, today, but Adolf is your man-crush for your polemical S&M.
You’ve also said NOTHING about Manzanar or Tule Lake, which, if America’s supply lines had collapsed as did Germany’s, would have looked exactly like Dachau or Sachsenhausen. Like the “forces of freedom” would have given a milligram of a poop if Japanese people died as America was losing the war.
“It’s simple. Either you are against tyranny or you’re not. JewAnons are not. They desire “the right” tyranny.”
It’s simple: I pursue and convey facts – “the truth.” You either do, or you don’t. You choose to push seven-decades old mythology that borders on religion, instead of pursue the facts of what TRULY, ACTUALLY happened.
Holocaust™ Denial™ and giving an accurate historical account of what happened in the Third Reich are felonies in many countries. As any honest researcher or libertarian (little “L”) knows, the truth needs no protection – only lies need such protection.
LastHumanist:
“I don’t understand what you mean by that.
“From what I know, Cuomo has responsibility for plenty of avoidable deaths in nursing homes so he’s another example of the statist refusal to respect human life.”
mkey inadvertently offered another example of where your priorities are!
Andrew “Snuff the SNF patients” Cuomo killed thousands, but you – and so many others – are still hung up on the events of over 70 years ago. Why? Because what I claim about Jewry is true. The “secret weapon” of Jewry is The Holocaust™ – the ultimate “shut down” of all criticism of Jews and Judaism and Israel. Trouble is, naughty Goys like me don’t care about The Holocaust™ mythology, since it stands as a mid-level atrocity compared to so many others. Hard to make someone feel guilty about such things, when their own family suffered a greater atrocity from the cousins of the real and alleged victims of that Holocaust™.
You’re really going through some hoops there with definitions.
A government camp that people were forced into and died in is a government death camp. What else would it be?
As for how they died, my grandfather could have told you more that you will pretend never happened. I don’t know what your deal is but it’s probably something you’re struggling with so whatever. It’s deeply offensive to me on a personal level due to what I have experienced and suffered in life. Essentially, it’s a grave insult.
I am against the state of Israel and I do not hate the Jews. Alex Jones was pro-Israel, last time I checked.
Bill Cooper was right about him being a sensationalist who’ll sell people Russian nuclear attacks for the spectacle of it.
If “the Jews” of the world conspiracy you believe in are everyone then they are nobody at all. Being Jewish is then an unimportant detail. Don’t you see that?
Maybe you are not actually trying to articulate the anti-human diatribes you’re putting out here.
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt.
BlueAnon is the MSM narrative that Trump was a Russian agent. JewAnon is what I call the evidently false and anti-Semitic belief in a “Jewish” world conspiracy that still attracts a certain crowd even after way too many years of hatred against the Jewish minority within western culture.
I don’t see why that word triggers you. I am not the ADL.
Never would I agree with using a history of oppression to justify the oppression of other groups.
Hatred is hatred. Human is human.
Du hast doch keine Ahnung was in Deutschland passiert ist und suchst dir nur das zusammen was dein Weltbild bestätigen soll.
Ekelhaft.
Wir haben erlebt was Faschismus bedeutet und wohin der blinde Hass auf die Anderen führt.
Do you think it is pleasant and truthful to tell someone from a family of German dissenters whose grandfather was nearly killed by the Nazis that it was actually just fine that people in my Vaterland decided to go kill their Jewish neighbours and all who objected to that?
I do not think so.
Saying that also means that you essentially give your support to all the totalitarian terror that is happening again today.
It’s not ok. It is the most evil kind of ignorance. Maybe you were not aware of that before but now you are.
LastHumanist:
I think I’m starting to understand you, to recognize what motivates you.
You’re driven by guilt, inculcated into Germans and many of their first- and second-generation descendants. The idea that Germans are “inherently driven to do evil.” You know, two world wars to “take over the world.” That narrative has been spewed and spewed for over a century now. “Beat back the Hun” in World War I. “Germany Must Perish,” by the Jew, Theodore N. Kaufman, in World War II.
You’re unable to even function outside of that paradigm. You think you’re comprehensively “informed,” but are helpless to rise above the ideological and spiritual box you’ve been confined to.
Fighting someone like myself leads you to believe you’re “saving the world” from yet more “German” instincts to do “bad.”
Interesting tidbit about my family I’ve not shared in this thread. My grandmother was IN a German Ostarbeiter camp. She had plenty to tell her daughter and all of us about what actually happened in Germany. She also had much to say about the official, approved narrative of the “unique experiences” of Jews in German custody, as well as their behavior after “liberation.” And, of course, she had plenty to say about her life before the war, under Stalin. Self-evidently no fan of Adolf, but neither a pawn in the grand lies.
You can make as many assumptions about me as you wish. None of them matter. I’ve heard it all. In the end, I’m not really a human being to you, but a caricature of a human being, a “menace,” dehumanized into something “bad.” Systematic projection onto those who won’t toe the line, who refuse to live within the only “acceptable” tale of what happened. The very things you condemn me for and about are actually what you use, what those you lionize perfected against their enemies.
The presumably-endless narrative about what happened in World War II was a prerequisite for this final assault on humanity. You can’t see it, because you’ve been programmed not to see it. As I said previously, the Holocaust™ mythology was the essential foundation for all other lies to come, including COVID-19(84). The lies just got bigger and bigger. And now we are looking at the literal end of humanity, with a technocratic “utopia” of transhumanism closing on us.
Your last line, “it’s not ok,” smacks of a “woke” soyboy telling someone, as an automaton, that they are not “complying” with the approved spectrum of “thought.” Regardless of whatever inherent intellect or breadth of knowledge you possess, when it comes right down to it, you’re just a variant NPC. Nothing anyone says to the contrary of what you think you know matters.
Sigh…
Not at all. I am proud of being a German because I and mine were not on team Hitler like you.
It’s pointless to talk to you because you do not acknowledge any of the evidence that conclusively proves the crimes that were committed by Nazi Germany.
It makes you a pathetic human being that I won’t waste any more time on. Some cannot be saved. Enjoy your insanity.
I do not need a degenerate lunatic who does not even speak German to explain the history to me that I have been researching based on its primary evidence for years.
Who do you think you are? Go back to 4Chan.
LH,
When you say
LH says:
“Not at all. I am proud of being a German because I and mine were not on team Hitler like you.
