A Brief History of False Flag Drills

07/02/20167 Comments

Pop quiz: What do 9/11, 7/7, the Norway attacks, and last November's Paris attacks have in common?

Alright, alright. If you've read the title of this column, you've probably already guessed that they all took place at the same time as eerily similar drills and exercises. But why is this? Is it important? In this week's subscriber newsletter, James looks at the history of false flag attacks that coincide with drills and examines the reasons for this phenomenon.

Also, don't miss this week's recommended reading, listening and viewing with links to CIA geoengineering testimonials, the final chapter on the MLK assassination, and more.

For free access to this, and all of my subscriber editorials, please go to www.theinternationalforecaster.com

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register here.

Existing Users Log In

Filed in: Newsletter
Tagged with:

Comments (7)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Corbett says:

    Hey guys, the 9/11 + 7/7 + Norway + Paris examples in this article were just the four that came to my mind when composing this piece, but if you have your own suggestions for amazingly fortuitous drill/event “coincidences” feel free to post them here.

  2. n4x5 says:

    State of Connecticut Department of Emergency Management & Homeland Security event (FEMA L-366 Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters) on 12/14/12, which coincides with the Sandy Hook event.

    On an unrelated note, thanks for the links to the Matthew Slater Credit Commons articles. Looks interesting.

  3. HomeRemedySupply says:

    Oh my! That was something to see the CIA talk about geoengineering!
    Thanks for the link James.
    June 30th!

  4. russ says:


    Profiles and Commonalities of School and Random Other Shooters

    Compiled by: starviego


    (Edited for Brevity)

    There are many mass shooting-type events—school shooters, workplace shooters, family-ciders, “politically-motivated” (and so-called) mass shooters seem to be the main categories.

    Academic studies on these shootings exist, but they’ve mostly been conducted from the widely unquestioned—but flawed—viewpoint that they are spontaneous or organic in origin.
    Face value, shooter-oriented explanations are inadequate. [The starviego thread] is an alternative paradigm necessary, a la Webster Tarpley’s eminently useful “9/11 false flag framework of moles, patsies, […] professional killers, and [a] “command” center that coordinates all of that within the framework of a brainwashed world by a controlled corporate media.”

    Following are examples of common characteristics present in school shootings that fit a manipulated event, circa late 1990’s-2011. Starviego lists events and dates for each of the following categories.

    • The black/camouflage/trench-coat ‘look’ is the uniform for manipulated shootings

    • A “work hour/week day” start time for a manipulated shooting—midmorning to early afternoon—is generally preferred so the event will dominate the evening news and the next day’s headlines.

    • An astoundingly high percentage of the shooters are reported to have been on psychotropic drugs like selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), often in combination with other stimulants like Ritalin.

    • Often the alleged perp, if he’s still alive, has no memory of the event

    • “Extra” guns and ammo always are found somewhere—auto, home, on the perp, etc.—that “belonged to the shooter” in an attempt to further convince the public a manipulated shooting event was real.

    • The shooter is usually a scapegoat or patsy who, although he might have had some prep for the job, typically is less than 100% witting of his intended destiny as “fall guy”—the hallmark of an “intelligence” operation.

    • Generally, there’s a lack of any believable motive for the shooter’s acts at a manipulated event.

    • Police response is generally ‘reserved’ at the outset of a manipulated shooting. Most street-level officers aren’t going to be consciously in on the plot, but they know where their supervisor’s ‘interests’ lie, and are ‘around’ to keep would-be heroes from muddling the event. Local officials assist with the cover-up, often with “prepared” statements.

    • In killings that are classified by “authorities” as “random-rage”, survivors often don’t report rage, hate, or anger on the face of the perp, and often report the exact opposite; which would indicate mind-control and a manipulated event.

    • Where real victims have all been shot in the head or torso, or where there’s a very high proportion of hits vs shots fired, or where witnesses noted military-style gun handling skills, suggests a shooter(s) with professional training.

    • When numerous Feds, usually represented by the FBI, become involved in the “response” or a post-shooting “investigation”, despite it being a purely local crime, indicates a manipulated event.

    • An attempt by Washington politicians to immediately introduce and impose new gun restriction laws follow each manipulated shooting event.

    Starviego lists events and dates for each of the above catagories.


  5. kwignall says:

    ‘Ignorant Masses’ Warn ‘Elites’ – ZeroHedge is actually linking to an antiwar article not a zero hedge.

  6. Fosca says:

    One more for the list:
    The Madrid train bombing on 11 March 2004 was preceeded by the NATO annual crisis management exercise (CMX 2004) from 4 to 10 March 2004

    Addition to 9/11:
    RUDOLPH GIULIANI at the 9/11 commission:
    ” … we selected Pier 92 as our command center.

    And the reason Pier 92 was selected as the command center was because on the next day, on September 12, Pier 92 was going to have a drill. It had hundreds of people here from FEMA, from the federal government, from the state, from the State Emergency Management Office, and they were getting ready for a drill for a biochemical attack. So that was going to be the place they were going to have the drill.”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Back to Top