Follow the Money: From Paris to ISIS to Paris

11/18/20153 Comments

Paris-Attack-ISIS-flag-mainJames Corbett
November 17, 2015

Let us for one moment accept the whole Paris attacks narrative hook, line and sinker.

That the French government could not possibly have foreseen an attack.

That a multi-site emergency exercise planned for the same day just happened to be simulating an armed group committing attacks around the city just hours before that very scenario unfolded.

That the "mastermind" of the attacks just happens to be the latest in a string of terrorist bogeymen who manage to escape capture time and time again.

OK, fine. The question that the French people should still be asking themselves, even if they believe all of that, is this: How does the Islamic State, a ragtag band of jihadis who are supposedly at war with the combined military might of the US, Turkey, the Saudis, the Russians, the Iraqis, the Iranians and many others (including, of course, the Syrians), manage to fund and coordinate spectacular international terror attacks, including not only the Paris attack, but also (apparently) bombings in Turkey and Lebanon and the take down of Russian airliners? How is it that governments can flag and track the "suspicious" financial transactions of anyone withdrawing or transferring over $10,000 from their own bank account, but can't seem to find a way to restrict cash flows, arms and munitions to a geographically isolated enemy who is dependent on oil sales for its financial survival?

Good question. Just don't ask the US State Department spokesman, because he doesn't have the answers. When asked earlier this week by RT's Gayane Chichakyan "whether the US has sanctioned any banks suspected of carrying out transactions for ISIL," State spokesman Mark Toner responded with a resounding: "I'd have to look into that. I don't have the answer in front of me."

who-created-isisApparently the question of how ISIS is financing its operations is of so little interest to the State Department that they haven't bothered to look into it. So let's help them out with their homework by connecting a few dots, shall we?

Earlier this year it was revealed that French President François Hollande had authorized illegal shipments of arms to the Syrian terrorists in 2012. The deliveries—including cannons, machine guns, rocket launchers and anti-tank missiles—were in direct contravention of an EU embargo that was in place at the time.

In late 2012 it was revealed that one of the most prominent backers of the Syrian terrorists was the French government, who, besides illegal arms shipments, were also delivering money directly to the terrorist opposition leaders.

Last year the French arms export industry enjoyed its best sales in 15 years, with revenues up 18%. The reason for the Merchant of Death bonanza? A spike in sales to Saudi Arabia and Qatar, two of the main funders and supporters of ISIS.

Of course, not all of the blame for the fostering, funding, arming, equipping and training of ISIS belongs to France. Much of it belongs to the United States, its Gulf allies, Turkey and Israel, as well as assorted other NATO members. But there is a line to be drawn from the arms and funds that France supplied to the "moderate" terrorists in Syria and the seeming international operational abilities of this seemingly unstoppable terrorist bogeyman group.

France is a nation in mourning. But perhaps the French people can reserve at least some of their outrage for the government which has used its own tax money to fund, supply and support the terrorists with whom it is now at war.

Filed in: Articles
Tagged with:

Comments (3)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. shopbruce says:

    I would also like to ask whether anyone believes that the French President just did that on his own volition or just maybe was influenced by….fill in the blank (NATO,US,Britain,Germany,Israel, CIA,etc). The trail of influence is just as important as the trail of money.

  2. WAYNED says:

    I love this well-documented, concise, to-the-point, informative… well, isn’t it just ideal? manner of delivering information. It’s what I grew up expecting, but never getting, every time I tuned in to the so-called news to find out about major events.

    It got so the only time you could half-count on what you were seeing was when you needed to keep up with a real natural disaster, because information about real topics that would expose the powers that should not be was absent or deliberately obscured and made uninteresting. And now even real natural disasters are hijacked.

    I honestly think you may be the one of a handful of true journalists practicing to endeavor honest, open delivery of information meant to benefit those who read and listen. I am so impressed James, and thankful, it is not too much to say that your media is what I have been searching for my whole cognizant life. And you know, I was born a year before the JFK assassination, and learning of that when I was 5 years old, having it explained to me, stayed with me, because I knew our government had been taken over, and none of the adults were doing a thing about it.

    I have stopped trying to sift through the garbage to find the nuggets of truth in news sources. I stick with what I trust and believe based on the information provided.

    I think you are a growing phenomenon. I hope so.

  3. toddmartinchristiansen says:

    Between this and the current rundown featured at BFP, REAL alternative media is quickly revealing a well-documented narrative that is appearing nowhere else. Scary to see the exact same 9/11 mainstream response in regard to civil liberties etc., I truly hope enough of this good information leaks into the mainstream to dissuade some of that retaliatory action.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top