It’s pointless to talk to you because you do not acknowledge any of the evidence that conclusively proves the crimes that were committed by Nazi Germany.
It makes you a pathetic human being that I won’t waste any more time on. Some cannot be saved. Enjoy your insanity.
I do not need a degenerate lunatic who does not even speak German to explain the history to me that I have been researching based on its primary evidence for years.
Who do you think you are? Go back to 4Chan.”
Some of these statements have an Ad Hominem tone and don’t add to the discussion.
If you have the statement beacon made that says HE thinks Hitler was a good guy, please link that comment below.
Though, I think there is a tone of hatred towards Jews as a group in his posts, I didn’t read anything where he thinks death camps are NOT a crime.
I just didn’t see this comment made by him. If he made that comment, I would like to see it.
Let me say that, I have family who died in camps who were Jews and my maternal grandmother barely got out alive. My great grandmother recalls people screaming in the streets, people being beaten. My maternal family lost all of their wealth and their home and barely escaped. I have heard this first hand and other horrific anecdotes about how horrendous the camps were.
I am NOT a Nazi sympathizer. Later on when I started to learn about what Israel was doing to the Palestinians, I read the work of Dr. Norman Finklestein who described how the Nazi Holocaust was used for Zionist goals in Palestine.
Check out the book “The Holocaust Industry” it was a good book. Both of his parents were death camp survivors.
Beacon has a point about how Stalin’s Gulags and murderous regime served as a template for Hitler.
I do think beacon has some resentment that is transferred to Jews who have done nothing to further any agenda. The tone of his posts to me seem that way.
With that said, I don’t think lumping him into “4Chan, or Jewanon” (I don’t know what Jewanon is, perhaps some anti-semitic hate group??) IS THE SAME as if he were lumping regular Jews as Zionists or part of the “elitist” Rothchild types of people who are also Jews.
This doesn’t make the points you are trying to make in this particular post.
But, I would like to also say that as a person of Jewish decent depending on how that is defined, I do not appreciate being grouped into any group by another person because I find it dehumanizing and insulting.
I think beacon has returned this type of commenting toward you and it is equally as wrong.
Can we focus on the discourse and evidence rather than Ad hominem? I think the topic is important, to distinguish behavior from groups of people and this can be achieved to forward liberty and understanding.
beaconterraone,
I have not read the Talmud. But I am going to get one out of curiosity about what you are saying.
My mom is a secular Jew and didn’t raise us as Jews. But according to many people who have a hatred of Jews, that hatred would be directed at me and my mom. I don’t think this if right.
With that said, there are parts of the Old Testament and even the New Testament that are rather sexist. These books were written a long time ago, when society was much different, so I try to forgive some of it.
I think what’s important in interpreting religious texts are that you have to separate the baby with the bathwater.
I think it’s important to separate behavior from personal identity, or genetic links, or identity created by others to describe groups of people.
It’s more useful to me to make this distinction. I agree that there are parts of Jewish identity that are chauvinistic and tribalistic. This is present in other religions and cultures as well, not just Judaism or among Jews.
There are some “sects” of Islam or people who call them selves Islamics who commit violent, criminal and even murderous acts towards women and outsiders. I choose to distinguish the people who do these evil acts from regular Muslims.
I think the religion still seems a little sexist where women have to cover themselves up and pray separately. I’m not particularly drawn to that religion myself. But I try not to direct anger or hate at people just because they follow that religion.
I have said quite enough on the topic.
If you look hard enough, you’ll not only find my explanation on what I call JewAnon, you will also find how the other party here has condoned the crimes of Christianity such as crusades and inquisitions and believes in a “Jewish” ideology that was largely constructed through Nazi propaganda while repeatedly ignoring my points about the history of oppression Jews have been subjected to.
I named a 1492 chronicle ,which you can find above in this thread, as an example.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4e/Liber_Chronicarum_f_220v.jpg
I could name hundreds more but will not bother showing the blind things they cannot see. Meanwhile, the “argument” of the Jewish world conspiracy was sourced by the other party through a drawing of a star of David that connected the 1% with a bunch of other pieces of the actual conspiracy.
It is an insult to human intelligence to pretend that this is proof of “Jewish masterminds” steering this world.
The other party here was also arguing that Jews must be evil because they were always hated. I do not know what else you need to see to confirm the tangible anti-Semitism?
If the other party had any actual proof that millions of well-documented crimes that are part of my own experienced history never happened then that evidence would have been shown. Since it does not exist, the argument was turned into ad hominem attacks so that the other party’s unhealthy and distorted world view be protected from reason. I therefore responded in kind and will leave the matter there.
LH,
Thanks for your explanation. I will try to find a translation of the link you posted.
The Spanish Inquisition is a good piece of evidence that shows that people who call themselves Christian have committed atrocities.
I think that at this point in time, rather than blaming any group we can work together to stop the insanity closing in on us.
I hope that beacon can “let it go” and focus on the present. What I see now unfolding is not an agenda that serves any “cultural” or “racial” or “religious” group, but rather group of elitists who want to enslave and control people they consider inferior to them.
Do you remember when Peter Scully, the Australian who went to the Philippines, made the news with the utter depravity of his rape, murder and snuff film production that was brought before the public in 2015?
Even now, there are people who ignore the evidence and claim that no networks exist that produce and sell snuff films.
This is a disgusting mockery of the victims of these crimes.
Pretending that the Holocaust did not happen is a mockery in a similar vein that boils down to kicking the victims and their children who became targeted by this tyranny.
It is morally bankrupt to do such a thing. It is deeply appalling and makes those who engage in it accomplices to the crime.
I do not allow any of this BS. This is not a line to cross.
But it seems lots of people want to “lie for their truth” these days. The fandom of Satanism, for example, that promotes denialism when it comes to Scully snuff networks, considers its work to be the pinnacle of Humanism, rather than the complete downfall of what that philosophy originally stood for. They are scum.
If I’ll be the last Humanist who forever refuses to cross the lines that must never be crossed then so be it.
LastHumanist:
“were not on team Hitler like you.”
That would actionable libel if I were of the litgatory mindset.
Since you promote Bolsheviks, perhaps it would be fair to place you on “Team Stalin”?
“It’s pointless to talk to you because you do not acknowledge any of the evidence that conclusively proves the crimes that were committed by Nazi Germany.”
The “evidence” of “gas chambers” and “showers” is of the exact same nature as the “evidence” for “safe & effective COVID-19 ‘vaccines’.”
It is NOT conclusive, which is why people like you desperately try to shut down ANY discussion/debate of what actually happened, sometimes by making such discussion/debate “illegal.”
People like yourself never define The Holocaust™, which enables you to wield it as a weapon to shut down debate via coercion and fear. The Holocaust™ is obviously a religion, part of Talmudism now, and is, as Dr. Finkelstein pointed out, an “industry.” No business like Shoah business.
“It makes you a pathetic human being that I won’t waste any more time on. Some cannot be saved. Enjoy your insanity.”
“Saved from what? A sincere quest for the truth? A fanatically-obstinate dedication to actual facts despite “trusted sources” DEMANDING we all believe otherwise?
“I do not need a degenerate lunatic who does not even speak German to explain the history to me that I have been researching based on its primary evidence for years.”
LOL, “degenerate lunatic.” You’ve dropped the pretense. That is good!
“Who do you think you are? Go back to 4Chan.”
Who I am is not really relevant. Who you are is relevant. You are a clown. One who wallows in the Clown World of “this is THE truth, and you are a bad, bad, bad person if you won’t just swallow what we DEMAND you accept.”
“It is not OK.” LOL
BTW, I’ve never been a member of 4Chan.
cu.h.j:
“I have not read the Talmud. But I am going to get one out of curiosity about what you are saying.”
I would encourage you to do it. But not just the Talmud itself, which comes in a variety of editions and language translations. You’ll need commentaries, and, for fairness’ sake, both pro- and anti-rabbinical commentaries.
Among the most important commentaries is Peter Schäfer’s Jesus in the Talmud (Princeton U Press, 2009). It lays out the basis for the centuries of Christian “persecution” of Jews for the blasphemies against Christ and Christianity. It is an academic work, and not some “neo-Nazi”/”anti-Semitic” polemic that the Talmud is “bad, bad, bad.” [Of course, Talmud cheerleaders claim ANYTHING that tells the truth about the Talmud is “anti-Semitic.”]
“My mom is a secular Jew and didn’t raise us as Jews. But according to many people who have a hatred of Jews, that hatred would be directed at me and my mom. I don’t think this if right.”
As I’ve said multiple times, Jews are NOT born “evil.” The evil can only develop if the evil work and “traditions” are studied and embraced. Hating Jews for being “different” is utterly stupid. Hating Jews for Talmudism – when those particular Jews do NOT embrace the Talmud – is both stupid, and morally wrong.
“With that said, there are parts of the Old Testament and even the New Testament that are rather sexist. These books were written a long time ago, when society was much different, so I try to forgive some of it.”
Some of the Bible presents standards and conditions that are “-ist” or “bad” only when stripped of their original context. The more “extreme” codes of the Old Testament, for example, must be considered within the context of the era – the Israelites’ culture offered a semblance of “justice” when the pagans around them offered NONE. Compelling a rapist to marry his victim is disgusting in our modern era, but, back then, raping a woman and then abandoning her was tantamount to killing her in most settings. “Damaged goods.”
“I think what’s important in interpreting religious texts are that you have to separate the baby with the bathwater.”
I believe one of the anti-rabbinical commentaries you should investigate would be to read the works of the Karaites, who reject the Talmud while embracing the WRITTEN Torah and Tanakh.
LastHumanist:
“Even now, there are people who ignore the evidence and claim that no networks exist that produce and sell snuff films.”
Even now, there are people who ignore the evidence and claim that no networks exist that sell human organs and body parts, and conduct ritual sacrifice of children. Because claiming that is “anti-Semitic.”
“Pretending that the Holocaust did not happen is a mockery in a similar vein that boils down to kicking the victims and their children who became targeted by this tyranny.”
The Holocaust™ mythology, exactly like COVID-19(84), is entirely dependent upon lies. “Trusted sources” and “experts” must – MUST – be submitted to, their proclamations MUST be accepted as gospel, without question.
What, exactly, was/is The Holocaust™? You people never want to define it, since leaving it plastic, able to be molded to the particular argument or moment in time, benefits your strategy.
Was The Holocaust™:
1) a “plan” to exterminate all Jews? [demonstrably false]
2) a plan to expel Jews from Germany and all German-occupied territories? [historical fact]
3) an industrial effort to build & use “gas chambers” and then burn the bodies in crematoria? [demonstrably false]
4) the overall punishment and sometimes persecution of Jews for real or alleged activities and behaviors? [fact]
5) the bona fide death of Six Million™” Jews, from all methods, and never 5,999,999 or 6,000,001? [demonstrably false]
6) the deaths of around 400,000 Jews from all causes in German-occupied lands? [an accurate number of Jews killed or who died]
“I do not allow any of this BS. This is not a line to cross.”
Fortunately, you’re not the arbiter of what is “allowed.”
“If I’ll be the last Humanist who forever refuses to cross the lines that must never be crossed then so be it.”
I will happily call out BS until the day I die. That includes Catholic BS, Scientology BS, “vaccination” BS, Evangelical BS, government BS, LGBTQPXYZ BS, and, yes, plain Jewish BS.
If an event is true, then no one but a kook would object to investigation and discussion/debate about it. You want to deny the Holodomor? Go right ahead! I’ll never suggest you be put in a cage for it. Unlike Holocaust™ mythology promoters.
“If there were technology that allowed a pregnancy to survive outside of the body at 3-6 weeks, and that would be an alternative to an abortion, I’m sure some women would opt for doing that.”
This is a very weak argument in favor of abortion. “People” (including “pregnant people”–a grotesque phrasing!) must inhabit the world they live in, and must be imputed knowledge of the constraints of that world. Women shouldn’t be absolved of whatever moral duties they might have toward the unborn just because one can imagineer some fanciful technology that would relieve them of those duties, and then hold them to the moral standard of a counterfactual fantasy. No such technology exists, so the moral question has to be whether the woman’s “bodily autonomy” outweighs the interest of the unborn. I think you would agree, cu hj, that that question properly turns on the gestational age, which is a nuanced and debatable matter about which reasonable people may disagree. Therefore, it is best to leave it to the smallest civilizational unit possible, such as village or even family, rather than allowing for a one-size-fits-all diktat from the state, national, or world-government level.
“…I won’t judge or condemn someone for an early abortion.”
This argument has appeal because it allows for differences of opinion, differences in moral attitudes, and most of all compassion and empathy. Refraining from judgment in itself is a virtue. However, it doesn’t solve the issue for someone who feels strong bias toward the life interest of the unborn. Someone like beacon considers the “feelings” of the aborter to be completely irrelevant. For others still, beacon’s style of autistic rigidity fails to convince precisely because it declines to take into account the totality of interests at play. I think the best position is that beacon should be permitted to judge all he wants, but he should not be empowered to enforce his values on anyone else, through the state or otherwise.
“She might be a psychopathic pedophile for all I know. I’ve seen some very monstrous examples of child abuse working as a nurse.”
This to me is a very strong argument in favor of the conditional propriety of abortion. To me, there is no question that such a child would be better off unborn. HOWEVER, the state should NOT be empowered to make that decision, lest truly dangerous “preventative compulsory abortion” become a government prerogative! (On the other hand is the interesting concern of: “Wouldn’t such a woman be less inclined to get an abortion?” I think this is just an indicator that cu hj has chosen an imperfect example. A better example in today’s context is: what if the woman cannot safely obtain obstetric treatment without submitting to compulsory mutagenic injection? OR what if the woman knows that her baby will be injected by the state with mutagenic materials immediately upon birth? I think both of those circumstances, outside her control, would make a better case for the moral propriety of abortion.)
[SNIP – Please keep comments to 500 words. Longer comments can be split into multiple posts. -JC]
Agreed, my example could have been better, but wanted to convey that the issue is very complex and that as you say the totality of the circumstances need to be considered.
I do think it will be more difficult for children in our post Covid reality, and do think the injections should be a consideration for pregnant women.
Yet I am not convinced we have been check mated yet. Just my opinion though through my own biased lens.
Abortions not only murder millions of unborn children toward achieving goals toward massive blood sacrifices, they also help destroy the family unit.
The state goes out of its way to enable completely irresponsible conduct and decision making for untold millions of uneducated, unbegun women.
Instead of applying scrutiny in choosing a partner (if it is their wish to do so and history would agree this to be the case for a majority) they do whatever it feels like and then “fix” the “problem”.
I won’t even go start describing the derragned sense of sense worth many of these women have. The whole societal control ploy is pure brilliance, what it is. Goddamn brilliant.
Regarding a “solution” for this issue, making anything “illegal” is certainly not it. If you asked me, I would make it available (because these morons will find a way), but with a lot of jumping through loops and expensive as hell.
So you would increase the suffering of the downtrodden women that have been failed by this system?
I don’t think that’s very helpful. I know a girl whose father is a clinically retarded criminal with a history of abuse. She dropped out of school, got pregnant and had an abortion.
Is there individual guilt in what her life has come to? Sure.
There is, however, more to it than that.
We are all Malthusians by training when we go through the educational system. We live in social Darwinism, a war of all against all. Naturally, a society like that breeds contempt and erodes all social structures.
It is easy to blame the oligarchy for all our failings. They are to blame for many things but a pyramid can only stand on its bottom and rings within rings must intersect to effect change.
If we wish to win the war for humanity, we win by changing the culture that has led us to this point. This is the only way. It’s not enough to replace one oligarch with another or even the whole oligarchy with another system. We must change our outlook on what we are and what our role in this world is.
No.
For each one of those there are a thousand or ten thousand completely irresponsible women who want to do whatever they want without consequence.
Sounds like a generalisation to me or do you know tens of thousands of women so intimately that you can judge their mindsets?
Besides, abortions are not fun. They are unpleasant consequences in and of themselves.
I like how Corbett often directs attention towards Solutions.
We are not helpless.
Big or small, there is always something we can do.
Glad he mentioned his article “Absolute Zero: The Global Agenda Revealed”.
You can hear that freight train coming.
Social Media – Why it Sickens the Self and Divides Society
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHwfJDqerGM
Academy of ideas dive into the conformity induced by social media. As usual, I’ll probably need to rewatch a few times to let it sink in.
Brilliant!! Thank-you Mkey! I had forgotten about the Academy of Ideas and how much I enjoy their videos!
I hadn’t thought about the permanence of a media profile as exacerbating an existing reticence to change one’s mind about issues.
I’m looking forward to watching the others on that topic of social media.
I bought Ian’s book as soon as I was made aware of it and I highly recommend it. There is so much more in there than can be covered in the interview. I felt slightly sorry for Ian as he tried to summarise it in the short time available,
I think the author has a very deep and thorough grasp of what is going on.
I share your opinion as well.
Greetings Iain,
I am not sure if you will get this message, but I have been reading your book since I heard about it on the Corbett Report, yesterday. I am on Chapter 9 right now and I must say, it is a great piece of work on this ccovid1984 madness we are experiencing. I just wanted to let you know how much I appreciate your work. I am so sure another book will be needed but this one is a real winner!! As a writer myself, I applaud your effort to compile such a large amount of information and in a way that can be easily followed. You also have several sources which makes your book a real study piece for those of us who would want to research further. For me, it is the way this thing happened globally. How is it that so many policies were enacted world wide in “Lockstep’? I knew just from common sense, but few wanted to say, that the measures they were using were making people sicker, thereby giving them an excuse to keep the tyrannical measures going, not to mention the vaccine roll out. Common sense went out the window and people just went along with the madness. One thing you said in the book so far, is the influence doctors have over the masses. It’s so true. I said that to a friend just the other day, the first person we see when we pop out of the womb is a doctor or someone in the medical profession. Birthing had become something that needed medical assistance, when for thousands of years it was natural. Big Pharma made an imprint on the masses that birthing needed medical assistance. Oh boy, I could go on and on about that, but it does seem that humans have replaced their allegiance to their God/religion, to their doctor…. and for so many reasons. I could go on and on about that as well. I am a mental health professional so the way of the mind is rather intriguing to me. Anyways, I don’t want to make this too long, and I am not sure you will get it, but I just wanted to thank you, personally and wish you and your family well!!
I just purchased the book and can’t wait to read it.
As an aside, I understand Ian’s skepticism about the 85% adult stats in light of 11% children stats. Though, my own personal experience makes me think those stats might be accurate.
For instance, two of my friends–one in California and one in Massachusetts; one a natural health teacher and one a C-level executive at a mid-sized pharmaceutical company–are awake and know that everything being portrayed in the MSM is not true.
BUT both of them, and their husbands, got the jab (I was stunned), FOR THEIR CHILDREN. In the US, at least, they are making children’s lives hell if their parents don’t prove they’ve both been “vaccinated.” We’re talking separated from their classmates, spontaneously called down to the office for COVID testing in front of their peers, and all sorts of horrible consequences for their children to bear. So four informed, smart, educated, awake parents chose to “go along to get along” and be “vaccinated” to prevent psychological damage to their children.
In contrast, one of those same sets of parents, now that their state is pondering mandates for school-aged children has told me, “we’ll die before we inject our daughter with that; we will move out of state;” and the other set of parents are now part of huge protests at their children’s schools to prevent their children from being forced to have the shots…
Having their children given the shot is definitely where a lot of people who have been manipulated into getting it themselves draw the line. They’ll risk getting the shot “for their children,” but then adamantly refuse to have it injected into those same kids.
I’ve been told that schools across the US have put those protocols in place to qualify for the maximum federal funding being offered. Sigh. Using our school children’s welfare to manipulate people to do what they otherwise would never do.
As always, thank you to James and Ian for this wonderful information.
Unmani,
Thanks for relaying that anecdote about your friends and the Vax.
This aspect of “wrestling with tyranny” would have escaped me if you had not told the story.
Why do they all keep saying we should go to the farmer’s market to buy real food? I mean I’m all for it, I also go to such markets sometimes to buy great cheese and stuff but how is that going to solve anything? How are we even supposed to go to such a market? Take a bus, wear a mask, buy your fare with your centrally controlled visa card… Or drive there yourself, with your car that you most certainly haven’t built yourself, that you need to take to the gas station regularly where gas prices are slowly increasing because, you know, carbon taxes and so on…
Supporting local producers, either directly or via farmer’s markets (or equivalent) is a small action that, hopefully, will help develop your local food production. You get: 1) lower prices; 2) often much higher quality produce; 3) networking and being able to see the humanity of your food producer right in front of you.
And most importantly, in the event of a collapse of supply chains, for whatever reason, a local food production infrastructure that just might stave off starvation, locally.
“[At the farmers’ market] You get: 1) lower prices”
Almost never true.
“… 2) often much higher quality produce;”
Sometimes true, sometimes not. Typically, any slight advantage in quality is overwhelmed by the ridiculous price premium these markets charge.
“…3) networking and being able to see the humanity of your food producer right in front of you.”
I drive by these farmers’ markets frequently, and it just looks like a Surgeons and Bandits Convention of masked weirdos, every time.
“in the event of a collapse of supply chains, for whatever reason, a local food production infrastructure that just might stave off starvation, locally.”
In collapse conditions, strict continuity-of-government/martial law conditions will be in effect. If they can put the populace on house arrest for a phony “virus,” imagine what they have planned for the “War with China” or however they are going to sell the final liquidation. You probably won’t even be able to call out on your telephones, let alone drive to a farmers’ market [closed] or a farm [quarantined and nationalized]. The whole point is to have a “single-provider” system of food: the FEMA center. That way, they can require injections in order to access any food. No “consumer-choice” actions we take now will alter that exceedingly straightforward outcome. Shopping at farmers’ markets is a hobby, not a “solution” to anything.
I only go by what I’ve seen locally, recently, at our farmers’ markets. Prices and quality are better for me than in the corporate stores. The people I meet are, credibly, the producers, as well; they can actually tell me details that a mere distributor could not.
Of course, “your mileage may vary” is a truism. I imagine the farmer’s markets in cities are a much different experience. Come to think of it, the latter are probably like the Denio’s Farmer’s Market in Roseville, suburb of Sacramento, which was, for decades already, dominated by merchants, not farmers. I can’t imagine it’s changed since I’ve been there.
Very likely a city thing, but my experience with farmers’ markets has always been consistent with the Futurama treatment of the phenomenon:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XstPD4a700Y
Leela: “See all the dirt and earwigs? That’s the sign of healthy food!”
* * *
Leela: “Oooh. Are they more expensive than regular eggs?”
Egg Guy: “Way more.”
Leela: “I’ll take a dozen!”
LOL – thanks for the humorous illustration!
The final two minutes of this interview really spoke to me. Iain is absolutely right. I swear, I could have Michael Yeadon walk into the room as I am talking to people who have their minds made up and it wouldn’t convince them.
I am in the unique position of occasionally being able to relate, on a more or less equal level to people who FactChecker and others would consider my “betters”. Because they use me to keep their fancy toys working.
In the last two weeks I met and worked for two medical professionals, one of whom shares my name ironically. He works at what he claims is the seventh largest hospital in the States and his job involves using the PCR test.
The customer I am currently working with is a pharmacist who works in operating rooms apparently. Both of these guys are/were very friendly and willing to talk. But very sure, or claimed to be sure of the validity of the official narrative.
Steve, who though kinda proud of being injected thrice, in humility never volunteered his credentials or even hinted that he was a doctor until I pried it out of him.
He told me Friday that he would email me proof that the virus has been isolated. I’m still waiting. But its only Tuesday to be fair.
My problem is that I don’t have a photographic nor encyclopedic memory. When I am presented with these opportunities, I do my best but unless someone is willing to read, listen to or watch something that I have learned from, I am left with using mostly just words. I’ve heard lots of information and have been able to draw conclusions that I am confident about. But being able to relate that information to other people in a short time and coherent manner while ostensibly maintaining a professional businesslike manner is pretty difficult and almost always fruitless.
And without links, sources, footnotes, references, words are usually not enough to convince someone who is vested in the scam.
And then James gets to the heart of the matter. “What do people want from life?” And is what they want what they really want or what they have been programmed to believe that they should want?
Only speaking for myself but I am discovering that the wanting was usually more fun than the getting. The anticipation was more intense than the realization. The fear was more debilitating than the challenges.
I tried sharing some content from Yeadon but apparently Michael Yeadon got “discredited” within the few mainstream media platforms that even mentions his name for being wrong about a second wave at the end of 2020. We cannot seem to challenge all the manipulation being done to boost numbers up, especially in the winter of 2020-2021.
Fact checkers can frame the opposing facts and evidence however they want to make it easier to discredit. They have framed information from the independent media as the lies that get halfway around the world before the truth gets its boots on. But the slow “truth” of mainstream media is able to beat all independent media to the public first, while also having enough time to drown the public in misrepresentation of the opposition so the public won’t listen to them.
Steve Smith,
I think that you are very skilled at talking to people.
At the moment of time in a conversation, one has to determine the best approach.
It ain’t easy to be quick on your feet.
Here is one Steve Smith anecdote which impressed me, because it worked for what it was.
https://www.corbettreport.com/august-open-thread/#comment-115251
I don’t think the particulars matter as much as the basic fundamental right to be free from bodily violations and the pursuit of happiness. The minutia are not as important.
The fact is that healthy people and children don’t need a Covid “vaccine “ and people should never be coerced into medical treatment especially for something that is treatable.
People with Covid can try Ivermectin and HCQ in lieu of going to the ER. Of course if that doesn’t work they can seek medical treatment. But people can and should be trying those things and improving their health.
My point is that I don’t think you need all the facts at hand but rather the term obvious common sense issue of people having a natural right of bodily autonomy and the pursuit of happiness.
I suggest people talk to people who they think they might not have any thing in common with and start with a very general discussion.
Ask them what they think. If they seem like a person you like, tell them enough to get them to learn more. I think listening to what people think about all this nightmare, hellhole of the past 2 years, will enable us to modify what we do to stop it.
I suggest people talk to people who they think they might not have any thing in common with and start with a very general discussion.
Ask them what they think. If they seem like a person you like, tell them enough to get them to learn more. I think listening to what people think about all this nightmare, hellhole of the past 2 years, will enable us to modify what we do to stop it.
These are two conflicting comments. What I mean to convey Steve Smith is that I think you are doing a great job just talking to people! I think that is essential, just keep talking to people. And finding out what they actually believe about all this will enable us to pique their interest. It’s been a very long day for me, the emergency room volume is picking up again. People seem less afraid and are coming back for the normal issues again, so I am tired after a long and busy shift.
People are asking why they are having side effects from the injections. I missed talking to a patient about the issues she was having unfortunately. I am going to start asking people about side effects and what they think off all this.
The 3 Tacks.
Thanks for this interview. I really appreciate the work of Mr.Davis.
One of his latest articles on the Off-Guardian, about inalienable rights, is a masterpiece.
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/21/inalienable-rights-a-suggested-solution-to-the-covid-coup/
O.T.
As expected, the dockworkers protesting peacefully in front of Trieste harbour have been cowardly attacked yesterday morning by the police with water canons and tear gas and they have been forced to leave. They moved to the main square of the city and are determined to go back to the harbour. People are supporting and joining them from all over the country.
Just look at the desperation of the worker crying at the min 37:00. What a sad day. You can see the police attacking at the min 60:00, min 120:00 and so on. Clashes have been going on in the evening too.
Let’s see what will happen today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVbl063OZuI
Both James fell into using one of the main enemies’ tactics. The first James attack Christian pastors and churches. Christian Pastors and Christians are big part the resistance. Pastors in Alberta alone have gone to jail and churches closed. The second James attacked fat people. There are many reasons for people to be fat. Their food is designed to make you fat. If all you can afford is calories which are cheap your going to be fat. Someone near and dear to me fought our enemies during her teenage years. She won the battle that but her body continues to pay the price of that battle. One expression of that is she is unable to control her weight. It is not because she does not make every effort to be and eat healthy.
The tactic I was speaking about was divide and conquer.
Most “Christian” pastors and churches COMPLIED/COMPLY without resistance with the “public health orders.” Even my own pastor, after a threat of being fined $25,000 per baptism. I forgive him, but am sorely disappointed (I wasn’t in the situation, and he was not gleeful about compliance). Unfortunately, so many – most – “churches” are 501(c)(3) (or foreign equivalent) Babylon-licensed “churches,” and, as the Master warned, you cannot serve two masters. A community of Christians – a “church” – should not have such divided loyalties, even if it means you pay to the Federal regime some of the “Federal” Reserve Notes you gain.
For every hero like Artur Pawlowski, there are a dozen preaching either non-resistance, or worse, active collaboration, including taking the Liquid Idol! Romans 13! Romans 13! (of course, Romans 13 does NOT preach obedience to an anti-Christ regime)
As for being fat, I count among them. I do not find the scientific fact of my rotundancy “offensive,” like the weak-willed common minds of this society (while I believe all non-hostile individuals should be treated with kindness and dignity, I am OPPOSED to so-called “fat acceptance”). Yes, there are factors that made and keep me fat, but if I REALLY, REALLY wanted to fight back against obesity, I could. I was told (as were we all) that being fat was a strong risk factor for SARS 2. Yet, here I am, 20 months in, and still no infection – I eschew masks when possible, and am not afraid of doing what humans are designed to do: converse face-to-face. Either my immune system is very strong (and, admittedly, helped by credible immune-boosting natural substances), or COVID-19 just isn’t as deadly as implied – or both.
WATCH OUT!! Dangers you hadn’t considered before!
OuestFrance provides vital clarifications:
Covid-19. Can you be infected by two variants at the same time? We answer you
Marie SASIN. 1 hour ago
…Yes, it is possible to be infected with two Covid-19 variants at the same time. It happened in Belgium this year. A 90-year-old woman who died of Covid-19 in March had contracted two variants of the coronavirus simultaneously, which would be the first documented case of its kind, according to a scientific study cited on July 11 by a scientific conference and Belgian media.
The nonagenarian contracted the Alpha and Beta variants – first identified in Britain and South Africa – and her doctors said she could have been infected by two different people.
AND, guess what!
The woman, who was treated in a hospital in Aalst near Brussels, had not been vaccinated, Belgian public broadcaster VRT said.
https://www.msn.com/fr-fr/lifestyle/trucs-et-astuces/covid-19-peut-on-c3-aatre-infect-c3-a9-par-deux-variants-en-m-c3-aame-temps-on-vous-r-c3-a9pond/ar-AAPHuvG
Guess we’ll be needing double, or better yet TRIPLE, the number of doses hitherto prescribed!!
Thank heavens for this very serious reporting!
Only the dead have seen the end of their injections.
Gosh, wish you wouldn’t post stuff like that; it makes me feel like Bruce Willis’ character in the 6th Sense.
Lol
What’s worrying is that not everyone finds this article amusing.
Indeed
For Iain (also keep an eye on Chile’s new Constitution being written right now):
Reminder :
PROCLAMATION OF THE FIRST DIRECT DEMOCRACY OF FRANCE, JULY 14, 2019 IN PARIS
The people have the natural right to form or abolish any government for the purpose of ensuring their own security and sustainability.
On this July 14, 2019, National Day, We, the people of France, once again declare our inalienable sovereignty.
With constancy and obstinacy, the people of France, with or without a vest, denounced the corruption of the republic and the illegitimacy of this false representative democracy.
Access to information, induced by the advent of modern communication technologies, allowed us to make a lucid observation of the uselessness and even of the harmful character of the political representation set up as a system, almost always concussionnary, subservient to the big world bank and the military-industrial complex which enslave the peoples of the whole world.
Everyone has the right to speak for themselves. Collective decision-making through citizen structures freed from the republican yoke can now be achieved.
We hereby declare that we have the right to do so in every corner of France, in our districts, our municipalities, our cities and our provinces.
In order to restore the destiny and sovereignty of the French people, we hereby proclaim the first direct democracy in France and we invite all the citizens of France who love justice and freedom to meet in constituent assemblies, new institutions which will see the light of day soon in each province of France. Everyone can thus bring their own skills and expertise to the established democratic structure in order to determine together the rules of our mutual ties.
We will not go back.
National Council of Vests meeting in Paris, July 14, 2019
Rappel :
PROCLAMATION DE LA PREMIÈRE DÉMOCRATIE DIRECTE DE FRANCE, LE 14 JUILLET 2019 A PARIS
Le peuple a le droit naturel de constituer ou de supprimer tout gouvernement aux fins d’assurer sa propre sécurité et sa pérennité.
En ce 14 juillet 2019, jour de Fête nationale, Nous, peuple de France, déclarons une nouvelle fois notre souveraineté inaliénable.
Avec constance et opiniâtreté, le peuple de France, avec ou sans gilet, a dénoncé la corruption de la république et l’illégitimité de cette fausse démocratie représentative.
L’accès à l’information, induit par l’avènement des technologies modernes de communication, nous a permis de faire le constat lucide de l’inutilité et même du caractère néfaste de la représentation politique érigée en système, presque toujours concussionnaire, inféodée à la grande banque mondiale et au complexe militaro-industriel qui asservissent les peuples du monde entier.
Chaque personne a le droit de parler au nom d’elle-même. La prise de décision collective par le biais de structures citoyennes libérées du joug républicain peut maintenant être réalisée.
Nous déclarons par la présente que nous avons le droit de le faire dans chaque recoin de France, dans nos quartiers, nos communes, nos villes et nos provinces.
Afin de rendre aux Français un destin et une souveraineté, nous proclamons par la présente la première démocratie directe de France et nous invitons tous les citoyens de France épris de justice et de liberté à se réunir en assemblées constituantes, institutions nouvelles qui verront le jour prochainement dans chaque province de France. Chacun pourra ainsi apporter à l’édifice démocratique direct mis en place ses compétences et expertises propres afin de déterminer ensemble les règles de nos liens mutuels.
Nous ne reviendrons pas en arrière.
Conseil National des Gilets réuni à Paris, le 14 juillet 2019
Brilliant conversation. Thank you very much for the info. I have changed a few of my ways during the scamdemic and it feels nice to be honest with you. Not anything massive, little things like going to independent farmers instead of the supermarket and getting my money out of the bank every month (leaving only the amount necessary for my bills). this way i always use cash and i choose local stores for anything i need.
Laws that allow the police States’ agents within their instruments of repression to commit crimes just aren’t surprising. It tracks. Police State governments are part of the Biblical wild beast which gets its authority from the invisible ruler (temporarily) of this world, namely Satan (aka Devil aka Gog). Expect the gangster Corporatocracy to be… criminal.
Iain makes the point that the hoaxsters (Klaus Schwab et al) are human like us. One, Iain sort of doesn’t finish his thought there. He only says that they make mistakes, which we know without him telling us. I sort of get nothing from it. I can read into it this or that of course. Two, Who does Iain mean by ‘us’?
Me and Iain (a decent person who tolerates – politely and in a genuinely friendly manner – my constant criticism) are members of the anti-covid 1984 camp. And we are decent people. But Iain is wedded to germ theory, which makes his pushback limited (but still very good).
Beyond that, I am not part of this toilet world. I am a worshipper of Jehovah God. I don’t believe, or act as though I believe, that ‘we’ are God and can fix the mess we are in right now in regard to the emerging global biosecurity police State. The hoaxsters, including the powerful special interests who are mainly responsible for getting gangster politicians and others to go along with their twisted plans, are self-modified creatures who no long resemble the Creator in any important fashion. They are not like me. I don’t play God and I don’t play an evil God. I don’t attack God by attacking his standards and those who uphold them. This world’s time is up. The sheep are being separated from the goats (and God has always done that in the sense that he takes note of how we behave, but it’s kind of visible right now) and the sheep will further be separated from the sheep and then, very soon now, this toilet world (not planet) will be destroyed.
Perhaps a look at this social paradigm will advance your understanding of the “parasite class” and its weaknesses:
https://reportingforbeauty.substack.com/p/ourpsychopathproblem
Ultimately, there is no reason to believe that the world will end in these coming 2000 years just like it has refused to do so these past 2000 years. The things that can and should end now are misconceptions.
It’s up to us? At this point, it isn’t. It’s beyond us, and the ‘us’ – those who don’t agree with or want covid 1984 – are too few in number to beat the army of darkness (Gog’s Crowd) – which includes police State governments and their lawless instruments of repression – that is right now rampaging on this planet.
Should we do nothing? Only if we don’t care. I’m not doing nothing. We can all do something. Obviously, we have different talents and some of us have resources that others don’t. But I don’t believe that we can’t do anything. Nor do I believe that it would be right to do nothing. It’s just that I have a different take on the overall situation than James and Iain.
The way I see things, I’m not stuck in the system that James wants us to reject. Is he?
What system are you stuck in, though?
The same old mental control system of religion.
“1 A time there was when disorder ruled
Human lives, which were then, like lives of beasts,
Enslaved to force; nor was there then reward
For the good, nor for the wicked punishment.
5 Next, it seems to me, humans established laws
For punishment, that justice might rule
Over the tribe of mortals, and wanton injury be subdued;
And whosoever did wrong was penalized.
Next, as the laws held [mortals] back from deeds
10 Of open violence, but still such deeds
Were done in secret,—then, I think,
Some shrewd man first, a man in judgment wise,
Found for mortals the fear of gods,
Thereby to frighten the wicked should they
15 Even act or speak or scheme in secret.
Hence it was that he introduced the divine
Telling how the divinity enjoys endless life,
Hears and sees, and takes thought
And attends to things, and his nature is divine,
20 So that everything which mortals say is heard
And everything done is visible.
Even if you plan in silence some evil deed
It will not be hidden from the gods: for discernment
Lies in them. So, speaking words like these,
25 The sweetest teaching did he introduce,
Concealing truth under untrue speech.
The place he spoke of as the gods’ abode
Was that by which he might awe humans most,—
The place from which, he knew, terrors came to mortals
30 And things advantageous in their wearisome life—
The revolving heaven above, in which dwell
The lightnings, and awesome claps
Of thunder, and the starry face of heaven,
Beautiful and intricate by that wise craftsman Time,—
35 From which, too, the meteor’s glowing mass speeds
And wet thunderstorm pours forth upon the earth.
Such were the fears with which he surrounded mortals,
And to the divinity he gave a fitting home,
By this his speech, and in a fitting place,
40 And [thus] extinguished lawlessness by laws.”
https://people.wku.edu/jan.garrett/302/critias.htm
The natural order of the universe does not need us to be scared.
Any omnipotent and omniscient beings will surely have no need nor concern for anything that happens here.
“And, after proceeding a little further, he adds—
Thus first did some man, as I deem, persuade
Men to suppose the race of Gods exists.”
God and religion as the first panopticon…
The natural order of the universe does not need us to be scared.
How similar are “sacred” and “scared”…?
Knowing how difficult it is to reproduce behavior you’ve never known, I’m still wondering if the universe can create something that did not inherently exist at the outset: i.e. meaning and a sense of “good” and “bad” with all of the subjective relativity that those notions carry.
I agree that the universe does not need us to be scared of some outer entity. As we have an inner affinity for those around us and can ultimately learn from necessity and an innate affinity the meta-concepts of the Golden Rule…
maybe not?
ps: Good morning and Happy Full Moon (which just set here)!
Hi Mr. Davis, if you are reading this!
I subscribed and immediately uploaded into Z library.
https://1lib.us/s/pseudopandemic
Also wanted to share the above link with Mr. Corbett as a good resource link for books that can be downloaded (up to 10 per day) for free. I have found and downloaded a treasure trove – including “Behind the Green Mask” by the late Rosa Koire and various homesteading and guilty pleasure books.
Please pass the link along. Happy Reading.
This info needs to be shared!! The vaccines are CAUSING auto immune issues! My friend shared this with me this morning and another friend confirmed this with her latest bloodwork testing.
https://mobile.twitter.com/constanzag77/status/1449589677132959748?s=12&fbclid=IwAR3YBqm7Tc2glP4qGGDr_dwUC6US91ESGSQunjtEdWpO_3Zh6lvlpRFn_6M
What authoritarianism gone? Stop obeying. Incourage others to self-govern by resisting edicts on principle. Do not be apologetic or explain or appear to need a justification. We are all equal, with equal authority. We don’t need rulers, can’t live as human if we comply to coercion.
What Iain and James say at the end of this video is gold.
Our society has reached a cul de sac (dead-end) and the only option being presented to us is a “new normal” that is similar enough to the “old normal” to make us want to do virtually anything to attain it. That includes wearing face-masks, being vaccinated, etc., etc.
But that “new normal” is a sham based on a lie. The “old normal” was never sustainable, from an economic or a spiritual perspective. So even if the Great Reset was not being foisted on us, we should still consider a fresh start for humanity.
For whatever reason, those behind the Great Reset have tipped their hand and many more people than they would like have been alerted because the project has been accelerated. Therein lies the opportunity to come up with a different plan that rejects both the “old” and the “new” normal, and which can win popular support.
I suspect even some of the “idealists” behind the Great Reset would come on board if the alternative plan is clearly better.
Would any of these WEF idealists (if they exist) be willing to talk to James about their objectives? I think I would support some of those objectives, e.g. vegetarianism, no cars. But not the subterfuge of the pseudo-pandemic.
Anyway it would be nice to hear from the “other side” on a forum like this.
Hey James, could you do a talk with Paul Schreyer about his new book?
In Germany it was a number 1. bestseller. It`s out in english for a while now but I don`t think many people know about it.
I wish someone would do a book conference/convention discussing the best books about it to reach more people.
James, I hope you and Lain do a follow-up in the very near future, focusing on building a viable alternative to what the transhumanists have planned. Thoughts that came to my mind are shadow government/institutions, and resurrecting the councils of the unemployed, which today would include the unvaxxed. That’s a tremendous resource that I think could win the day if we can organize it into local resistance troops that operate along the lines of what the Wobblies did to beat back the industrial tyrants.
One of the easiest way to defeat them is to ditch your cell phone, to grow your own food and to shut off the main stream media. You need to start creating your own community. And yes believe in your own power and yes there is more of us than them. We are the majority! Stop buying from Amazon and Walmart. Yes there is hope! Looks like Fauci will be charged with cruelty to animals. It may be the first domino.
I live in a rural area where there is a lot of organic farmer and sadly a lot of them have been doubled vaccinated. Even though they would not themselves eat any genetically modified food they have now become genetically modified. This is how good the brainwash worked.
Interesting that in a discussion on pandemics, about a book called Pseudopandemic, there is no discussion of the most fundamental question related to the topic: does a virus exist?
There is no virus. There never was.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/unscientific-human-experiments:2
https://odysee.com/@ReneScherger:a/The-Emperors-New-Virus—-An-Analysis-of-the-Evidence-for-the-Existence-of-HIV-(Documentary):2
https://odysee.com/@notanotherbrick:f/Exosome-Theory-vs-Virus-Theory—CV19-Fraud:b